Chip with simple program for Toy

What about "totally big?"

HUGE.

There's that word again.

---
Something you obviously can't deal with...

How big is "huge?"

Way big?

Really big?

Super duper big?

---
Let's put it this way:
Just answer the question: huge with respect to what?

Most valley girls speak with better reasoning and greater precision
than you.


Bret Cahill
 
When looking at battery tech for (PH)EVs, I came across an
interesting experiment converting a school bus into an electric
vehicle.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/icat/projects/smud.pdf

The battery used here is a ZEBRA (NiNaCl liquid salt) battery pack.
These guys paid $53,500 for their 107 kWh ZEBRA battery (in 2003).
In volume production, the manufacturer price sheet goes to about
$20,000 for the same battery pack.
Lots of benefits here over other battery technologies, most notably
its cost, it's robustness, safety and its absense of 'rare' metals.
Nickel and table salt (NaCl) are the main ingredients.

Technically, school busses (and city busses and most delivery vans)
seem to be a great early adopter to become "electrified", not just
because of their frequent stops (regenerative braking advantages),
and air pollution (noone likes stinking diesels in urban areas),
but also because they run short trips (no more than one day at a
time).

Yes, vehicles that do not require long ranges and have defined
periods of use that allow regular recharging would be a good bet for
this kind of thing.

Like electric farm tractors?

Nope, the cost of the batterys is much too high.
Totally huge.

It makes a hell of a lot more sense to use biodiesel in those.
Nope.

Not gonna happen.

Nuke.

Pathetic.

They can even grow that themselves.
Nope.

Totally impossible.

Ain't gonna happen.

Pathetic.
 
When looking at battery tech for (PH)EVs, I came across an
interesting experiment converting a school bus into an electric
vehicle.

http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/icat/projects/smud.pdf

The battery used here is a ZEBRA (NiNaCl liquid salt) battery pack.
These guys paid $53,500 for their 107 kWh ZEBRA battery (in 2003).
In volume production, the manufacturer price sheet goes to about
$20,000 for the same battery pack.
Lots of benefits here over other battery technologies, most notably
its cost, it's robustness, safety and its absense of 'rare' metals.
Nickel and table salt (NaCl) are the main ingredients.

Technically, school busses (and city busses and most delivery vans)
seem to be a great early adopter to become "electrified", not just
because of their frequent stops (regenerative braking advantages),
and air pollution (noone likes stinking diesels in urban areas), but
also because they run short trips (no more than one day at a time).

ZEBRAs seem to have a very bright future in PHEV tech.

Nope, a rather dim one actually, because of the price.

Just a few cents/kW-hr if it cycles 5K times, a little more
than a dime including the electricity in many places.

Thats not the price that matters, its the cost of the batterys that matters.
You mean,

It's not the cost that matters it's the price of the batteries that
matters.

In 2 years a perfectly tuned diesel running at optimum speed will be 17 cents/kW- hr.
Totally huge.

And doesnt need those batterys.
But the price of diesel will be totally huge.

In 6 years the diesel will be 50 cents/kW-hr.

Just another number plucked out of your arse. We can tell that from the smell.
Nope.

It's gonna be totally huge.

Pathetic.

Ain't gonna happen.

Nuke.
 
So you are not only a dick-head, you are also a retard.
Just go back through the tread about who said what.
Some of the posters here are not even functional.

In Tucson they tried to integrate these SSI mental disability cases
into society by locating them in apt. buildings, etc. At first I
thought it was a good idea but later discovered merely having them
physically around normal people isn't much different that putting them
all together on the funny farm. One glance and every normal avoids
them w/o even thinking about it.

Now apparently they are trying this which is a good idea.

After all, what damage can they do here?


Bret Cahill
 
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:00:34 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:

What about "totally big?"

HUGE.

There's that word again.

---
Something you obviously can't deal with...

How big is "huge?"

Way big?

Really big?

Super duper big?

---
Let's put it this way:

Just answer the question: huge with respect to what?
---
Didn't understand it, huh?

Why am I not surprised?
---

Most valley girls speak with better reasoning and greater precision
than you.
---
If you understand Valley Girl but you don't understand me that means
you're stuck, intellectually, at the Valley Girl level.

Understand?

JF
 
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 07:43:59 -0700 (PDT), Bret Cahill
<BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:

So you are not only a dick-head, you are also a retard.
Just go back through the tread about who said what.

Some of the posters here are not even functional.

In Tucson they tried to integrate these SSI mental disability cases
into society by locating them in apt. buildings, etc. At first I
thought it was a good idea but later discovered merely having them
physically around normal people isn't much different that putting them
all together on the funny farm. One glance and every normal avoids
them w/o even thinking about it.

Now apparently they are trying this which is a good idea.

After all, what damage can they do here?
---
Not much, but you _do_ waste our time.

JF
 
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:11:37 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:

That could drop with cheap PV.

So such thing yet exists.

One plant in San Jose puts out a GW a year.

And it's area is ?

I'ld assume it is the 15% rating applied to the 1kW/m^2 figure, 6.7
m^2/kW X 1 GW X 1,000,000 kW/GW = 6.7 million m^2.

Have you EVER heard of something called INSOLATION ?

How else are they going to rate their plant's capacity?

Whoooooosssshhhhhhh !

WOW you really are dumb.I'm not quite sure I've ever seen anyone miss the
point quite as effectively as you just did.
---
He probably thinks insolation is something you put in your attic and
walls to keep the sun's heat out in summer.

JF
 
Bret Cahill wrote:

Pathetic.

Nope.

Nuke.

No way.

Ain't gonna happen.
Sadly this is true of some technologies. Their good sides are outweighed
by their deficits. 100% full marks for trying mind you but not every
alleged 'breakthrough' will make it.

Graham
 
Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

Did you know that something like 30% of all fuel oil is used
in SHIPPING. No more trade with Asia (fuel costs too high

Thats not true. The sea freight is a small part of the retail price.

That's not what I said.

Yes it is.

I said % of usage.

That was a comment on your second sentance. Thats why I broke your para there.

In comparison aviation is 'only' 8% or so. Therefore
SHIPPING usage has a MAJOR effect on fuel oil price.

Nope, because it isnt where the increased demand is.

- already sea transport can account for 10% of the FOB - destination cost),

Not with the sort of stuff we buy from asia it doesnt.

You must be getting some damn good deals then !

Nope, just high value containerised 'stuff'
The value being highly critical. Lower value stuff goes that way too don't forget.
We used to get containerised deliveries for example of mid-value electronics and
shipping costs weren't negligible by any means.


no more cruise lines,

The cost of the fuel is a small part of their costs.

Maybe in their case.

No maybe about it. Their costs are completely dominated by wages and food etc.

you name it.

The Arabs aren't stupid, they know who pays for the modernisation
(and bombing) of their countries. It won't go that high.

It aint set by the arabs, and yes, it wont get that high.

Ever heard of OPEC ?

OPEC doesnt determine the price of oil.
Well no, ultimately 'the market' and speculators do that so we could say Wall St
etc is to blame.

I dare say we could debate factors of this at length and it would be quite
interesting but I think there are other more important fish to fry.

Rgds, Graham
 
Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote
Rod Speed wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

Did you know that something like 30% of all fuel oil is used
in SHIPPING. No more trade with Asia (fuel costs too high

Thats not true. The sea freight is a small part of the retail price.

That's not what I said.

Yes it is.

I said % of usage.

That was a comment on your second sentance. Thats why I broke your para there.

In comparison aviation is 'only' 8% or so. Therefore
SHIPPING usage has a MAJOR effect on fuel oil price.

Nope, because it isnt where the increased demand is.

- already sea transport can account for 10% of the FOB - destination cost),

Not with the sort of stuff we buy from asia it doesnt.

You must be getting some damn good deals then !

Nope, just high value containerised 'stuff'

The value being highly critical. Lower value stuff goes that way too don't forget.

Not what we buy from ASIA it doesnt.

We used to get containerised deliveries for example of mid-value
electronics and shipping costs weren't negligible by any means.

I didnt say anything about negligible. Nothing like 10% tho.

no more cruise lines,

The cost of the fuel is a small part of their costs.

Maybe in their case.

No maybe about it. Their costs are completely dominated by wages and food etc.

you name it.

The Arabs aren't stupid, they know who pays for the modernisation
(and bombing) of their countries. It won't go that high.

It aint set by the arabs, and yes, it wont get that high.

Ever heard of OPEC ?

OPEC doesnt determine the price of oil.

Well no, ultimately 'the market' and speculators do that so we could say Wall St etc is to blame.

Yep, hence my original comment.

I dare say we could debate factors of this at length and it would be
quite interesting but I think there are other more important fish to fry.

Fried fish is bad for you.
Have you ever had British 'fish and chips' ? It's a fine meal. Admittedlyt I prefer poached salmon.

I have no argument with you.

We see things from slightly different perspectives maybe, but I think we are are in broad agreement.


Graham
 
Rob Dekker wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:

Diesel will go _up_ 20 cents/kW-hr over the next year or so.

It might also go down. Suggest you inspect history.

Also, newer tech diesel engines are getting ever more efficicent. Check out
Detroit Diesel's site IIRC for example. They're not letting the grass grow under
their feet.

Thanks Graham,

I know that diesels (especially lately) are probably the most efficient ICEs around.
But do you see any efficiency numbers for the new diesels ? Can't find much on detroitdiesel.com.
I don't know the exact details for sure but very large marine diesels are now hitting 50%. That's
impressive, especially when you consider what you might do with the waste 'co-gen' capacity.

I believe the target for road diesels in the long term is in the region of 40% or maybe a tad better.


Graham
 
Rob Dekker wrote:

"John Fields" <jfields@austininstruments.com> wrot
Eeyore wrote:
BretCahill@peoplepc.com wrote:

That could drop with cheap PV.

So such thing yet exists.

One plant in San Jose puts out a GW a year.

And it's area is ?

I'ld assume it is the 15% rating applied to the 1kW/m^2 figure, 6.7
m^2/kW X 1 GW X 1,000,000 kW/GW = 6.7 million m^2.

Have you EVER heard of something called INSOLATION ?

How else are they going to rate their plant's capacity?

Whoooooosssshhhhhhh !

WOW you really are dumb.I'm not quite sure I've ever seen anyone miss the
point quite as effectively as you just did.

---
He probably thinks insolation is something you put in your attic and
walls to keep the sun's heat out in summer.

JF

You guys having fun beating around the bush ?
LMAO !

Something like that. ;~)

If only more people were born cleverer and less gullible !

Graham
 
Rod Speed wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Bret Cahill wrote:

When looking at battery tech for (PH)EVs, I came across an
interesting experiment converting a school bus into an electric vehicle.

And if it was so great whey aren't they in volume manufacture right now ?

Coz the oil companys use terrorists to blow up the factorys, silly.
LMFAO !

Do they use C4 ?

Graham
 
Rob Dekker wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote
Bret Cahill wrote:

When looking at battery tech for (PH)EVs, I came across an
interesting experiment converting a school bus into an electric
vehicle.

And if it was so great whey aren't they in volume manufacture right now ?

They are manufactured, but not in large volume yet.
Many reasons for that. One important one because the cost of diesel only recently became more expensive than grid+battery.
Remember oil was HALF the cost last year around this time (remember $70/barrel?).
It has been only been a few years that even diesel-hybrids became competitive with standard diesels.

Diesel-hybrids (especially series hybrids) already have full electric drive, so now that battery+grid became cheaper than diesel, I
expect a lot plug-in hybrid diesels to emerge (retrofit bigger batteries on existing hybrids, and on new vehicles), and electric and
plug-in hybrid busses/delivery vans will almost certainly take off too.

All this is assuming that price of oil is not gotta go down below $100 any more. If that happens, many applications will drop back
to simpler ICE technology.

Couple of big problems remains : how fast can the world increase battery production ? And which battery technology can expand
fastest...
The free market should be able to determine that though.
Since ZEBRAs use cheap production materials, and fairly simple production process, I give them a very good chance of becoming a
dominant battery technology for PHEVs and EVs.
Pitty that only one manufacterer in the world makes them (MES-DEA in Switzerland).

I wonder how many patents are still open on ZEBRA technology. Patent litigation and negotiation could slow down investment and
production of battery-tech.
That is a truly SILLY answer.

Nice try. Nul points as the French say. And they should know a thing or two having chosen to respond to the 70s fuels crisis with mega
nuclear power.

Energy crisis ? Quelle energe crise ?

Graham
 
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:16:09 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:
Bret Cahill wrote:

When looking at battery tech for (PH)EVs, I came across an
interesting experiment converting a school bus into an electric vehicle.

And if it was so great whey aren't they in volume manufacture right now ?

Coz the oil companys use terrorists to blow up the factorys, silly.
---
Actually, they tried to get some terrorists to blow up the school bus,
but they burned their lips on the exhaust pipe.

JF
 
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 07:21:50 +1000, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote

I dare say we could debate factors of this at length and it would be
quite interesting but I think there are other more important fish to fry.

Fried fish is bad for you.
---
Depends on what you fry it in.

JF
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top