Toshiba TV29C90 problem; Image fades to black...

This might be useful for you:

http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=278


Geir Holmavatn wrote:
Hi,

Does it exist small embedded programmable controllers using basic or
something which can be connected to a cellular phone and be able to decode
SMS messages sent to this phone?

Thanks a lot for comments + hints and info about such devices.
 
On 7 Mar 2006 03:35:07 -0800, "Deejay" <deejay27@pacbell.net> wrote:

Can someone please help me identify the capacitor in the link below? I
don't really understand the writing on the capacitor so I'm having a
super hard time trying to find a replacement. All I know is that it is
not working and I need to solder a new one back on to the device in
which I took it off to get it to work again. Please help....thanks.

http://home.pacbell.net/deejay27/capacitor_pic.jpg
You didn't leave the pic there for long did you? If you got the answer
you were after then post a reply saying so and that you are removing
the link.
 
On 7 Mar 2006 14:58:44 -0800, runderwo@mail.win.org wrote:

I am fully aware of how to test a fuse, given that I can find the
terminals of the fuse, which is not usually an unreasonable assumption.
If you look at the picture, it is a type of fuse that screws in. It
is not like the "edison" type screw-in fuses. There is kind of a
"rivet" in the end of it that, when removed, retains a metal cylinder
that hangs loosely over the rivet. I can't figure out how the fuse is
supposed to work, because when I've removed it, it physically becomes
one big short because of the loose cylindrical part.

I am fully aware of the hazards, but from the replies, you'd think I
was prodding around in it with a kitchen knife while plugged in. All I
am trying to do is test this fuse, and if disassembly is required, I
have no plans to do that with it plugged into the wall or with an
energized filter cap.
It may simply be that the fuse holder is broken...

If the fuse is a screw cap then you simply unscrew the cap
anti-clockwise. The fuse will most likely be a 3AG (1-1/4" x 1/4"
tubular glass). Usually the screw cap has a flat spring retainer to
hold the new fuse when inserting it but these sometimes break or go
missing butthis doesn't usually affect the function of the fuse
holder. At the far end of the fuse holder the rear terminal is spring
loaded so that pressure is applied to both ends of the fuse when the
cap is screwed home. You can test to see if the spring exerts pressure
by pushing a screwdriver blade down inside the fuse holder.

I have found these fuseholders sometimes go open circuit usually
through a terminal or phenolic body breakage internally. The only way
to test the fuse holder is to disconnect (unsolder) one of the wires
connecting to it (the far end one is easiest) and with a known good
fuse inserted measure across both terminals of the fuse holder with
your DMM. Naturally, you must ensure that no power is applied while
doing any of this.
 
Tony Martinezwrote:
I see from ads online that I could get a brand new tube TV for
under
$200, so I guess it would have to be REALLY inexpensive to warrant
repair.


*** TUBE TVS GET A SONY LCD HDTV.

No need to get a SONY LCD HDTV. If this set is worth the repair then
I would say to go ahead and do it.
 
"427Cobraman" <quartermiler1320@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141780241.243805.29580@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
OK. Here's an update. I tried the front panel board from the 945 in
the 845 and it worked great. I checked continuity on all of the
switches on the bad board and none are shorted. I'm guessing a new
board is in order. What is a good source for sony parts? I've used
mostly pac parts but they don't seem to show this part, let alone many
sony replacement parts.

Alex

If you've got the skill to have undertaken the repair in the first place,
and have managed to successfuly transplant the board from the '9 to the '8,
then I wouldn't give up quite yet. You say that it initially worked, so
there's a good chance that there's not a lot wrong. As the other poster
said, now you know for sure that the problem is in the system control, check
the clock generator crystal for activity with a 'scope, check that the 5v
actually reaching the Vcc pin on the micro is accurate and clean, and check
that there is activity on the switch matrix lines, just to make sure that
there is no leakage across any of them, even though no switches appear to be
actually closed. Have you checked this one with the remote control ? You
might need to use the remote which matches the board ie from the '9, unless
you know for sure that both remotes work both units correctly.

Arfa
 
"jakdedert" <jakdedert@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:IUpPf.19217$f6.18838@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Arfa Daily wrote:
trousky1@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:u84p02553f8n84bsgfl8rfle6f5s7j26rf@4ax.com...
Speaker connected (switch on or off for them), right channel power amp
still very hot. The sound is good on both speakers but I cant leave it
on for long, I am afraid to fry the power amp ($20.00)


On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:37:03 +0100, Damir <nop@nop.hr> wrote:

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:12:54 -0500, trousky1@videotron.ca wrote:

Thanks Charles,
I checked the voltages(DC) on all pins on both hybrid power amps and
they are the same. I swapped the input to the hybrid power amps (left
and right channels) and I still have the same power amp getting very
hot. Not sure what to check next.



If the sound is good, but the hybrid is frying, then I would suggest that
it is hooting, maybe as high as RF. You need to get a 'scope on the
output to check for this. There may be a Zobel network ( R & C in
series ) on the output that was damaged by the previously faulty hybrid.
Alternatively, there may be a defective decoupling cap on one of the
bypass pins of the hybrid, or an open or high ESR supply decoupling cap,
and this is allowing it to hoot, which may be what caused the demise of
the original hybrid, and would ultimately do the same to the replacement,
if left.

Arfa
'Hooting', you say. I suppose by that--and your description of the
solution--you refer to high-frequency oscillation.

Hooting...that's a new one on me; but I like it.

jak


Oh, ok. Perhaps it's a funny British thing !! It's a term that was taught to
me when I was an apprentice nearly 40 years ago, by my apprentice mentor,
and I've always used it ...

Your assumption of its meaning Jak, is basically correct. It is a parasitic
oscillation of a stage which may be, but is often not, detrimental to the
basic operation of that stage. The OP's amp is a classic example, if that is
indeed what the problem was - pins 3,4 and 5 of that hybrid are all up the
front end, and typically have caps connected to them. The stage basically
carried out its job of amplifying ' low freq ' music perfectly well, but was
also outputting an additional signal either at an ultrasonic, or low HF
frequency, probably at close to full power, depending on how good a
bandwidth the output stage has - hence it gets very hot. I don't know if you
remember the old Texas Instruments SN76003 / 013 / 023 series of power amp
ICs. They had a sort
of " fan " shaped hetsink bonded to them. Well those used to suffer from it
badly, if the supply decoupling wasn't perfect.

I've also had genuine oscillators in mixers that have suffered from
parasitic oscillations. Their primary function has been basically fine,
except that every other radio in the vicinity is going bananas, due to the
high amplitude 'hoot' that is also occuring.

Sorry if I've caused any confusion to anyone. I'll stick to ' contemporary '
terminology in the future ... !!

Arfa
 
"Bill Simpson" <plusnetfiles@comcast.net.com> wrote in message
news:qids02pd1js4o7rlf6labhan24s755bq92@4ax.com...
Thanks for all the help. Since you introduced the concerns about
maintaining the proper polarity. Is there a simple way to verify
this? I recently pick up a new Greenlee DM-810 True RMS Digital
Multimeter at a garage sale for $5. Does this have a function that
would test polarity?


Bill, I'm assuming that this is a digital meter - yes ? OK. Making sure that
you have the red probe in the red socket, and the black in the black socket,
then just go ahead and measure the output. If you have your red lead
connected to the positive output wire, then the meter will just
read " 12.00 " or whatever. If you have your red lead connected to the
negative output wire, then the meter will read " - 12.00 " ie a minus sign
at the front of the number.

As additional confirmation, the original power supply may well have a little
picture of the output connector, indicating polarity, as might the monitor
by its input socket. Additionally, as any replacement you buy is likely just
a generic type, it will probably also have a picture of its plug, indicating
polarity. For what it's worth, you very likely will not have to do any
cutting and grafting. In general, there seems to be a loose " standard " on
the plug size and polarity sense, employed by the current crop of externally
powered LCD monitors and TVs. But that said, I emphasise, better to be safe
than sorry ...

Arfa
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 14:06:46 GMT, "Arfa Daily"
arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote:


"Bill Simpson" <plusnetfiles@comcast.net.com> wrote in message
news:aj9o02dm6d2n47hu4qlusena3qnlvf3o1d@4ax.com...
On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 09:03:42 GMT, "Arfa Daily"
arfa.daily@ntlworld.com> wrote:

I see that my reply did get double posted. Thanks for the very
precise information. With my rather low level of technical knowledge,
do you think it more advisable that I just replace the power supply?

The power supply that I currently have is

Sunny
Input :100-240 - 1.6A Max, 50-60Hz, 70-80VA
Output: +12V - 4.0A

I contacted the manufacturer of the monitor and they want $75 for a
replacement power supply (More on that later). I've found some others,
more reasonably priced online. One is a 12V 5A (60W) and the other is
a 12V 4.16A (50W). Am I correct in assuming that both should work?
If the connector is different in these power supplies, would cutting
and soldering the original connector to the new power supply be
acceptable rather than the more complicated and dangerous course that
professionals with your expertise would take? I know it's a crude
solution, but it's something I would feel comfortable with.

The rest if off topic, but if you have some time, I would like your
opinion. I had mentioned earlier that I contacted the manufacturer
about a new power supply. I went to their home page and read the FAQ
ahead of time. I found this in the FAQ:

"My screen comes on for a second and then goes black. How do I resolve
this issue?

1. Please contact Customer Service for further assistance at
323-346-0888. There is a possible short in the ac adapter. "

It seems that the manufacturer knew about this problem for some time.
I had registered my monitor and asked the representative when I called
why they hadn't notified me of the problem (As the warranty on the
montitor had just run out). I also asked if this wasn't a potential
fire hazard. I got a typical rebuff. My question is: Could a short
in the power supply cause a fire? I this a dangerous situation or
would normal internal safeguards kept anything hazardous from
happening?

Thanks again for all of the expert help. You all went above and
beyond what I expected.


Bill

If you don't feel qualified to go inside the supply, then I would not be
comfortable advising you to do so. The fault almost certainly will be one
of
the things I suggested, but it's not worth risking injury to try to repair
it, if you're not absolutely confident of what you're doing.

Either of the two power supplies should be ok rating-wise. Any power
supply
with a rating of 4 amps, will be a switch mode type, so by very nature
will
be regulated to its declared 12v output.
Cutting and joining on the output lead is fine, BUT make absolutely sure
that you get the polarity the same as original. The monitor will not like
having reverse polarity DC shoved up it ...

If ever I join wires in this way, I always use heatshrink sleeving, which
you could probably get from your local Radio Shack. It shrinks easily with
a
small paint stripper gun on 'low', and does a nice neat job of
re-insulating
the cable, and reinforcing the join.

As far as the manufacturer's statement about a " short in the power supply
"
goes, it's probably a bit of generic techno-babble that means nothing more
than ' a faulty power supply '. Joe public can equate with a " short ". It
sounds just technical enough to be describing something real, but is
basically meaningless in this context. It is unlikely that any fire would
ensue from any of the typical ( and much more likely ) faults that the
power
supply would really be suffering from. It's probably just a typical switch
mode power supply design issue, where whover laid out the board, decided,
as
they always seem to, to place an important cap right next to a resistor
that
gets hot. It probably just happens that the fallout from this has been
particularly bad for this manufacturer, using this ( almost certainly
bought-in ) power supply on his particular product.

Arfa
 
Patt wrote:
I have a Hoover vacuum, Legacy 740, model #U4537910. I have to replace the
cord. What is the easiest way to get at the motor to make this repair?
Patt
Does this help?

http://www.elkypro.com/hoops2005/vacuum_parts/hoover/U4537-910.html

Tony
 
"427Cobraman" <quartermiler1320@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141780241.243805.29580@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
OK. Here's an update. I tried the front panel board from the 945 in
the 845 and it worked great. I checked continuity on all of the
switches on the bad board and none are shorted. I'm guessing a new
board is in order. What is a good source for sony parts? I've used
mostly pac parts but they don't seem to show this part, let alone many
sony replacement parts.

Alex
You're really going to have to troubleshoot it down further than just the
board. First of all the board may very well not be available, and if it is,
it's going to be expensive (over 100.00 maybe closer to 150.00 - I'll
check.)

Mark Z.
 
Thanks for the encouragement boost. I would normally shoot deeper, but
I lack the SMD solder/desolder tools I'd need, especially the micros on
there. I've done chip resistors and caps, etc. with a standard iron on
occasion, though. I did see that crystal there and will check it out
as well as the switch matrices. The remote is actually from the 845.
....the adventure continues...
 
"427Cobraman" <quartermiler1320@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141823137.825365.105060@j52g2000cwj.googlegroups.com...
Thanks for the encouragement boost. I would normally shoot deeper, but
I lack the SMD solder/desolder tools I'd need, especially the micros on
there. I've done chip resistors and caps, etc. with a standard iron on
occasion, though. I did see that crystal there and will check it out
as well as the switch matrices. The remote is actually from the 845.
...the adventure continues...
There is a guy over here who has created " Beer's Maxim " ( his name is
Beer ). It basically states that " The more pins an IC has, the less likely
it is to be faulty ". Over the years, I've found this to be a pretty good
thing to keep in mind. On many occasions, I've condemned a micro, because
it's easy to do. With the best will in the world, none of us mere mortals,
no matter how experienced in the world of repairs, TRULY understands the
black magic, sorcery and esoteric shenanigans, that go on inside a
microcontroller IC, so when one doesn't work, we always condemn it. On the
occasions when I have actually replaced such an IC - and you can do it
perfectly successfully with ordinary workshop soldering equipment - it has
cured the problem on probably fewer than 20% of the occasions. Almost
always, unless there is a definite reason for the IC to be bad, such as
lightning damage, screwed internal software ( people trying to hack DVD
region protection etc ) or your 'scope probe having slipped ( !! ), the
problem turns out to be something simple, elsewhere. Often, an input to the
micro is wrong - even the /reset line. If you've got the time and
inclination, I would recommend checking all of the pins on the micro on the
working board, and noting the conditions on them, and then comparing to the
bad board.

Also, as you previously did work to this board, involving soldering, check
carefully, all over the board, with a strong magnifier, just in case a
whisker of solder has flown off the end of the iron, and lodged across
somewhere. Also check that there are no bent pins on any connectors, or
damaged foil fingers on the ends of any flexiprints going to the board. It's
amazing how often secondary faults, are caused by something you've done
yourself ...

Arfa
 
Arfa Daily wrote:
"jakdedert" <jakdedert@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:IUpPf.19217$f6.18838@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Arfa Daily wrote:
trousky1@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:u84p02553f8n84bsgfl8rfle6f5s7j26rf@4ax.com...
Speaker connected (switch on or off for them), right channel power amp
still very hot. The sound is good on both speakers but I cant leave it
on for long, I am afraid to fry the power amp ($20.00)


On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:37:03 +0100, Damir <nop@nop.hr> wrote:

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:12:54 -0500, trousky1@videotron.ca wrote:

Thanks Charles,
I checked the voltages(DC) on all pins on both hybrid power amps and
they are the same. I swapped the input to the hybrid power amps (left
and right channels) and I still have the same power amp getting very
hot. Not sure what to check next.


If the sound is good, but the hybrid is frying, then I would suggest that
it is hooting, maybe as high as RF. You need to get a 'scope on the
output to check for this. There may be a Zobel network ( R & C in
series ) on the output that was damaged by the previously faulty hybrid.
Alternatively, there may be a defective decoupling cap on one of the
bypass pins of the hybrid, or an open or high ESR supply decoupling cap,
and this is allowing it to hoot, which may be what caused the demise of
the original hybrid, and would ultimately do the same to the replacement,
if left.

Arfa
'Hooting', you say. I suppose by that--and your description of the
solution--you refer to high-frequency oscillation.

Hooting...that's a new one on me; but I like it.

jak


Oh, ok. Perhaps it's a funny British thing !! It's a term that was taught to
me when I was an apprentice nearly 40 years ago, by my apprentice mentor,
and I've always used it ...

Your assumption of its meaning Jak, is basically correct. It is a parasitic
oscillation of a stage which may be, but is often not, detrimental to the
basic operation of that stage. The OP's amp is a classic example, if that is
indeed what the problem was - pins 3,4 and 5 of that hybrid are all up the
front end, and typically have caps connected to them. The stage basically
carried out its job of amplifying ' low freq ' music perfectly well, but was
also outputting an additional signal either at an ultrasonic, or low HF
frequency, probably at close to full power, depending on how good a
bandwidth the output stage has - hence it gets very hot. I don't know if you
remember the old Texas Instruments SN76003 / 013 / 023 series of power amp
ICs. They had a sort
of " fan " shaped hetsink bonded to them. Well those used to suffer from it
badly, if the supply decoupling wasn't perfect.

I've also had genuine oscillators in mixers that have suffered from
parasitic oscillations. Their primary function has been basically fine,
except that every other radio in the vicinity is going bananas, due to the
high amplitude 'hoot' that is also occuring.
I used a Studiomaster desk that just sounded like utter sh*t. I
couldn't get a decent mix out of it to save my life, although the rest
of the PA system was really excellent. I couldn't put my finger on it,
but something was just not 'right'. I subbed in a cheap Sunn console,
and the whole system came to life!

Turned out the Studiodisaster had parasitics (up into AM radio
frequencies) in almost every stage.
Sorry if I've caused any confusion to anyone. I'll stick to ' contemporary '
terminology in the future ... !!

Hooting is fine. I like it, but it must be a British thing...like 'valve'.

jak
 
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:47:37 -0500, "JANA" <jana@ca.inter.net> wrote:

You would have to go through all the capacitors in the power supply and
vertical deflection circuits with an ESR meter. More than likely you will
find a number of capacitors that have become high in ESR with use. This was
very common on many of these monitors.

Since there are serious safety issues when working in monitors, if you are
not properly trained and equipped to do monitor service work, you should
give the monitor out to a service centre for an estimate.

Considering the quality of the new LCD monitors that are in the same price
range that you paid for your Mits monitor, it may be a better preference to
upgrade to a descent LCD screen. There are many advantages of the LCD
technology over the CRT technology.
bummer. I've been hearing about the low quality caps for a while now.
That would explain why google posters mention they sent theirs off for
warranty service and it didn't get repaired. Pity.

Yeah I've got a LCD HDTV (a sweet 40 lbs or so), but I like being able
to change resolution on CRT monitors, which is one rather large
problem with LCD displays. Colors are nice too. Ideally I'd like a
32-42" 1080P LCD with a strobed LED backlight and a CAD quality 20+"
CRT combo for my desktop.

Oh well I guess I'll invest in the shop manual and browse around
inside with a hair dryer.

Any recommendations on a place to buy good Caps ?
 
runderwo@mail.win.org wrote:
I am fully aware of how to test a fuse, given that I can find the
terminals of the fuse, which is not usually an unreasonable assumption.
If you look at the picture, it is a type of fuse that screws in. It
is not like the "edison" type screw-in fuses. There is kind of a
"rivet" in the end of it that, when removed, retains a metal cylinder
that hangs loosely over the rivet. I can't figure out how the fuse is
supposed to work, because when I've removed it, it physically becomes
one big short because of the loose cylindrical part.
Are you sure there's even a fuse in there? Almost sounds to me like an
empty holder.
 
"jakdedert" <jakdedert@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:vBCPf.39$X7.25@bignews7.bellsouth.net...
Arfa Daily wrote:
"jakdedert" <jakdedert@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:IUpPf.19217$f6.18838@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Arfa Daily wrote:
trousky1@videotron.ca> wrote in message
news:u84p02553f8n84bsgfl8rfle6f5s7j26rf@4ax.com...
Speaker connected (switch on or off for them), right channel power amp
still very hot. The sound is good on both speakers but I cant leave it
on for long, I am afraid to fry the power amp ($20.00)


On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:37:03 +0100, Damir <nop@nop.hr> wrote:

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 13:12:54 -0500, trousky1@videotron.ca wrote:

Thanks Charles,
I checked the voltages(DC) on all pins on both hybrid power amps and
they are the same. I swapped the input to the hybrid power amps
(left
and right channels) and I still have the same power amp getting very
hot. Not sure what to check next.


If the sound is good, but the hybrid is frying, then I would suggest
that it is hooting, maybe as high as RF. You need to get a 'scope on
the output to check for this. There may be a Zobel network ( R & C in
series ) on the output that was damaged by the previously faulty
hybrid. Alternatively, there may be a defective decoupling cap on one
of the bypass pins of the hybrid, or an open or high ESR supply
decoupling cap, and this is allowing it to hoot, which may be what
caused the demise of the original hybrid, and would ultimately do the
same to the replacement, if left.

Arfa
'Hooting', you say. I suppose by that--and your description of the
solution--you refer to high-frequency oscillation.

Hooting...that's a new one on me; but I like it.

jak


Oh, ok. Perhaps it's a funny British thing !! It's a term that was taught
to me when I was an apprentice nearly 40 years ago, by my apprentice
mentor, and I've always used it ...

Your assumption of its meaning Jak, is basically correct. It is a
parasitic oscillation of a stage which may be, but is often not,
detrimental to the basic operation of that stage. The OP's amp is a
classic example, if that is indeed what the problem was - pins 3,4 and 5
of that hybrid are all up the front end, and typically have caps
connected to them. The stage basically carried out its job of amplifying
' low freq ' music perfectly well, but was also outputting an additional
signal either at an ultrasonic, or low HF frequency, probably at close to
full power, depending on how good a bandwidth the output stage has -
hence it gets very hot. I don't know if you remember the old Texas
Instruments SN76003 / 013 / 023 series of power amp ICs. They had a sort
of " fan " shaped hetsink bonded to them. Well those used to suffer from
it badly, if the supply decoupling wasn't perfect.

I've also had genuine oscillators in mixers that have suffered from
parasitic oscillations. Their primary function has been basically fine,
except that every other radio in the vicinity is going bananas, due to
the high amplitude 'hoot' that is also occuring.

I used a Studiomaster desk that just sounded like utter sh*t. I couldn't
get a decent mix out of it to save my life, although the rest of the PA
system was really excellent. I couldn't put my finger on it, but
something was just not 'right'. I subbed in a cheap Sunn console, and the
whole system came to life!

Turned out the Studiodisaster had parasitics (up into AM radio
frequencies) in almost every stage.

Sorry if I've caused any confusion to anyone. I'll stick to '
contemporary ' terminology in the future ... !!

Hooting is fine. I like it, but it must be a British thing...like
'valve'.

jak
Arfa
Yes, that's the sort of thing. I've had similar where a high amplitude RF
signal is being created in an audio stage, and rectified in the following
stage due to its huge amplitude driving that stage to non linearity. The DC
then produced at the base of the transistor, upsets the bias, and bingo,
hefty distortion.

Arfa
 
In article <Gk7Pf.13246$ty4.7761@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com>,
crayzkirk@yahoo.com says...
I've got a Magnavox RH8524AK08 projection TV that went dead. I bought a set
of boards from an RH8520 from a guy on eBay. The power supply board
indicated in my service manual is the same for both sets (APW007). The
flyback is totally different on the set that I bought; my original has a
tube that comes out at an angle that the HV line slips into and a nut
tightens down. Since the set I bought came with the HV line and splitter, I
replaced the associated parts as well. The TV now comes on.
It's unusual to find one of those relics that still works. We used to
call them "gourmet flybacks from Orville Reddenbacher", you know - not
a one left unpopped ;-) A slight exaggeration, no doubt, but a *lot*
of them blew up. I guess if you have one that survived this long, no
reason not to keep using it.

Another common problem about that vintage was green circuit boards
that used square pins shoved through the board for feed-throughs
instead of plated-through holes. This attempt at cost cutting was a
notorious source of intermittant connections. Some were so bad that
they required repair right out of the box before they could even be
sold.

Is this going to cause a problem?
Aside from the questionable reliability of certain parts already
mentioned, I don't see a problem. There were minor variations for
special versions like the JBL sound system, but basically they were
intended to be compatible. As you have discovered, the HV lead is
different, so just use the one that came with it.

Given the age of the set, is it likely the power supply was changed
at some point?
Fair chance. We used to carry a set of spare boards in the service
truck for elusive problems. Sometimes easier to swap in the home and
rebuild back at the shop where presumably you have better lighting,
more tools, parts, and equipment.

Also, where can I get replacement crt seal kits so I can change the
coolant?
The O-rings between the lens and the cooling chamber are quite durable
and usually reusable. I have not often needed the gasket between the
CRT and cooling chamber except on the rare occasion of replacing a
tube. Philips didn't list these parts separately in the manuals, but
shows one each as parts of the 171677-3 kit. I used to have the
individual numbers written down somewhere but can't find them anymore.
 
Sam, save the flames for someone more deserving, please. I said that I
have never seen THIS TYPE of fuse before, because I mistook what is
apparently a broken fuse holder for the fuse itself. That is not
equivalent to asking "how do I test a fuse?". As for "questioning my
experience", go right ahead, I'm not going to get into a pissing match,
but it is usually less effort to simply answer the question as posed.

I openly admit that I rarely get to deal with nice test equipment. And
I don't see where that means that I should simply accept that it is
broken and not attempt to learn about it - just as I learned about
microwaves, televisions, monitors, amplifiers or any other piece of
electronics that could be dangerous if one does not employ common sense.
 
Is there a mode switch on this model?
"Tony Martinez" <iwishiwasstillavirgin@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141785779.390554.286030@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Mark wrote:
Hi. The tape cassete will not move onto the reels. I've checked the
belts,
gears but no visible damage. If I move the gearing by hand, it works ,
could
it be electronic? Any help would be appreciated. Mark.

GODDAMN I LOVE FOOTBALL
 
Yes, it appears to be an empty, broken fuse holder. When I first
unscrewed it, I was confused and thought it was similar to the mains
fuses that screw into the panel. A step in the right direction, thanks!
 
060307 1848 - Luddite posted:

indago <elindago@earthlink.net> wrote:
060307 1444 - Luddite posted:

indago <elindago@earthlink.net> wrote:
060307 0343 - Luddite posted:

indago <elindago@earthlink.net> wrote:
I have an Amphenol Millivolt Commander Model 870, about 30 years old. It
is
a sensitive, FET unit that uses batteries. Most of the batteries are
general AA 1.5 volt batteries (8), but 2 of the batteries are Duracell
Mercury 1.4 volt batteries (Duracell ZM9). I suppose that these
batteries
are a reference voltage. Mercury batteries are no longer in use, so I
used
two 1.5 volt batteries in their place.

When I turn the on and select battery test, the meter does not move. It
is
supposed to move to above the Battery OK mark. Also, when I select the
positive DC, the meter pegs negative, and when I select the negative DC,
the
meter pegs positive. The batteries are all new batteries, so there is
not
a
problem with dead batteries.

Anyone ever worked with one of these meters and can give me some insight
into the problem with it?


Polarity of mercury cells is reversed as I recall,turn the one pair
around if the holder will accept it.

All of the batteries are in their holders in the proper polarity, as shown
on the chart. I did change the two batteries as you had suggested, and
nothing changed with the operation of the meter.


Does the chart show +/- or an outline drawing of the cells?


Both


I thought that would do it,then theres always the manual
type amphenol millivolt commander into google and click on the
first result from bama.edebris.com its 7mb or so
I already have the owners manual that came with the tester. Is that 7mb
download a service manual?
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top