The PornTard Of The United States Awards Medal

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 03:49:56 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:8168d6a8-379a-4d4d-ab82-22fc437aeaf9@googlegroups.com:

On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 7:23:40 AM UTC+11, John Larkin
wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

On 10/9/19 10:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:31:30 AM UTC-4,
blo...@columbus.rr
.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex
wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
If you did not already think it was pretty bad.

The buffoon gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to
criminal
Edwin Meese today (yesterday).

Yeah, you know... the guy who was put in charge of
stopping p
orn
in the USA when he was under Ronnie. Yeah that guy... he
was giv
en
a medal by a guy who was in three soft porn flics, and was
caught paying off a porn star just some few months ago.
He failed on tha
t
one.

He also committed crimes, with Reagan, that should
have sent t
hem
both to prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal

He should have croaked in prison years ago, if not
decades, no
t be
getting a fucking medal.

Rod Serling is turning in his grave.


The senile old oaf will be demanding the His Military make
him king
and
do napalm strikes on his opponents before the end. The
military pro
bably
has other ideas about who runs the country.

Trump is 3 years into this. No napalm yet. Actually, Trump
is prob
ably the most measured president (ignoring his tweets) in years.
He knows that any mishap (like directing the IRS to go after his
enemies) is going to get him immediately booted from office. At
this point the best they have (ignoring the Russia hoax) is a
"whistle blower" who has second hand information who , it appears,
is a staff member in Elizabeth warrens campaign.

These losers are just projecting what they want done to
others.

Terrified that their porn might be cut off. Then they might
have to leave home and try to meet some actual women.
Terrified.


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the
other regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual
women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.

So you both like to swing both ways?

Our building houses a number of same sex couples - of both sexes.
I get on fine with all them but I've not had cause to ask whether
they frequent the same gay bars.

It seems unlikely, but there are lots of bars and presumably some
gay bars cater to both sexes.


Most bars do not care. The person deciding to go into a given bar
is the one whom must decide wisely.

The beer matters.

I was in GPS down the hill (Glen Park Station) and asked the barkeep
if they had any good rum, Ron Zacapa or something. "This ain't that
kind of joint, honey." she said.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[bitrex]

On 10/10/19 12:41 AM, gray_wolf wrote:

On 10/9/2019 2:25 PM, Michael Terrell wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 12:02:46 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:

The 70% of Americans under 35 who want him gone are too busy working
three jobs to spend a lot of time jerking off over some gun collection
or reading The Turner Diaries


They are too stupid to do anything correctly. Their idea of 'A living
wage' is to buy everything in sight. The ones that I know have to
drive expensive cars, and waste thousands on useless stereos for them.

I worked for $3.00 an hour when I got out of the Army. I bought a
house on that wage. If those kids need three jobs, they either need to
stop wasting money, or develop worthwhile job skills. You don't need
to buy everything new, and only certain brands to show off. My first
car was $300 and I drove it for several years. It was a nice Pontiac
convertible. I have only bought one new vehicle in almost 50 years of
driving. I did my own repairs, including rebuilding the engine in my
'66 GTO. Today's kids are too stupid to do anything buy complain and
waste money. They would be the first to die if we lost the grid.

You constantly jerk of about queers, and shooting people in trailer
parks. My only guns say Weller or Wen, not Harrison or Mattel. Any
lead I sling is mixed with tin, but I am not afraid of guns, grenades
or bazookas. I have used real 'Assault Style Weapons' including a belt
fed gun with tracer rounds at night. I've thrown live grenades, and
used the M72 LAW bazooka. I qualified on the range in Basic with a M16
built by Mattel. I later used one made by Harrison

The whining pussies would die before they learned to use real weapons.
I took down an idiot a few years ago with my cane. He tried to take it
from me. He ended up begging to be let p off the ground, and for me to
let go of the arm I had pinned to his back. It was nothing special,
for those trained to defend themselves. It didn't matter that he
was18, and six inches taller. Like you, he was cocky and over
confident. That can easily get you killed. One thing they forget. A
lot of old men just don't give a damn. Punks are not worth wasting
time on. Like the bumper sticker I see on some cars. "Old men don't
waste time fighting. They just kill you."


LOL!! At 80 that makes perfect sense to me. I love the 1911

If an army ever tells me they're hiring senior citizens to be on the
front lines when I'm that age I'm not sure I would consider them to be
doing me any great "honor."

 

[bitrex]

On 10/10/19 12:26 AM, gray_wolf wrote:

On 10/9/2019 4:04 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 4:54 PM, bitrex wrote:


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the other
regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.


I see.

In any case in the year 2019 there are few strictly "gay bars" or
gay-only night life establishments remaining in many small US cities;
for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost
half the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people
entering your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

And also why would you want to turn away paying customers? Night life
revenues tanked after online dating became a thing all small bars and
clubs that want to stay alive need to be willing to take whomever
wants to show up and spend

Dress codes serve the same function, anyway, you can't turn people
away from a night club based on their sexual orientation in those
places but if someplace really wants to keep most straight men out
there's no law saying one can't require everyone who wants to be
admitted to be wearing all skin-tight leather, and pink sunglasses.

Lol! Back in the '70s I had a friend that had a few video games and pin
balls in a
lesbian club that I maintained. Very good looking gals there. They all
thought we
were cool. One evening I was checking out this machine and four business
men
in suits came in. They walked toward back with the biggest grins on
their face like
they had died and gone to heaven. It wasn't long before they were making
a rapid
exit red faced and all. I did meet one patron there who was a pinball
mechanic.
She was pretty sharp with a medium skill level. It doesn't take much
talent to clean
and adjust relay contacts and such. I never liked being around gay men
but the
lesbians and I generally get along well. I suppose because we both like
women.

Almost like you have to be around women regularly if you want the
opportunity to sleep with women. What a concept. It's unfortunately a
concept that seems lost on many young men. It doesn't happen by sitting
on the computer all day.

 

[bitrex]

On 10/10/19 12:26 AM, gray_wolf wrote:

On 10/9/2019 4:04 PM, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 4:54 PM, bitrex wrote:


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the other
regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.


I see.

In any case in the year 2019 there are few strictly "gay bars" or
gay-only night life establishments remaining in many small US cities;
for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost
half the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people
entering your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

And also why would you want to turn away paying customers? Night life
revenues tanked after online dating became a thing all small bars and
clubs that want to stay alive need to be willing to take whomever
wants to show up and spend

Dress codes serve the same function, anyway, you can't turn people
away from a night club based on their sexual orientation in those
places but if someplace really wants to keep most straight men out
there's no law saying one can't require everyone who wants to be
admitted to be wearing all skin-tight leather, and pink sunglasses.

Lol! Back in the '70s I had a friend that had a few video games and pin
balls in a
lesbian club that I maintained. Very good looking gals there. They all
thought we
were cool. One evening I was checking out this machine and four business
men
in suits came in. They walked toward back with the biggest grins on
their face like
they had died and gone to heaven. It wasn't long before they were making
a rapid
exit red faced and all. I did meet one patron there who was a pinball
mechanic.
She was pretty sharp with a medium skill level. It doesn't take much
talent to clean
and adjust relay contacts and such. I never liked being around gay men
but the
lesbians and I generally get along well. I suppose because we both like
women.

Yeah there are men who would prefer to go to a nightclub that has 10
dudes for every woman just because it says "Straight Club" on the front
and would walk out of a club that has 2 women for every man just because
it says "Gay Club" on the front, even if they both admit anyone.

Can't say I understand it myself. When I was single if I saw a bar that
had that many dudes in it I just figured it was a de-facto gay club no
matter what the sign said. Looks and quacks like a duck. I'm not yet
married (probably pretty soon) but I haven't been single for any
significant length of time in recent history so I have no regrets so far.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:07:01 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:54:15 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/9/19 4:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/9/19 10:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:31:30 AM UTC-4, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
If you did not already think it was pretty bad.

The buffoon gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to criminal
Edwin Meese today (yesterday).

Yeah, you know... the guy who was put in charge of stopping porn
in the USA when he was under Ronnie. Yeah that guy... he was given
a medal by a guy who was in three soft porn flics, and was caught
paying off a porn star just some few months ago. He failed on that
one.

He also committed crimes, with Reagan, that should have sent them
both to prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal

He should have croaked in prison years ago, if not decades, not be
getting a fucking medal.

Rod Serling is turning in his grave.


The senile old oaf will be demanding the His Military make him king and
do napalm strikes on his opponents before the end. The military probably
has other ideas about who runs the country.

Trump is 3 years into this. No napalm yet. Actually, Trump is probably the most measured president (ignoring his tweets) in years. He knows that any mishap (like directing the IRS to go after his enemies) is going to get him immediately booted from office. At this point the best they have (ignoring the Russia hoax) is a "whistle blower" who has second hand information who , it appears, is a staff member in Elizabeth warrens campaign.

These losers are just projecting what they want done to others.

Terrified that their porn might be cut off. Then they might have to
leave home and try to meet some actual women. Terrified.


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the other
regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.


I see.

In any case in the year 2019 there are few strictly "gay bars" or
gay-only night life establishments remaining in many small US cities;

Hamburger Marys wasn't entirely gay.

We were recently having a beer at Wild Side West, a famous dyke dive
bar, when I stepped away for a minute. Mo was immediately hit on... by
a guy.

for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost half
the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people entering
your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

The discrimination was mostly visible hostility against straights.

Wow, that a whopping lie. Ever hear of Stonewall, in NYC, for example?
The NYC cops targeted everyone in the gay bar, regardless of sexual
orientation, assuming they were all gay or gay sympathizers.
NEver saw that happen in a straight bar. No one can tell sexual
orientation in most cases by
looking at anyone anyhow. This straight out of Archie Bunker bigot
land.

And also why would you want to turn away paying customers? Night life
revenues tanked after online dating became a thing all small bars and
clubs that want to stay alive need to be willing to take whomever wants
to show up and spend

Things here used to be a lot more segregated. Being (whatever) is just
not such a big thing now.

I remember when, especially, dyke places were clearly man-hostile. Gay
guys seemed to like women. All that has pretty much calmed down now.
People must find new things to be outraged about. Just don't wear a
MAGA hat around here.

Why would anyone want to wear a hat associated with an evil, lying,
shyster orange clown? Did you get one straight from the basement of
Trump Tower, $45 a piece?

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 4:54:22 PM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:

On 10/9/19 4:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/9/19 10:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:31:30 AM UTC-4, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
If you did not already think it was pretty bad.

The buffoon gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to criminal
Edwin Meese today (yesterday).

Yeah, you know... the guy who was put in charge of stopping porn
in the USA when he was under Ronnie. Yeah that guy... he was given
a medal by a guy who was in three soft porn flics, and was caught
paying off a porn star just some few months ago. He failed on that
one.

He also committed crimes, with Reagan, that should have sent them
both to prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal

He should have croaked in prison years ago, if not decades, not be
getting a fucking medal.

Rod Serling is turning in his grave.


The senile old oaf will be demanding the His Military make him king and
do napalm strikes on his opponents before the end. The military probably
has other ideas about who runs the country.

Trump is 3 years into this. No napalm yet. Actually, Trump is probably the most measured president (ignoring his tweets) in years. He knows that any mishap (like directing the IRS to go after his enemies) is going to get him immediately booted from office. At this point the best they have (ignoring the Russia hoax) is a "whistle blower" who has second hand information who , it appears, is a staff member in Elizabeth warrens campaign.

These losers are just projecting what they want done to others.

Terrified that their porn might be cut off. Then they might have to
leave home and try to meet some actual women. Terrified.


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the other
regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.


I see.

In any case in the year 2019 there are few strictly "gay bars" or
gay-only night life establishments remaining in many small US cities;
for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost half
the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people entering
your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

How the hell would any bar owner or anyone else know, either then
or now, what your sexual orientation is? Sure, in some cases you could
make a good guess, but probably not in most cases.

And also why would you want to turn away paying customers? Night life
revenues tanked after online dating became a thing all small bars and
clubs that want to stay alive need to be willing to take whomever wants
to show up and spend

IDK any regular bar that ever turned away anyone based on sexual orientation.
The thing that defined customers was venue. If you were a sports bar with
TVs, people came to drink and watch sports. If you had a gay flag flying
outside, they came to hang out with mostly gay people, but people were
not checked or denied, at least not for the most part. I'm sure there
were some bars with knuckle draggers that would give the evil eye to
some effeminate looking guy wearing a beret, but that wasn't the general
case. What you did have was some bigoted police and similar going into
gay bars, eg Stonewall in NYC and harrassing gays.

 

[John Larkin]

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT), Whoey Louie
<trader4@optonline.net> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:07:01 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:54:15 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/9/19 4:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/9/19 10:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:31:30 AM UTC-4, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
If you did not already think it was pretty bad.

The buffoon gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to criminal
Edwin Meese today (yesterday).

Yeah, you know... the guy who was put in charge of stopping porn
in the USA when he was under Ronnie. Yeah that guy... he was given
a medal by a guy who was in three soft porn flics, and was caught
paying off a porn star just some few months ago. He failed on that
one.

He also committed crimes, with Reagan, that should have sent them
both to prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal

He should have croaked in prison years ago, if not decades, not be
getting a fucking medal.

Rod Serling is turning in his grave.


The senile old oaf will be demanding the His Military make him king and
do napalm strikes on his opponents before the end. The military probably
has other ideas about who runs the country.

Trump is 3 years into this. No napalm yet. Actually, Trump is probably the most measured president (ignoring his tweets) in years. He knows that any mishap (like directing the IRS to go after his enemies) is going to get him immediately booted from office. At this point the best they have (ignoring the Russia hoax) is a "whistle blower" who has second hand information who , it appears, is a staff member in Elizabeth warrens campaign.

These losers are just projecting what they want done to others.

Terrified that their porn might be cut off. Then they might have to
leave home and try to meet some actual women. Terrified.


Yeah I'd sure like to have a round-table discussion with the other
regular users here on what they know about meeting "actual women."

I met my wife Mo in a gay bar.


I see.

In any case in the year 2019 there are few strictly "gay bars" or
gay-only night life establishments remaining in many small US cities;

Hamburger Marys wasn't entirely gay.

We were recently having a beer at Wild Side West, a famous dyke dive
bar, when I stepped away for a minute. Mo was immediately hit on... by
a guy.

for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost half
the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people entering
your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

The discrimination was mostly visible hostility against straights.

Wow, that a whopping lie.

You didn't visit the dyke bars and parties that I did. The anti-male
loathing was intense.

Ever hear of Stonewall, in NYC, for example?
The NYC cops targeted everyone in the gay bar, regardless of sexual
orientation, assuming they were all gay or gay sympathizers.
NEver saw that happen in a straight bar. No one can tell sexual
orientation in most cases by
looking at anyone anyhow. This straight out of Archie Bunker bigot
land.

I grew up in New Orleans. The French Quarter was heavily gay, and
everybody was fine with that; adds color. Houston was pretty gay too.
Bigotry must be a Yankee thing.

Everybody had an uncle or a friend who "never married." Boys will be
boys.

And also why would you want to turn away paying customers? Night life
revenues tanked after online dating became a thing all small bars and
clubs that want to stay alive need to be willing to take whomever wants
to show up and spend

Things here used to be a lot more segregated. Being (whatever) is just
not such a big thing now.

I remember when, especially, dyke places were clearly man-hostile. Gay
guys seemed to like women. All that has pretty much calmed down now.
People must find new things to be outraged about. Just don't wear a
MAGA hat around here.


Why would anyone want to wear a hat associated with an evil, lying,
shyster orange clown?

To enrage people like you, of course.

 

[Tom Del Rosso]

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Looks like the Russian hoax worked in his favor, and he'll probably
spin the Ukraine thing his way too.

Ukraine is in his favor with no spin. The question is whether the Dems
attempt to spin it works, and puplic opinion says it is working. The
dimwits actually believe that insisting on an investigation into someone
who admitted on tape that he commited a crime, is a crime.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 6:19:32 PM UTC-4, Tom Del Rosso wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Looks like the Russian hoax worked in his favor, and he'll probably
spin the Ukraine thing his way too.

Ukraine is in his favor with no spin. The question is whether the Dems
attempt to spin it works, and puplic opinion says it is working. The
dimwits actually believe that insisting on an investigation into someone
who admitted on tape that he commited a crime, is a crime.

Yeah, that Ukraine thing is really going well for Trump. Last night
the two guys that Giuliani relied on for his vast Ukraine conspiracy
theories, ie that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election, not Russia,
were arrested at Dulles Airport. They had one way tickets to Vienna.
The and two others are charged with illegally funneling foreign money,
into US election campaign in 2018. $325K went to a pro-Trump PAC.
Looks like some went direct to Trump's campaign too as well as to
House Minority leader Tim McCarthy's campaign, former Congressman
Sessions of TX and FL governor DeSantis, all Republicans. It looks
like the illegal source of the money was a Russian.

Oh, but it gets worse, much worse. Who did the two arrested at the airport
have lunch with that afternoon? Why Ruddy Giuliani, at the Trump DC hotel
of course. For the Cliff Notes version, just look here, it includes
a picture of Trump, Ruddy, and the two arrested, all together. One of
those arrested apparently had dinner at the White House too.

So, it turns out that the ones that Ruddy was relying on to show him
how Ukraine, not Russia meddled in the 2016 election, were actually
illegally meddling themselves. They filled Ruddy with crazy BS
conspiracy crap that will have Trump impeached. And the indictment
alleges that after
making the donation to Sessions, they requested that the US Ambassador
to Ukraine be fired, because she wasn't positive enough to Trump's
"agenda'. Sessions admits he called Mike Pompeo to relay that request.
Wow, this is stunning, even by Trump standards. It will be interesting
to here both of those chumps explain what exactly they thought was really
going on, like why some schmuck business guys from FL give a rat's ass
about who the US ambassador to Ukraine is or how they know what she was
or wasn't doing.....

Bye, bye, the clown is going down.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, October 11, 2019 at 9:19:32 AM UTC+11, Tom Del Rosso wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

Looks like the Russian hoax worked in his favor, and he'll probably
spin the Ukraine thing his way too.

Ukraine is in his favor with no spin.

Tom Del Rosso may be silly enough to think that - he really isn't very clever.

> The question is whether the Dems attempt to spin it works, and public opinion says it is working.

Trump's attempt to hold up Congress-voted aid in order to get Ukraine to try and dig some dirt on a political rival was blatantly criminal, even if the twit was too ignorant to realise it. This isn't the kind of incident that the Democrats need to spin - all they need is the facts (which the White House tried to bury).

The dimwits actually believe that insisting on an investigation into someone
who admitted on tape that he committed a crime, is a crime.

Tom Del Rosso isn't all that articulate.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Friday, October 11, 2019 at 8:02:27 AM UTC+11, John Larkin wrote:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 13:27:33 -0700 (PDT), Whoey Louie
trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:07:01 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:54:15 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 10/9/19 4:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
On 10/9/19 10:25 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:40:51 -0700 (PDT), Michael Terrell
terrell.michael.a@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 6:31:30 AM UTC-4, blo...@columbus.rr.com wrote:
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

<snip>

for one thing discrimination on sex preference is illegal in almost half
the states, so you cannot discriminate against straight people entering
your establishment, either. and they hold places to that.

The discrimination was mostly visible hostility against straights.

Wow, that a whopping lie.

You didn't visit the dyke bars and parties that I did. The anti-male
loathing was intense.

John Larkin interpreted it as anti-male loathing, as any egomaniac would.

More objective observers might be able to find another interpretation.

<snip>

Why would anyone want to wear a hat associated with an evil, lying,
shyster orange clown?

To enrage people like you, of course.

Rational human beings with a realistic attitude to Trump's inadequacies?

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

> The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

YOU CAN'T. Mueller couldn't, you think you can ? How advanced is YOUR law degree ?

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 1:15:48 PM UTC+11, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:

The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

YOU CAN'T. Mueller couldn't, you think you can ? How advanced is YOUR law degree ?

Mueller thought that there was a case against Trump for obstruction of justice, but not one that could be pursued against a sitting president.

As soon as Trump is out of office, this impression will become testable.

In France Jacque Chirac got tried and convicted as soon as he stopped being president. Sadly, he only got a suspended sentence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:e9156c22-5957-432b-9f64-8b10b16a8c75@googlegroups.com:

The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

You're a goddamned idiot. The ignorant bastard thinks he is teflon
and breaks the goddamned law every day.

Hell, the FCC should go after the retarded fuck, because he has a
SAG card, and therefore he took the Broadcaster's Oath, which means
he is criminally responsible for his acts when on the air.

They should cite him and fine him $1M for each and every instance.
He should actually face a criminal charge for it as well, since it is
so deliberate and pre-meditated.

He should go to jail for the shit he pulled in the discrimination
cases that were brought against him. He should face jail for the
Asbestos debacle he ignored and then made even worse, and then
ignored the EPA and NYC and the FEDs.

The motherfucker should go to jail for the hundreds of millions of
dollars he shirked his responsibility to pay the contractors who
performed work for him. A cleverly crafted bankruptcy filing is NOT
an excuse.

The bastard is lucky one of them doesn't nail his ass for it.

The porn star pay-off was ALSO a crime.

> YOU CAN'T.

You're mumbling... again.

> Mueller couldn't,

You have no clue what Mueller reported. You are 100% clueless
about it. FACT.

you think you can ? How advanced is
YOUR law degree ?

3 fucking orders of magnitude moreso than yours is, punk.

You're a goddamned idiot. Blind as a bat dumbfuck. That is what
you are.

 

On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 03:31:23 -0700 (PDT), blocher@columbus.rr.com
wrote:

On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 5:24:34 AM UTC-4, bitrex wrote:
On 10/9/19 2:47 AM, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
If you did not already think it was pretty bad.

The buffoon gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom to criminal
Edwin Meese today (yesterday).

Yeah, you know... the guy who was put in charge of stopping porn
in the USA when he was under Ronnie. Yeah that guy... he was given
a medal by a guy who was in three soft porn flics, and was caught
paying off a porn star just some few months ago. He failed on that
one.

He also committed crimes, with Reagan, that should have sent them
both to prison.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Contra_affair

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedtech_scandal

He should have croaked in prison years ago, if not decades, not be
getting a fucking medal.

Rod Serling is turning in his grave.


The senile old oaf will be demanding the His Military make him king and
do napalm strikes on his opponents before the end. The military probably
has other ideas about who runs the country.

Trump is 3 years into this. No napalm yet. Actually, Trump is probably the most measured president (ignoring his tweets) in years. He knows that any mishap (like directing the IRS to go after his enemies) is going to get him immediately booted from office. At this point the best they have (ignoring the Russia hoax) is a "whistle blower" who has second hand information who , it appears, is a staff member in Elizabeth warrens campaign.

He was on Plugs Biden's Whitehouse staff ("working relationship").

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 2:10:49 PM UTC+11, k...@notreal.com wrote:

On Wed, 09 Oct 2019 13:27:11 -0700, John Larkin
jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:36:31 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:h32spe16jmhv9k05l1bhj1q7v665d9emf8@4ax.com:
On Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:c1srpe9u93svphbj9hehj0uuvf3pq8eidg@4ax.com:

<snip>

No, I refer to the manipulated Electoral College.
You are too fucking stupid to know anything about The Constitution.
Much less how the EC got included.

Please enlighten us.

AlwaysWrong "enlighten us"? You've *got* to be joking. He'll lie to
you, give you all the word salad you can stomach, and generally give
wrong information but none of that is in any way "enlightening".

Krw's memory seems to have gone to read-only some years ago, so he's never going to get any more enlightened than he is at the moment. Since a lot of his memory seems to have been programmed with false information, he's inclined to incorrectly reject a lot of what he reads as misleading word salad.

It's sad. The fact that he's not aware of his mental defects means that he wastes a lot of bandwidth telling us that his brain stopped doing anything useful years ago.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 10:47:52 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 1:15:48 PM UTC+11, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

YOU CAN'T. Mueller couldn't, you think you can ? How advanced is YOUR law degree ?

Mueller thought that there was a case against Trump for obstruction of justice, but not one that could be pursued against a sitting president.

That's a lie.

As soon as Trump is out of office, this impression will become testable.

Not very likely, unless the next administration is as stupid as this one.

In France Jacque Chirac got tried and convicted as soon as he stopped being president. Sadly, he only got a suspended sentence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Who the hell cares about the French?

Isn't it time to go feed the kangaroos?

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:8cb846cd-d6b4-4b17-aafd-a4e1537830ef@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 10:47:52 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 1:15:48 PM UTC+11,
jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

YOU CAN'T. Mueller couldn't, you think you can ? How advanced
is YOUR law degree ?

Mueller thought that there was a case against Trump for
obstruction of justice, but not one that could be pursued against
a sitting president.

That's a lie.





As soon as Trump is out of office, this impression will become
testable.

Not very likely, unless the next administration is as stupid as
this one.





In France Jacque Chirac got tried and convicted as soon as he
stopped being president. Sadly, he only got a suspended sentence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Who the hell cares about the French?

You really are one stupid fuck.

Isn't it time to go feed the kangaroos?

And a retarded punk as well. And you wonder why I think you should
be erased from the human gene pool.

You should do some reading. Try reading a bit of the works of
Thomas Paine. Maybe you'll get a clue.

Here, dingledorf...

https://www.amazon.com/Thomas-Paine-Interpretation-Illustrated-
Hyperlinked-ebook/dp/B00IS56CV0

https://www.amazon.com/Common-Writings-Norton-Critical-
Editions/dp/0393978702

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 10:45:55 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:8cb846cd-d6b4-4b17-aafd-a4e1537830ef@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 10:47:52 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 1:15:48 PM UTC+11,
jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
The motherfucker broke the rules and the law. Period.

WHAT LAW. Name code and statute number of whatever.

YOU CAN'T. Mueller couldn't, you think you can ? How advanced
is YOUR law degree ?

Mueller thought that there was a case against Trump for
obstruction of justice, but not one that could be pursued against
a sitting president.

That's a lie.





As soon as Trump is out of office, this impression will become
testable.

Not very likely, unless the next administration is as stupid as
this one.





In France Jacque Chirac got tried and convicted as soon as he
stopped being president. Sadly, he only got a suspended sentence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Who the hell cares about the French?

You really are one stupid fuck.

Isn't it time to go feed the kangaroos?

And a retarded punk as well. And you wonder why I think you should
be erased from the human gene pool.

You should do some reading. Try reading a bit of the works of
Thomas Paine. Maybe you'll get a clue.

Did Thomas Paine comment on the Mueller investigation? I think not.
He was dead, stupid.