Adjusting an atomizer circuit...

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 1:42:03 AM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 16:28:33 +0100, <jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:49:00 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 15:28:31 +0100, <jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Fri, 15 Apr 2022 08:59:40 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\" <C...@nospam.com> wrote:
On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:01:23 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 17:02:41 +0100, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamM...@electrooptical.net> wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:

<snip>

Nobody\'s that fragile. Imagine the animals outside....

I\'m sure glad you don\'t design electronics.

WTF has that do with the breathing of animals?

Your comments show that you are all emotion and no rationality. That\'s the norm in humans, actually.

No, I detest emotions, emotions are for girls.

That\'s an emotional reaction.

> Again, what electronics are used in an open window, some cold dry air, and an old codger with a tracheal problem?

The assertion that you don\'t design electronics - which is clearly true - was intended as an insult. It didn\'t have any more content than that.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[whit3rd]

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

> Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?
They\'re less toxic than pepper, I hear.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?
They\'re less toxic than pepper, I hear.

Go vote for the green party and fuck off out of my sight.

 

[whit3rd]

On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 4:12:18 AM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.
So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

Whole plant tissues, with proteins, trace minerals, etc. Not just the
sugar-and-starch components. More CO2 makes for more carbohydrates, but
doesn\'t increase uptake of nitrogen, potassium, and other necessary chemical
components of a foodstuff. CHO isn\'t enough, CHON, or CHONP, are food requirements.

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?
They\'re less toxic than pepper, I hear.

Go vote for the green party and fuck off out of my sight.

Do you want an F on the assignment, or are you going for an incomplete? That
doesn\'t address microplastics in any coherent way.

 

[server]

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[Arie de Muijnck]

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.

Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

Arie

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:29:36 +0100, whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:

On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 4:12:18 AM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.
So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

Whole plant tissues, with proteins, trace minerals, etc. Not just the
sugar-and-starch components.

We eat the tasty bits because we have brains.

More CO2 makes for more carbohydrates, but
doesn\'t increase uptake of nitrogen, potassium, and other necessary chemical
components of a foodstuff. CHO isn\'t enough, CHON, or CHONP, are food requirements.

Fusspot.

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?
They\'re less toxic than pepper, I hear.

Go vote for the green party and fuck off out of my sight.

Do you want an F on the assignment, or are you going for an incomplete? That
doesn\'t address microplastics in any coherent way.

The green party hate them for some reason, I don\'t care.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Oh how far the world could have come without Merkins.

 

[rbowman]

On 04/27/2022 11:13 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck
eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t
express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates.
That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and
even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to
the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those
hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Oh how far the world could have come without Merkins.

you would be speaking German without Merkins. Not that that would be a
bad thing...

 

[Peeler]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 07:31:47 -0600, lowbrowwoman, the endlessly driveling,
troll-feeding, senile idiot, blabbered again:

you would be speaking German without Merkins. Not that that would be a
bad thing...

You would STILL be sucking the unwashed Scottish wanker\'s cock, regardless
of what language he speaks, you abnormal senile Yankee bigmouth!

--
More typical idiotic senile gossip by lowbrowwoman:
\"It\'s been years since I\'ve been in a fast food burger joint but I used
to like Wendy\'s because they had a salad bar and baked potatoes.\"
MID: <ivdi4gF8btlU1@mid.individual.net>

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 10:05:40 AM UTC+10, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 07:29:36 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 4:12:18 AM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

Whole plant tissues, with proteins, trace minerals, etc. Not just the
sugar-and-starch components.

We eat the tasty bits because we have brains.

You haven\'t, so how do you manage it? In reality, the sort of mechanisms that let grazing animals pick the salt lick that contains the cobalt or whatever element they need doesn\'t seem to have much to do with brains, or not at least the intellectual bits that clowns like you think you can boast about.

More CO2 makes for more carbohydrates, but doesn\'t increase uptake of nitrogen, potassium, and other necessary chemical
components of a foodstuff. CHO isn\'t enough, CHON, or CHONP, are food requirements.

Fusspot.

It\'s worth fussing about. If you don\'t get your proteins (nitrogen) and phosphates you will starve quite quickly.

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?
They\'re less toxic than pepper, I hear.

Go vote for the green party and fuck off out of my sight.

It hasn\'t got much to do with green party, but Commander Kinsey never misses a chance to tell people to fuck off. They\'d be wise to take his advice.
He sounds like a total disaster area,

> > Do you want an F on the assignment, or are you going for an incomplete? That doesn\'t address microplastics in any coherent way.

Commander Kinsey makes a virtue of his ignorance. It doesn\'t make him any less ignorant.

> The green party hate them for some reason, I don\'t care.

Of course you don\'t. You\'d have to learn stuff before you could work out why, and that\'s not in your skill set.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:29:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 4:12:18 AM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.
So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

Whole plant tissues, with proteins, trace minerals, etc. Not just the
sugar-and-starch components. More CO2 makes for more carbohydrates, but
doesn\'t increase uptake of nitrogen, potassium, and other necessary chemical
components of a foodstuff. CHO isn\'t enough, CHON, or CHONP, are food requirements.

We make nitrogen fertilizers from air and oil/gas. We mine and
transport other plant nutrients using oil and gas. Cows and chickens
convert carbs to proteins. Per-capita ag production is way, way up
from the past and still increasing. Added CO2 certainly helps. Google
nasa greening

Things keep getting better. That seems to annoy people who desperately
want things to get worse.


>> > What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?

No problem. We have sand and indigestable fiber and all sorts of
things just passing through. Micrograms of plastic are down in the
noise.



--

Anybody can count to one.

- Robert Widlar

 

[server]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 06:13:49 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
<CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Life would be simpler with everyone speaking either Japanese or
German.



--

Anybody can count to one.

- Robert Widlar

 

[Peeler]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:36:32 -0700, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com,
another mentally challenged, troll-feeding, senile ASSHOLE, blathered:

Life would be simpler with everyone speaking either Japanese or
German.

It would be even simpler, if you troll-feeding senile assholes wouldn\'t fall
for every single idiotic bait the trolling sociopathic attention whore sets
out for you assholes! <tsk>

 

[rbowman]

On 04/28/2022 09:36 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 06:13:49 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those hydraulic doohickeys.\"


Life would be simpler with everyone speaking either Japanese or
German.

Sie haben vollkommen recht.

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:31:47 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/27/2022 11:13 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck
eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t
express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates.
That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and
even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to
the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those
hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Oh how far the world could have come without Merkins.

you would be speaking German without Merkins. Not that that would be a
bad thing...

I don\'t like masculine feminine neuter in their language, but other than that they\'re a very sensible people.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Friday, April 29, 2022 at 1:34:22 AM UTC+10, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:29:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Saturday, April 16, 2022 at 4:12:18 AM UTC-7, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 08:33:54 +0100, whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:

CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.
So you\'re a meat eating moron? What do you think those animals eat?

Whole plant tissues, with proteins, trace minerals, etc. Not just the
sugar-and-starch components. More CO2 makes for more carbohydrates, but
doesn\'t increase uptake of nitrogen, potassium, and other necessary chemical
components of a foodstuff. CHO isn\'t enough, CHON, or CHONP, are food requirements.

We make nitrogen fertilizers from air and oil/gas. We mine and
transport other plant nutrients using oil and gas. Cows and chickens
convert carbs to proteins.

Cows and chickens can\'t transmute carbon, oxygen or hydogen into the nitrogen you need to make proteins. John Larkin seems to have skipped the relevant chemistry lecture.

> Per-capita agricultural production is way, way up from the past and still increasing. Added CO2 certainly helps. Google nasa greening .

Additional CO2 in the atmosphere can help plant growth in some situations. Anthony Watts\' climate change denial propaganda does ignore the ways in which it is less helpful

> Things keep getting better. That seems to annoy people who desperately want things to get worse.

Things have gotten better so far. This doesn\'t constitute any guarantee that they will keep on getting better, and there\'s a lot of evidence that makes it clear that they won\'t.
John Larkin probably couldn\'t understand any of it, even if he could be bothered to try.

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?

No problem. We have sand and indigestible fiber and all sorts of things just passing through. Micrograms of plastic are down in the noise.

That\'s John Larkin\'s theory and he\'s happy to test it on his own gut every day. The trouble with that kind of experiment is that it pretty much has to start killing people before anybody notices the unfortunate side effects when they do show up. More sensible people - the kind who can design stuff before they put it together to see if it works - tend to be a bit more careful.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Commander Kinsey]

On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 02:26:31 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/28/2022 09:36 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 06:13:49 +0100, \"Commander Kinsey\"
CK1@nospam.com> wrote:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck <eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates. That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Life would be simpler with everyone speaking either Japanese or
German.

Sie haben vollkommen recht.

Japanisch habe ich noch nie probiert. Was macht es so gut?

 

[whit3rd]

On Thursday, April 28, 2022 at 8:34:22 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 23:29:36 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com
wrote:

What can you say approvingly about microplastics in your food?

No problem. We have sand and indigestable fiber and all sorts of
things just passing through. Micrograms of plastic are down in the
noise.

Not approving, really, just a claim of ignorance. Ignorance isn\'t always
fatal. Small particles (like heavy metal ions) are sometimes
effective poisons, and even microgram doses are a lot, if the material accumulates.

Did you hear about the sewer cleaning in New Orleans, that discovered tons of
plastic?
<https://www.huffpost.com/entry/new-orleans-beads-storm-drains_n_5a6bb80be4b0ddb658c693bb>

 

[rbowman]

On 04/28/2022 09:33 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Thu, 28 Apr 2022 14:31:47 +0100, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On 04/27/2022 11:13 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2022 16:55:08 +0100, Arie de Muijnck
eternal.september@ademu.com> wrote:

On 2022-04-20 16:17, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 00:33:54 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Tuesday, April 12, 2022 at 7:41:41 AM UTC-7,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Yes, plants love CO2. It\'s good for the planet and we need more.

Planets aren\'t plants. Neither are \'we\'. And, plants don\'t
express love.
CO2 and sunlight and rain, plants make into... carbohydrates.
That\'s the \'empty calories\'
subset of agriculture, for instance, and not unequivocally good.

It would be interesting to assign a single, literal meaning to every
word in the English language and try to live with that.


Not for everyday use and each word, but there has been attempts and
even standards to do so for technical manuals:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simplified_Technical_English

I\'m guessing yanks couldn\'t handle this.

Instead of
\"GET ACCESS TO THE ACCUMULATOR FOR THE NO. 1 HYDRAULIC SYSTEM\"
they would write
\"Now what you\'re gonna wanna go and do next is be getting the access to
the accumulator so you can then go and use the first one of those
hydraulic doohickeys.\"

Oh how far the world could have come without Merkins.

you would be speaking German without Merkins. Not that that would be a
bad thing...

I don\'t like masculine feminine neuter in their language, but other than
that they\'re a very sensible people.

You prefer gender fluidity? I will admit I\'ve been curious how things
like der Wein und das Bier came about.


An otherwise highly respected translator of Old Norse material took a
lot of flack when he switched the pronouns for the sun and the moon to
conform to the English sense. English may not have genders anymore but
to most people a feminine sun and masculine moon just seems wrong.