Texas power prices briefly soar to $9,000/MWh as heat wave b

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?

Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!

Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.

Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example.

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.

Actually, he didn't. You are too stupid to understand what he did say.

> Ask him for your links.

You made the claim, which you are totally incapable of documenting. You need to find the evidence.

Actually, what you need is a working brain, and that clearly isn't going to happen.

I suspect you are confusing the idea that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find any evidence.

Nobody likes the fact that Russia intervened. Trump resents the suggestion that he might have collaborated with the Russians, which would not play well with the people silly enough to support him, and labels the whole question fake news, as he would, even if it were true.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:dd3953cb-8fc0-4586-8885-3eef744c5641@googlegroups.com:

but there's no evidence that Trump even knew that he was being
helped

That actually makes sense stated that way. The motherfucker is too
fucking stupid to know what he did... or is doing.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-4cc5-
ae08-5cd859b4545f@googlegroups.com:

but I haven't
called you a lib.

Yes you did.

You are too goddamned stupid to even remember the shit you have
spewed into this group.

 

Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-
4cc5-ae08-5cd859b4545f@googlegroups.com:

I only call people libs who have actually demonstrated
that they are liberals and it's not specific to Trump.

You are a true idiot with an utterly and hopelessly bent
understanding of what "a liberal" is.

You are a punk. The end result of the mentality the Tea Party
fostered into certain idiots' claims to an "American mindset".
Motherfuckers like you are about as far off the mark as it gets.

You very likely have never been able to work with others and got
shitcanned from every real job you ever had.

Trader indeed. You are a traitor, motherfucker.

 

Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-
4cc5-ae08-5cd859b4545f@googlegroups.com:

You claim to be a Republican, so then Trump is
your guy, stop complaining or quit the party and stop enabling him.

Trump is not "my guy" you retarded fuck. A person of a party does
not have to be behind or with all of the members of the party.

It is called dissention, idiot. And I am not the only republican
against the bastard. And you are a complete and utter immature idiot
to think those against him "enable him".

And I am not enabling him.

If you post you name and address though, I'l be enabled and sure to
come over and un enable you, traitorous dumbfuck.

 

Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-
4cc5-ae08-5cd859b4545f@googlegroups.com:

Geez, what a bunch.

Then...

Go away, little girl.

Or post your name and address and I'll come over and introduce you to
a bunch... of knuckles.

Run, fat ass.... RUN! Run over and update your LITS!

 

Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:ba220939-9ad2-408e-b301-f77f7548100d@googlegroups.com:

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid,
lib Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's
true. Ask him for your links.

Goddamn, motherfucker. Little LYING fucktards like you deserve to
be beaten with baseball bats. Not upside da haed... All over your
limbs... nice and painfull and slow.

Then you won't be able to make up stupid shit.

Go ahead, pussy boy... post that info.

Don't forget to update your lits.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:5f056fc4-24be-4cc5-
ae08-5cd859b4545f@googlegroups.com:

> IDK what you are really, besides very confused and

You DK a goddamned thing about a goddamned thing.

You are so fucking stupid that you cry and compile "lists", because
you are to retarded to know what constitutes a threat.

Why anyone here gives you any credence much less discussion time is
beyond me. If we all filter you, you can spew all you want, but you
will be the only one reading your spew.

Again, dumbfuck... *YOU* don't *know* anything, much less anything
about me.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 5:43:11 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:dd3953cb-8fc0-4586-8885-3eef744c5641@googlegroups.com:

but there's no evidence that Trump even knew that he was being
helped

That actually makes sense stated that way. The motherfucker is too
fucking stupid to know what he did... or is doing.

You claim to be a Republican, Trump is the leader of your party, he's setting
it's policies and values, so maybe you should reevaluate who's really
stupid?

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:34:37 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?

Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!

Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.

Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example.

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.

Actually, he didn't. You are too stupid to understand what he did say.

Ask him for your links.

You made the claim, which you are totally incapable of documenting. You need to find the evidence.

Actually, what you need is a working brain, and that clearly isn't going to happen.

I suspect you are confusing the idea that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find any evidence.

I know you don't know the meaning of the world collusion. But then that's
no surprise. You're so stupid that you keep denying that libs here have
been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016.

Nobody likes the fact that Russia intervened. Trump resents the suggestion that he might have collaborated with the Russians,

And you say that as if he shouldn't resent it. Go figure. Of course
if you or some of your favorite libs had any kind of accusation leveled
against them and after two years and $30 mil, there was zero evidence
it was true, why then it would be a very different story.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 9:04:51 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:34:37 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?

Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!

Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.

Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example.

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.

Actually, he didn't. You are too stupid to understand what he did say.

Ask him for your links.

You made the claim, which you are totally incapable of documenting. You need to find the evidence.

Actually, what you need is a working brain, and that clearly isn't going to happen.

I suspect you are confusing the idea that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find any evidence.

I know you don't know the meaning of the world collusion.

Trader4 makes some bizarre claims.

> But then that's no surprise. You're so stupid that you keep denying that libs > here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016..

All I've said is that I've not seen any evidence of it. If you are so convinced that it has been happening, you should be able to provide a link to an example.

Since you haven't, we have to assume that you can't.

<snipped the usual evidence of Trader4's enthusiasm for text chopping and missing the point>

--
Bill Sloman, Suydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 9:04:51 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:34:37 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

<snip>

Nobody likes the fact that Russia intervened. Trump resents the suggestion that he might have collaborated with the Russians,

And you say that as if he shouldn't resent it. Go figure. Of course
if you or some of your favorite libs had any kind of accusation leveled
against them and after two years and $30 mil, there was zero evidence
it was true, why then it would be a very different story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report

The Mueller investigation was into "into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election". It found quite a lot.

"It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government, about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations."

The possibility that Trump or some of his campaign officials might actively have collaborated with the Russians was looked into.

Trump has always wanted to depict the investigation as solely looking at him - it's what egomaniacs do - but it doesn't happen to be true.

His claim that the investigation "exonerated" him is pure spin, based on the false propositon that they were only looking for collaboration.

The $30 million dollar investigation found a whole lot of Russian intervention, and has already put a few of Trump's campaign team into prison. Mueller seems to suggest that Trump may be in line for prosecution once he stops being president.

Mueller did a whole lot better than Ken Starr could manage.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:400089a4-1d2e-4f35-8652-325f0c55f2fd@googlegroups.com:

You claim to be a Republican, Trump is the leader of your party,
he's setting it's policies and values, so maybe you should
reevaluate who's really stupid?

You are an idiot.

His policies suck, and no, you stupid fucktard, he is not "setting
values".

If he were, I'd follow his calls to violence and make you a primary
example.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:77d5d95b-2739-48c6-abda-ccd4e09ada61@googlegroups.com:

You deny that libs have been howling about Trump and Russian
collusion since 2016, yet here you are, doing exactly that,
yourself. Thanks for helping prove my point.

You did not make any point, dumbfuck.

You spewed some lame shit that *YOU* believe, and used lame monikers
that show *YOU* for the total retard that you are.

You are exactly that... a lame Usenet trolling, POINTLESS utter
retard.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 12:42:09 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:400089a4-1d2e-4f35-8652-325f0c55f2fd@googlegroups.com:

You claim to be a Republican, Trump is the leader of your party,
he's setting it's policies and values, so maybe you should
reevaluate who's really stupid?


You are an idiot.

His policies suck,

His policies are overwhelmingly supported by REPUBLICANS, stupid.
You claim to the a Republican, so obviously those policies can't be
all that repugnant to you. By being a member of his party, you're
enabling him. You never answered the question I've asked many times
now. What do you think would happen if 10% or 20% of Republicans
changed their registration and left the Republican Party?






and no, you stupid fucktard, he is not "setting

values".

Of course he is. All leaders have a major impact on establishing values.
The country sees their leader lie, divide, insult and they think
that makes it OK, that they can do it too.

If he were, I'd follow his calls to violence and make you a primary
example.

And of course you don't see how really stupid it is to be trying to take
a shot at Trump for his remarks that promoted violence while you make
violent threats here regularly. And you just did it again, as part of
the same sentence.

Of course not, because you're wrong, always wrong.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 9:39:22 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 9:04:51 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:34:37 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

snip

Nobody likes the fact that Russia intervened. Trump resents the suggestion that he might have collaborated with the Russians,

And you say that as if he shouldn't resent it. Go figure. Of course
if you or some of your favorite libs had any kind of accusation leveled
against them and after two years and $30 mil, there was zero evidence
it was true, why then it would be a very different story.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mueller_Report

The Mueller investigation was into "into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election". It found quite a lot.

"It also identifies links between Trump campaign officials and individuals with ties to the Russian government, about which several persons connected to the campaign made false statements and obstructed investigations."

The possibility that Trump or some of his campaign officials might actively have collaborated with the Russians was looked into.

Trump has always wanted to depict the investigation as solely looking at him - it's what egomaniacs do - but it doesn't happen to be true.

His claim that the investigation "exonerated" him is pure spin, based on the false propositon that they were only looking for collaboration.

The $30 million dollar investigation found a whole lot of Russian intervention, and has already put a few of Trump's campaign team into prison. Mueller seems to suggest that Trump may be in line for prosecution once he stops being president.

Mueller did a whole lot better than Ken Starr could manage.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

You deny that libs have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion
since 2016, yet here you are, doing exactly that, yourself. Thanks for
helping prove my point.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 10:56:38 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 9:04:51 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:34:37 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Tuesday, September 3, 2019 at 1:35:42 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:

Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?

Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!

Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.

No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.

Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example.

There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.

Actually, he didn't. You are too stupid to understand what he did say..

Ask him for your links.

You made the claim, which you are totally incapable of documenting. You need to find the evidence.

Actually, what you need is a working brain, and that clearly isn't going to happen.

I suspect you are confusing the idea that Russia intervened in the 2016 election to support Trump - which it certainly did - and idea that Trump had some kind of deal with the Russians where he offered them something for that intervention, which is conceivable but for which Mueller couldn't find any evidence.

I know you don't know the meaning of the world collusion.

Trader4 makes some bizarre claims.

But then that's no surprise. You're so stupid that you keep denying that libs > here have been howling about Trump and Russian collusion since 2016.

All I've said is that I've not seen any evidence of it. If you are so convinced that it has been happening, you should be able to provide a link to an example.

And yet here you are, a lib, howling about Trump and Russian collusion
yourself. Thanks for proving my point. Oh, the irony....

 

Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in news:a8703665-5bf7-
4681-a4d2-d06449e1fc5b@googlegroups.com:

Refusal to again answer the simple question noted.

I do not opine on politics, and I will not opine to a total piece
of shit like TraitorTard4. You dig, you traitortard fuckhead?

It is not refusal, dipshit.

You do not rate. BIG difference. get a clue. Not only do I not
want to discuss something with a total, hard wired, self impotent,
bent brained piece of shit retard like you, but given the
opportunity, I would gladly remove you or at least your ability to
sully the human gene pool any further.

You are a waste of oxygen, and the shit you exhale is boderline
hazardous.

Even a tardigrade has more on the ball than you do.

They can survive the vacuum of space. It would be great to see if
you could. My bet is no.

Really though... I'd rather simulate a deep dive and infuse your
blood heavy with nitrogen and then bring you back to atmospheric and
watch you scream and pop!

Hey... a new Kervorkian machine...

The Benzomatic!

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 11:07:06 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 12:42:09 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:400089a4-1d2e-4f35-8652-325f0c55f2fd@googlegroups.com:

<snip>

and no, you stupid fucktard, he is not "setting
values".

Of course he is. All leaders have a major impact on establishing values.
The country sees their leader lie, divide, insult and they think
that makes it OK, that they can do it too.

Seems unlikely. With Trump setting records for presenting false and misleading information, anybody in the US who might think that he was setting a good example would have to ignore the news.

https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/donald-trump-washington-post-fact-checker-figure_n_5d526ff0e4b0c63bcbecbbea

<snip>

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:a8703665-5bf7-4681-
a4d2-d06449e1fc5b@googlegroups.com:

> And yet here you are spewing yourself.

I call shit where I see shit, you you are SHIT, ShitHeadTard4.


> ROFL

More childish, immature, stupid shit, from the childish, immature
total piece of shit.

> I didn't start the OT thread either.

Then STAY THE FUCK OUT OF THEM, DUMBFUCKTARD4!

REFRAIN FROM POSTING.

Oh, that's right... YOU CAN'T because you are a fucktarded, group
invading Usenet TROLL.