Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:15:35 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
you're babbling.
you're babbling.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:10:19 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Those who are qualified to assess this & have the relevant data have done so & do not agree with you.
> My laptop does 3D CAD and finite element analysis pretty swiftly.
kind of irrelevant
> Faster than any POS you ever owned.
At the risk of stating the utterly obvious, you don't know what computers I've owned or used, nor at what speeds they ran.
The only thing obvious is why you get called 'always wrong'.
NT
tabbypurr wrote in
news:0b0ae9d4-611b-4062-869b-2a80ad9bbef5@googlegroups.com:
No, the slowness is primarily caused by inefficient code & failure
to match code size to machine ability. This is why so many new
computers are painfully slow.
You are an abject idiot.
Those who are qualified to assess this & have the relevant data have done so & do not agree with you.
> My laptop does 3D CAD and finite element analysis pretty swiftly.
kind of irrelevant
> Faster than any POS you ever owned.
At the risk of stating the utterly obvious, you don't know what computers I've owned or used, nor at what speeds they ran.
You do not have the experience
and observational tools (a working brain or decent PC) to understand,
much less profess on how (quickly) computers work. Obviously.
The only thing obvious is why you get called 'always wrong'.
NT
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:07:23 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight
Again the correct word is 'are', and even then it's still incorrect. And that was your 2nd try.
tabbypurr wrote in
news:f28cef9d-a527-4a37-9378-237e1724fd47@googlegroups.com:
Stupid? You sure *is*.
the word is 'are', and again you're wrong. As almost always. Dunno
how you manage that.
I put it in highlight, just for you.
This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight
And I knew you would pull this
stupid baby bullshit... again. Wake up, fucktard. It was
deliberate.
You sure IS stupid, boy! (IS: Information System)
Again the correct word is 'are', and even then it's still incorrect. And that was your 2nd try.
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:06:03 UTC+1, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
The average slow pc runs fast with a lighter OS. Just gotta match the 2.
NT
If you are having problems you would like to blame Windows for, >I suggest you upgrade your dog slow hardware, because the OS is >not to blame.
Slow PCs around here get scrapped. Windows is the biggest virus ever written. Junk. Like VHS, inferior but popular.
The average slow pc runs fast with a lighter OS. Just gotta match the 2.
NT
Guest
>Those who are qualified to assess this & have the relevant data >have done so & do not agree with you.
He doesn't seem to know that many people do not have nor want a six grand laptop.
He doesn't seem to know that many people do not have nor want a six grand laptop.
Guest
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:c4d38b2c-8a5f-4092-81cc-9428734d4232@googlegroups.com:
Referencing an obsolete, failed OS that will not even run on today's
hardware is a fail.
Ooops... stupid comparison, child.
Firefox pukes on it because it also wonders what the fuck you are
trying to pull attempting to run an obsolete, failed OS release. I
doubt it is even listed on their site.
And yes, I could run the app you are claiming runs better on your
old machine.
You gonna start crying about hardware hooks now, right?
My fucking Cubox could probably beat it. An old ARM 4 core.
news:c4d38b2c-8a5f-4092-81cc-9428734d4232@googlegroups.com:
The average slow pc runs fast with a lighter OS. Just gotta match
the 2.
Twenty year old software on ten year old hardware. I never meant
to keep it this long but it runs so well, and I have compared it
to many newer ones and they just can't do it.
There is one OS I think is extra slow - Vista. It takes minutes to
CLOSE Firefox. Even the GUI is slow, go into a text area and it is
like a whole second sometimes before the cursor changes. And
booting ? Go buy a new car and take a trip for a few days. And it
has been like that since day one when I bought it new. It has
about the same numbers as my XP box just a different OS.
Referencing an obsolete, failed OS that will not even run on today's
hardware is a fail.
Ooops... stupid comparison, child.
Firefox pukes on it because it also wonders what the fuck you are
trying to pull attempting to run an obsolete, failed OS release. I
doubt it is even listed on their site.
And yes, I could run the app you are claiming runs better on your
old machine.
You gonna start crying about hardware hooks now, right?
My fucking Cubox could probably beat it. An old ARM 4 core.
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:13e1bf1a-335b-4eac-a409-acd750ed7dee@googlegroups.com:
This from the utter retard whom just got done calling an OS a
virus, like a petty child and in such a petty, childish way.
You are babbling, child.
news:13e1bf1a-335b-4eac-a409-acd750ed7dee@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:15:35 UTC+1,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:c23000e6-2bd1-4c69-95f2-887b323c47d2 @googlegroups.com:
Windows is the biggest virus ever written.
Yeah... it takes out computer idiots like you, and leaves you
bitching like Donald J. Trump about shit that isn't even real.
While *US* real men USE the machine for what they were designed
for.
Instant Karma, fucktard. *WE* can only hope it gets to you
soon.
you're babbling.
This from the utter retard whom just got done calling an OS a
virus, like a petty child and in such a petty, childish way.
You are babbling, child.
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:a2c1cd85-d7d7-4c87-ab12-62364813d634@googlegroups.com:
By the way you bark out utter bullshit about computers... I most
certainly do. All pieces of shit hand me down crap... obviously.
Bwuahahahahaha!
Your cat has more brains than you do.
news:a2c1cd85-d7d7-4c87-ab12-62364813d634@googlegroups.com:
At the risk of stating the utterly obvious, you don't know what
computers I've owned or used, nor at what speeds they ran.
By the way you bark out utter bullshit about computers... I most
certainly do. All pieces of shit hand me down crap... obviously.
Bwuahahahahaha!
Your cat has more brains than you do.
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
IS, dumbfuck! Information System
You sure are Information System stupid, boy.
Damn... You're so fucking stupid it has to be spelled out for you
TWICE and you are STILL too stoopid to get it.
news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
You sure IS stupid, boy! (IS: Information System)
Again the correct word is 'are', and even then it's still
incorrect. And that was your 2nd try.
IS, dumbfuck! Information System
You sure are Information System stupid, boy.
Damn... You're so fucking stupid it has to be spelled out for you
TWICE and you are STILL too stoopid to get it.
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many years and
you do not know what a word framed in two asterix means?
You are lying or are an abject idiot, or both. After observing
your stupid Usenet horseplay as opposed to discussing the topic I say
you are leaning toward both.
I guess that makes you a Usenet, Internet, and plain text format
*TOTAL RETARD* as well.
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight
You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many years and
you do not know what a word framed in two asterix means?
You are lying or are an abject idiot, or both. After observing
your stupid Usenet horseplay as opposed to discussing the topic I say
you are leaning toward both.
I guess that makes you a Usenet, Internet, and plain text format
*TOTAL RETARD* as well.
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:64418274-26dd-4a09-a364-d3ffbc8dd1d6
@googlegroups.com:
Bwuahahahahaha!
What would an example of that average be?
A 486?
A Pentium?
An old AMD 2 core?
@googlegroups.com:
The average slow pc
Bwuahahahahaha!
What would an example of that average be?
A 486?
A Pentium?
An old AMD 2 core?
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in
news:64418274-26dd-4a09-a364-d3ffbc8dd1d6@googlegroups.com:
"A lighter OS"? What a Linux desktop with zero modern features?
I take a fully GUI Linux desktop. Still peppy as it gets.
Your shit hardware is truly outdated. You... running what? A 486
barely capable of even running 64 bit Linux if it can at all?
And no, that will not make your machine any faster at actually
running an app. It will make YOU a slight bit faster at navigating
around your storage, desktop, etc. But running apps on ANY slow
machine configured in ANY way is still SLOW. Wake up and smell the
instruction pipelines, boy.
But nope. Light desktops are actually a burden at this point. the
speed of a modern multicore machine cares less about the GUI time
slices, so fully 'gadgeted' desktops doesn't slow down a good PC box
at all. You must have shit Hdw.
news:64418274-26dd-4a09-a364-d3ffbc8dd1d6@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:06:03 UTC+1, jurb...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you are having problems you would like to blame Windows for,
I suggest you upgrade your dog slow hardware, because the OS
is >not to blame.
Slow PCs around here get scrapped. Windows is the biggest virus
ever written. Junk. Like VHS, inferior but popular.
The average slow pc runs fast with a lighter OS. Just gotta match
the 2.
NT
"A lighter OS"? What a Linux desktop with zero modern features?
I take a fully GUI Linux desktop. Still peppy as it gets.
Your shit hardware is truly outdated. You... running what? A 486
barely capable of even running 64 bit Linux if it can at all?
And no, that will not make your machine any faster at actually
running an app. It will make YOU a slight bit faster at navigating
around your storage, desktop, etc. But running apps on ANY slow
machine configured in ANY way is still SLOW. Wake up and smell the
instruction pipelines, boy.
But nope. Light desktops are actually a burden at this point. the
speed of a modern multicore machine cares less about the GUI time
slices, so fully 'gadgeted' desktops doesn't slow down a good PC box
at all. You must have shit Hdw.
J
John Larkin
Guest
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 04:36:58 -0700 (PDT), mpm <mpmillard@aol.com>
wrote:
Their 4-layer coupon sample board takes 7 hours to print. One serious
multilayer might take days.
I'd be concerned about defects, solder adhesion, and crosstalk.
PCBWAY does nice multilayer boards and stencils cheap, in 5 days.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
wrote:
On Saturday, June 29, 2019 at 2:27:27 AM UTC-4, Michael Terrell wrote:
I heard an ad for this company on the radio a few days ago. Has anyone here used this process?
https://www.nano-di.com/
Their 4-layer coupon sample board takes 7 hours to print. One serious
multilayer might take days.
I'd be concerned about defects, solder adhesion, and crosstalk.
I have not used it, but saw things similar at the Orlando FabTECH show.
Worth a visit, but I think the next one is in Chicago?
Anyway, I'm old. (-ish). And lazy.
So I get a tech to do the Gerbers and send them off to JLBPCB.
A week later, perfect boards are here - at ridiculously low cost.
PCBWAY does nice multilayer boards and stencils cheap, in 5 days.
--
John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement
jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:19:16 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
I have not said any such thing. Nor am I retarded. These are just facts.
the only one being childish in this thread is you. You will soon be plonked.
tabbypurr wrote in
news:13e1bf1a-335b-4eac-a409-acd750ed7dee@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:15:35 UTC+1,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:c23000e6-2bd1-4c69-95f2-887b323c47d2 @googlegroups.com:
Windows is the biggest virus ever written.
Yeah... it takes out computer idiots like you, and leaves you
bitching like Donald J. Trump about shit that isn't even real.
While *US* real men USE the machine for what they were designed
for.
Instant Karma, fucktard. *WE* can only hope it gets to you
soon.
you're babbling.
This from the utter retard whom just got done calling an OS a
virus,
I have not said any such thing. Nor am I retarded. These are just facts.
like a petty child and in such a petty, childish way.
You are babbling, child.
the only one being childish in this thread is you. You will soon be plonked.
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:17:23 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
wrong again.
> Your cat has more brains than you do.
Cats have smaller brains than humans, always wrong.
tabbypurr wrote in
news:a2c1cd85-d7d7-4c87-ab12-62364813d634@googlegroups.com:
At the risk of stating the utterly obvious, you don't know what
computers I've owned or used, nor at what speeds they ran.
By the way you bark out utter bullshit about computers... I most
certainly do. All pieces of shit hand me down crap... obviously.
Bwuahahahahaha!
wrong again.
> Your cat has more brains than you do.
Cats have smaller brains than humans, always wrong.
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:09:38 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
yawn
> I take a fully GUI Linux desktop. Still peppy as it gets.
ditto.
> Your shit hardware is truly outdated.
no it's not, same spec as new machines.
that is a good demo of how off with the fairies you are
lol. I doubt any 486 can run a 64 bit OS. Long ago I put w98 on one, gawd it was slow.
I'm sure a 64 bit OS on a 486 would be slower than this machine in the extreme.
Actually no. Moons ago I used to take old machines & put lightweight OS & apps on them, and had them running very well. The reality is that different apps with similar functionality can run at greatly different speeds.
I'm awake thanks.
non-factual and non-logical. Hey what's new.
NT
tabbypurr wrote in
news:64418274-26dd-4a09-a364-d3ffbc8dd1d6@googlegroups.com:
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 18:06:03 UTC+1, jurb...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you are having problems you would like to blame Windows for,
I suggest you upgrade your dog slow hardware, because the OS
is >not to blame.
Slow PCs around here get scrapped. Windows is the biggest virus
ever written. Junk. Like VHS, inferior but popular.
The average slow pc runs fast with a lighter OS. Just gotta match
the 2.
NT
"A lighter OS"? What a Linux desktop with zero modern features?
yawn
> I take a fully GUI Linux desktop. Still peppy as it gets.
ditto.
> Your shit hardware is truly outdated.
no it's not, same spec as new machines.
You... running what? A 486
barely capable of even running 64 bit Linux if it can at all?
that is a good demo of how off with the fairies you are
And no, that will not make your machine any faster at actually
running an app.
lol. I doubt any 486 can run a 64 bit OS. Long ago I put w98 on one, gawd it was slow.
It will make YOU a slight bit faster at navigating
around your storage, desktop, etc.
I'm sure a 64 bit OS on a 486 would be slower than this machine in the extreme.
But running apps on ANY slow
machine configured in ANY way is still SLOW.
Actually no. Moons ago I used to take old machines & put lightweight OS & apps on them, and had them running very well. The reality is that different apps with similar functionality can run at greatly different speeds.
Wake up and smell the
instruction pipelines, boy.
I'm awake thanks.
But nope. Light desktops are actually a burden at this point. the
speed of a modern multicore machine cares less about the GUI time
slices, so fully 'gadgeted' desktops doesn't slow down a good PC box
at all.
You must have shit Hdw.
non-factual and non-logical. Hey what's new.
NT
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:10:41 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
So you've no idea what the average PC is either.
tabbypurr wrote in news:64418274-26dd-4a09-a364-d3ffbc8dd1d6
@googlegroups.com:
The average slow pc
Bwuahahahahaha!
What would an example of that average be?
A 486?
A Pentium?
An old AMD 2 core?
So you've no idea what the average PC is either.
Guest
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:13:50 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Plain text does not do highlight. Fact.
Well, you are always wrong.
always wrong. just always.
tabbypurr wrote in news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight
You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many years and
you do not know what a word framed in two asterix means?
Plain text does not do highlight. Fact.
You are lying or are an abject idiot, or both. After observing
your stupid Usenet horseplay as opposed to discussing the topic I say
you are leaning toward both.
Well, you are always wrong.
I guess that makes you a Usenet, Internet, and plain text format
*TOTAL RETARD* as well.
always wrong. just always.
P
Phil Hobbs
Guest
On 7/10/19 4:22 PM, tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote:
Thunderbird renders *this* as bold and _this_ as underlined.
Not to disturb this _heartwarming_, *brotherly* exchange, of course. ;_
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
On Wednesday, 10 July 2019 20:13:50 UTC+1, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
tabbypurr wrote in news:79a61332-8981-4dbd-9628-
3d7267e2dbe9@googlegroups.com:
This is a plain text medium, it doesn't do highlight
You have been in Usenet and on the Internet for how many years and
you do not know what a word framed in two asterix means?
Plain text does not do highlight. Fact.
Thunderbird renders *this* as bold and _this_ as underlined.
Not to disturb this _heartwarming_, *brotherly* exchange, of course. ;_
Cheers
Phil Hobbs
--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510
http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
Guest
tabbypurr@gmail.com wrote in news:4d9b5d16-599e-441c-b7f4-f089d3a56c08
@googlegroups.com:
Yeah, I know. Now read it again. Your fucking cat is smarter than
you are.
Colloquial conversation, dumbfuck, not literal.
@googlegroups.com:
Your cat has more brains than you do.
Cats have smaller brains than humans, always wrong.
Yeah, I know. Now read it again. Your fucking cat is smarter than
you are.
Colloquial conversation, dumbfuck, not literal.