We need to do our Doo Doo Diligence and oust the stupid bast

[Lasse Langwadt Christense]

onsdag den 16. oktober 2019 kl. 06.38.12 UTC+2 skrev Bill Sloman:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:09:07 PM UTC+11, Robert Baer wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:07:08 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:29:58 -0700, bulegoge wrote:

Haha. You are angry he mixed up 223 with 232? Now that is too funny.

Those "super delegates" of Hitlary's didn't do her much good, did they? I
hope she gets the Dem nomination for 2020 then gets her butt kicked once
again in the election by Trump. It's not only the most likely scenario,
but the most enjoyable to see realised. But most importantly by far,
absolutely vital for world peace.

Cursitor Doom believes what Russia Today tells him about world peace, rather than noticing the kind of "peace" Russia is delivering in Syria.

* And, pray tell, what kind of "peace" are we promoting in Syria?

In the past the US seemed to want a peace that involved Bashar al-Assad murdering rather fewer of his citizens. That would have taken removing him from power, which Putin doesn't want, and Trump doesn't seem to be interested in achieving.

yeh, because removing dictators or semi dictators in the Middle East has
worked so great in the past ...

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:09:07 PM UTC+11, Robert Baer wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:07:08 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:29:58 -0700, bulegoge wrote:

Haha. You are angry he mixed up 223 with 232? Now that is too funny.

Those "super delegates" of Hitlary's didn't do her much good, did they? I
hope she gets the Dem nomination for 2020 then gets her butt kicked once
again in the election by Trump. It's not only the most likely scenario,
but the most enjoyable to see realised. But most importantly by far,
absolutely vital for world peace.

Cursitor Doom believes what Russia Today tells him about world peace, rather than noticing the kind of "peace" Russia is delivering in Syria.

* And, pray tell, what kind of "peace" are we promoting in Syria?

In the past the US seemed to want a peace that involved Bashar al-Assad murdering rather fewer of his citizens. That would have taken removing him from power, which Putin doesn't want, and Trump doesn't seem to be interested in achieving.

<snipped the stuff that was clearly above Robert Baer's pay grade>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:d7ace64a-63fe-4e74-88d0-0a845788b013@googlegroups.com:

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:43:37 PM UTC+11, Lasse
Langwadt Christensen wrote:
onsdag den 16. oktober 2019 kl. 06.38.12 UTC+2 skrev Bill Sloman:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:09:07 PM UTC+11, Robert
Baer wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:07:08 AM UTC+11,
Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:29:58 -0700, bulegoge wrote:

Haha. You are angry he mixed up 223 with 232? Now that is
too funny.

Those "super delegates" of Hitlary's didn't do her much
good, did they? I hope she gets the Dem nomination for
2020 then gets her butt kicked once again in the election
by Trump. It's not only the most likely scenario,
but the most enjoyable to see realised. But most
importantly by far, absolutely vital for world peace.

Cursitor Doom believes what Russia Today tells him about
world peace, rather than noticing the kind of "peace"
Russia is delivering in Syria.

* And, pray tell, what kind of "peace" are we promoting in
Syria?

In the past the US seemed to want a peace that involved Bashar
al-Assad murdering rather fewer of his citizens. That would
have taken removing him from power, which Putin doesn't want,
and Trump doesn't seem to be interested in achieving.


yeh, because removing dictators or semi dictators in the Middle
East has worked so great in the past ...

Leaving them in place isn't an attractive option either. Georg W
Bush managed to prove that invading Irak and finding a new
administration from scratch doesn't work all that well, but
presumably one could find other options.

George W Bush seems to have been more interested in getting his
hands on Iraqi oil rather than in establishing democracy in Irak.
Some one who worked rather harder on getting the politics right
might have done better.

I would have had the Iraqi new gov send thousands down the where
the broder with Iran and Iraq meets the sea. Start a wall. Build a
wall, moving schools kids workers, etc. north as the wall gets down,
and eventually cut off Iran completely. that puts tens of thousands
to work, and they can stop all the arms and boms etc. making it into
the country and even across to Syria and other nations.

Iran is the true enemy. Not their people. The governing body and
all the military folk. Wrong mindset. Wrong industrial/military
endeavors.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:43:37 PM UTC+11, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:

onsdag den 16. oktober 2019 kl. 06.38.12 UTC+2 skrev Bill Sloman:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 3:09:07 PM UTC+11, Robert Baer wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 5:07:08 AM UTC+11, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:29:58 -0700, bulegoge wrote:

Haha. You are angry he mixed up 223 with 232? Now that is too funny.

Those "super delegates" of Hitlary's didn't do her much good, did they? I
hope she gets the Dem nomination for 2020 then gets her butt kicked once
again in the election by Trump. It's not only the most likely scenario,
but the most enjoyable to see realised. But most importantly by far,
absolutely vital for world peace.

Cursitor Doom believes what Russia Today tells him about world peace, rather than noticing the kind of "peace" Russia is delivering in Syria.

* And, pray tell, what kind of "peace" are we promoting in Syria?

In the past the US seemed to want a peace that involved Bashar al-Assad murdering rather fewer of his citizens. That would have taken removing him from power, which Putin doesn't want, and Trump doesn't seem to be interested in achieving.


yeh, because removing dictators or semi dictators in the Middle East has
worked so great in the past ...

Leaving them in place isn't an attractive option either. Georg W Bush managed to prove that invading Irak and finding a new administration from scratch doesn't work all that well, but presumably one could find other options.

George W Bush seems to have been more interested in getting his hands on Iraqi oil rather than in establishing democracy in Irak. Some one who worked rather harder on getting the politics right might have done better.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in
news:qo672h$9qd$1@gioia.aioe.org:

snip

Oh and he RECENTLY committed crimes when he was asked by Erdogan to
get the prosecution of a terrorist enabler put aside and get the guy
released. Donald J. Trump then tried to task Tillerson with asking the
DOJ to do exactly what Erdogan wanted. Tillerson resigned or was fired
upon refusal of that order.

Donald J. Trump should get ten years at GITMO for the firing of Marie
Yovanovitch.

Donald J. Trump should get 20 years at GITMO for the treasonous act
of catering to a foriegn leader's request to release a fucking
terrorist from US custody!

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:43:33 -0700, Lasse Langwadt Christensen wrote:

yeh, because removing dictators or semi dictators in the Middle East has
worked so great in the past ...

Trump was elected on a popular platform of non-interference in foreign
countries' affairs. An easily-forgotten pledge for someone in his
position it seems.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:qo6ngi$vun$4@dont-email.me:

On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 21:43:33 -0700, Lasse Langwadt Christensen
wrote:

yeh, because removing dictators or semi dictators in the Middle
East has worked so great in the past ...

Trump was elected on a popular platform of non-interference in
foreign countries' affairs.

No. Idiots whom know nothing about the position the US has in the
world believed Trump's completely stupid claims made while he
campaigned for the votes of all the stupid people in America.
Any US citizen with any brains knows that we have jobs to do around
the world as does all the other 135 free world allied nations.

What Trump did is Putin's bidding by fucking around with the NATO
situation, and now we are going to have to boot out Turkey, a former
ally, with ALL KINDS OF US MILITARY INTEL to hand over to our
enemies. He fucked up, BIG TIME!

An easily-forgotten pledge for someone
in his position it seems.

No. An imossible to implement stupid claim of a pledeg that stupid
fucks unable to see it cannot be done grabbed onto like Tea Party
retards grabbed onto their "gotta fix Washington" platform.

 

[John Larkin]

On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 05:52:06 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote in
news:qo672h$9qd$1@gioia.aioe.org:

snip

Oh and he RECENTLY committed crimes when he was asked by Erdogan to
get the prosecution of a terrorist enabler put aside and get the guy
released. Donald J. Trump then tried to task Tillerson with asking the
DOJ to do exactly what Erdogan wanted. Tillerson resigned or was fired
upon refusal of that order.

If that happened, why is that a crime? The President has the power to
pardon.

Donald J. Trump should get ten years at GITMO for the firing of Marie
Yovanovitch.

Is firing a subordinate a crime? Heck, I've done that.