W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 1:51:37 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
I've added that to my threat file on you.
I've added that to my threat file on you.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 1:32:51 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
One that's no where near 100%, and that's with tests where we know what's
coming, when, where, etc. And it doesn't cover all of SK, stupid.
NK could even put a nuke on a sub, deliver it to Busan or Inchon.
Perhaps you missed the lengthy discussion about that? As I tried
to explain to Rick, nuclear deterrence only works if both parties
are rational, and even then it has serious issues, it isn't perfect.
Eventually it will fail when some irrational leader comes to power.
History has a long list of them. Is KJU one? I guess not, Rick
says he's rational and there are no worries. I say we need to assume
he's not and make plans based on that.
Did they do that when NK torpedoed and sank their warship, killing 50?
Did they do that when NK shelled their island, killing their troops?
Yes, big talk, big balls, you sound like Trump.
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:47af4cf5-ecf9-4a96-
91c1-5add524fa726@googlegroups.com:
That doesn't mean that they can't launch a missile
with a nuke to hit most targets in SK,
No, they can't dipshit.
We have the most advanced missile defense in the world right there.
One that's no where near 100%, and that's with tests where we know what's
coming, when, where, etc. And it doesn't cover all of SK, stupid.
NK could even put a nuke on a sub, deliver it to Busan or Inchon.
The biggest defense, however, which you are stupid about is that if
they ever tried to do any such thing, they would be obliterated and
they know it. They would be on their knees in hours... literally.
If there were any of them left.
Perhaps you missed the lengthy discussion about that? As I tried
to explain to Rick, nuclear deterrence only works if both parties
are rational, and even then it has serious issues, it isn't perfect.
Eventually it will fail when some irrational leader comes to power.
History has a long list of them. Is KJU one? I guess not, Rick
says he's rational and there are no worries. I say we need to assume
he's not and make plans based on that.
SK will tear them a new asshole the next time they try anything
stupid.
Did they do that when NK torpedoed and sank their warship, killing 50?
Did they do that when NK shelled their island, killing their troops?
It is bad enough that we did not resolve it way back when instead
if this shit DMZ and y'all keep building up armies crap.
Yes, big talk, big balls, you sound like Trump.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 1:23:41 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Another lie. I never said they were developing "everything". I simply
stated that even if your premise were true, that NK is just importing
nukes, then they still have them, stupid.
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:47af4cf5-ecf9-4a96-
91c1-5add524fa726@googlegroups.com:
It doesn't matter exactly how they got there, the fact is that they
now have nuclear weapons and very likely the ability to deliver them,
Make up your mind you fucking retard. A few lines up they were
developing everything according to you.
Another lie. I never said they were developing "everything". I simply
stated that even if your premise were true, that NK is just importing
nukes, then they still have them, stupid.
Guest
Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:9bad7b89-d556-4450-adeb-5f67799384ad@googlegroups.com:
This is Usenet, TraitorTard4. Here, pissy little bitch punks like
you call them "lits".
Get to know the level of punk fucktard you have attained, dumbfuck.
Oh and for your lits... the cops will laugh at you and tell you to
discuss it with your therapist.
In your case, I suggest a psychiatrist. You need Lithium and
Thorazine.
The Lithium will take *your* IQ up a couple points, and the
thorazine will relieve this group of your fucktarded posts.
I suggest taking a triple dose of the M&Ms the first time.
You see, dippy traitortard4 bitch... social forums are one thing
and folks are identified. Usenet is anonymous. I know you might
have a hard time grasping that concept, but it means that I cannot
threaten you and you cannot be threatened. You get it now, dumbfuck?
And IF you ever answered the requests for you to post your name and
address, it would clearly be an invitation. Anything thereafter
would be something *YOU* incited.
So no matter how hard you try to claim that you were threatened, it
simply is not true, you pathetic, know nothing retarded fuck.
news:9bad7b89-d556-4450-adeb-5f67799384ad@googlegroups.com:
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 1:51:37 AM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:fd838ff0-45e0-4426- b75c-0e3a138e37fc@googlegroups.com:
Oh, poor widdle Australia, no balls of it's own, apparently
just
lead
around by the good old USA. I guess that's why you have this
total obsession with the USA, it's the big penis envy syndrome.
Wow. So you really are an idiot about Australia as well.
No surprise there. You seem to have an obsession with claiming
to
be superior to all those you deride.
It would be such a joy to deride up in your ass with about 5
feet
worth of a well whittled splintery NYPD broomstick handle.
Please post your name and address as a confirmation of your
desire
to have that happen. That way you cannot piss and moan that it
is a threat. You posting your name and address is your RSVP for
it.
Go update your lits, putz.
I've added that to my threat file on you.
This is Usenet, TraitorTard4. Here, pissy little bitch punks like
you call them "lits".
Get to know the level of punk fucktard you have attained, dumbfuck.
Oh and for your lits... the cops will laugh at you and tell you to
discuss it with your therapist.
In your case, I suggest a psychiatrist. You need Lithium and
Thorazine.
The Lithium will take *your* IQ up a couple points, and the
thorazine will relieve this group of your fucktarded posts.
I suggest taking a triple dose of the M&Ms the first time.
You see, dippy traitortard4 bitch... social forums are one thing
and folks are identified. Usenet is anonymous. I know you might
have a hard time grasping that concept, but it means that I cannot
threaten you and you cannot be threatened. You get it now, dumbfuck?
And IF you ever answered the requests for you to post your name and
address, it would clearly be an invitation. Anything thereafter
would be something *YOU* incited.
So no matter how hard you try to claim that you were threatened, it
simply is not true, you pathetic, know nothing retarded fuck.
Guest
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:2c2541df-4aa2-4d3c-
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
You keep mumbling this stupid shit.
No, idiot, it has nothing to do with both parties. The BAD parties
ALL know that WE will stamp them out lke the scum they are if they try
to pull ANYTHIONG. You dig, you dumb fucktard?
It is NOT MAD. It is You will not get three steps before you die if
you thumb your nose at the free world. Wake the fuck up.
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
As I tried
to explain to Rick, nuclear deterrence only works if both parties
are rational, and even then it has serious issues,
You keep mumbling this stupid shit.
No, idiot, it has nothing to do with both parties. The BAD parties
ALL know that WE will stamp them out lke the scum they are if they try
to pull ANYTHIONG. You dig, you dumb fucktard?
It is NOT MAD. It is You will not get three steps before you die if
you thumb your nose at the free world. Wake the fuck up.
Guest
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:2c2541df-4aa2-4d3c-
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
You're a goddamned total retard.
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
Yes, big talk, big balls, you sound like Trump.
You're a goddamned total retard.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 11:19:35 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
You dig that only applies if they are RATIONAL? How well did that work
with Saddam? TWICE he chose war, death and destruction, even with overwhelming
forces assembled and it very apparent what would happen. He was not a
rational player, dig? He chose death and destruction, instead of simply
cooperating with the weapons inspectors. History is littered with many other examples.
It's quite amazing that anyone would even debate that deterrence only
works with rational players. That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare. Sadly some people are just
too stupid to understand. Which is OK, but to argue it like the two
of you dopes here, well that really does show how stupid you are.
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:2c2541df-4aa2-4d3c-
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
As I tried
to explain to Rick, nuclear deterrence only works if both parties
are rational, and even then it has serious issues,
You keep mumbling this stupid shit.
No, idiot, it has nothing to do with both parties. The BAD parties
ALL know that WE will stamp them out lke the scum they are if they try
to pull ANYTHIONG. You dig, you dumb fucktard?
You dig that only applies if they are RATIONAL? How well did that work
with Saddam? TWICE he chose war, death and destruction, even with overwhelming
forces assembled and it very apparent what would happen. He was not a
rational player, dig? He chose death and destruction, instead of simply
cooperating with the weapons inspectors. History is littered with many other examples.
It's quite amazing that anyone would even debate that deterrence only
works with rational players. That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare. Sadly some people are just
too stupid to understand. Which is OK, but to argue it like the two
of you dopes here, well that really does show how stupid you are.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 3:52:02 AM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
We all appreciate that. We also appreciate that getting to be the top dog in a organisation complicated enough to threaten mutually assured destruction filters out the totally irrational.
> How well did that work with Saddam? TWICE he chose war, death and destruction, even with overwhelming forces assembled and it very apparent what would happen.
This is Trader4's deluded opinion of what happened. If he had the attention span to read an actual history of what went on, he'd be aware that Saddam made a series of rational choices that didn't work out as well as Saddam had hoped.
Saddam's judgement wasn't great, but then neither was Dubbya's.
> He was not a rational player, dig?
Actually he was, but Trader4 lacks to the wit to understand what was actually going on.
History records that he did cooperate with the weapons inspectors - not slavishly enough to deny Dubbya the excuse to invade, but he probably couldn't have been punctilious enough to manage that, since his underlings weren't all that clever, and Dubbya did do a lot of lying about what Saddam might have been involved in. 9/11 got invoked.
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Saturday, August 31, 2019 at 11:19:35 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:2c2541df-4aa2-4d3c-
b2f8-92eeae598c2a@googlegroups.com:
As I tried
to explain to Rick, nuclear deterrence only works if both parties
are rational, and even then it has serious issues,
You keep mumbling this stupid shit.
No, idiot, it has nothing to do with both parties. The BAD parties
ALL know that WE will stamp them out lke the scum they are if they try
to pull ANYTHING. You dig, you dumb fucktard?
You dig that only applies if they are RATIONAL?
We all appreciate that. We also appreciate that getting to be the top dog in a organisation complicated enough to threaten mutually assured destruction filters out the totally irrational.
> How well did that work with Saddam? TWICE he chose war, death and destruction, even with overwhelming forces assembled and it very apparent what would happen.
This is Trader4's deluded opinion of what happened. If he had the attention span to read an actual history of what went on, he'd be aware that Saddam made a series of rational choices that didn't work out as well as Saddam had hoped.
Saddam's judgement wasn't great, but then neither was Dubbya's.
> He was not a rational player, dig?
Actually he was, but Trader4 lacks to the wit to understand what was actually going on.
He chose death and destruction, instead of simply
cooperating with the weapons inspectors. History is littered with many other examples.
History records that he did cooperate with the weapons inspectors - not slavishly enough to deny Dubbya the excuse to invade, but he probably couldn't have been punctilious enough to manage that, since his underlings weren't all that clever, and Dubbya did do a lot of lying about what Saddam might have been involved in. 9/11 got invoked.
<snip>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Guest
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d1b895c5-b140-4f14-
bffa-0d68cdba40ff@googlegroups.com:
You are an abject idiot. No surprise, since you are comprised of
100% shit.
You know nothing about the death penalty or nuclear warfare.
There is no such thing as nuclear warfare.
We have a world full of assholes trying to light one off on or near
us so they can then say "oops" in a similar fashion Trump uses to
ignore the shit he pulls.
Should that happen, we MIGHT light on off to detroy them if we know
truly who the culprit was.
If NK tried to send one upon us or Korea, we might respond by
sending one to the Kremlin.
We know who the real responsible parties are. You can fucking bet.
They are also the assholes who gave Iran their "technology".
We should pounce on Iran, DPRK, and the Kremlin since they have
spent the last five decades pointing their sabres at us.
Fuck waiting to be smitten.
bffa-0d68cdba40ff@googlegroups.com:
That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare.
You are an abject idiot. No surprise, since you are comprised of
100% shit.
You know nothing about the death penalty or nuclear warfare.
There is no such thing as nuclear warfare.
We have a world full of assholes trying to light one off on or near
us so they can then say "oops" in a similar fashion Trump uses to
ignore the shit he pulls.
Should that happen, we MIGHT light on off to detroy them if we know
truly who the culprit was.
If NK tried to send one upon us or Korea, we might respond by
sending one to the Kremlin.
We know who the real responsible parties are. You can fucking bet.
They are also the assholes who gave Iran their "technology".
We should pounce on Iran, DPRK, and the Kremlin since they have
spent the last five decades pointing their sabres at us.
Fuck waiting to be smitten.
Guest
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:6632c569-c1e9-4427-a9e5-8a1cb6ae04c1@googlegroups.com:
We have never had it so how can you say it is a thing?
We have had war using conventional weapons and we have ENDED a war
using two single device nuclear strikes.
The world has never had any back and forth 'nuclear war' and likely
never will.
The next lessons learned by the world will define the US, and the
UK and our 135 allies as the leaders of the free nations of the world
and we have already defined and proven that communist factions like
China and North Korea and what Russia wants to return to as the worst
human rights social structures known to man. The current situation
in Hong Kong is a perfect example.
You are an irrational abject idiot and decidedly it has not worked
out for you.
Nice try though, idiot. You keep barking that same tone like a
little female chihuahua. It really shows you for the pathetic twerp
you are.
news:6632c569-c1e9-4427-a9e5-8a1cb6ae04c1@googlegroups.com:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 9:25:10 AM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d1b895c5-b140-4f14- bffa-0d68cdba40ff@googlegroups.com:
That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare.
You are an abject idiot. No surprise, since you are comprised of
100% shit.
You know nothing about the death penalty or nuclear warfare.
There is no such thing as nuclear warfare.
ROFL
Sure, just like North Korea has no steel mills.
We have never had it so how can you say it is a thing?
We have had war using conventional weapons and we have ENDED a war
using two single device nuclear strikes.
The world has never had any back and forth 'nuclear war' and likely
never will.
The next lessons learned by the world will define the US, and the
UK and our 135 allies as the leaders of the free nations of the world
and we have already defined and proven that communist factions like
China and North Korea and what Russia wants to return to as the worst
human rights social structures known to man. The current situation
in Hong Kong is a perfect example.
snipped retarded shit that *you* should have snipped.
Deterrence only works when you're dealing with rational parties,
stupid.
You are an irrational abject idiot and decidedly it has not worked
out for you.
Nice try though, idiot. You keep barking that same tone like a
little female chihuahua. It really shows you for the pathetic twerp
you are.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 9:25:10 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
ROFL
Sure, just like North Korea has no steel mills.
"Kim Chaek Iron & Steel Works is one of North Korea's largest steel mills. It is located in Songpyong-guyok, Chongjin, North HamgyĹng Province. It was established by Nippon Steel during the Japanese occupation of Korea, and was subsequently nationalised after the establishment of the DPRK. In North Korea, this factory is called "The Big Metallurgic Base of the North (ëśë°Šě ëěźę¸ę¸°ě§)".. It has fifty thousand employees. "
Now that is really stupid, even for you.
That's really stupid, even for you.
Deterrence only works when you're dealing with rational parties, stupid.
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d1b895c5-b140-4f14-
bffa-0d68cdba40ff@googlegroups.com:
That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare.
You are an abject idiot. No surprise, since you are comprised of
100% shit.
You know nothing about the death penalty or nuclear warfare.
There is no such thing as nuclear warfare.
ROFL
Sure, just like North Korea has no steel mills.
"Kim Chaek Iron & Steel Works is one of North Korea's largest steel mills. It is located in Songpyong-guyok, Chongjin, North HamgyĹng Province. It was established by Nippon Steel during the Japanese occupation of Korea, and was subsequently nationalised after the establishment of the DPRK. In North Korea, this factory is called "The Big Metallurgic Base of the North (ëśë°Šě ëěźę¸ę¸°ě§)".. It has fifty thousand employees. "
We have a world full of assholes trying to light one off on or near
us so they can then say "oops" in a similar fashion Trump uses to
ignore the shit he pulls.
Now that is really stupid, even for you.
Should that happen, we MIGHT light on off to detroy them if we know
truly who the culprit was.
If NK tried to send one upon us or Korea, we might respond by
sending one to the Kremlin.
That's really stupid, even for you.
We know who the real responsible parties are. You can fucking bet.
They are also the assholes who gave Iran their "technology".
We should pounce on Iran, DPRK, and the Kremlin since they have
spent the last five decades pointing their sabres at us.
Fuck waiting to be smitten.
Deterrence only works when you're dealing with rational parties, stupid.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 10:21:34 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
You act like I just made up some crazy term, that's never been used before.
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_warfare
That's wildly optimistic, knowing how just about all other weapons of
war have been used and knowing history. An important part of that history
is that irrational, bad actors, truly evil people do come to power.
It's only a matter of time before one comes along that has nukes.
KJU could be that one.
Unintelligible, even by your standards.
Irrelevant of course. All those are rational actors, where deterrence
works.
Obviously you;re just as ignorant as some others here that deterrence
requires rational parties and eventually we'll likely wind up with
an irrational actor that has nukes.
Wrong, always wrong.
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:6632c569-c1e9-4427-a9e5-8a1cb6ae04c1@googlegroups.com:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 9:25:10 AM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d1b895c5-b140-4f14- bffa-0d68cdba40ff@googlegroups.com:
That applies in everything from the death
penalty for murder to nuclear warfare.
You are an abject idiot. No surprise, since you are comprised of
100% shit.
You know nothing about the death penalty or nuclear warfare.
There is no such thing as nuclear warfare.
ROFL
Sure, just like North Korea has no steel mills.
We have never had it so how can you say it is a thing?
You act like I just made up some crazy term, that's never been used before.
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_warfare
We have had war using conventional weapons and we have ENDED a war
using two single device nuclear strikes.
The world has never had any back and forth 'nuclear war' and likely
never will.
That's wildly optimistic, knowing how just about all other weapons of
war have been used and knowing history. An important part of that history
is that irrational, bad actors, truly evil people do come to power.
It's only a matter of time before one comes along that has nukes.
KJU could be that one.
The next lessons learned by the world will define the US, and the
UK and our 135 allies as the leaders of the free nations of the world
Unintelligible, even by your standards.
and we have already defined and proven that communist factions like
China and North Korea and what Russia wants to return to as the worst
human rights social structures known to man. The current situation
in Hong Kong is a perfect example.
Irrelevant of course. All those are rational actors, where deterrence
works.
snipped retarded shit that *you* should have snipped.
Deterrence only works when you're dealing with rational parties,
stupid.
You are an irrational abject idiot and decidedly it has not worked
out for you.
Nice try though, idiot. You keep barking that same tone like a
little female chihuahua. It really shows you for the pathetic twerp
you are.
Obviously you;re just as ignorant as some others here that deterrence
requires rational parties and eventually we'll likely wind up with
an irrational actor that has nukes.
Wrong, always wrong.
C
Cursitor Doom
Guest
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
> Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
> Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
Cursitor Doom has the same kind of problem - he gets his information from the Daily Mail and Russia Today, and resolutely refuses to believe that they are giving him deceptively edited and misleading information.
Trader4 makes a habit of snipping the links I do find and post to illustrate the defects in his view of the world, so his claim that I lack the skills to use Google properly should be seen as one more example of his wishful thinking.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
Cursitor Doom has the same kind of problem - he gets his information from the Daily Mail and Russia Today, and resolutely refuses to believe that they are giving him deceptively edited and misleading information.
Trader4 makes a habit of snipping the links I do find and post to illustrate the defects in his view of the world, so his claim that I lack the skills to use Google properly should be seen as one more example of his wishful thinking.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Guest
Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in news:7853e23b-1618-
4beb-b72b-6fd8be7501c0@googlegroups.com:
> You act like I just made up some crazy term,
Go away, little girl.
4beb-b72b-6fd8be7501c0@googlegroups.com:
> You act like I just made up some crazy term,
Go away, little girl.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion. Or when you deny
that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction around the world,
stupid Aussie troll.
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion. Or when you deny
that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction around the world,
stupid Aussie troll.
Guest
Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:aeb93c12-40eb-4be4-b3f0-467f8f9d5cc5@googlegroups.com:
that Trump and Russia's collusion did not exist and that anyone that
bitches about his illicit ill character is 'a lib'.
The "howling" you shitspew about has been since the very day he
solicited them on national television, and it was by anyone able to
see how bad the error was, not just your precious 'libs'.
It does not get any more retarded than TraitorTard4.
news:aeb93c12-40eb-4be4-b3f0-467f8f9d5cc5@googlegroups.com:
What I find telling about the utter shit you spew is that you thinkOn Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom
wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up
only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion. Or when you
deny that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction
around the world, stupid Aussie troll.
that Trump and Russia's collusion did not exist and that anyone that
bitches about his illicit ill character is 'a lib'.
The "howling" you shitspew about has been since the very day he
solicited them on national television, and it was by anyone able to
see how bad the error was, not just your precious 'libs'.
It does not get any more retarded than TraitorTard4.
B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example. It's well known that the Russians did help Trump get his - thin - majority in the electoral college. Collusion was suspected, but there's no evidence that Trump even knew that he was being helped - and reasonable people never saw him as anybody fit to collude with.
> Or when you deny that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction around the world, stupid Aussie troll.
Since the few that I know about are all behind schedule and way over budget, I was wondering where you'd got your figure.
Somebody else found a nuclear power plant manufacturer's site, which didn't say anything about delays or being over budget, pretty much as you'd expect and I'd expected.
The web is full of bad information, and dim-wits like you can be relied on to find it. If you won't tell us where you get your misleading information, it's reasonable to suspect you of inventing it, not that you are rational enough to understand why.
The stupidity is all yours.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.
Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example. It's well known that the Russians did help Trump get his - thin - majority in the electoral college. Collusion was suspected, but there's no evidence that Trump even knew that he was being helped - and reasonable people never saw him as anybody fit to collude with.
> Or when you deny that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction around the world, stupid Aussie troll.
Since the few that I know about are all behind schedule and way over budget, I was wondering where you'd got your figure.
Somebody else found a nuclear power plant manufacturer's site, which didn't say anything about delays or being over budget, pretty much as you'd expect and I'd expected.
The web is full of bad information, and dim-wits like you can be relied on to find it. If you won't tell us where you get your misleading information, it's reasonable to suspect you of inventing it, not that you are rational enough to understand why.
The stupidity is all yours.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:41:56 AM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.
Ask him for your links.
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 9:27:04 PM UTC+10, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion.
Not something that I've noticed, and you've never provided a single link to an example.
There you go again, and then you wonder why I say you're a stupid, lib
Aussie troll. Even your buddy DL just acknowledged that it's true.
Ask him for your links.
W
Whoey Louie
Guest
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 8:17:49 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Wrong, always wrong. I only call people libs who have actually demonstrated
that they are liberals and it's not specific to Trump. For example,
it's clear that you've done plenty of bitching about Trump, but I haven't
called you a lib. IDK what you are really, besides very confused and
wrong, always wrong. You claim to be a Republican, so then Trump is
your guy, stop complaining or quit the party and stop enabling him.
Also, if you have questions about Trump and Russian
collusion, why not take them up with Mueller? He spent two years and
$30 mil and he reported that he could find no evidence that Trump, his
campaign, or any American colluded with Russia or any Russians.
Great, so you agree that it's true that libs have been howling about
Trump and Russian collusion since 2016. Maybe now you can explain that
to your friend Bill?
Geez, what a bunch.
Whoey Louie <traitortard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:aeb93c12-40eb-4be4-b3f0-467f8f9d5cc5@googlegroups.com:
On Sunday, September 1, 2019 at 11:24:30 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Monday, September 2, 2019 at 2:10:56 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom
wrote:
On Sun, 01 Sep 2019 08:24:50 -0700, Whoey Louie wrote:
Try googling or is your Google broken too, like Bills?
Like Bill's...... what? Brain? LOL!
Trader4 imagines that because my google searches don't show up
only the right-wing lunacies that he finds, I can't use google.
No, I told you that when you disputed that libs here have been
howling since 2016 about Trump and Russian collusion. Or when you
deny that there are 50 nuclear power plants under construction
around the world, stupid Aussie troll.
What I find telling about the utter shit you spew is that you think
that Trump and Russia's collusion did not exist and that anyone that
bitches about his illicit ill character is 'a lib'.
Wrong, always wrong. I only call people libs who have actually demonstrated
that they are liberals and it's not specific to Trump. For example,
it's clear that you've done plenty of bitching about Trump, but I haven't
called you a lib. IDK what you are really, besides very confused and
wrong, always wrong. You claim to be a Republican, so then Trump is
your guy, stop complaining or quit the party and stop enabling him.
Also, if you have questions about Trump and Russian
collusion, why not take them up with Mueller? He spent two years and
$30 mil and he reported that he could find no evidence that Trump, his
campaign, or any American colluded with Russia or any Russians.
The "howling" you shitspew about has been since the very day he
solicited them on national television, and it was by anyone able to
see how bad the error was, not just your precious 'libs'.
Great, so you agree that it's true that libs have been howling about
Trump and Russian collusion since 2016. Maybe now you can explain that
to your friend Bill?
Geez, what a bunch.