Chip with simple program for Toy

[Josepi]

Now you consider yourself "most".

Learning to troll, are we?


"daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hgtcnc12ug9@news5.newsguy.com...
How arrogant of you to presume to speak for 'most others'.

You certainly don't speak for me.

daestrom



Josepi wrote:
Yup, top posting is the favouite troll of the unoriginal ones.

I can read either but most bottom posted polls longer than one page are not
read by me or most others.

 

[krw]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:21:25 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

Now you consider yourself "most".

Show us the numbers or admit your lie.

Learning to troll, are we?

Do you *always* refer to yourself in the plural?

"daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hgtcnc12ug9@news5.newsguy.com...
How arrogant of you to presume to speak for 'most others'.

You certainly don't speak for me.

daestrom



Josepi wrote:
Yup, top posting is the favouite troll of the unoriginal ones.

I can read either but most bottom posted polls longer than one page are not
read by me or most others.

 

[Michael A. Terrell]

krw wrote:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:21:25 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

Now you consider yourself "most".

Show us the numbers or admit your lie.

Learning to troll, are we?

Do you *always* refer to yourself in the plural?

Morons usually do.


--
Offworld checks no longer accepted!

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 16:15:09 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

Good thing it was easy to follow for you.

---
Following an asshole's trail isn't difficult, all one has to do is
follow the scent of shit.
---

If you have no logical arguments left try insulting everybody.

---
No need to, and even if I had no logical arguments left, why would I
take a page from your book and try to use it to my advantage by
insulting everyone?

Do you think that because you're at your wit's end and have nowhere to
hide that I have no logic left with which to flail you?

If you do, you're severely mistaken and I'll be glad to drag your dick
in the dirt for as long as it takes to get you to understand what a
pathetic little piece of shit you really are.

Here: take some more rope...

JF

 

[Josepi]

But nobody can see who said what as the headers are all separated from their
respective text bodies.

Wot a mess. Just look at it <attached below> It appears John says he likes
top posting and that would be a co-operative thing. From previous posts it
appears he gets insulting with everybody in his frustration to make a valid
point. This is common for bottom posters.


"Michael B" <baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:2c828404-7c96-4377-96f2-d53a81814302@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.


On Dec 23, 12:56 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:11:59 -0500, "Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote:
I must say I do like the way the browsers were designed to top post. I
hate
scrolling to the bottom and then reading backwards to find the top of
their
statements.

---
Browsers aren't designed to top post, but simpletons who can't be
bothered (or don't know how) to locate the cursor properly before they
start typing use that as an excuse to justify top posting, a format that
was adopted as the default for email, where it works since the
(generally) two people involved in the exchange know what went before.

In USENET that's not true, and a reader coming across a thread for the
first time wouldn't know what went before and would then, logically, go
to the top of the post and start reading from there in order to traverse
the correct chronological sequence of posts _if_ the earlier posts were
located at the top of the stack.

Just like picking up a book you had never read before, would you expect
chapter 10 to be at the beginning and chapter 1 at the end?
---

Just look at a thread where epople haven't trimmed and the big inserted
lexical levels are hard to pick out and the outside lexical levels are
useless as nobody can count that many right carets to figure out who said
it. The result? People read the previous posts to know who said what,
confusion results in fights from people disagreeing with the wrong people
and just general mass confusion of information, especially with the
browsers
meant to download binary files, mainly.

---
Troll, huh?
---

Look at this beautiful format. This is the way every browser I have seen
so
far is designed to work. It is always a favourite troll post of the lazy
trolls when losing an argument. "Your format is wrong" makes a good
distraction from the real issue.

---
My position and that of probably >>99% of USENET is that bottom and
in-line posting is much more efficacious and considerate to readers than
top posting, so your disagreeing with that position is tantamount to
your declaring "Your format is wrong", which hoists you on your own
petard and brands _you_ as the lazy troll losing the argument.
---

Now read very closely in the attached reference posts I may have
interlaced
a comment, somewhere...LOL

---
You make my point and laugh at any inconvenience I may experience in
trying to search for your maliciously placed nonsense.

Just what I would expect of an immature, self-centered, top-poster.
---





"Michael B" <baugh...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:61e9f5bc-7024-4deb-bdd5-2ac4c079d56b@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
Your position, at the bottom, assumes that your responses
will be something a reader actually seeks by scrolling past
all your other trolldom utterances.
I actually scrolled down to see if you had posted something
relevant to the topic. But, no. I was disappointed, but not
particularly surprised.
Go back to the bottom where you are comfortable, more easily
ignored.

On Dec 22, 7:55 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>wrote:
Your idiotic predilection for top posting assumes that what you have to
say is important enough that everyone should read it first and then go
thrashing about, scampering through the thread in order to determine
what you were talking about.

---
Ugh...

If you consider that formatting to be beautiful, then I suggest you
consider this to be beautiful, as well:

http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pictures_Abortion_Pho...

JF

 

[Michael B]

In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.

On Dec 23, 12:56 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>
wrote:

On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 23:11:59 -0500, "Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote:
I must say I do like the way the browsers were designed to top post. I hate
scrolling to the bottom and then reading backwards to find the top of their
statements.

---
Browsers aren't designed to top post, but simpletons who can't be
bothered (or don't know how) to locate the cursor properly before they
start typing use that as an excuse to justify top posting, a format that
was adopted as the default for email, where it works since the
(generally) two people involved in the exchange know what went before.

In USENET that's not true, and a reader coming across a thread for the
first time wouldn't know what went before and would then, logically, go
to the top of the post and start reading from there in order to traverse
the correct chronological sequence of posts _if_ the earlier posts were
located at the top of the stack.

Just like picking up a book you had never read before, would you expect
chapter 10 to be at the beginning and chapter 1 at the end?
---

Just look at a thread where epople haven't trimmed and the big inserted
lexical levels are hard to pick out and the outside lexical levels are
useless as nobody can count that many right carets to figure out who said
it. The result? People read the previous posts to know who said what,
confusion results in fights from people disagreeing with the wrong people
and just general mass confusion of information, especially with the browsers
meant to download binary files, mainly.

---
Troll, huh?
---

Look at this beautiful format. This is the way every browser I have seen so
far is designed to work. It is always a favourite troll post of the lazy
trolls when losing an argument. "Your format is wrong" makes a good
distraction from the real issue.

---
My position and that of probably >>99% of USENET is that bottom and
in-line posting is much more efficacious and considerate to readers than
top posting, so your disagreeing with that position is tantamount to
your declaring "Your format is wrong", which hoists you on your own
petard and brands _you_ as the lazy troll losing the argument.
---

Now read very closely in the attached reference posts I may have interlaced
a comment, somewhere...LOL

---
You make my point and laugh at any inconvenience I may experience in
trying to search for your maliciously placed nonsense.

Just what I would expect of an immature, self-centered, top-poster.
---





"Michael B" <baugh...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:61e9f5bc-7024-4deb-bdd5-2ac4c079d56b@k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com....
Your position, at the bottom, assumes that your responses
will be something a reader actually seeks by scrolling past
all your other trolldom utterances.
I actually scrolled down to see if you had posted something
relevant to the topic. But, no. I was disappointed, but not
particularly surprised.
Go back to the bottom where you are comfortable, more easily
ignored.

On Dec 22, 7:55 pm, John Fields <jfie...@austininstruments.com>wrote:
Your idiotic predilection for top posting assumes that what you have to
say is important enough that everyone should read it first and then go
thrashing about, scampering through the thread in order to determine
what you were talking about.

---
Ugh...

If you consider that formatting to be beautiful, then I suggest you
consider this to be beautiful, as well:

http://www.100abortionpictures.com/Aborted_Baby_Pictures_Abortion_Pho...

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:30:10 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

But nobody can see who said what as the headers are all separated from their
respective text bodies.

---
Get a proper newsreader and a non-combative attitude and it'll all
become clear to you.
---

Wot a mess. Just look at it <attached below> It appears John says he likes
top posting and that would be a co-operative thing. From previous posts it
appears he gets insulting with everybody in his frustration to make a valid
point. This is common for bottom posters.

---
You parrot Michael B's nonsensical post, which is, at best wishful
thinking, and therefore show yourself up as being unable to defend your
own untenable position. The insults are there just for deserved
emphasis and are aimed squarely at top posters like you, since you seem
to understand little else.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:47:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B
<baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.

---
You're a waste of time and air.

JF

 

[Josepi]

<PLONK>
Bet you can read this.

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:kg07j5h0417k3h8p17r216hs52obfanktk@4ax.com...
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:30:10 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

But nobody can see who said what as the headers are all separated from
their
respective text bodies.

---
Get a proper newsreader and a non-combative attitude and it'll all
become clear to you.
---

Wot a mess. Just look at it <attached below> It appears John says he likes
top posting and that would be a co-operative thing. From previous posts it
appears he gets insulting with everybody in his frustration to make a valid
point. This is common for bottom posters.

---
You parrot Michael B's nonsensical post, which is, at best wishful
thinking, and therefore show yourself up as being unable to defend your
own untenable position. The insults are there just for deserved
emphasis and are aimed squarely at top posters like you, since you seem
to understand little else.

JF

 

[Josepi]

Get with the programme.


"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:h817j5p7luherh8i0469ic4kjguh2eeoj8@4ax.com...

You're a waste of time and air.

JF

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:47:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B
<baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.

JF


JF

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:33:55 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

PLONK
Bet you can read this.

---
Ha! Good riddance.

Poor baby got out-trolled and now she's going to stick her head in the
sand so she won't have to read about how fucked in the head she is.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:35:50 -0500, "Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

Get with the programme.

---
First you plonk me and then you write to me?

Seems like you like to dish it out but you can't take it, huh, you
miserable little coward.

JF

 

[John Fields]

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:47:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B
<baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.

---
Geez...

As usual, when you try to give one of the mentally deficient
Google-groupers a hand by clueing them in to USENET etiquette they fight
tooth and nail to remain clueless and self-absorbed.

JF

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2009-12-23, Josepi <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote:

Now you consider yourself "most".

Learning to troll, are we?


"daestrom" <daestrom@twcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:hgtcnc12ug9@news5.newsguy.com...
How arrogant of you to presume to speak for 'most others'.

You certainly don't speak for me.

daestrom



Josepi wrote:
Yup, top posting is the favouite troll of the unoriginal ones.

I can read either but most bottom posted polls longer than one page are not
read by me or most others.

it appears that you are talking to yourself.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

[Baron]

John Fields Inscribed thus:

On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:47:32 -0800 (PST), Michael B
baughfam@bellsouth.net> wrote:

In this post, John acknowledges that top posting is more
logical and effective, apologizes for the distraction, admits
that he is a troll, and wishes he could get out of his mother's
basement and get a job.

---
Geez...

As usual, when you try to give one of the mentally deficient
Google-groupers a hand by clueing them in to USENET etiquette they
fight tooth and nail to remain clueless and self-absorbed.

JF

They ain't worth wasting time over.

Merry Christmas John.

--
Best Regards:
Baron.

 

[Fred Abse]

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 09:13:05 +0000, Jasen Betts wrote:

it appears that you are talking to yourself.

Not just talking, I think ;-)

--
"Electricity is of two kinds, positive and negative. The difference
is, I presume, that one comes a little more expensive, but is more
durable; the other is a cheaper thing, but the moths get into it."
(Stephen Leacock)

 

[amdx]

"Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ybudndZDC5qJD63WnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...

"amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote in message
news:6fa7d$4b2e19fd$18ec6dd7$14722@KNOLOGY.NET...

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain about
my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said: "heat
disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You dipshit
were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.


Ok, then your brain works slow, not slowly. Is that ok grammar according
to your suggestion ?

Walk slow, Don't walk slowly ok?

I don't think you get it!

This is better and more complete.
Your brain works slow.
Your brain was slowly damaged by a lack of stimulation as a toddler.
It was wrong for your mother to do that.
She was not wrongly committed to the insane asylum.
Hope that helps,
Mike

 

[Anti Vigilante]

On Fri, 25 Dec 2009 20:55:00 -0600, amdx wrote:

"Edmond H. Wollmann" <EHWollmann@aol.com> wrote in message
news:ybudndZDC5qJD63WnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@posted.toastnet...

"amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote in message
news:6fa7d$4b2e19fd$18ec6dd7$14722@KNOLOGY.NET...

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote in message
news:b3fqi5ltit4esi8u3r2o55oskpiksitiv9@4ax.com...
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:00:00 -0800 (PST), harry
susan.armitage@virgin.net> wrote:

On Dec 19, 8:38 am, "The real Edmond H. Wollmann"
EHWollm...@aol.com> wrote:
"Josepi" <J...@inv.alid.com> wrote in
messagenews:XirWm.107088$gg6.86188@newsfe25.iad...
The heat disapation is not a big feature of the varnish but
nevertheless, is
there.

Where is John Fools and John Lackin? You fools like to complain
about my English...heehee....Now look at the guy above^ He said:
"heat disapation".

...I've Never heard of it! I heard "Heat Dissipation!" You
dipshit were born here, how can you let an alien beat you huh?

They're only poor Yanks. They spell lots of word wrongly in America.

---
Should be 'words', actually.

JF
According to the Grammar Logs, it should be wrong not wrongly.


Ok, then your brain works slow, not slowly. Is that ok grammar
according to your suggestion ?

Walk slow, Don't walk slowly ok?

I don't think you get it!
This is better and more complete.
Your brain works slow.
Your brain was slowly damaged by a lack of stimulation as a toddler. It
was wrong for your mother to do that. She was not wrongly committed to
the insane asylum.
Hope that helps,
Mike

Drive slowly.



--
Fuck the Enlightenment! Viva la Renaissance!

 

[amdx]

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message
news:KOvYm.3408$DR6.1159@newsfe19.iad...

I'll stick with the crowd and the logical method following the flavour of
the three browsers I have experienced.

Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups,

you will find the convention is bottom posting.
Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader.
If you were right, you would not be getting flack from the regulars?
Note, I agree with your logic, top posting would be easier for the way
I read the groups. But that is not the convetion. You could drive on the
right* so you so you have a better sense of where the centerline is, but
that's not the convention. If you drive on the right it screws up traffic.
Join the crowd.
Mike
* assumes your in the UK.

 

On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:52:55 -0600, "amdx" <amdx@knology.net> wrote:

"Josepi" <JRM@inv.alid.com> wrote in message
news:KOvYm.3408$DR6.1159@newsfe19.iad...
I'll stick with the crowd and the logical method following the flavour of
the three browsers I have experienced.

Your NOT sticking with the crowd. Take some time and read some groups,
you will find the convention is bottom posting.
Regulars don't use browsers for a newsgroup, they use a newsreader.
If you were right, you would not be getting flack from the regulars?
Note, I agree with your logic, top posting would be easier for the way
I read the groups. But that is not the convetion. You could drive on the
right* so you so you have a better sense of where the centerline is, but
that's not the convention. If you drive on the right it screws up traffic.
Join the crowd.
Mike
* assumes your in the UK.

Save your keystrokes. Josepi is just another of gymmy bob's nyms. A
couple of the others he's used in the energy groups are john p bengi
and solar flare. No matter the newsgroup, he *always* ends up arguing
against proper posting form. Here are a few examples, see for
yourself.

http://tinyurl.com/yhuapw7
http://tinyurl.com/yj2cbtg
http://tinyurl.com/yh386pu


I can't remember which nym it was, but when he started using it here
he bottom posted as part of his disguise. <snorf> But his quackery
gave him away, and as soon as he was outed he went right back to top
posting again, and insisting that it's the standard, despite what by
now must be hundreds of posts explaining the situation to him.
Clearly, he'll never learn.

Wayne