45-degree diagonal cutters?

Greegor wrote:
On Feb 14, 9:54 pm, RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
On 2/12/2010 6:41 AM, Greegor wrote:

Can anybody tell me why Xcelite nut drivers smell like puke?

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts" Tom Servo ;-P

I never posted the puke comment.
Has a cowardly sporger been putting words in my mouth?

I see that the original header from RFI-EMI-GUY's
message shows some info about the message
being replied to.

It looks like some coward is using eternal-september
to sporge me.

0001HW.C7982CF900D218CEB08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org
Click to expand...

Learn to read. He deleted all the text from your post, but left the
header information. Typical of some careless posters.



--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
On Feb 14, 9:54 pm, RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
On 2/12/2010 6:41 AM, Greegor wrote:

Can anybody tell me why Xcelite nut drivers smell like puke?

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts" Tom Servo  ;-P
Click to expand...
I never posted the puke comment.
Has a cowardly sporger been putting words in my mouth?

I see that the original header from RFI-EMI-GUY's
message shows some info about the message
being replied to.

It looks like some coward is using eternal-september
to sporge me.

0001HW.C7982CF900D218CEB08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:01:34 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

life imitates life wrote:

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:47:27 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com
wrote:

Full context restored for unanswered questions.

On Feb 11, 2:39 am, Sansui Samari <jimjam1...@gmail.com> wrote:
SS > I cobbed a bunch of lindstrom cutters and pliers
SS > from a place I worked at years ago. They were
SS > going belly up and tossed out boxes of the things.
SS > I'm still using the few that I haven't given away
SS > or broken. As long as you don't use them to cut
SS > steal (hence the broken cutters) they are
SS > awesome. I wish I would have grabbed more.


G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > At the liquidation sales for some bankrupt
G > companies, sometimes I have seen hard,
G > tangeable evidence of WHY they went broke.


lifeimitateslife wrote:
lil > I think you assign "hard and tangible" to
lil > others when it can be assigned to you.
lil > Hard and tangible evidence that your
lil > statistical analysis prowess ain't that great.
lil
lil > If the difference between buying $600
lil > worth of cheap shit tools or $5000
lil > worth of long lasting, high quality tools
lil > is a figure that you think could break
lil > just about any company, < snip

G > Are you saying that the outfit that
G > Sansui Samurai described as having
G > gone belly up did the right thing by
G > buying $5000 worth of Rolls Royce
G > hand tools rather than the Xcelite
G > ones which would have cost $600?

lil > No. I am saying that your claim that it is any indication of a
lil > causation for having gone bankrupt, is a fallacy, and it is.

G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

G > Wasteful overspending and overcommitment
G > in purchasing are common contributors to
G > business failure. The number one cause of
G > failure for small business is undercapitalization
G > or excessive cost of money. ie Cost controls.

G > The stuff that "belly up" companies throw away
G > or liquidate MAY VERY WELL reveal important
G > symptoms of problems that destroyed them.

G > Like most people here I enjoy and appreciate
G > truly good quality tools, FOR ME.

G > As others have mentioned, theftability, loss
G > and abuse CAN MEAN that the Xcelite tools
G > provide a better Return On Investment.

G > The nature of the work, the security of
G > individuals toolboxes, the number of people
G > who might potentially forget to return a
G > tool are all variables that could decide
G > whether the ROLLS ROYCE quality of
G > nippers are a good or bad idea.

G > Fluorescent light bulbs at $ 4 a shot are
G > great if your mortgage is totally paid off.
G > If you're selling your home next week
G > or if you're a landlord the ROI's not there.

G > Businesses OWNING their own facilities
G > sometimes find that they are better off to
G > sell their own building and rent it back
G > because they can't charge off any building
G > cost if they OWN the building.

G > I neither condone this nor like it, I just report it.

G > I LOVE well machined high quality tools
G > and craftsmanship, but it doesn't always
G > show up on the P&L sheet. I wish it did.

G > You seem to be applying personal taste
G > to profitability rationalizations.

G > That's partly why "bean counters" are
G > so widely disliked, isn't it?

G > My background is in small businesses
G > where you wear many hats and can't
G > blame "that other guy".

G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > Didn't I convey two alternatives there?
G
G > That the outfit failed:
G > A. BECAUSE they buy "only the finest" or
G > B. DESPITE buying "only the finest"?
G
G > It's like option A set you off so much that
G > you overlooked option B.

G > Did you miss option B, lil ?

G > Judging from the way you took it very
G > personally, I'm guessing that you worked
G > somewhere where you groused about
G > the shit Xcelite nippers all day long....

G > How is that different from the
G > MacIntosh kooks?

G > I wrote this BEFORE I read your posted
G > story about exploding at a new guy for
G > using your tools. Did somebody at the
G > company give him permission to do so?

G > Telling the new guy to use your toolbox
G > would seem to be fairly typical hazing or
G > office politics considering your reaction.

-------------------------------------



G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

AL > No, but the remark was incorrect because there
AL > are plenty of examples of companies that have
AL > no problem stocking or using expensive items
AL > along with their other assets.

Those would fall under option B that I suggested from the beginning.

AL > Your remark had/has absolutely no basis in fact.

Please diagram your logic.

It is like you are trying to say that a company would go under because
it chose an expensive Mac over a PC. It is severely flawed logic.


AL > And that "theftability" remark was about as stupid as it gets.

So extremely so that you didn't have to explain how, logically, right?

Maybe not in the little hick town hick shop you worked in, but where I
work all the employees are honorable.


Yeah, you assulting a co-worker is 'real' honorable.
Click to expand...
Where did I say I ever assaulted a co-worker. you fucking slanderous,
retarded bastard.
 
life imitates life wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:01:34 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


life imitates life wrote:

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:47:27 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com
wrote:

Full context restored for unanswered questions.

On Feb 11, 2:39 am, Sansui Samari <jimjam1...@gmail.com> wrote:
SS > I cobbed a bunch of lindstrom cutters and pliers
SS > from a place I worked at years ago. They were
SS > going belly up and tossed out boxes of the things.
SS > I'm still using the few that I haven't given away
SS > or broken. As long as you don't use them to cut
SS > steal (hence the broken cutters) they are
SS > awesome. I wish I would have grabbed more.


G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > At the liquidation sales for some bankrupt
G > companies, sometimes I have seen hard,
G > tangeable evidence of WHY they went broke.


lifeimitateslife wrote:
lil > I think you assign "hard and tangible" to
lil > others when it can be assigned to you.
lil > Hard and tangible evidence that your
lil > statistical analysis prowess ain't that great.
lil
lil > If the difference between buying $600
lil > worth of cheap shit tools or $5000
lil > worth of long lasting, high quality tools
lil > is a figure that you think could break
lil > just about any company, < snip

G > Are you saying that the outfit that
G > Sansui Samurai described as having
G > gone belly up did the right thing by
G > buying $5000 worth of Rolls Royce
G > hand tools rather than the Xcelite
G > ones which would have cost $600?

lil > No. I am saying that your claim that it is any indication of a
lil > causation for having gone bankrupt, is a fallacy, and it is.

G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

G > Wasteful overspending and overcommitment
G > in purchasing are common contributors to
G > business failure. The number one cause of
G > failure for small business is undercapitalization
G > or excessive cost of money. ie Cost controls.

G > The stuff that "belly up" companies throw away
G > or liquidate MAY VERY WELL reveal important
G > symptoms of problems that destroyed them.

G > Like most people here I enjoy and appreciate
G > truly good quality tools, FOR ME.

G > As others have mentioned, theftability, loss
G > and abuse CAN MEAN that the Xcelite tools
G > provide a better Return On Investment.

G > The nature of the work, the security of
G > individuals toolboxes, the number of people
G > who might potentially forget to return a
G > tool are all variables that could decide
G > whether the ROLLS ROYCE quality of
G > nippers are a good or bad idea.

G > Fluorescent light bulbs at $ 4 a shot are
G > great if your mortgage is totally paid off.
G > If you're selling your home next week
G > or if you're a landlord the ROI's not there.

G > Businesses OWNING their own facilities
G > sometimes find that they are better off to
G > sell their own building and rent it back
G > because they can't charge off any building
G > cost if they OWN the building.

G > I neither condone this nor like it, I just report it.

G > I LOVE well machined high quality tools
G > and craftsmanship, but it doesn't always
G > show up on the P&L sheet. I wish it did.

G > You seem to be applying personal taste
G > to profitability rationalizations.

G > That's partly why "bean counters" are
G > so widely disliked, isn't it?

G > My background is in small businesses
G > where you wear many hats and can't
G > blame "that other guy".

G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > Didn't I convey two alternatives there?
G
G > That the outfit failed:
G > A. BECAUSE they buy "only the finest" or
G > B. DESPITE buying "only the finest"?
G
G > It's like option A set you off so much that
G > you overlooked option B.

G > Did you miss option B, lil ?

G > Judging from the way you took it very
G > personally, I'm guessing that you worked
G > somewhere where you groused about
G > the shit Xcelite nippers all day long....

G > How is that different from the
G > MacIntosh kooks?

G > I wrote this BEFORE I read your posted
G > story about exploding at a new guy for
G > using your tools. Did somebody at the
G > company give him permission to do so?

G > Telling the new guy to use your toolbox
G > would seem to be fairly typical hazing or
G > office politics considering your reaction.

-------------------------------------



G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

AL > No, but the remark was incorrect because there
AL > are plenty of examples of companies that have
AL > no problem stocking or using expensive items
AL > along with their other assets.

Those would fall under option B that I suggested from the beginning.

AL > Your remark had/has absolutely no basis in fact.

Please diagram your logic.

It is like you are trying to say that a company would go under because
it chose an expensive Mac over a PC. It is severely flawed logic.


AL > And that "theftability" remark was about as stupid as it gets.

So extremely so that you didn't have to explain how, logically, right?

Maybe not in the little hick town hick shop you worked in, but where I
work all the employees are honorable.


Yeah, you assulting a co-worker is 'real' honorable.

Where did I say I ever assaulted a co-worker. you fucking slanderous,
retarded bastard.
Click to expand...


Yawn. You were talking about leaving a charged electrolytic for the
guy that was in your toolbox and how the company wouldn't do anything to
you. That can be considered assult. You're just too stupid to realise
it. Setting any booby trap can get you arrested. The irony would be
that a boob would be trying to set the trap.


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
In article <4b789ff5$0$31011$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
I picked up a barely used set of Lindstrom (Sweden)Model Rx 8142. I am
not sure if the angle is more than 30 degrees, but very well balanced
and cushioned. I have forbidden the family to use them! My other cutters
look like they have been used for cutting iron nails!
Click to expand...
Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters. But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.

--
*The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese *

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 02:07:45 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

life imitates life wrote:

On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:01:34 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:


life imitates life wrote:

On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:47:27 -0800 (PST), Greegor <greegor47@gmail.com
wrote:

Full context restored for unanswered questions.

On Feb 11, 2:39 am, Sansui Samari <jimjam1...@gmail.com> wrote:
SS > I cobbed a bunch of lindstrom cutters and pliers
SS > from a place I worked at years ago. They were
SS > going belly up and tossed out boxes of the things.
SS > I'm still using the few that I haven't given away
SS > or broken. As long as you don't use them to cut
SS > steal (hence the broken cutters) they are
SS > awesome. I wish I would have grabbed more.


G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > At the liquidation sales for some bankrupt
G > companies, sometimes I have seen hard,
G > tangeable evidence of WHY they went broke.


lifeimitateslife wrote:
lil > I think you assign "hard and tangible" to
lil > others when it can be assigned to you.
lil > Hard and tangible evidence that your
lil > statistical analysis prowess ain't that great.
lil
lil > If the difference between buying $600
lil > worth of cheap shit tools or $5000
lil > worth of long lasting, high quality tools
lil > is a figure that you think could break
lil > just about any company, < snip

G > Are you saying that the outfit that
G > Sansui Samurai described as having
G > gone belly up did the right thing by
G > buying $5000 worth of Rolls Royce
G > hand tools rather than the Xcelite
G > ones which would have cost $600?

lil > No. I am saying that your claim that it is any indication of a
lil > causation for having gone bankrupt, is a fallacy, and it is.

G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

G > Wasteful overspending and overcommitment
G > in purchasing are common contributors to
G > business failure. The number one cause of
G > failure for small business is undercapitalization
G > or excessive cost of money. ie Cost controls.

G > The stuff that "belly up" companies throw away
G > or liquidate MAY VERY WELL reveal important
G > symptoms of problems that destroyed them.

G > Like most people here I enjoy and appreciate
G > truly good quality tools, FOR ME.

G > As others have mentioned, theftability, loss
G > and abuse CAN MEAN that the Xcelite tools
G > provide a better Return On Investment.

G > The nature of the work, the security of
G > individuals toolboxes, the number of people
G > who might potentially forget to return a
G > tool are all variables that could decide
G > whether the ROLLS ROYCE quality of
G > nippers are a good or bad idea.

G > Fluorescent light bulbs at $ 4 a shot are
G > great if your mortgage is totally paid off.
G > If you're selling your home next week
G > or if you're a landlord the ROI's not there.

G > Businesses OWNING their own facilities
G > sometimes find that they are better off to
G > sell their own building and rent it back
G > because they can't charge off any building
G > cost if they OWN the building.

G > I neither condone this nor like it, I just report it.

G > I LOVE well machined high quality tools
G > and craftsmanship, but it doesn't always
G > show up on the P&L sheet. I wish it did.

G > You seem to be applying personal taste
G > to profitability rationalizations.

G > That's partly why "bean counters" are
G > so widely disliked, isn't it?

G > My background is in small businesses
G > where you wear many hats and can't
G > blame "that other guy".

G > Were they going belly up because of
G > buying only the finest, or despite of that?
G
G > Didn't I convey two alternatives there?
G
G > That the outfit failed:
G > A. BECAUSE they buy "only the finest" or
G > B. DESPITE buying "only the finest"?
G
G > It's like option A set you off so much that
G > you overlooked option B.

G > Did you miss option B, lil ?

G > Judging from the way you took it very
G > personally, I'm guessing that you worked
G > somewhere where you groused about
G > the shit Xcelite nippers all day long....

G > How is that different from the
G > MacIntosh kooks?

G > I wrote this BEFORE I read your posted
G > story about exploding at a new guy for
G > using your tools. Did somebody at the
G > company give him permission to do so?

G > Telling the new guy to use your toolbox
G > would seem to be fairly typical hazing or
G > office politics considering your reaction.

-------------------------------------



G > That you disagree does not make something a logical fallacy.

AL > No, but the remark was incorrect because there
AL > are plenty of examples of companies that have
AL > no problem stocking or using expensive items
AL > along with their other assets.

Those would fall under option B that I suggested from the beginning.

AL > Your remark had/has absolutely no basis in fact.

Please diagram your logic.

It is like you are trying to say that a company would go under because
it chose an expensive Mac over a PC. It is severely flawed logic.


AL > And that "theftability" remark was about as stupid as it gets.

So extremely so that you didn't have to explain how, logically, right?

Maybe not in the little hick town hick shop you worked in, but where I
work all the employees are honorable.


Yeah, you assulting a co-worker is 'real' honorable.

Where did I say I ever assaulted a co-worker. you fucking slanderous,
retarded bastard.



Yawn. You were talking about leaving a charged electrolytic for the
guy that was in your toolbox and how the company wouldn't do anything to
you.
Click to expand...
No. I was talking about doing it because the company I worked for then
would not do anything to HIM for his deeds, you dopey ditz.

That can be considered assult.
Click to expand...
Only if it is witnessed. One shit deed deserves another in such cases.

His shit deed went unpunished, so me letting him get zapped was bad,
but not nearly as bad as his compromise.


You're just too stupid to realise
it.
Click to expand...
You're too goddamned stupid to realize that there is a whole world of
folks out here that know MORE than you do about human nature, you stupid
twit. Hell, you can't even spell the word right!

Setting any booby trap can get you arrested.
Click to expand...
No. Setting a trap that does harm to someone is illegal.

The irony would be
that a boob would be trying to set the trap.
Click to expand...
That's impossible since the boob in this thread is you.
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 11:02:09 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <4b789ff5$0$31011$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
I picked up a barely used set of Lindstrom (Sweden)Model Rx 8142. I am
not sure if the angle is more than 30 degrees, but very well balanced
and cushioned. I have forbidden the family to use them! My other cutters
look like they have been used for cutting iron nails!

Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters.
Click to expand...

Nice try, troll.

But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.
Click to expand...
There are no cutters that should be used on ANY fucking steel wire,
much less nails.

Your fucking name fits, Plowtard.
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws won't
be damaged by this.
Click to expand...
You are an idiot, and a troll.

Piano wire is cut with a heavy shear, not a nip cutter. There are no
nip style cutters made meant for steel with the exception of bolt cutters
and they are a completely different animal. That is why a block shear
cutter is used.
 
In article <c6kin55l7rfbqkrvtjitqd3d1l86g275f4@4ax.com>,
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters.
Click to expand...

Nice try, troll.

But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.

There are no cutters that should be used on ANY fucking steel wire,
much less nails.
Click to expand...
If like you, they're bought from the pound shop, yes.

A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws won't
be damaged by this.

Your fucking name fits, Plowtard.
Click to expand...
Very witty. From one who hides behind a pseudonym.

--
weapon of math disruption*

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
In article <rooin5p9ke8epetf6rak3ird8thp4lgluf@4ax.com>,
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws
won't be damaged by this.

You are an idiot, and a troll.

Piano wire is cut with a heavy shear, not a nip cutter. There are no
nip style cutters made meant for steel with the exception of bolt cutters
and they are a completely different animal. That is why a block shear
cutter is used.
Click to expand...
Try learning something about tools. It's a standard test to check the
quality of side cutter jaws. There is no difference in principle between
cutting any sort of wire.

If your favourite brand fails this go get a decent one.

--
*'Progress' and 'Change' are not synonyms.

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:15:05 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <rooin5p9ke8epetf6rak3ird8thp4lgluf@4ax.com>,
life imitates life <pasticcio@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws
won't be damaged by this.

You are an idiot, and a troll.

Piano wire is cut with a heavy shear, not a nip cutter. There are no
nip style cutters made meant for steel with the exception of bolt cutters
and they are a completely different animal. That is why a block shear
cutter is used.

Try learning something about tools. It's a standard test to check the
quality of side cutter jaws. There is no difference in principle between
cutting any sort of wire.
Click to expand...
You're an idiot. There is a HUGE difference between pincer type
cutting and shear cutting and both are used in the industry, dingledorf.

If your favourite brand fails this go get a decent one.
Click to expand...
Wrong. It is the standard "destructive" analysis. There are other
methods for testing the hardness without damaging the cutting face.

Also, they are not all tested that way. There are softer materials used
for lighter duty work media, and they get tested differently.

As far as "what any cutter can do..." goes, the construction of the
cutter determines its correct usage limits. regardless of any cutting
edge hardness tests that may or may not have been specified or performed.
Not only do the edges have to have specific hardness ratings, but the
meat of the cutter jaws have to be designed heavy enough to be able to
withstand the forces a given size and type of wire proposed to be cut by
it, as well as the shock wave that traverses through the jaws at the
moment the wire snaps and the cutting edge 'mating faces' close together.

THAT is for pincer type "cutters". Shear type is a different test
standard. Not that you would know about such things.

I know more about tools than you ever will.

The FEA analysis on your skull comes back with a reading of "Hollow
structure found... Analysis halted" Even the phrenologist nearly
vomited.
 
On 2/14/2010 11:46 PM, life imitates life wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:14:38 -0500, RFI-EMI-GUY<Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM
wrote:

On 2/10/2010 12:29 PM, DaveC wrote:
I used to own a pair of flush cutters where the jaws and the handles met at
about a 45-degree angle. Made for a nice tool for getting in between
components when you needed to nip something off flush with the PCB.

I think they were Xcelite.

I can't find anything like those Xcelites anymore. Everything is either
straight (no angle between the jaws and handles) or maybe a slight angle.

Anyone know of a good cutter that has a 45-degree angle? Flush-cut desirable
but not critical. A 1/2" (12 mm) jaw opening would be nice, though.

Thanks,
Dave

I picked up a barely used set of Lindstrom (Sweden)Model Rx 8142. I am
not sure if the angle is more than 30 degrees, but very well balanced
and cushioned. I have forbidden the family to use them! My other cutters
look like they have been used for cutting iron nails!


Does that say something about you, or are you saying that the other
members of your family were never properly educated on tool care? :)
Click to expand...
I think the concept of returning tools to the toolbox and using proper
tools for the job is lost on certain other members of the family. I have
given up training them.

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts" Tom Servo ;-P
 
On 2/15/2010 12:39 AM, Greegor wrote:
On Feb 14, 9:54 pm, RFI-EMI-GUY<Rhyol...@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
On 2/12/2010 6:41 AM, Greegor wrote:

Can anybody tell me why Xcelite nut drivers smell like puke?

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts" Tom Servo ;-P

I never posted the puke comment.
Has a cowardly sporger been putting words in my mouth?

I see that the original header from RFI-EMI-GUY's
message shows some info about the message
being replied to.

It looks like some coward is using eternal-september
to sporge me.

0001HW.C7982CF900D218CEB08A39AF@news.eternal-september.org
Sorry; I meant to snip out your message properly but didn't have proper
Click to expand...
tool!

--
Joe Leikhim K4SAT
"The RFI-EMI-GUY"Š

"Use only Genuine Interocitor Parts" Tom Servo ;-P
 
In article <47ajn550er7a9d2ooo68mkg3godgcu9gqd@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
<MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
If your favourite brand fails this go get a decent one.

Wrong. It is the standard "destructive" analysis. There are other
methods for testing the hardness without damaging the cutting face.
Click to expand...
That's the whole point. They don't damage decent ones. I'm not interested
in your cheap shoddy ones.

--
*It's o.k. to laugh during sexŒ.Œ.just don't point!

Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.
 
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:51:41 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
<dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:

In article <47ajn550er7a9d2ooo68mkg3godgcu9gqd@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
If your favourite brand fails this go get a decent one.

Wrong. It is the standard "destructive" analysis. There are other
methods for testing the hardness without damaging the cutting face.

That's the whole point. They don't damage decent ones. I'm not interested
in your cheap shoddy ones.
Click to expand...

I was the one that suggested Lindstrom, you retarded fuck. So "my cheap
shoddy ones" are far better than yours, if you have some other brand and
I have yet to give them a once over. My opinion is the only one that
counts.
 
life imitates life wrote:
Yawn. You were talking about leaving a charged electrolytic for the
guy that was in your toolbox and how the company wouldn't do anything to
you.

No. I was talking about doing it because the company I worked for then
would not do anything to HIM for his deeds, you dopey ditz.
Click to expand...

So you become judge, jury and execuctioner?
That can be considered assult.

Only if it is witnessed. One shit deed deserves another in such cases.
Click to expand...

Every one of your deeds is shit. By your logic it would be ok for
one of your victims to kill you, as long as no one sees it.



His shit deed went unpunished, so me letting him get zapped was bad,
but not nearly as bad as his compromise.
Click to expand...

What compromise? You're a vindictive jackass. You sghould have kept
your toolbox locked if you didn't want people messing with it.


You're just too stupid to realise
it.

You're too goddamned stupid to realize that there is a whole world of
folks out here that know MORE than you do about human nature, you stupid
twit. Hell, you can't even spell the word right!
Click to expand...

Yawn. What you know about human nature isn't worth knowing.

Setting any booby trap can get you arrested.

No. Setting a trap that does harm to someone is illegal.
Click to expand...

In other words, as long as no one catches you, it's ok to do whatever
the hell you please.
The irony would be
that a boob would be trying to set the trap.
Click to expand...


That's impossible since the boob in this thread is you.
Click to expand...

Yawn. If you could be subdivded, there would be enough to give
10,000 bimbos G cups.




--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article <4b789ff5$0$31011$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosting.com>,
RFI-EMI-GUY <Rhyolite@NETTALLY.COM> wrote:
I picked up a barely used set of Lindstrom (Sweden)Model Rx 8142. I am
not sure if the angle is more than 30 degrees, but very well balanced
and cushioned. I have forbidden the family to use them! My other cutters
look like they have been used for cutting iron nails!

Cutting nails shouldn't worry a decent pair of cutters. But obviously
smaller ones could bend if trying to cut a large nail. Small electronic
cutters should only be used for that purpose. Larger electrician's type
will survive lots of abuse if of good quality.
Click to expand...

A small pair of bolt cutters would be better for nails. Especially
cut nails, made for masonry work.


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
life imitates life wrote:
On Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:16:28 +0000 (GMT), "Dave Plowman (News)"
dave@davenoise.co.uk> wrote:


A test for *any* decent cutter is piano wire. Properly hardened jaws won't
be damaged by this.

You are an idiot, and a troll.

Piano wire is cut with a heavy shear, not a nip cutter. There are no
nip style cutters made meant for steel with the exception of bolt cutters
and they are a completely different animal. That is why a block shear
cutter is used.
Click to expand...

Do they use a block shear to cut your hair, blockhead?


--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote:
In article <47ajn550er7a9d2ooo68mkg3godgcu9gqd@4ax.com>,
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org
MassiveProng@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
If your favourite brand fails this go get a decent one.

Wrong. It is the standard "destructive" analysis. There are other
methods for testing the hardness without damaging the cutting face.

That's the whole point. They don't damage decent ones. I'm not interested
in your cheap shoddy ones.
Click to expand...

Dimbulb wouldn't be alive if his cheapskate dad didn't reuse the used
condoms he fished out of a gas station toilet.

--
Greed is the root of all eBay.
 
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:15:12 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote:

What compromise? You're a vindictive jackass. You sghould have kept
your toolbox locked if you didn't want people messing with it.
Click to expand...

It was *my* prototype parts cabinets, and fuck you, and the horse that
rode in up your mother's ass.

I was the eight year tenured engineering tech, and he was the newly
hired, no HV experience whatsoever test tech, *at best*.

He had no business anywhere near ANY of my things, including my desk or
ANYTHING that was in MY LAB, including my benches, cabinets, desk,
computer, etc. etc. etc. He had no business there, which was not even
where he was assigned to work from to begin with. NONE of my things
needed to be locked up before the little zit faced bastard showed up, so
they should have shit canned him as soon as I declared the severe ethics
breech and character flaw.

You're a dopey bastard if you think every company has enclosed labs for
everyone. Like I originally stated, I caught him as I came downstairs
because I had to traverse the balcony area to get to the staircase. It
is a wide open lab from several pathways. Never a problem until the guy
that apparently acts just like you would got hired.

Fuck you, and him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top