What is a women?...

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 4:05:15 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

====================================

If you want social justice you don\'t let a few a previous men compete
against the many women that have worked their whole lives to compete.

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.

** Never work.

Fake Trans athletes only want to steal awards off women whom they deeply despise.
Cos that is like taking candy from babies.

Phil does have an odd enthusiasm for reminding us that he has some very silly ideas.

Maybe he could list the fake trans athletes whose motivations he knows so much about. My suspicion is that every last one of them exists only in his fertile imagination, but maybe he will prove me wrong. And pigs might fly.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Tom Del Rosso]

bitrex wrote:

On 3/26/2022 7:10 AM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:23 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso
wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:

We will see. Let\'s see if women in fact don\'t do anything about
transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a
huge question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world
problems of the regular American. Lol
That\'s interesting, if you mean that it isn\'t important because
it doesn\'t involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn\'t
involve most people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
Excellent technique.


I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

Every time Tucker Carlson gets a time out on Twitter it\'s BASICALLY
the same as the Holocaust

Jim Crow, the Holocaust, and wokeness all warp the definition of
humanity. If eugenics had critics 50 years earlier when it was only a
harmless theory you would have said it doesn\'t connect with the real
world problems of the average person.


The Nazis would\'ve put transsexuals to death, and the Moral Majority
in 2022 would like to put them and all \"degenerates\" to death, a
direct lineage of right-wing fascist philosophy. Nothing changed...

Nothing real. Just what you imagine about the right.

And Hitler was on the left, only to the right of Stalin. To believe
otherwise you have to believe that all of us are in the middle of the
two.

--
Defund the Thought Police

 

[Tom Del Rosso]

bitrex wrote:

On 3/26/2022 7:02 AM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:

We will see. Let\'s see if women in fact don\'t do anything about
transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a
huge question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world
problems of the regular American. Lol
That\'s interesting, if you mean that it isn\'t important because it
doesn\'t involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn\'t involve
most people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
Excellent technique.

I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

It wasn\'t an analogy. It was a critique of this logic: \"If it doesn\'t
connect with the real-world problems of the regular American\" then it
doesn\'t need to be considered.



With respect to slavery I\'d say the Civil War was certainly a big
problem for most everyone at the time and a long while after. Some
seem to still be fighting it

The Civil War wasn\'t an issue 10 or 100 or 200 years earlier when people
should have thought slavery was an issue.

But it wasn\'t on their minds when it should have been, or the Civil War
would not have happened.

Which was my original point. Just because it isn\'t currently affecting
most people does not mean they shouldn\'t be concerned about it.

The Left wants to use civil rights as a cudgel against every opposing
position. It\'s not possible to believe a judge has bad judgement wthout
being racist. You have to be demented to believe that but many people do
a convincing impression. And yet while they use civil rights as a
buzzword, they don\'t give a wit about civil society, which they destroy
with censoring, cancelling, and redefining the most basic elements of
society to suit themselves.

--
Defund the Thought Police

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 6:24:39 PM UTC+11, Tom Del Rosso wrote:

bitrex wrote:
On 3/26/2022 7:02 AM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:

We will see. Let\'s see if women in fact don\'t do anything about
transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a
huge question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world
problems of the regular American. Lol
That\'s interesting, if you mean that it isn\'t important because it
doesn\'t involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn\'t involve
most people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
Excellent technique.

I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

It wasn\'t an analogy. It was a critique of this logic: \"If it doesn\'t
connect with the real-world problems of the regular American\" then it
doesn\'t need to be considered.

With respect to slavery I\'d say the Civil War was certainly a big
problem for most everyone at the time and a long while after. Some
seem to still be fighting it

The Civil War wasn\'t an issue 10 or 100 or 200 years earlier when people
should have thought slavery was an issue.

But it wasn\'t on their minds when it should have been, or the Civil War
would not have happened.

Which was my original point. Just because it isn\'t currently affecting
most people does not mean they shouldn\'t be concerned about it.

The Left wants to use civil rights as a cudgel against every opposing
position. It\'s not possible to believe a judge has bad judgement wthout
being racist. You have to be demented to believe that but many people do
a convincing impression. And yet while they use civil rights as a
buzzword, they don\'t give a wit about civil society, which they destroy
with censoring, cancelling, and redefining the most basic elements of
society to suit themselves.

Or that\'s what the lunatic right would like us to believe.

\"Transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports\" is something that John Doe thinks is happening or wants us to think is happening.

It\'s just one more of his imaginary problems, like cannibal leftists, and the deep state, which is so deeply hidden that only hos imagination can detect it.

-
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[amdx]

On 3/28/2022 8:01 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 3:21:26 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:01:43 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:28:55 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

They aren\'t previous men because they wanted to do well in women\'s sport.
Gender dysphoria is a mental conditions, and the best - and pretty much
the only - treatment that works, involves changing the body of the
sufferer into one that looks like the body of the preferred sex. Taking
part in sport as a member of the preferred sex is one of the activities
that reinforces the desired mental state.
Absolutely correct., although in my case I was subjected to so much
bullying in school at so-called sport that I spent most of my time
trying hard to avoid it.
But surely some of the cases of transgenderism are faked,
Very very few indeed. That is no reason for penalising the thousands of
genuine transgender people who are faced with a choice between
transitioning and suicide.
They don\'t need to play girls sports to prevent suicide.
It\'s part of the process of getting them to fit in as girls. The frivolous objections of creeps like John Doe and Phil Allison shouldn\'t really be allowed to get in the way of an effective therapy.

   Again, their therapy should not be to the detriment of all the women
that have worked hard to compete and then have to compete against a
former man\'s body.
Where are the women to men trans in men\'s sports? They aren\'t because
they were former women and don\'t have the male body characteristics to win.


 Are women to men having as tough of a time feeling as they don\'t fit
in  as men to women?
Mikek


--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

 

[Liz Tuddenham]

amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:

 Are women to men having as tough of a time feeling as they don\'t fit
in  as men to women?

Very much so. They don\'t have the same problem as Mtf transgender
people, who are seen as \'dangerous men\' (minus their penis, testicles
and testosterone) masquerading as women, but they do have to cope with
their family\'s reaction to losing a \'daughter\' who was expected to bear
children.

The pressures on MtF are different, but they are responbsible for
causing a lot of mental illness, self-harm and suicides.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the \".invalid\"s and add \".co.uk\" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 11:38:02 PM UTC+11, amdx wrote:

On 3/28/2022 8:01 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 3:21:26 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:01:43 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:28:55 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

They aren\'t previous men because they wanted to do well in women\'s sport.
Gender dysphoria is a mental conditions, and the best - and pretty much
the only - treatment that works, involves changing the body of the
sufferer into one that looks like the body of the preferred sex. Taking
part in sport as a member of the preferred sex is one of the activities
that reinforces the desired mental state.
Absolutely correct., although in my case I was subjected to so much
bullying in school at so-called sport that I spent most of my time
trying hard to avoid it.
But surely some of the cases of transgenderism are faked,
Very very few indeed. That is no reason for penalising the thousands of
genuine transgender people who are faced with a choice between
transitioning and suicide.
They don\'t need to play girls sports to prevent suicide.

It\'s part of the process of getting them to fit in as girls. The frivolous objections of creeps like John Doe and Phil Allison shouldn\'t really be allowed to get in the way of an effective therapy.

Again, their therapy should not be to the detriment of all the women
that have worked hard to compete and then have to compete against a
former man\'s body.

They have to compete against all kinds of different bodies anyway. A \"former man\'s body\" isn\'t guaranteed to win despite John Doe\'s delusions on the subject, and races do only have one winner, so most of the competitors are always going to lose.

> Where are the women to men trans in men\'s sports? They aren\'t because they were former women and don\'t have the male body characteristics to win.

Some of them might. A woman recently won an ultra-marathon bike race against men - women do do well in endurance sports >

> Are women to men having as tough of a time feeling as they don\'t fit in as men to women?

Don\'t know.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[server]

On Sat, 26 Mar 2022 08:56:11 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 3/26/2022 7:10 AM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:23 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:

We will see. Let\'s see if women in fact don\'t do anything about
transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a huge
question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world
problems of the regular American. Lol
That\'s interesting, if you mean that it isn\'t important because it
doesn\'t involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn\'t involve
most people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
Excellent technique.


I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

Every time Tucker Carlson gets a time out on Twitter it\'s BASICALLY
the same as the Holocaust

Jim Crow, the Holocaust, and wokeness all warp the definition of
humanity. If eugenics had critics 50 years earlier when it was only a
harmless theory you would have said it doesn\'t connect with the real
world problems of the average person.


The Nazis would\'ve put transsexuals to death, and the Moral Majority in
2022 would like to put them and all \"degenerates\" to death,

Got a reference for that?



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[server]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 03:24:45 -0400, \"Tom Del Rosso\"
<fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

bitrex wrote:
On 3/26/2022 7:02 AM, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 6:09 PM, Rickster wrote:
On Friday, March 25, 2022 at 5:28:42 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:
bitrex wrote:
On 3/25/2022 11:22 AM, John Doe wrote:

We will see. Let\'s see if women in fact don\'t do anything about
transgender bullies beating up on girls in sports. That is a
huge question.

Definitely an issue that really connects with the real-world
problems of the regular American. Lol
That\'s interesting, if you mean that it isn\'t important because it
doesn\'t involve most people. Slavery and Jim Crow didn\'t involve
most people.

I like the way you ask him a question, then answer it for him.
Excellent technique.

I like that it does save time and it was a dumb analogy, anyway.

It wasn\'t an analogy. It was a critique of this logic: \"If it doesn\'t
connect with the real-world problems of the regular American\" then it
doesn\'t need to be considered.



With respect to slavery I\'d say the Civil War was certainly a big
problem for most everyone at the time and a long while after. Some
seem to still be fighting it

The Civil War wasn\'t an issue 10 or 100 or 200 years earlier when people
should have thought slavery was an issue.

But it wasn\'t on their minds when it should have been, or the Civil War
would not have happened.

Which was my original point. Just because it isn\'t currently affecting
most people does not mean they shouldn\'t be concerned about it.

The Left wants to use civil rights as a cudgel against every opposing
position. It\'s not possible to believe a judge has bad judgement wthout
being racist. You have to be demented to believe that but many people do
a convincing impression. And yet while they use civil rights as a
buzzword, they don\'t give a wit about civil society, which they destroy
with censoring, cancelling, and redefining the most basic elements of
society to suit themselves.

Turning everything into racism probably makes the population more
racist. Almost certainly.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[server]

On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 07:37:54 -0500, amdx <amdx@knology.net> wrote:

On 3/28/2022 8:01 PM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 3:21:26 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 17:01:43 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 09:28:55 +0100, l...@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
Anthony William Sloman <bill....@ieee.org> wrote:

They aren\'t previous men because they wanted to do well in women\'s sport.
Gender dysphoria is a mental conditions, and the best - and pretty much
the only - treatment that works, involves changing the body of the
sufferer into one that looks like the body of the preferred sex. Taking
part in sport as a member of the preferred sex is one of the activities
that reinforces the desired mental state.
Absolutely correct., although in my case I was subjected to so much
bullying in school at so-called sport that I spent most of my time
trying hard to avoid it.
But surely some of the cases of transgenderism are faked,
Very very few indeed. That is no reason for penalising the thousands of
genuine transgender people who are faced with a choice between
transitioning and suicide.
They don\'t need to play girls sports to prevent suicide.
It\'s part of the process of getting them to fit in as girls. The frivolous objections of creeps like John Doe and Phil Allison shouldn\'t really be allowed to get in the way of an effective therapy.

   Again, their therapy should not be to the detriment of all the women
that have worked hard to compete and then have to compete against a
former man\'s body.

My younger daughter was a baseball fan practically from birth. She
tried to play in the boys baseball leagues, but she wasn\'t strong
enough to hit homers, and the boys wouldn\'t accept her, even though
she is a great fielder.

So she cut over to girls softball and thrived. She was shortstop and
team captain at Cornell and is still in touch with her teammates.

I tell people that she dual-majored in softball and beer pong.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[server]

On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:05:11 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

====================================

If you want social justice you don\'t let a few a previous men compete
against the many women that have worked their whole lives to compete.

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.


** Never work.

But imagine the adorable uniforms.

Every team would need a makeup manager.



--

I yam what I yam - Popeye

 

[John Doe]

\"Tom Del Rosso\" wrote:

bitrex wrote:

The Nazis would\'ve put transsexuals to death, and the Moral Majority
in 2022 would like to put them and all \"degenerates\" to death, a
direct lineage of right-wing fascist philosophy. Nothing changed...

Nothing real. Just what you imagine about the right.

And Hitler was on the left, only to the right of Stalin. To believe
otherwise you have to believe that all of us are in the middle of the
two.

+3

 

[Liz Tuddenham]

<jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:

On Mon, 28 Mar 2022 22:05:11 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

====================================

If you want social justice you don\'t let a few a previous men compete
against the many women that have worked their whole lives to compete.

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.


** Never work.


But imagine the adorable uniforms.

Every team would need a makeup manager.

You have some very curious and outdated ideas about transpeople. Most
of us are trying to fit in and be unobtrusive; very few ciswomen would
wear makeup whilst playing sport, so neither would transwomen.


--
~ Liz Tuddenham ~
(Remove the \".invalid\"s and add \".co.uk\" to reply)
www.poppyrecords.co.uk

 

[amdx]

On 3/29/2022 12:16 AM, Anthony William Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, March 29, 2022 at 4:05:15 PM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

====================================
If you want social justice you don\'t let a few a previous men compete
against the many women that have worked their whole lives to compete.
We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.
** Never work.

Fake Trans athletes only want to steal awards off women whom they deeply despise.
Cos that is like taking candy from babies.
Phil does have an odd enthusiasm for reminding us that he has some very silly ideas.

Maybe he could list the fake trans athletes whose motivations he knows so much about. My suspicion is that every last one of them exists only in his fertile imagination, but maybe he will prove me wrong. And pigs might fly.

 I have no concern about fake trans, my concern are the real trans
competing against women.
                              Mikek

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

 

[Phil Allison]

Lizard Tuddenham wrote:
==========================

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com> wrote:

If you want social justice you don\'t let a few a previous men compete
against the many women that have worked their whole lives to compete.

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.


** Never work.


Every team would need a makeup manager.

You have some very curious and outdated ideas about transpeople.

** It was a joke Joyce.

> Most of us are trying to fit in and be unobtrusive;

** fFat chance.

> very few ciswomen would wear makeup

** That is a horrible, derogatory term that women all hate.

> would wear makeup

** One or two female sprinters famously did.

whilst playing sport, so neither would transwomen.

** Logical fallacy.


....... Phil

 

[Phil Allison]

amdx wrote:
===========

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.

** Never work.

Fake Trans athletes only want to steal awards off women whom they deeply despise.
Cos that is like taking candy from babies.

I have no concern about fake trans, my concern are the real trans
competing against women.

** There aren\'t any.

No proof of being \"trans\" is needed for a male to enter many women\'s events.
The ones we see now in swimming and athletics etc are opportunistic fakes.



...... Phil

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 11:09:15 AM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

amdx wrote:
===========

We have Special Olympics. We should have Trans Olympics.

** Never work.

Fake Trans athletes only want to steal awards off women whom they deeply despise.
Cos that is like taking candy from babies.

I have no concern about fake trans, my concern are the real trans
competing against women.

** There aren\'t any.

No proof of being \"trans\" is needed for a male to enter many women\'s events.
The ones we see now in swimming and athletics etc are opportunistic fakes.

And your evidence for this bizarre claim is? Tucker Carlson sounding off on Fox News isn\'t evidence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Phil Allison]

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
===================================

My younger daughter was a baseball fan practically from birth. She
tried to play in the boys baseball leagues, but she wasn\'t strong
enough to hit homers, and the boys wouldn\'t accept her, even though
she is a great fielder.

So she cut over to girls softball and thrived. She was shortstop and
team captain at Cornell and is still in touch with her teammates.

** Women\'s sports are different from men\'s, plenty of skill on display but played in much fairer spirit.
I enjoy watching Golf and Tennis on TV, but lean strongly towards women\'s events.
Australia\'s world no 1 tennis player ( Ash Barty) retired a few days ago a the peak of her career - bugger.

If even ONE good male player entered women\'s Golf or Tennis, he would win every match and title on offer.
I sure hope the relevant bodies never let it happen.

FYI:

Women players are welcome to enter male Golf tournaments - they are literally \"open\" to all comers subject to a qualifying standard.
This was common years ago, until the women\'s tour was established.
Those who attempted it lately finished way down the list.
Men hit their tee shots so much further than women.


...... Phil

 

[Don Y]

On 3/25/2022 6:07 AM, amdx wrote:

From Google, \"Definitions fro Oxford Languages\"

How long before Googles deletes these definitions?

Female
Noun
an adult female human being.

Woman
adjective
of or denoting the sex that can bear offspring or produce eggs,
distinguished biologically by the production of gametes (ova)
which can be fertilized by male gametes.

Dictionaries constantly evolve.

You should, instead, ask what role you expect this \"qualification\"
to play.

Are you using it to determine the types of medical afflictions
the Pt is likely to experience?

Are you using it to determine how much you can afford NOT to pay
the job applicant? (oops!)

Or, to determine suitability to holding positions of power/authority,
advancement opportunities? (oops!)

Are you using it to determine whether or not you can exert control
over that entity\'s body? (oops!)

Are you using it to determine the suitability for that party to
perform a particular task? (spatial reasoning, digital dexterity)

Are you using it to gauge their body shape? (petite vs. large)

If, instead, you are using it to convince yourself that there is
(and should be!) some difference between \"women\" and \"men\" -- in
much the same way that you think there should be a substantive
difference between \"blacks\" and \"whites\", \"jews\" and \"gentiles\",
\"blonds\" and \"brunettes\", etc.) then I suspect you are just letting
your own, personal insecurities manifest.

I know \"men\" who are \"weaklings\" and \"women\" that you\'d never want
to engage in a bar fight! I know \"men\" who are chefs and \"women\"
who are engineers. (I know men with larger \"mammaries\" than many
women! Should I call them \"girls\" and the flatter-chested women
\"boys\"?)

I suspect most \"women\" would be more appreciative of your efforts to
ensure them equal pay, equal respect, equal promotion opportunities,
etc. than to come to the defense of women competing (at a disadvantage?)
with transwomen. (yet, I don\'t see any impassioned posts about \"equal
rights\"...)

Does your employer have different standards for female job applicants
than men? Perhaps we should divide society along those lines and
split the opportunities, responsibilities, etc. based on percentage
representation in the population?

Maybe women soldiers should wear pink uniforms so the opposing forces
can ensure only *their* women soldiers fire on YOUR women soldiers?
We can make that determination prior to issuing your uniform (at
short-arm inspection)...

Have HALF of your bosses been women? Half of your colleagues? Half
of your CEOs (just from your PERSONAL observations, not expecting you
to be able to know about the population as a whole)? Politicians?
Doctors? Lawyers? Auto-mechanics? Plumbers? Do you really think
there haven\'t been an equal number of \"females\" qualified for those roles?

[Personally, I\'ve never had a female boss. Nor employer. And, only
*once* had a boss that was an engineer -- so the \"male-STEM-bias\" can\'t
explain away that (I\'ve known several female engineers). OTOH, every
\"HR\" person I\'ve encountered has been female, save one.]

If sports wanted to be \"fair\", they would assess the ATHLETIC
qualities of the participants and qualify the competitions accordingly.

You don\'t see \"welter-weights\" boxing \"heavy-weights\"! Why not?
Shouldn\'t the *bigger* boxer be ALLOWED to clean the little guy\'s
clock? (\"Oh, but that wouldn\'t be *sporting*!\")

Do we sort *jockeys* based on length of penis?? Or, amount of leg hair?

How does \"sex/gender\" *meaningfully* act to sort competitors? (in ANY
competition -- sports or otherwise)

Entities/individuals exist in an N-dimensional space. \"Sex\", \"hair color\",
\"religious belief\", \"ethnicity\", \"BMI\", \"height\", \"weight\", ... can each
be used to subdivide that space. Only a fool resorts to simple subdivisions.

 

[Anthony William Sloman]

On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 11:32:06 AM UTC+11, palli...@gmail.com wrote:

jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
===================================

My younger daughter was a baseball fan practically from birth. She
tried to play in the boys baseball leagues, but she wasn\'t strong
enough to hit homers, and the boys wouldn\'t accept her, even though
she is a great fielder.

So she cut over to girls softball and thrived. She was shortstop and
team captain at Cornell and is still in touch with her teammates.

** Women\'s sports are different from men\'s, plenty of skill on display but played in much fairer spirit.
I enjoy watching Golf and Tennis on TV, but lean strongly towards women\'s events.
Australia\'s world no 1 tennis player ( Ash Barty) retired a few days ago a the peak of her career - bugger.

If even ONE good male player entered women\'s Golf or Tennis, he would win every match and title on offer.

Idiot assertion.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)

Billy Jean King wiped the floor with Bobby Riggs. He\'d earlier in the same year won against Margaret Court, who had had her first child by then, and was past her peak.

> I sure hope the relevant bodies never let it happen.

They did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Sexes_(tennis)

FYI:

Women players are welcome to enter male Golf tournaments - they are literally \"open\" to all comers subject to a qualifying standard.
This was common years ago, until the women\'s tour was established.
Those who attempted it lately finished way down the list.
Men hit their tee shots so much further than women.

Most men hit their tee shots further than most women, but it\'s overlapping bell curves. Dimbos like Phil and John Doe do like to simpllfy this down to the sort pf binary distinction they can process.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney