cholesterol

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:26:32 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:5cpgre5a2c0r0giuim49t8flpblngsojdr@4ax.com:

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy enough.


Weed is not a hallucinogen, unlike the hypnotic propaganda drug the
lame segment of society bent your brain with.

It would, decidedly, calm your lame ass, most likely.

Why would I want to be calmed? I'm hyperactive for fun and profit.
--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[bitrex]

On 10/29/19 1:18 PM, Jeff Layman wrote:

On 29/10/19 08:06, bitrex wrote:
On 10/28/19 11:09 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:28:19 PM UTC+11,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a superfood now.

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/10-proven-health-benefits-of-eggs#section3


John Larkin seems to think that the diet advice business has
something to do with science. He's always been shallow, ill-informed
and ignorant, and treats self-promoting buffoons (Donald Trump comes
to mind) as if they are just as credible as scientific authorities.

He doesn't know enough about science to realise that there is a
difference, and resists any suggestion that he ought to learn enough
to find out.

There are pretty well-established digestive-tract-health reasons I
believe that it's a good idea for men over 40 to cut down on e.g. red
meat intake. Also heavily smoked foods are likely to be carcinogenic for
the same reason secondhand tobacco smoke is carcinogenic.

There just /might/ be a difference between a 40 or 60-a-day habit with
carcinogens delivered to the alveoli in the lungs and remaining in place
as the tar holds them there, and once or twice a week smoked food moving
through the intestines. But there does seem to be a risk of carcinoma, I
grant you. Mind you, the use of smoke (and indeed nitrites) was there
for a good reason, and that was preservation. Nowadays we have
refrigeration of course, but for hundreds of years there was just salt
and/or smoke. Then nitrites appeared on the scene. Yes, they can be
considered precursors to nitroso-compounds which can be carcinogenic,
but I hope you agree that botulism will kill you a *lot* quicker, and
until a few years ago there was no hope of a cure, unlike the surgeon's
knife for a cancer.

And also foods like ice cream, cheesecake, ribs, foods with lots of eggs
in them like scrambled eggs and omelets just have a huge amount of
calories and eating too much of them (they do taste pretty great) tends
to make you overweight and obesity is definitively associated with a
host of health problems.

What are you talking about?! "...food with lots of eggs in them like
scrambled eggs and omelets (sic)". What??!! Scrambled eggs and omelettes
have lots of eggs in them?

Ya, that's the "joke" such as it was

peanuts being marked as "contains nuts" (or even worse, "might contain
traces of nuts") for those with nut allergies. The "huge amount of
calories" has nothing to do with the eggs - it's all the fats and oils
added to them. I don't believe that eggs are a "superfood", but neither
do I believe they are harmful. You might like to have a read of this
page, which will tell you more about the nutritional value of eggs than
you will ever want to know:
https://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/calories-in-an-egg#recipes


Just remember - "Nothing in excess", and you will live longer.

Guess a lot of Americans never got the memo.

 

[gray_wolf]

On 10/28/2019 5:28 PM, John Larkin wrote:

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:13:57 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/28/19 3:39 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
"John Larkin" <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in message
news:tifere5djqtpnjoke71ngsg8vqjda8qt87@4ax.com...
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415535875/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1


Its perspective is mostly about how genetics, predisposition, affects
the way people think. I haven't read it all, but a quick scan looks
like it doesn't assign much weight to the power of social inputs
(tribal concensus, personal hostility, leader charisma) or of fear
(includes fear of being different or wrong) in shaping how people
reason.

Sounds like thinly veiled racism.  I'll make a point to avoid it, thanks!

Tim


If JL likes it it says that conservatives are conservatives because
they're just naturally smarter and better people than other kinds of
people.

what else could it say.

You'll never know. Because you don't want to know.

I've been around for almost 80 years and over the years they say eggs a bad for
you. Then they say the latest research has shown that eggs are good for you. As
time passes we go from one fad to another not knowing the real truth if such a
thing even exists.

I was speaking with an ER doctor during a followup a few days after getting two
layers of stitches on a severe cut on my hand. He was surprised at how much
better it looked. I asked him If he thought that one's attitude had anything to
do with it. He said "Hell yes it does." He told me that he had often wondered
why 20% of the people had 80% of the illness.

Conservatives seem to be better at thinking for themselves than the left who
believe what they are told what to think.

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 19:04:14 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:18:50 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of the
money on ski gear and lift tickets.

Thought I'd best point out for the benefit of our British readers that
John is *not* sponging off the state, which is what his chosen form of
phrasing unfortunately implies to UK readers.

I get a Social Security check every month, for being "retired", even
though I still have a regular job. And of course I pay state and
federal income tax on both the SS payment and on my salary and on
everything else. And I (and my employer) keep making payments into the
SS system!

I have an expensive accounting firm do my taxes every year. The
paperwork is a stack about 2" thick.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:46:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

It's curious how so many of Bill's comments nowadays are just his
personal slant on what other posters here have said. Nearly all begin
with "X seems to believe...." or "X seems to think..." or "X's beliefs
are mistakenly based on..." It is just so weird. And hardly ever does he
contribute anything electronic-related any more. :-(




--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:44:29 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:bmugredcna3sj2ck4rui2csau66vu61h5n@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.


You are such the honorable man. NOT!

More like Trumpesque characterless bastard.

You are equally sad. You curse and shriek at everyone about
everything.

Probably all that weed you smoke makes you paranoid.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:18:50 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of the
money on ski gear and lift tickets.

Thought I'd best point out for the benefit of our British readers that
John is *not* sponging off the state, which is what his chosen form of
phrasing unfortunately implies to UK readers.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:fougrelvpbqbmfe5a98n2lip0rcapv1gog@4ax.com:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:26:32 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:5cpgre5a2c0r0giuim49t8flpblngsojdr@4ax.com:

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy
enough.


Weed is not a hallucinogen, unlike the hypnotic propaganda drug
the
lame segment of society bent your brain with.

It would, decidedly, calm your lame ass, most likely.

Why would I want to be calmed? I'm hyperactive for fun and profit.

Your hyperactive ass is fine.

It would calm your LAME ass, which comprises 95% of you.

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:qpa3lj$in8$6@dont-email.me:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:46:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

It's curious how so many of Bill's comments nowadays are just his
personal slant on what other posters here have said. Nearly all
begin with "X seems to believe...." or "X seems to think..." or
"X's beliefs are mistakenly based on..." It is just so weird. And
hardly ever does he contribute anything electronic-related any
more. :-(

So, his psychological observations about you, putz, are bad, but
yours about him are supposed to be all OKIE DOKIE.

You truly have zero capacity to look at the big picture, son.

You all spend so much time talking about whatever the fuck you
want, yet want to perform fucking retarded zero fact audits on other
posters all the fucking time. How quaint. No fucking wonder nobody
wants to subscribe to the group.

 

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:ho3hreppmnn3ccpehgsf8h382v80r3e8ov@4ax.com:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:44:29 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:bmugredcna3sj2ck4rui2csau66vu61h5n@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.


You are such the honorable man. NOT!

More like Trumpesque characterless bastard.

You are equally sad. You curse and shriek at everyone about
everything.

Probably all that weed you smoke makes you paranoid.

Curse and shriek? Hardly. And take note. It is ONLY ASSHOLES
that have pulled shit on me in the past. So if you "suddenly" see
it, think back to the history that preson has for attacking me. When
I refer to you as a piece of shit, it is not always based on your
current stupid argument. It is based on your decades long retarded
uncivil attitude towards me. Just because you like to make a veiled
insult does not make me a bad person because I openly insult you back
without regard for how it may or may not appear as 'crude' to a
retarded putz like you. I do not need to get 'clever' when I refer
to the stench in the room.

And it has nothing to do with weed. Damn! You are a putz, boy!

 

[gray_wolf]

On 10/29/2019 10:22 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:00:02 +0000, Martin Brown
'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

On 29/10/2019 08:54, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

  Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
  declared superfoods.  In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
 - they have a higher concentration of some useful
   nutrient or micronutrient
 - they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
   concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

It is that last of these that makes all the difference.
Think goji berries etc. Exotic overpriced and over packaged.

Change the superfood du jour every couple of years and you are onto a
sure fire winner selling overpriced "superfoods" to the worried well.

So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.

It is a rather curious situation in the West at the moment where rickets
is making a come back in children because of indoor lifestyles and high
protection factor sunscreen (and a vitamin D/calcium deficient diet).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7043698/Rickets-makes-comeback-among-computer-generation.html


My wife, a speech pathologist, sees an occasional austistic kid whose
food demands are so narrow that they get severe deficiencies.

Interesting. When I was ca 9 years I was somewhat anemic. Old army. now family.
Doc told me I needed to eat a piece of red meat the size of my hand every day.

Over the years I keep track of my protein intake. I wonder if a lot of people
really get enough. I check the labels on canned food and mostly its not very
much. Just a few grams at the most.

Back in the '30s there were papers written about the loss of important minerals
in the farm land and that it was a serious threat to peoples health in the long
term. IIRC. Is this still a problem? What about all of our imported food? Can
you really trust just anybody to tell you the truth?

Then there's possible toxins in the food and the FDA's safety reports are likely
paid for the by highest bidder. I've been a member of some purebred dog fancy
groups for years. Some were devoted to canine nutrition. There were some very
smart people and a few vets there. I found out that most commercial dog food is
pure crap except maybe for the essential nutrients. I had one lady, who had
worked for a pet food company, tell me that their food was inspected by the
government like they claimed. She also told me that they said nothing about it
was declared to be unfit for human consumption.

I wonder if they are honest and independent analytical labs where we could get
our food analyzed to find out what was really going on for a reasonable cost.
What would it take for an individual to have an adequate mass spectrometer and
the ability to use it? How do we really know that our city water is safe?

 

[John Larkin]

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 15:51:32 -0500, gray_wolf <g_wolf@howling_mad.com>
wrote:

On 10/29/2019 11:16 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:lllgre9qsi5bgb1dt494pk25l7bh90i1v0@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:46:12 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

I figure that my body knows what it wants. But it can be fooled by
chemical engineers with test kitchens who design stuff that
over-stimulates natural appetites, so read the labels.

Most folks are unable to process long chain triglycerides. They
get stored as fat.

Most body building regimens involve removal of all long chain
triglyceride sources from one's diet as they are the ones that get
stored and produce fat cells.

We also have a hard time gfeting rid of them once they are
established.

All folks thinking they can get rid of layers of lard that took
decades to form in a few weeks of TV diet time are idiots.

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of
the money on ski gear and lift tickets. The food at Sugar Bowl is
actually pretty good.

Grow some weed in your back yard.

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy enough.




ROFLMAO!! I've reached that point. After enough travel enough you just don't
need to go there anymore.

It's not an accident that great artists run towards schizophrenia.
Creativity requires leaks between compartments of the brain, but not
too much.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com

 

[gray_wolf]

On 10/29/2019 11:16 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:lllgre9qsi5bgb1dt494pk25l7bh90i1v0@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:46:12 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

I figure that my body knows what it wants. But it can be fooled by
chemical engineers with test kitchens who design stuff that
over-stimulates natural appetites, so read the labels.

Most folks are unable to process long chain triglycerides. They
get stored as fat.

Most body building regimens involve removal of all long chain
triglyceride sources from one's diet as they are the ones that get
stored and produce fat cells.

We also have a hard time gfeting rid of them once they are
established.

All folks thinking they can get rid of layers of lard that took
decades to form in a few weeks of TV diet time are idiots.

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of
the money on ski gear and lift tickets. The food at Sugar Bowl is
actually pretty good.

Grow some weed in your back yard.

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy enough.

ROFLMAO!! I've reached that point. After enough travel enough you just don't
need to go there anymore.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 6:24:46 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:46:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

It's curious how so many of Bill's comments nowadays are just his
personal slant on what other posters here have said. Nearly all begin
with "X seems to believe...." or "X seems to think..." or "X's beliefs
are mistakenly based on..." It is just so weird. And hardly ever does he
contribute anything electronic-related any more. :-(

Cursitor Doom doesn't seem to read threads that involve electronics.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 4:46:23 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

Not as sad as John Larkin, whose advice isn't all that great either.

At least I have been known to realise that I've got stuff wrong, which John Larkin can't manage.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 2:09:02 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:42:12 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/28/19 6:28 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:13:57 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/28/19 3:39 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
"John Larkin" <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in message
news:tifere5djqtpnjoke71ngsg8vqjda8qt87@4ax.com...
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415535875/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1


Its perspective is mostly about how genetics, predisposition, affects
the way people think. I haven't read it all, but a quick scan looks
like it doesn't assign much weight to the power of social inputs
(tribal concensus, personal hostility, leader charisma) or of fear
(includes fear of being different or wrong) in shaping how people
reason.

Sounds like thinly veiled racism.  I'll make a point to avoid it, thanks!

If JL likes it it says that conservatives are conservatives because
they're just naturally smarter and better people than other kinds of
people.

what else could it say.

You'll never know. Because you don't want to know.

There are millions of other books in the world I'll never get to read
either I suppose life will go on, somehow.

Page 72,

"The Marx with better intuition is clearly Groucho."

"Je suis Marxiste, tendance Groucho"

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Jean-Luc_Godard

It's an old joke, almost certainly made by the kind of right-wing political commentator who shapes his narrative to appeal to people like John Larkin.

A couple of other books you can add to your never-never-read list are

https://www.amazon.com/Extraordinary-Popular-Delusions-Harriman-Definitive/dp/0857197428/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?keywords=Extraordinary+Popular+Delusions+and+The+Madness+of+Crowds&qid=1572361144&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExSVNROTNKNTBMMklBJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODExMTU1M0dVUFVLN0gyQ1Y3OCZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNjA0MTE3M0JBM01KQzBGNFdGMyZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU
and

https://www.amazon.com/WHY-SCIENCE-WRONG-Almost-Everything-ebook/dp/B00QJOBE7Y/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=wrong+science&qid=1572361524&s=books&sr=1-6

But by all means read and trust all of

https://www.amazon.com/High-Speed-Digital-Design-Handbook/dp/0133957241/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=johnson+black+magic&qid=1572361642&s=books&sr=1-1

It's not a well-constructed book, and not one that you should read in isolation.

The individual facts present may not be wrong, but the order of presentation seems to be designed to make high speed digital design look like black magic, where a more competent exposition could have brought out the science underlying the points you need to attend too.

Win Hill liked it when he first read it, which prompted me to buy it. It's probably worst investment I ever made.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 30, 2019 at 6:24:46 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:46:13 -0700, John Larkin wrote:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

It's curious how so many of Bill's comments nowadays are just his
personal slant on what other posters here have said. Nearly all begin
with "X seems to believe...." or "X seems to think..." or "X's beliefs
are mistakenly based on..." It is just so weird. And hardly ever does he
contribute anything electronic-related any more. :-(

Cursitor Doom won't be able to identify the recent thread where I posted this link to my web-site

http://sophia-elektronica.com/PMT-transformer.html

or say why I posted it. His comprehension of electronics is extremely superficial.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Tom Gardner]

On 29/10/19 19:37, gray_wolf wrote:

Conservatives seem to be better at thinking for themselves than the left who
believe what they are told what to think.

If you invert that statement it is just as valid.

 

[Rick C]

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:19:06 PM UTC-4, Jeff Layman wrote:

Just remember - "Nothing in excess", and you will live longer.

Just don't take that advice to excess and you'll enjoy life so much better.

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:r6bhrehlf1lp3a47rs7k0cosqbau7qh9hn@4ax.com:

Creativity requires leaks between compartments of the brain, but not
too much.

Were that true, you would need and matbe benefit from electro-shock
'therapy'.

Your stupidity is compartmented.