A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, May 25, 2023 at 7:51:36â¯AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
But you just did.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Wednesday, 24 May 2023 at 04:54:30 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 10:11:11â¯AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 May 2023 at 05:49:46 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 23, 2023 at 9:56:30â¯AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Monday, 22 May 2023 at 05:19:37 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 11:53:49â¯AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Saturday, 20 May 2023 at 06:38:20 UTC+1, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, May 20, 2023 at 8:34:39â¯AM UTC+10, Tabby wrote:
On Friday, 19 May 2023 at 14:29:25 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 19 May 2023 00:33:17 -0700 (PDT), Tabby <tabb....@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, 18 May 2023 at 19:19:26 UTC+1, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2023 11:14:12 -0700 (PDT), Fred Bloggs
bloggs.fred...@gmail.com> wrote:
I\'ll wait for Fred\'s report on how it actually works.
AIUI it detects inconsistent hf content. The graph shows a messy freq/dist relationship, making distinguishing here from next door impossible, unless next door is far away. And that is frequently not the situation.
As usual Tabby\'s \"as I understand it\" documents the fact that he doesn\'t understand it very well. He never does, which doesn\'t stop him imagining that he does,
The distances that matter are along pairs of wire, not between pairs of wires,
whoosh. I\'m solely discussing distance along wires.
Clearly you aren\'t.
Lol, oh dear.
Tabby still doesn\'t get it.
The whoosh is stuff going over your head - which happens a lot, and you are too dim realise it.
There are a large number of properties where the distance to next door is far less than the length of in-house cabling.
Terrace houses in England will certainly work the way - our house in Cambridge was a lot longer than it was wide.
and that, as I said, is why it can\'t possibly tell which property an arc is on.
That\'s because you still don\'t understand that it\'s the distance along the wires that matters, not the physical separation between the arc and the arc detector.
if you\'re too messed up to even listen to what\'s being said then further discussion is pointless.
You really should invent your own abuse. That\'s exactly what I\'ve just said to you.
snip more junk.
I\'m inclined to agree that pointing out that you are a complacent half-wit is a waste of bandwidth - you won\';t get the message and everybody else has known it for years, but you are in no position to complain about it, since you never post anything worth reading. We all know that you take yourself seriously - and shouldn\'t.
you\'re not worth continuing wasting time on.
But you just did.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney