3D printing of PCBs?

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:a52a37e3-32c7-4f73-b119-7faceffbdaa3
@googlegroups.com:

> Lol. Since I never said what I considered an average PC

A dope that touts Vista as viable...

I do not need to see what you declare as average. You are an abject
idiot, "above the idiot level" of the average idiot.

Hint: "above" means worse in this case.

 

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:7c38dd0c-145a-4488-a694-041d5421ba86@googlegroups.com:

Ah. That's why the number of 'successful' malware attacks on
windows is so enormous.

You are an idiot.

I took the government contractor security seminar and the ITAR
seminar. My machine is cleared by the NSA.

I'd bet that yours is not.

Your brain... NOT 'enormous' in any way, shape, or form.

I know more about modern computer vulnerabilities than you ever
have or ever will, child.

 

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:e965be3d-96fd-461b-8a6d-
47139ec0be6b@googlegroups.com:

> Babbling again I see

Yes, you most certainly are, chump.

'something useful'?

It would be useful to babble a baseball bat against your brain, boy.

In the key of b.

I guess you are lucky that I do not consider you worth much more time
than it takes to call you the putz you are, putz.

 

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:ffb3e162-9f9a-4a06-be6f-
738a5e5b567f@googlegroups.com:

good to see

You do not see anything, boy.

You are a putz, and your little pathetic dance here is laughable.

 

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:b5a6dd8b-2851-496a-a954-
472917a4692e@googlegroups.com:

> Do yourself a favour,

Tell you to fuck off and die and plonk your retarded ass... yeah...
that is what I *should* do.

I sure wish the baseball bat babbling event could happen. It would
be cool to see what a 3 inch thick skull looks like split apart.

 

tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:b5a6dd8b-2851-496a-a954-
472917a4692e@googlegroups.com:

> I'm done with you.

You are a piece of shit. You should not even be here.

Your whore mother should be put into prison for failing to flush you,
the moment the severely ass fucked street slut shat you.

Oh, and you said that petty, lame baby bullshit before.

 

On Thursday, 11 July 2019 11:51:14 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in news:qg64nd$3lq$4@dont-
email.me:

virus, like a petty child and in such a petty, childish way.

Wrong again, as usual. He typed nothing of the sort.


You Usenet piggy boy wannabes are even more lame than the mere
spellcheck retards.

I made an incorrect attribute.

So far you've wrongly attributed moronicness to every poster on here except yourself, and done nothing but get basic facts wrong over & over. Do yourself a favour, build a circuit or something.


garbage demonstrating your mental state deleted. I'm done with you.

 

krw@notreal.com wrote in newsb5diehqpjmtia6fqi6hnjnuvslqi75kpl@
4ax.com:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 00:25:24 -0700 (PDT), jurb6006@gmail.com wrote:

Your "house sized" laptop would also be dog slow and riddled with
logic arrors.

And that separates it from Windows PCs just how ?

And that separates it from AlwaysWrong just how?

KRW, yet another triple point universal failure.

Grab that chest, boy!

 

On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 21:52:28 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

tabbypurr wrote in news:a4ed62d5-63d1-4a79-8976-
bb7043825e6d@googlegroups.com:

So you've no idea what the average PC is either.


No.. I am saying that you do not.

I see you snipped your list of 'average PCs' that's near 20 years out of date, but not to worry

I'd say right now, not counting college student new purchases, which
are all likely at the i7 or higher level, I'd say an average joe bloe
old guy household where he could give a shit about computers (but
doesn't) runs about at an i5 level or higher.

ok, good to hear you know the completely obvious.

> You have no idea.

Lol. Since I never said what I considered an average PC that statement can only possibly come from one place, and I reckon it's dark there.


NT

 

On Thursday, 11 July 2019 03:04:18 UTC+1, k...@notreal.com wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:59:04 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr wrote:
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:15:35 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in news:c23000e6-2bd1-4c69-95f2-887b323c47d2
@googlegroups.com:

Windows is the biggest virus ever written.

Yeah... it takes out computer idiots like you, and leaves you
bitching like Donald J. Trump about shit that isn't even real.
While *US* real men USE the machine for what they were designed for.

Instant Karma, fucktard. *WE* can only hope it gets to you soon.

you're babbling.

You're up for the Capt. Obvious award.

heh, looks like you're right there

 

John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in news:qg64nd$3lq$4@dont-
email.me:

virus, like a petty child and in such a petty, childish way.

Wrong again, as usual. He typed nothing of the sort.

You Usenet piggy boy wannabes are even more lame than the mere
spellcheck retards.

I made an incorrect attribute. Whoopie fuckin doo.

You made an incorrect life choice. Won't see you in hell, because
I won't be attending that scene... but you will.

Wow.... The things that make you old senile fucktards' morning.

You are pathetic, sag face.

What are you, asswipe? Like 70 now?

I have some nice Kervorkian suggestions for you to follow.

 

On Thursday, 11 July 2019 03:10:19 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote in news:1560fbeb-d6e4-40df-8860-
e3cb41d0f845@googlegroups.com:

Linux is the closest thing to future-proof
and works-with-legacies, but isn't perfect either.

Linux is the best. I was not making that argument.

I was jumping on stupid Windows bashing.

You were jumping on realistic windows bashing. Win has its good points but lord is it a pile of issues.

And yes, fully updated, it is actually pretty safe. Workstation Pro
level anyway.

But I run both.

Ah. That's why the number of 'successful' malware attacks on windows is so enormous.


NT

 

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:476diet42nhbotniegfeet6pv9vucm3fqb@4ax.com:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 10:59:04 -0700 (PDT), tabbypurr@gmail.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:15:35 UTC+1,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:c23000e6-2bd1-4c69-95f2-887b323c47d2 @googlegroups.com:

Windows is the biggest virus ever written.

Yeah... it takes out computer idiots like you, and leaves you
bitching like Donald J. Trump about shit that isn't even real.
While *US* real men USE the machine for what they were designed
for.

Instant Karma, fucktard. *WE* can only hope it gets to you
soon.

you're babbling.

You're up for the Capt. Obvious award.

You're up for the myocardial infarction event.

I sure hope it hurts. You sure deserve it that way.

 

On Thursday, 11 July 2019 11:43:18 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in news:qg63vn$3lq$2@dont-
email.me:
On 7/10/2019 2:15 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
You sure IS stupid, boy! (IS: Information System)

So you got that one wrong, too. It should be
You sure _are_ IS stupid, boy! (IS: Information System)


You pathetic claim to be smart dumbfucks cannot even get street
slang.

You be dumb, boy.

He was wrong 1, and now you are wrong 2.

That's OK, punk. In Usenet, your stupidity has a certain kind of
wring to it.

Babbling again I see. Why don't you do something useful? It's a lot more satisfying.

 

On Thursday, 11 July 2019 11:45:17 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in
news:qg64ba$3lq$3@dont-email.me:
On 7/10/2019 3:54 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in
news:4d9b5d16-599e-441c-b7f4-f089d3a56c08 @googlegroups.com:

Your cat has more brains than you do.

Cats have smaller brains than humans, always wrong.


Yeah, I know.

good to see a moment of sense. It doesn't last long...

Now read it again. Your fucking cat is smarter
than
you are.


I read it again and that's not what you typed.



"more brains" comon colloquiallism, you retarded putz.

NOT "more brain matter".

Even though in his case, and apparently yours as well, it would be
a valid argument, considering the 2.8 inch thickness of your skull.

 

John S <Sophi.2@invalid.org> wrote in
news:qg64ba$3lq$3@dont-email.me:

On 7/10/2019 3:54 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:4d9b5d16-599e-441c-b7f4-f089d3a56c08 @googlegroups.com:

Your cat has more brains than you do.

Cats have smaller brains than humans, always wrong.


Yeah, I know. Now read it again. Your fucking cat is smarter
than
you are.


I read it again and that's not what you typed.

"more brains" comon colloquiallism, you retarded putz.

NOT "more brain matter".

Even though in his case, and apparently yours as well, it would be
a valid argument, considering the 2.8 inch thickness of your skull.

 

[Phil Hobbs]

On 7/11/19 6:41 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in
news:7-OdnTAFh-rgD7vAnZ2dnUU7-T2dnZ2d@supernews.com:

On 7/10/19 9:34 PM, John S wrote:
On 7/10/2019 2:13 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:


This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight


   You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many
years and you do not know what a word framed in two asterix
means?

Wrong again. Plural of asterix is asterisks. From the Learner's
Dictionary: http://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/asterisk


   You are lying or are an abject idiot, or both.  After
observing your stupid Usenet horseplay as opposed to discussing
the topic I say you are leaning toward both.

   I guess that makes you a Usenet, Internet, and plain text
format *TOTAL RETARD* as well.


As Nathan Hale famously SED, "my only regret is that I have but
one
asterisk for my country."

Cheers

Phil Hobbs


Good one.

It's from the Jargon File.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

 

[Phil Hobbs]

On 7/10/19 10:00 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:35:56 -0400, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 7/10/19 9:34 PM, John S wrote:
On 7/10/2019 2:13 PM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:


This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight


   You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many years and
you do not know what a word framed in two asterix means?

Wrong again. Plural of asterix is asterisks. From the Learner's Dictionary:
http://www.learnersdictionary.com/definition/asterisk


   You are lying or are an abject idiot, or both.  After observing
your stupid Usenet horseplay as opposed to discussing the topic I say
you are leaning toward both.

   I guess that makes you a Usenet, Internet, and plain text format
*TOTAL RETARD* as well.


As Nathan Hale famously SED, "my only regret is that I have but one
asterisk for my country."

Is "asterix" the feminine form of the word?

No, he's a French cartoon character. (He's the star, geddit?)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:16:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
<terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 3:04:21 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), mpm wrote:

On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 2:27:27 AM UTC-4, Michael Terrell wrote:
I heard an ad for this company on the radio a few days ago. Has anyone here used this process?

https://www.nano-di.com/


Their 4-layer coupon sample board takes 7 hours to print. One serious
multilayer might take days.

I'd be concerned about defects, solder adhesion, and crosstalk.

I have not used it, but saw things similar at the Orlando FabTECH show.
Worth a visit, but I think the next one is in Chicago?

Anyway, I'm old. (-ish). And lazy.
So I get a tech to do the Gerbers and send them off to JLBPCB.
A week later, perfect boards are here - at ridiculously low cost.

PCBWAY does nice multilayer boards and stencils cheap, in 5 days.


I posted this because I couldn't see any real value to the process. I would also be concerned about the resistance of printed traces.

I also suspect this is a mostly useless gimmick. If traces take hours
to print, what about power pours? The mechanical and laser
milling-machine PCB fab things are also mostly useless.

Photoimaged/etched PCBs were invented roughly 80 years ago and are
still a great idea.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, July 11, 2019 at 9:52:46 AM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 23:16:28 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, July 10, 2019 at 3:04:21 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), mpm wrote:

On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 2:27:27 AM UTC-4, Michael Terrell wrote:
I heard an ad for this company on the radio a few days ago. Has anyone here used this process?

https://www.nano-di.com/


Their 4-layer coupon sample board takes 7 hours to print. One serious
multilayer might take days.

I'd be concerned about defects, solder adhesion, and crosstalk.

I have not used it, but saw things similar at the Orlando FabTECH show.
Worth a visit, but I think the next one is in Chicago?

Anyway, I'm old. (-ish). And lazy.
So I get a tech to do the Gerbers and send them off to JLBPCB.
A week later, perfect boards are here - at ridiculously low cost.

PCBWAY does nice multilayer boards and stencils cheap, in 5 days.


I posted this because I couldn't see any real value to the process. I would also be concerned about the resistance of printed traces.

Oh? What is the resistance?

I also suspect this is a mostly useless gimmick. If traces take hours
to print, what about power pours? The mechanical and laser
milling-machine PCB fab things are also mostly useless.

"Mostly useless"? Is that like "mostly harmless"? How do you know how long it takes for any board?

Actually "hours" sounds pretty good to me. It's not like anyone other than huge companies will want to pay for one of these. However, I can see a PCB house having one to make rapid prototypes on for customers. Then shipping will be the time limiter in prototype production. I've seen government bids sent on passenger airlines by buying the document a ticket.

Photoimaged/etched PCBs were invented roughly 80 years ago and are
still a great idea.

So was the land line, but most people are using cell phones now.

I guess some people don't "get" many new ideas. Just because you don't have an immediate need for it doesn't mean others won't find it useful.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209