W
whit3rd
Guest
On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 8:00:08 AM UTC-7, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
The arrogant dismissal is clear, the testable assertions are not.
The virus is novel, so "another" is correct.
The 'winter' assertion would be contrary to the Australian experience; incorrect.
A 'cold' doesn't have the same symptoms (which is how, in China,
the disease was discovered) nor the same cause (a virus not previously
known in humans), but we've folded many other viruses into that catch-all.
Spin, this assertion is, and sloppy nomenclature, and... rejected because
it's MY language too, and I need clarity. I also am defensive of SI units...
'Bad', while also not testable because not quantified, can stand.
There are LOTS of slow press cycles, they don't become pandemics.
But, science doesn't need those local-condition-dependent curves.
The disease is being fought in ways that are uneconomic, we need to
understand other-than-lockdown treatments, and curve-description doesn't
help that. There's no treatment protocol or vaccine in that information.
The publication and discussion of curves IS a slow-press-cycle effect.
I have been suggesting that this *could* be just another bad
winter cold that was unfortunate to be born in a slow press cycle. I
have made no "claims."
The arrogant dismissal is clear, the testable assertions are not.
The virus is novel, so "another" is correct.
The 'winter' assertion would be contrary to the Australian experience; incorrect.
A 'cold' doesn't have the same symptoms (which is how, in China,
the disease was discovered) nor the same cause (a virus not previously
known in humans), but we've folded many other viruses into that catch-all.
Spin, this assertion is, and sloppy nomenclature, and... rejected because
it's MY language too, and I need clarity. I also am defensive of SI units...
'Bad', while also not testable because not quantified, can stand.
There are LOTS of slow press cycles, they don't become pandemics.
I still think the curves should be scaled by test density, which would
change their shapes radically.
But, science doesn't need those local-condition-dependent curves.
The disease is being fought in ways that are uneconomic, we need to
understand other-than-lockdown treatments, and curve-description doesn't
help that. There's no treatment protocol or vaccine in that information.
The publication and discussion of curves IS a slow-press-cycle effect.