Chip with simple program for Toy

[The real Edmond H. Wollm]

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...

The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation".



...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

 

[harry]

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
<EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:

"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

 

[Josepi]

I have never lived in the USA.

Since you are an alien English wizard, when is a singular noun used with a
plural verb in a sentence?

Better troll, next time. Glass house?


"The real Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote in message
news:LMydnY2mMvCSDLHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message
news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless,
is
there.


Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my
English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".



...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were
born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
<susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF

 

[Bob Eld]

"The real Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote in message
news:LMydnY2mMvCSDLHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message
news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.


Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my
English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation".



...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were
born here, >how can you let an alien beat you huh?

Sew wat ar u, the speling Natzie. Watz it two ya! Dyd u hav trubel
undorstadn wat waz sed?

Her is a notr on for yu, yu can tke ot evry thrd leter or so an stil mak
sens o it. Englsh is vry redndant contanin far mor letrs than necesry for
comunicatin.

 

[Josepi]

!!dias ylecin

"Bob Eld" <nsmontassoc@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:hgji34$k8h$1@news.eternal-september.org...

"The real Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote in message
news:LMydnY2mMvCSDLHWnZ2dnUVZ_tmdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message
news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.


Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my
English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".



...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were
born here, >how can you let an alien beat you huh?

Sew wat ar u, the speling Natzie. Watz it two ya! Dyd u hav trubel
undorstadn wat waz sed?

Her is a notr on for yu, yu can tke ot evry thrd leter or so an stil mak
sens o it. Englsh is vry redndant contanin far mor letrs than necesry for
comunicatin.

 

[m II]

John Fields wrote:

Should be 'words', actually.

Prepositions are not your strong point, are they John?



mike

--
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \/ /\'Think tanks cleaned cheap' /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

Densa InternationalŠ
For the OTHER two percent.



Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.


For solutions which may work for you, please check:

http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

 

[Edmond H. Wollmann]

"m II" <C@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:4b2dcce2@news.x-privat.org...
John Fields wrote:

Should be 'words', actually.

Prepositions are not your strong point, are they John?
mike

Nop! He's good at copy and past some funky formulas off his Electronic workbench!...heeheee....

 

[amdx]

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about
my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit
were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.

http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/grammarlogs4/grammarlogs546.htm
"Both wrong and wrongly are adverbs. As a general rule, use wrongly when the
adverb appears before the verb it modifies, but use wrong when the adverb
appears after the verb it modifies. "The German shepherd was wrongly awarded
Best of Show." "He guessed wrong."
Mike
Hmm, should that be double quotation marks at the end of the quote? ;-)

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:55:20 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

!!dias ylecin

---
..etairporppa erehw tsop enilni ro tsop mottob esaelP

Thanks,

JF

 

[Michael B]

You imply that top posting is a backwards communication.
But ya know, you don't have to pick through the shit to find
the corn with top posting.

Did you?

On Dec 20, 9:49 am, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com> wrote:

.etairporppa erehw tsop enilni ro tsop mottob esaelP

Thanks,

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:06:02 -0700, m II <C@in.the.hat> wrote:

John Fields wrote:

Should be 'words', actually.


Prepositions are not your strong point, are they John?

---
Huh?

Here's the quote:

"They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America."

The preposition is "in" and it introduces the noun "America".

Then, the prepositional phrase 'in America' acts as an adverb,
describing where the words were wrongly spelled.

My quarrel was with the plural adjective "lots" being used to modify the
singular noun "word", which has nothing to do with the preposition or
the prepositional phrase.

Here:

http://www.arts.uottawa.ca/writcent/hypergrammar/preposit.html

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:04:31 -0800, "Edmond H. Wollmann"
<EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote:

"m II" <C@in.the.hat> wrote in message news:4b2dcce2@news.x-privat.org...
John Fields wrote:

Should be 'words', actually.


Prepositions are not your strong point, are they John?
mike



Nop! He's good at copy and past some funky formulas off his Electronic workbench!...heeheee....

---
"Nop", I suspect, describes your life.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:35:17 -0600, "amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about
my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit
were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/grammarlogs4/grammarlogs546.htm
"Both wrong and wrongly are adverbs. As a general rule, use wrongly when the
adverb appears before the verb it modifies, but use wrong when the adverb
appears after the verb it modifies. "The German shepherd was wrongly awarded
Best of Show." "He guessed wrong."
Mike
Hmm, should that be double quotation marks at the end of the quote? ;-)
---

Yup, and at the beginning too.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:01:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B
<baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

You imply that top posting is a backwards communication.

---
I don't have to imply; it is.
---

But ya know, you don't have to pick through the shit to find
the corn with top posting.

---
Sure you do; when you top post and someone starts reading the thread
chronologically, the shit is right at the top followed by the corn.

Apparently, being an eminently stupid and inconsiderate Google Grouper,
you don't even realize that this is USENET and that you've accessed it
through Google's web-based interface.

In addition, you've obviously not even taken the time to read Google's
posting guidelines, which are sound.

From:

http://groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=12348&topic=250

"Summarize what you're following up.

When you click "Reply" under "show options" to follow up an existing
article, Google Groups includes the full article in quotes, with the
cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start
typing your message, please STOP and do two things first.
Look at the quoted text and remove parts that are irrelevant.
Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there.
Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your
post. They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your
comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article.
And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does,
they'll get the gist of what you're talking about."

JF
JF

 

[krw]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:11:07 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:35:17 -0600, "amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about
my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit
were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/grammarlogs4/grammarlogs546.htm
"Both wrong and wrongly are adverbs. As a general rule, use wrongly when the
adverb appears before the verb it modifies, but use wrong when the adverb
appears after the verb it modifies. "The German shepherd was wrongly awarded
Best of Show." "He guessed wrong."
Mike
Hmm, should that be double quotation marks at the end of the quote? ;-)

I prefer long quotes to be separated and offset.

---
Yup, and at the beginning too.

The opening quotation was there but had no match to close the
quotation.

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:40:38 -0600, krw <krw@att.bizzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 11:11:07 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 06:35:17 -0600, "amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote:


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about
my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit
were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.
http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/grammarlogs4/grammarlogs546.htm
"Both wrong and wrongly are adverbs. As a general rule, use wrongly when the
adverb appears before the verb it modifies, but use wrong when the adverb
appears after the verb it modifies. "The German shepherd was wrongly awarded
Best of Show." "He guessed wrong."
Mike
Hmm, should that be double quotation marks at the end of the quote? ;-)

I prefer long quotes to be separated and offset.

---
Yup, and at the beginning too.

The opening quotation was there but had no match to close the
quotation.

---
Yeah, you're right.

JF

 

[John Larkin]

On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 00:38:38 -0800, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
<EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote:

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message news:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but nevertheless, is
there.


Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat disapation".



...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

There's some Usenet law to the effect that posts which complain about
spelling or grammar errors always contain errors of their own.

Still true.

Do you know anything about electronics? Tell us.


John

 

[Michael B]

How long will it be before the Grammar Police get here?
Do I still have time to report the shoe sales posts as
spam before they get to me?
Oh, I see that the guidelines use the word "please". That
means "It would be very nice if you would do this". Okay,
I've been reminded.
Now, do you perhaps need a lesson on how to killfile me?
Wouldn't be the first, won't be the last.

On Dec 20, 12:46 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
wrote:

cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start
typing your message, please STOP and do two things first.  
Look at the quoted text and remove parts  that are irrelevant.
Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there.
Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your
post.  They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your
comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article.  
And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does,
they'll get the gist of what you're talking about."

On Dec 20, 12:46 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
wrote:

cursor at the top of the article. Tempting though it is to just start
typing your message, please STOP and do two things first.  
Look at the quoted text and remove parts  that are irrelevant.
Then, go to the BOTTOM of the article and start typing there.
Doing this makes it much easier for your readers to get through your
post.  They'll have a reminder of the relevant text before your
comment, but won't have to re-read the entire article.  
And if your reply appears on a site before the original article does,
they'll get the gist of what you're talking about."

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 18:42:48 -0800 (PST), Michael B
<baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

How long will it be before the Grammar Police get here?

---
They're here already.
---

Do I still have time to report the shoe sales posts as
spam before they get to me?

---
Ah, I see you _do_ consider some types of posts as being objectionable,
so you _should_ be capable of recognizing that many consider top posting
in USENET to be not only objectionable, but extremely bad form.

Why?

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=USENET+top-posting&rlz=1W1GFRC_en&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

---

Oh, I see that the guidelines use the word "please". That
means "It would be very nice if you would do this". Okay,
I've been reminded.

---
Since a few of the reasons for bottom posting and trimming were given,
and "please" was used to ask you, politely, to follow the conventions
that most of us have found helpful in eliminating confusion and saving
time, your recalcitrance at posting, using those conventions, is
telling.

Specifically, since you obviously have no intention of being
accommodating and making life a little easier for all of us, you brand
yourself as being a narcissistic little creep who wants Rome to do as he
does.
---

Now, do you perhaps need a lesson on how to killfile me?
Wouldn't be the first, won't be the last.

---
I'm sure.

With an attitude like yours there are likely many more who have filtered
you out of their lives than not; probably the way you prefer it...

JF