J
Joerg
Guest
On 2020-04-02 18:29, Rickie C wrote:
People do. No kidding.
Care to share the math on that one? Or your patent for the
"super-bundler antenna"?
[...]
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/
On Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 7:26:21 PM UTC-4, Joerg wrote:
On 2020-04-02 10:21, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 02 Apr 2020 09:32:36 +0300, upsidedown@downunder.com
wrote:
On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 16:30:55 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
News to me.
... Phil
50 kilowatts of radiated RF must be expensive. 5G will probably
take over everything at a huge energy saving.
No, it's just that the energy then comes out of the bank account of
the recipient, to pay for the pricey cell package. And where I was
today 5G would not have reached anyhow (access only on foot, via
mountain bike or on a horse).
I don't know what the big deal is about 5G. It is faster cell phone
service so that in dense cities you can pay the cell phone companies
for all your data needs rather than paying the "cable" companies for
the same thing. I suppose some people watch movies on their cell
phone, but really?
People do. No kidding.
... It's not really anything you can't get now,
except it will be from the cell companies instead of the cable
companies.
Larkin is funny. Talk about math challenged... 50 kW radiated is
around $0.25 per hour.
Care to share the math on that one? Or your patent for the
"super-bundler antenna"?
[...]
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com/