Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
snip
Your childish denial of producing the statistics you claim exist IS the problem. The fact is there ARE climate statistics out there, but they disprove your theories (which is why you don\'t present them).
There is climate change denial propaganda out there, and it\'s full of fake statistics that you\'d be happy to accept.
They are wrong, but you like them and refuse to recognise real data that doesn\'t tell the story you want to endorse.
Hey Bozo, I have given you MULTIPLE chances to produce:
1. Your OWN statistics.
How would I do that? I don\'t have access to the relevant data bases.
SURPRISE! He ADMITS that he has NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gnatguy does have some silly ideas.
2. Your OWN cites of others statistics
I have done that repeatedly, but you merely deny that statistics I cite meet your - undefined - standards that might let you accept them as statics. This is simply a childish evasion. but you do rely on it.
No, you HAVEN\'T, Bozo. What you call \"statistics\" are nothing but datum. Statistics ANALYZE large sets of data.
Statistical techniques extract information from large sets of data, which are the statistics being analysed. If you knew what you were talking about you\'d be aware of this.
You keep on FAILING to deliver!
From your point of view. From any other point of you are merely evading the issue.
OF COURSE it is my point of view - I DEMAND results, not EXCUSES!!!
To be more specific, you demand the result you want to see, and the fact that what you want is an imagined result stops you from being satisfied by real-world facts.
The actual problem is simply that you are a gullible twit, deeply attached to his delusions.
No, the problem isn\'t that I am a \"gullible twit,\" but that YOU ARE ONE. You just keep chanting the mantra of climate alarmists w/o ANY critical thinking.
You do like to make that claim, but it falls down on the fact that you can\'t recognise critical thinking when you are exposed to it.
Your idea of \"critical thinking\" is nothing more than repeating slogans of the hard left.
Gnatguy looks in the mirror, notes that he is repeating the slogans of the hard right and imagines that everybody who won\'t take him seriously is making the same kind of mistake.
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
The American Institute of Physics isn\'t any kind of \"hard left\" organisation. Gnatguy may be silly enough to think that it is.
--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:13:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
snip
Your childish denial of producing the statistics you claim exist IS the problem. The fact is there ARE climate statistics out there, but they disprove your theories (which is why you don\'t present them).
There is climate change denial propaganda out there, and it\'s full of fake statistics that you\'d be happy to accept.
They are wrong, but you like them and refuse to recognise real data that doesn\'t tell the story you want to endorse.
Hey Bozo, I have given you MULTIPLE chances to produce:
1. Your OWN statistics.
How would I do that? I don\'t have access to the relevant data bases.
SURPRISE! He ADMITS that he has NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gnatguy does have some silly ideas.
2. Your OWN cites of others statistics
I have done that repeatedly, but you merely deny that statistics I cite meet your - undefined - standards that might let you accept them as statics. This is simply a childish evasion. but you do rely on it.
No, you HAVEN\'T, Bozo. What you call \"statistics\" are nothing but datum. Statistics ANALYZE large sets of data.
Statistical techniques extract information from large sets of data, which are the statistics being analysed. If you knew what you were talking about you\'d be aware of this.
You keep on FAILING to deliver!
From your point of view. From any other point of you are merely evading the issue.
OF COURSE it is my point of view - I DEMAND results, not EXCUSES!!!
To be more specific, you demand the result you want to see, and the fact that what you want is an imagined result stops you from being satisfied by real-world facts.
The actual problem is simply that you are a gullible twit, deeply attached to his delusions.
No, the problem isn\'t that I am a \"gullible twit,\" but that YOU ARE ONE. You just keep chanting the mantra of climate alarmists w/o ANY critical thinking.
You do like to make that claim, but it falls down on the fact that you can\'t recognise critical thinking when you are exposed to it.
Your idea of \"critical thinking\" is nothing more than repeating slogans of the hard left.
Gnatguy looks in the mirror, notes that he is repeating the slogans of the hard right and imagines that everybody who won\'t take him seriously is making the same kind of mistake.
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
The American Institute of Physics isn\'t any kind of \"hard left\" organisation. Gnatguy may be silly enough to think that it is.
It isn\'t about the \"discovery of global warming,\" it is all about the CAUSE! There IS NO scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming. Period.
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 4:05:24 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:13:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
snip
Your childish denial of producing the statistics you claim exist IS the problem. The fact is there ARE climate statistics out there, but they disprove your theories (which is why you don\'t present them).
There is climate change denial propaganda out there, and it\'s full of fake statistics that you\'d be happy to accept.
They are wrong, but you like them and refuse to recognise real data that doesn\'t tell the story you want to endorse.
Hey Bozo, I have given you MULTIPLE chances to produce:
1. Your OWN statistics.
How would I do that? I don\'t have access to the relevant data bases.
SURPRISE! He ADMITS that he has NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gnatguy does have some silly ideas.
2. Your OWN cites of others statistics
I have done that repeatedly, but you merely deny that statistics I cite meet your - undefined - standards that might let you accept them as statics. This is simply a childish evasion. but you do rely on it.
No, you HAVEN\'T, Bozo. What you call \"statistics\" are nothing but datum. Statistics ANALYZE large sets of data.
Statistical techniques extract information from large sets of data, which are the statistics being analysed. If you knew what you were talking about you\'d be aware of this.
You keep on FAILING to deliver!
From your point of view. From any other point of you are merely evading the issue.
OF COURSE it is my point of view - I DEMAND results, not EXCUSES!!!
To be more specific, you demand the result you want to see, and the fact that what you want is an imagined result stops you from being satisfied by real-world facts.
The actual problem is simply that you are a gullible twit, deeply attached to his delusions.
No, the problem isn\'t that I am a \"gullible twit,\" but that YOU ARE ONE. You just keep chanting the mantra of climate alarmists w/o ANY critical thinking.
You do like to make that claim, but it falls down on the fact that you can\'t recognise critical thinking when you are exposed to it.
Your idea of \"critical thinking\" is nothing more than repeating slogans of the hard left.
Gnatguy looks in the mirror, notes that he is repeating the slogans of the hard right and imagines that everybody who won\'t take him seriously is making the same kind of mistake.
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
The American Institute of Physics isn\'t any kind of \"hard left\" organisation. Gnatguy may be silly enough to think that it is.
It isn\'t about the \"discovery of global warming,\" it is all about the CAUSE! There IS NO scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming. Period.
None that Gnatguy can follow. The American Institute of Physics tells a different story. Gnatguy doesn\'t seem to have had the kind of education that would let him follow the story, so he imagines that he can ignore it.
--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 10:14:36 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 4:05:24 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:13:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill.....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
snip
Your childish denial of producing the statistics you claim exist IS the problem. The fact is there ARE climate statistics out there, but they disprove your theories (which is why you don\'t present them).
There is climate change denial propaganda out there, and it\'s full of fake statistics that you\'d be happy to accept.
They are wrong, but you like them and refuse to recognise real data that doesn\'t tell the story you want to endorse.
Hey Bozo, I have given you MULTIPLE chances to produce:
1. Your OWN statistics.
How would I do that? I don\'t have access to the relevant data bases.
SURPRISE! He ADMITS that he has NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gnatguy does have some silly ideas.
2. Your OWN cites of others statistics
I have done that repeatedly, but you merely deny that statistics I cite meet your - undefined - standards that might let you accept them as statics. This is simply a childish evasion. but you do rely on it.
No, you HAVEN\'T, Bozo. What you call \"statistics\" are nothing but datum. Statistics ANALYZE large sets of data.
Statistical techniques extract information from large sets of data, which are the statistics being analysed. If you knew what you were talking about you\'d be aware of this.
You keep on FAILING to deliver!
From your point of view. From any other point of you are merely evading the issue.
OF COURSE it is my point of view - I DEMAND results, not EXCUSES!!!
To be more specific, you demand the result you want to see, and the fact that what you want is an imagined result stops you from being satisfied by real-world facts.
The actual problem is simply that you are a gullible twit, deeply attached to his delusions.
No, the problem isn\'t that I am a \"gullible twit,\" but that YOU ARE ONE. You just keep chanting the mantra of climate alarmists w/o ANY critical thinking.
You do like to make that claim, but it falls down on the fact that you can\'t recognise critical thinking when you are exposed to it.
Your idea of \"critical thinking\" is nothing more than repeating slogans of the hard left.
Gnatguy looks in the mirror, notes that he is repeating the slogans of the hard right and imagines that everybody who won\'t take him seriously is making the same kind of mistake.
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
The American Institute of Physics isn\'t any kind of \"hard left\" organisation. Gnatguy may be silly enough to think that it is.
It isn\'t about the \"discovery of global warming,\" it is all about the CAUSE! There IS NO scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming. Period.
None that Gnatguy can follow. The American Institute of Physics tells a different story. Gnatguy doesn\'t seem to have had the kind of education that would let him follow the story, so he imagines that he can ignore it.
Again, Bozo, you FAIL to produce the claimed evidence. WHERE THE FUCK IS IT????????
On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 2:38:46 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 10:14:36 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 4:05:24 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:13:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
snip
Your childish denial of producing the statistics you claim exist IS the problem. The fact is there ARE climate statistics out there, but they disprove your theories (which is why you don\'t present them).
There is climate change denial propaganda out there, and it\'s full of fake statistics that you\'d be happy to accept.
They are wrong, but you like them and refuse to recognise real data that doesn\'t tell the story you want to endorse.
Hey Bozo, I have given you MULTIPLE chances to produce:
1. Your OWN statistics.
How would I do that? I don\'t have access to the relevant data bases.
SURPRISE! He ADMITS that he has NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Gnatguy does have some silly ideas.
2. Your OWN cites of others statistics
I have done that repeatedly, but you merely deny that statistics I cite meet your - undefined - standards that might let you accept them as statics. This is simply a childish evasion. but you do rely on it.
No, you HAVEN\'T, Bozo. What you call \"statistics\" are nothing but datum. Statistics ANALYZE large sets of data.
Statistical techniques extract information from large sets of data, which are the statistics being analysed. If you knew what you were talking about you\'d be aware of this.
You keep on FAILING to deliver!
From your point of view. From any other point of you are merely evading the issue.
OF COURSE it is my point of view - I DEMAND results, not EXCUSES!!!
To be more specific, you demand the result you want to see, and the fact that what you want is an imagined result stops you from being satisfied by real-world facts.
The actual problem is simply that you are a gullible twit, deeply attached to his delusions.
No, the problem isn\'t that I am a \"gullible twit,\" but that YOU ARE ONE. You just keep chanting the mantra of climate alarmists w/o ANY critical thinking.
You do like to make that claim, but it falls down on the fact that you can\'t recognise critical thinking when you are exposed to it.
Your idea of \"critical thinking\" is nothing more than repeating slogans of the hard left.
Gnatguy looks in the mirror, notes that he is repeating the slogans of the hard right and imagines that everybody who won\'t take him seriously is making the same kind of mistake.
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
The American Institute of Physics isn\'t any kind of \"hard left\" organisation. Gnatguy may be silly enough to think that it is.
It isn\'t about the \"discovery of global warming,\" it is all about the CAUSE! There IS NO scientific evidence of anthropogenic global warming. Period.
None that Gnatguy can follow. The American Institute of Physics tells a different story. Gnatguy doesn\'t seem to have had the kind of education that would let him follow the story, so he imagines that he can ignore it.
Again, Bozo, you FAIL to produce the claimed evidence. WHERE THE FUCK IS IT????????
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
You\'ve got to dig through quite a lot of stuff to get to the evidence, but if you persisted, you\'d probably get there.
If you actually are as stupid as your posts here suggest, you might not be able to manage it, but I have pointed you at the evidence - repeatedly - and you\'ve failed to take advantage of my advice. Complaining that I haven\'t pointed you at climate change for morons might be a defensible claim, but as it is you are merely ignoring the evidence I have pointed you at.
--
Bozo Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 9:10:54 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, October 21, 2022 at 2:38:46 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 11, 2022 at 10:14:36 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 12, 2022 at 4:05:24 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, October 4, 2022 at 11:13:00 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, October 5, 2022 at 4:45:21 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 6:57:19 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee..org wrote:
On Monday, October 3, 2022 at 11:46:04 AM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 10:28:23 PM UTC-7, bill.....@ieee.org wrote:
On Sunday, October 2, 2022 at 1:42:54 PM UTC+11, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 11:20:44 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 3:28:52 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 12:27:03 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 3:08:43 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 11:26:28 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, September 23, 2022 at 3:04:45 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:56:26 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Thursday, September 22, 2022 at 12:58:23 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 1:15:46 AM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 2:33:11 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
On Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 7:23:35 PM UTC-7, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 9:51:45 AM UTC+10, a a wrote:
None that Gnatguy can follow. The American Institute of Physics tells a different story. Gnatguy doesn\'t seem to have had the kind of education that would let him follow the story, so he imagines that he can ignore it..
Again, Bozo, you FAIL to produce the claimed evidence. WHERE THE FUCK IS IT????????
https://history.aip.org/climate/index.htm
I am speaking specifically about SCIENTIFIC evidence, not OPINIONS, which is what your reference is. This stuff basically says global temperatures have risen (debatable), and CO2 levels have risen, therefore CO2 is the cause of ALL temperature increases.
You\'ve got to dig through quite a lot of stuff to get to the evidence, but if you persisted, you\'d probably get there.
Nothing that DIRECTLY links global warming to CO2 levels.
If you actually are as stupid as your posts here suggest, you might not be able to manage it, but I have pointed you at the evidence - repeatedly - and you\'ve failed to take advantage of my advice. Complaining that I haven\'t pointed you at climate change for morons might be a defensible claim, but as it is you are merely ignoring the evidence I have pointed you at.
Your \"advice\" is as worth listening to as your advice on FIREBOMBING and NUKING your own country!