Trump was right - AGAIN!...

[server]

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in news:cb015e70-ae54-4ba9-
9451-bf2ce1f08b72n@googlegroups.com:

> But we cannot keep living in the past.

EXACTLY YOU RETARDED FUCK!

Why do you think they call it ALTERNATIVE fuels?
Stupid little TrumpTwerp.

 

[server]

Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in news:5f2fb8ea-ec63-
40f6-8954-c8db33c7515bn@googlegroups.com:

> but I\'ve not read how that works,

Right. Yet you expound.

They have reduction gear fitted towers that can easily maintain the
proper spindle speed at the generation shaft.

 

[server]

Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote in news:2f20907e-7dea-44ed-
9567-1c4d4bae3a9dn@googlegroups.com:

Until then, we still need fossil.

Some but far less. So much less, in fact, that we did NOT need
another pipeline. The very reason it was killed. D\'Oh!

 

[Ed Lee]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 9:33:59 AM UTC-8, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote in news:2f20907e-7dea-44ed-
9567-1c4d...@googlegroups.com:

Until then, we still need fossil.


Some but far less. So much less, in fact, that we did NOT need
another pipeline. The very reason it was killed. D\'Oh!

We are still importing 10% from Russia, and now want to switch to bloodless (less but not none) Iranian and Venezuelan oil. And we could have supply more energy to European allies to reduce dependence on Russian blood oil.

Suppliers and customers need the pipeline. Canadian syrup are still being used, but at higher transport costs via sea tankers, which doesn\'t help the environment at all.

We will have $100 (wo/war) to $150 (w/war) oil from now on.

 

[Lasse Langwadt Christensen]

onsdag den 9. marts 2022 kl. 18.20.14 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:

On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:09:25 PM UTC-5, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:3ac2d52c-4f01-43bf...@googlegroups.com:
Not until the cost of storage is considered as well. 100%
renewable energy is going to require massive amounts of storage.
We are a long, long way from that being economical.

Wind generators are direct AC grid attached items. Solar requires
conversion, but not neccesarily storage. Ideally there would be a
storage \"buffer\".
Not sure what you mean. Wind turbines do not directly generate the 50/60Hz AC required for the grid. The rational speed is far to irregular for that.. The power is converted from AC to DC to AC or sometimes they do a direct AC to AC, but I\'ve not read how that works, it may just be the same AC to DC to AC with a different label.

Most of them do directly generate 50/60Hz AC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubly-fed_electric_machine#Double-fed_induction_generator

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2022-03-09, Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:09:25 PM UTC-5, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:3ac2d52c-4f01-43bf...@googlegroups.com:
Not until the cost of storage is considered as well. 100%
renewable energy is going to require massive amounts of storage.
We are a long, long way from that being economical.

Wind generators are direct AC grid attached items. Solar requires
conversion, but not neccesarily storage. Ideally there would be a
storage \"buffer\".

Not sure what you mean. Wind turbines do not directly generate the
50/60Hz AC required for the grid. The rational speed is far to
irregular for that. The power is converted from AC to DC to AC or
sometimes they do a direct AC to AC, but I\'ve not read how that works,
it may just be the same AC to DC to AC with a different label.

Possibly something like a cycloconverter.

Economical? Have you seen the storms this year. Tornados in
Kentucky in mid December. Freezes in Texas where it rarely happened
before, if ever.

That\'s simply not true. I attended a football game in Dallas once and had to go home because it was snowing and I didn\'t have clothes warm enough. I guess it depends on your definition of \"rare\". That\'s why we work with averages and other statistical measures of climate. Anecdotal extreme cases are a poor way to measure climate.

It happened to you once, I\'d call that rare.



--
Jasen.

 

[Rick C]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 8:01:03 PM UTC-5, Jasen Betts wrote:

On 2022-03-09, Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:09:25 PM UTC-5, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:3ac2d52c-4f01-43bf...@googlegroups.com:
Not until the cost of storage is considered as well. 100%
renewable energy is going to require massive amounts of storage.
We are a long, long way from that being economical.

Wind generators are direct AC grid attached items. Solar requires
conversion, but not neccesarily storage. Ideally there would be a
storage \"buffer\".

Not sure what you mean. Wind turbines do not directly generate the
50/60Hz AC required for the grid. The rational speed is far to
irregular for that. The power is converted from AC to DC to AC or
sometimes they do a direct AC to AC, but I\'ve not read how that works,
it may just be the same AC to DC to AC with a different label.
Possibly something like a cycloconverter.
Economical? Have you seen the storms this year. Tornados in
Kentucky in mid December. Freezes in Texas where it rarely happened
before, if ever.

That\'s simply not true. I attended a football game in Dallas once and had to go home because it was snowing and I didn\'t have clothes warm enough. I guess it depends on your definition of \"rare\". That\'s why we work with averages and other statistical measures of climate. Anecdotal extreme cases are a poor way to measure climate.
It happened to you once, I\'d call that rare.

I\'ve only been to Texas twice so it happened 50% of the time.

--

Rick C.

++ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
++ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:47:59 PM UTC-5, lang...@fonz.dk wrote:

onsdag den 9. marts 2022 kl. 18.20.14 UTC+1 skrev gnuarm.del...@gmail.com:
On Wednesday, March 9, 2022 at 12:09:25 PM UTC-5, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Rick C <gnuarm.del...@gmail.com> wrote in
news:3ac2d52c-4f01-43bf...@googlegroups.com:
Not until the cost of storage is considered as well. 100%
renewable energy is going to require massive amounts of storage.
We are a long, long way from that being economical.

Wind generators are direct AC grid attached items. Solar requires
conversion, but not neccesarily storage. Ideally there would be a
storage \"buffer\".
Not sure what you mean. Wind turbines do not directly generate the 50/60Hz AC required for the grid. The rational speed is far to irregular for that. The power is converted from AC to DC to AC or sometimes they do a direct AC to AC, but I\'ve not read how that works, it may just be the same AC to DC to AC with a different label.

Most of them do directly generate 50/60Hz AC

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doubly-fed_electric_machine#Double-fed_induction_generator

You learn something every day.

Thanks,

--

Rick C.

--- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Sunday, March 6, 2022 at 2:02:26 AM UTC-5, Flyguy wrote:

NATO countries must invest in their own SELF-DEFENSE, not depend on the \"kindness\" of Russia:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/germanys-dramatic-reversal-on-defense-explained/ar-AAUEagk?li=BBnb7Kz
This was the typical libtard response to Trump\'s demands that felt self-defense was an outdated idea:
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2018/07/trump-nato-defense-four-percent/564911/

I believe it was Trmp who said, \"I\'d rather be right than President!\"

He got his wish... at least part of it.

--

Rick C.

--+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
--+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209