cholesterol

On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
- they have a higher concentration of some useful
nutrient or micronutrient
- they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.
 
On 29/10/2019 08:54, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

  Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
  declared superfoods.  In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
 - they have a higher concentration of some useful
   nutrient or micronutrient
 - they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
   concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

It is that last of these that makes all the difference.
Think goji berries etc. Exotic overpriced and over packaged.

Change the superfood du jour every couple of years and you are onto a
sure fire winner selling overpriced "superfoods" to the worried well.
So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.

It is a rather curious situation in the West at the moment where rickets
is making a come back in children because of indoor lifestyles and high
protection factor sunscreen (and a vitamin D/calcium deficient diet).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7043698/Rickets-makes-comeback-among-computer-generation.html

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
 
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 9:00:16 PM UTC+11, Martin Brown wrote:
On 29/10/2019 08:54, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

  Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
  declared superfoods.  In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
 - they have a higher concentration of some useful
   nutrient or micronutrient
 - they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
   concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

It is that last of these that makes all the difference.
Think goji berries etc. Exotic overpriced and over packaged.

Change the superfood du jour every couple of years and you are onto a
sure fire winner selling overpriced "superfoods" to the worried well.

So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.

It is a rather curious situation in the West at the moment where rickets
is making a come back in children because of indoor lifestyles and high
protection factor sunscreen (and a vitamin D/calcium deficient diet).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7043698/Rickets-makes-comeback-among-computer-generation.html

Nothing particularly curious about it.

Required vitamin D intake seems to vary from person to person. I have to take double the standard dose every day to stop my doctor complaining that my vitamin D level tests too low.

It doesn't take too many idiosyncratic patients to make doctors anxious, and they aren't trained to think about individual variation.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 4:47:53 AM UTC-4, Winfield Hill wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.


--
Thanks,
- Win

You mean like everyone else here?

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:qp92j2$nf6$1@gioia.aioe.org:

On 29/10/2019 08:54, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

  Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
  declared superfoods.  In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
 - they have a higher concentration of some useful
   nutrient or micronutrient
 - they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
   concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

It is that last of these that makes all the difference.
Think goji berries etc. Exotic overpriced and over packaged.

Change the superfood du jour every couple of years and you are
onto a sure fire winner selling overpriced "superfoods" to the
worried well.

Well, one simply needs to have NOT been hypnotized over the
decades.

Hemp seed is second only to soy in protein content. It has the
best micronutrients in it.

It is a bit overpriced at $10 a pound, but so is meat, if one were
to ask me.

The best thing about it is that it can be used in other food
preparations and only serves to improve one's selected diet choices.

We could feed the unfed masses of the world (or some at least) if
we would simply embrace hemp and cannabis.

Oh and the seeds taste good too! Hemp butter is great!

As to embracing cannabis, there are several places where it would
help. Here is one example:

Instead of trying to quit smoking tobacco by way of patches or vape
devices which continue to imbue nicotine on one, cannabis provides a
cure without nicotine.

So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.

It is a rather curious situation in the West at the moment where
rickets is making a come back in children because of indoor
lifestyles and high protection factor sunscreen (and a vitamin
D/calcium deficient diet).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7043698/Rickets-makes-
comeback-among-computer-generation.html

I had "spots" as a child, which was a vitamin D deficiency.
Because of the spots, I was not able to get a smallpox vaccine as I
would have contracted the disease and died. My brother and sister
were also not able to get it as they would have passed it to me.
After I got the vitamins, the spots went away. They looked like
goose flesh.
 
On 29 Oct 2019 01:46:12 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com>
wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

I figure that my body knows what it wants. But it can be fooled by
chemical engineers with test kitchens who design stuff that
over-stimulates natural appetites, so read the labels.

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of the
money on ski gear and lift tickets. The food at Sugar Bowl is actually
pretty good.





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 18:42:12 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/28/19 6:28 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 17:13:57 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/28/19 3:39 PM, Tim Williams wrote:
"John Larkin" <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in message
news:tifere5djqtpnjoke71ngsg8vqjda8qt87@4ax.com...
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415535875/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1


Its perspective is mostly about how genetics, predisposition, affects
the way people think. I haven't read it all, but a quick scan looks
like it doesn't assign much weight to the power of social inputs
(tribal concensus, personal hostility, leader charisma) or of fear
(includes fear of being different or wrong) in shaping how people
reason.

Sounds like thinly veiled racism.  I'll make a point to avoid it, thanks!

Tim


If JL likes it it says that conservatives are conservatives because
they're just naturally smarter and better people than other kinds of
people.

what else could it say.

You'll never know. Because you don't want to know.



There are millions of other books in the world I'll never get to read
either I suppose life will go on, somehow.

Page 72,

"The Marx with better intuition is clearly Groucho."


A couple of other books you can add to your never-never-read list are

https://www.amazon.com/Extraordinary-Popular-Delusions-Harriman-Definitive/dp/0857197428/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?keywords=Extraordinary+Popular+Delusions+and+The+Madness+of+Crowds&qid=1572361144&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExSVNROTNKNTBMMklBJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODExMTU1M0dVUFVLN0gyQ1Y3OCZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNjA0MTE3M0JBM01KQzBGNFdGMyZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU=

and

https://www.amazon.com/WHY-SCIENCE-WRONG-Almost-Everything-ebook/dp/B00QJOBE7Y/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=wrong+science&qid=1572361524&s=books&sr=1-6

But by all means read and trust all of

https://www.amazon.com/High-Speed-Digital-Design-Handbook/dp/0133957241/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=johnson+black+magic&qid=1572361642&s=books&sr=1-1





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:00:02 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

On 29/10/2019 08:54, Tom Gardner wrote:
On 29/10/19 08:46, Winfield Hill wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

  Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
  declared superfoods.  In our dreams.

As far as I can make out, superfoods have a few characteristics
in common:
 - they have a higher concentration of some useful
   nutrient or micronutrient
 - they are eaten in small quantities, so the extra
   concentration is unimportant w.r.t. nutrition

Also, they are not everyday items, so can be "discovered"
and talked about, and marketed.

It is that last of these that makes all the difference.
Think goji berries etc. Exotic overpriced and over packaged.

Change the superfood du jour every couple of years and you are onto a
sure fire winner selling overpriced "superfoods" to the worried well.

So, if superfoods are nice, eat some. But don't use them
to satisfy nutritional needs.

It is a rather curious situation in the West at the moment where rickets
is making a come back in children because of indoor lifestyles and high
protection factor sunscreen (and a vitamin D/calcium deficient diet).

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/7043698/Rickets-makes-comeback-among-computer-generation.html

My wife, a speech pathologist, sees an occasional austistic kid whose
food demands are so narrow that they get severe deficiencies.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:27:26 +0000, Martin Brown
<'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote:

On 28/10/2019 19:32, John Larkin wrote:

https://medium.com/the-mission/higher-cholesterol-is-associated-with-longer-life-b4090f28d96e


This is arguably off-topic here, except that it once again illustrates
the repeated collective wrongness of experts who operate by
professional concensus.

Food fads are inclined to get endlessly recycled.

I wouldn't put too much faith in the Japanese data unless you are eating
a low fat high rice diet with a small amount of high quality oily fish
as protein. Likewise for some of the other countries cited in the
"study" which also have a preference for oily fish and active lifestyle.

When I lived in Japan my colleagues from the UK would take me out to
Western restaurants to feed me up because they thought I was wasting
away on my Japanese diet. The reality was that they were all becoming
much more rotund and I was getting slightly slimmer and a lot fitter.

We have an occasional Japanese visitor who wants sushi when we take
him to lunch. He says it's so much better here, and he can't afford it
in Japan anyhow.





https://medium.com/the-mission/higher-cholesterol-is-associated-with-longer-life-b4090f28d96e

Dump those statins! More ice cream and cheesecake and BBQ ribs!

Didn't that Atkin's diet bloke advocate that?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-207828/Dr-Atkins-18st-died.html

I'm just starting this book, but it's a lot of fun:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415535875/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Its perspective is mostly about how genetics, predisposition, affects
the way people think. I haven't read it all, but a quick scan looks
like it doesn't assign much weight to the power of social inputs
(tribal concensus, personal hostility, leader charisma) or of fear
(includes fear of being different or wrong) in shaping how people
reason.

There is a survival advantage to a species that has individuals who are
mostly concerned with just surviving and maintaining the status quo and
also a handful of risk takers who will go out and find new resources.

It's probably a tribal advantage for most people, farmers and
soldiers, to do and believe what their leaders tell them.

Also to do and believe whatever their neighbors do. That is an
interesting dynamic. Given normal distributions of behavior, this
believe-your-peers thing has interesting dynamics that could separate
the population into bimodal distributions.

Abstract thinking and language allows for past knowledge to be made
available to future generations initially by word of mouth.

Past myth, too. Some traditional behaviors are very unhealthy.





--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:43de9c22-048f-4d16-a920-aa8a8c799361@googlegroups.com:

On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 4:47:53 AM UTC-4, Winfield Hill
wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.


--
Thanks,
- Win

You mean like everyone else here?

I ride my bike several miles a day and I am talking about pressing
it, not coasting along. I also shoot pool and can run off an entire
rack in less than a minute and a half. Hell I can bank every shot!
Even as my eyes get a bit worse. Experience counts for a lot with
humans.

'crotchety'? I'll put what's in my crotchet right in her cachet,
once I find her. :)

Looks to me as if the number is only a few and one does not even
know if one is included in the set.

I know that I am not. I do not fit into your boxes.
 
On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:lllgre9qsi5bgb1dt494pk25l7bh90i1v0@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:46:12 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

I figure that my body knows what it wants. But it can be fooled by
chemical engineers with test kitchens who design stuff that
over-stimulates natural appetites, so read the labels.

Most folks are unable to process long chain triglycerides. They
get stored as fat.

Most body building regimens involve removal of all long chain
triglyceride sources from one's diet as they are the ones that get
stored and produce fat cells.

We also have a hard time gfeting rid of them once they are
established.

All folks thinking they can get rid of layers of lard that took
decades to form in a few weeks of TV diet time are idiots.

I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of
the money on ski gear and lift tickets. The food at Sugar Bowl is
actually pretty good.

Grow some weed in your back yard.

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy enough.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:lllgre9qsi5bgb1dt494pk25l7bh90i1v0@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:46:12 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

I figure that my body knows what it wants. But it can be fooled by
chemical engineers with test kitchens who design stuff that
over-stimulates natural appetites, so read the labels.

Most folks are unable to process long chain triglycerides. They
get stored as fat.

Most body building regimens involve removal of all long chain
triglyceride sources from one's diet as they are the ones that get
stored and produce fat cells.

We also have a hard time gfeting rid of them once they are
established.

All folks thinking they can get rid of layers of lard that took
decades to form in a few weeks of TV diet time are idiots.
I've been on Social Security for some time now, and spend some of
the money on ski gear and lift tickets. The food at Sugar Bowl is
actually pretty good.

Grow some weed in your back yard.
 
Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:qp8u8k02utl@drn.newsguy.com:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote...

On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a
superfood now.

Yes, it'd be nice if ice cream and cheesecake were
declared superfoods. In our dreams.

Just stir in a couple tablespoons of hemp seed (hearts) and...

waaaaa laaaa V O I L A' !

Hehehehe...
 
Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nezumi.demon.co.uk> wrote in
news:qp90lu$e8l$1@gioia.aioe.org:

On 28/10/2019 19:32, John Larkin wrote:

https://medium.com/the-mission/higher-cholesterol-is-associated-wi
th-longer-life-b4090f28d96e


This is arguably off-topic here, except that it once again
illustrates the repeated collective wrongness of experts who
operate by professional concensus.

Food fads are inclined to get endlessly recycled.

I wouldn't put too much faith in the Japanese data unless you are
eating a low fat high rice diet with a small amount of high
quality oily fish as protein. Likewise for some of the other
countries cited in the "study" which also have a preference for
oily fish and active lifestyle.

When I lived in Japan my colleagues from the UK would take me out
to Western restaurants to feed me up because they thought I was
wasting away on my Japanese diet. The reality was that they were
all becoming much more rotund and I was getting slightly slimmer
and a lot fitter.

https://medium.com/the-mission/higher-cholesterol-is-associated-wi
th-longer-life-b4090f28d96e

Dump those statins! More ice cream and cheesecake and BBQ ribs!

Didn't that Atkin's diet bloke advocate that?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-207828/Dr-Atkins-18st-di
ed.html

I'm just starting this book, but it's a lot of fun:

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0415535875/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_searc
h_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1

Its perspective is mostly about how genetics, predisposition,
affects the way people think. I haven't read it all, but a quick
scan looks like it doesn't assign much weight to the power of
social inputs (tribal concensus, personal hostility, leader
charisma) or of fear (includes fear of being different or wrong)
in shaping how people reason.

There is a survival advantage to a species that has individuals
who are mostly concerned with just surviving and maintaining the
status quo and also a handful of risk takers who will go out and
find new resources.

Abstract thinking and language allows for past knowledge to be
made available to future generations initially by word of mouth.

There was a study done in San Diego where a testing lab fed a group
of test animals half the diet the normal groups got fed. The animals
lived nearly twice as long as the heavily (normally) fed group.

I cut my diet to two, then one meal a day after that study came
out, but had to change that due to low blood sugar moments. So I eat
that one meal a day spread out over two or three small meals. The
point being that I have significantly reduced my diet as a result and
I do not do binge (as much) any more. Still gotta havva pizza reeyya
every now and then.
 
On 10/29/19 11:08 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

There are millions of other books in the world I'll never get to read
either I suppose life will go on, somehow.


Page 72,

"The Marx with better intuition is clearly Groucho."


A couple of other books you can add to your never-never-read list are

https://www.amazon.com/Extraordinary-Popular-Delusions-Harriman-Definitive/dp/0857197428/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?keywords=Extraordinary+Popular+Delusions+and+The+Madness+of+Crowds&qid=1572361144&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUExSVNROTNKNTBMMklBJmVuY3J5cHRlZElkPUEwODExMTU1M0dVUFVLN0gyQ1Y3OCZlbmNyeXB0ZWRBZElkPUEwNjA0MTE3M0JBM01KQzBGNFdGMyZ3aWRnZXROYW1lPXNwX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU=

Read it in college well over 20 years ago, also its counterpoint:

<https://www.amazon.com/Wisdom-Crowds-James-Surowiecki/dp/0385721706/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=wisdom+of+the+crowds&qid=1572364807&sr=8-1>

The opinions of the humble masses taken in aggregate are often quite good

and

https://www.amazon.com/WHY-SCIENCE-WRONG-Almost-Everything-ebook/dp/B00QJOBE7Y/ref=sr_1_6?keywords=wrong+science&qid=1572361524&s=books&sr=1-6

But by all means read and trust all of

https://www.amazon.com/High-Speed-Digital-Design-Handbook/dp/0133957241/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=johnson+black+magic&qid=1572361642&s=books&sr=1-1

I avoid books on engineering topics with the words "magic" or "guru" or
suchlike in the title
 
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:5cpgre5a2c0r0giuim49t8flpblngsojdr@4ax.com:

I don't need artificial hallucinogens. I'm naturally crazy enough.

Weed is not a hallucinogen, unlike the hypnotic propaganda drug the
lame segment of society bent your brain with.

It would, decidedly, calm your lame ass, most likely.

The chance that you are one of the 1 in 100 idiots unable to handle
the initial paranoia is low... Oh wait... maybe not.
 
On 29/10/19 08:06, bitrex wrote:
On 10/28/19 11:09 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2019 at 1:28:19 PM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On 28 Oct 2019 14:32:23 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

John Larkin wrote...

Electronics is (usually) good training for thinking,
because we get complex quantitative puzzles and
serious, timely feedback on what we decide to do.

Don't count on getting away with consuming mass
quantities of ice cream, cheesecake and BBQ ribs.
I haven't had any of the three for some time now.

Do you remember when eggs were bad for you? They are a superfood now.

https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/10-proven-health-benefits-of-eggs#section3

John Larkin seems to think that the diet advice business has something to do with science. He's always been shallow, ill-informed and ignorant, and treats self-promoting buffoons (Donald Trump comes to mind) as if they are just as credible as scientific authorities.

He doesn't know enough about science to realise that there is a difference, and resists any suggestion that he ought to learn enough to find out.

There are pretty well-established digestive-tract-health reasons I
believe that it's a good idea for men over 40 to cut down on e.g. red
meat intake. Also heavily smoked foods are likely to be carcinogenic for
the same reason secondhand tobacco smoke is carcinogenic.

There just /might/ be a difference between a 40 or 60-a-day habit with
carcinogens delivered to the alveoli in the lungs and remaining in place
as the tar holds them there, and once or twice a week smoked food moving
through the intestines. But there does seem to be a risk of carcinoma, I
grant you. Mind you, the use of smoke (and indeed nitrites) was there
for a good reason, and that was preservation. Nowadays we have
refrigeration of course, but for hundreds of years there was just salt
and/or smoke. Then nitrites appeared on the scene. Yes, they can be
considered precursors to nitroso-compounds which can be carcinogenic,
but I hope you agree that botulism will kill you a *lot* quicker, and
until a few years ago there was no hope of a cure, unlike the surgeon's
knife for a cancer.

And also foods like ice cream, cheesecake, ribs, foods with lots of eggs
in them like scrambled eggs and omelets just have a huge amount of
calories and eating too much of them (they do taste pretty great) tends
to make you overweight and obesity is definitively associated with a
host of health problems.

What are you talking about?! "...food with lots of eggs in them like
scrambled eggs and omelets (sic)". What??!! Scrambled eggs and omelettes
have lots of eggs in them? Who'd a guessed? That's like packets of
peanuts being marked as "contains nuts" (or even worse, "might contain
traces of nuts") for those with nut allergies. The "huge amount of
calories" has nothing to do with the eggs - it's all the fats and oils
added to them. I don't believe that eggs are a "superfood", but neither
do I believe they are harmful. You might like to have a read of this
page, which will tell you more about the nutritional value of eggs than
you will ever want to know:
<https://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/calories-in-an-egg#recipes>

Just remember - "Nothing in excess", and you will live longer.

--

Jeff
 
On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill <winfieldhill@yahoo.com>
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
John Larkin <jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
news:bmugredcna3sj2ck4rui2csau66vu61h5n@4ax.com:

On 29 Oct 2019 01:47:40 -0700, Winfield Hill
winfieldhill@yahoo.com
wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote...

John Larkin seems to think ...

Bill, you are becoming a very crotchety old man.

Sad case. Best to ignore him.

You are such the honorable man. NOT!

More like Trumpesque characterless bastard.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top