Tax Refunds are less this year, must be Trumps fault

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 12:08:38 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:2a0ef189-5714-4f2d-a0fb-4d05ecfa665d@googlegroups.com:

So in essence we need to decide if a stopped clock is indeed a
clock or not.

Agree, or not ? You have the floor, state your case.


"A clock" is a FUNCTIONING chronometer.

A broken or stopped clock is not any kind of chronometer. and said
stopped clock carries exactly zero correct indications of time ever.

Debate over.

Wrong, always wrong. Everyone with any sense knows that a stopped clock
is right twice a day. And more importantly what the point of that
expression is. It's a strange argument to be making. I didn't bring up
a stopped clock, your buddy Bill did. I guess he was giving you credit
for being right a tiny percentage of the time. Now, per the above,
you're agreeing with me, that you're ALWAYS wrong. Thanks for clearing
that up.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 12:02:01 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in news:69434e38-5719-40e2-befa-
6e90a641f73c@googlegroups.com:

But I guess that's OK because...

Because ?

Because the nation was in the middle of a war prosecution, you dopey
dumbfuck.

Wrong, always wrong. The huge deficits under Obama had very little to do
with wars. As proof, in 2008, the last normal year before the Great Recession,
the deficit under Bush was down to just $160 bil. And that was with TWO wars
raging near their peaks! With Obama, one war he completely withdrew US
forces from Iraq and then ignored what happened thereafter, allowing victory
to turn into defeat with the rise of ISIS. The other war was was drawn down
to very minimal level, yet the deficit in 2017 was $580 bil.

Wrong, always wrong.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:05:23 PM UTC-4, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:

Then so too is there benefit to the landlord. It's the landlord >that's getting stiffed if there is an eviction, damages, etc.

Yeah, and I won $400 in one hand at a poker game. Shoot me.

Did he benefit form discrimination ? Well if you don't want bugs and drugs I guess you discriminate. On race ? Your call.

It wasn't my call, the govt proved the discrimination. They sent a black
couple with good jobs, solid financials to inquire
about renting an apartment. They were told there were none. They sent
a white couple, with the same qualifications and they were shown apartments
and told they were available.

When Trump got into the rental game it wasn't all that bad. Now, especially in NYC if you rent to somebody they have you by the gonads.

It wasn't all that much different in the 70s, you couldn't just toss people
to the streets back then either. But none of that matters. The law is the
law and the law says you can't discriminate. Trump doesn't get to be special,
to ignore it, to do as he pleases.

One guy I corresponded with said he figured out a quick eviction - turn off the water. Then it is technically illegal to occupy and the deputies will do the work for free. Otherwise you have to pay like 4 of them about $25 an hour each to clear the shit out. In their own sweet time of course.

You can't do that just about anywhere today and you could not do it in NYC
in the 70s either. They even had rent control back then.

It is much better to just not rent to the wrong people.

The problem is when you decide who the "wrong people" are by skin color
and on that the govt nailed Trump big time.




Personally I got my own way of handling an eviction which involves carrying their stove outside by myself. I am not sure how well that would go over where I live now, but then I am no longer a landlord and don't have to worry about it.

When it comes to what many people consider "criminal", Trump is a babe in the woods.

Well, that;s very reassuring for someone we have as president. And a lot
of what he does isn't quite criminal, just dirty, immoral and despicable.
Like all the small businessmen and trades people he's screwed over the years,
where they do the work, then he refuses to pay. An example is a local
paint store in FL, where Trump ran up tens of thousands for paint, then
just refused to pay. You tell me, how can you buy tens of thousands of
paint and supplies and then there is a legitimate reason you have for not
paying? Most just write it off and Trump gets away with it. But that store
wouldn't, the owner spent tens of thousands more chasing Trump through the
courts, for years, until a judge finally slammed Trump as a cheat and
ordered him to pay $250K, including all the legal costs. Or his Trump U
operation, that wasn't even a "U".




I may not be 100% proud of my past but I know how the fuck things are. And I started learning young. Very young. And while many people will say "Oh dear what a shame" I wouldn't trade my past for anything. I REALLY know how to read people, that is why I am alive. Sometimes I am wrong, like the time I got beat and kicked half to death and then shot in the face with a .38. But that's the breaks. Most people would not have survived it. In fact I can say that about a few other times in my younger days.

What happened to me ? Well the reason I didn't fall is because of my skill. when I figured out I could make twice as much as most of the people I knew I didn't need to run a fencing operation, or have a ring of "boosters". Know what they are ? When you want something you send the boosters out and they steal it. Mechanics are "muscle" and you buy that by the pound. Many of them are willing to kill but that costs. That is getting old though, even the worst "groups" would prefer not to kill, especially for money only. But I think I can still get a house burned down for a few of kegs of beer.

You watch these scum steal millions form each other, which they stole from us, and you think not much of it unless you are politically motivated. That is all high level and not only doesn't it mean all that much, it affects us even less.

Really. Like you think it is criminal that Trump settled his tax bill with some state ? There are people advertising on TV that they can get you off for like 10%. Is THAT illegal ?

I don't disagree with you there. I said pretty much the same thing, starting
with that it appears to me that those tax debts were for his bankrupt casinos,
that he no longer owned when the settlement was reached. I would think
the COMPANIES paid the debt, not Trump personally. And you're right, given
that they had gone bankrupt, it was being litigated as to whether they even
really owed the amounts, etc, it's quite possible that it was settled
legitimately. Or Christie may have put in a word for him, but there is
AFAIK, zero evidence to support it. You'd think with all the leakers today,
if there was truth to it, someone involved with the tax suit would be
leaking about it, but we've heard nothing.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:40:25 PM UTC-4, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:

And Trump took a $580 bil deficit in 2017
and turned it into a $1 tril deficit this year

And Obama burned u p $9 trillion in eight years, that is a trill and a quarter per year.

But I guess that's OK because...

Because ?

Because he is not Trump.

How would you infer that from what I posted? But since you dragged Obama
into it, I'm happy to address that. Obama had a very good reason for huge
deficits in his first few years, the Great Recession. And some of what was
counted as a deficit, ie TARP, was not really a deficit, because that was
paid back. So the $1.4 tril deficit one year was more like a $1 tril
deficit. But your bottom line number is right. I would have liked to
have seen Obama and Congress bring the deficits down faster, but there
was steady progress. Under Trump, he REVERSED that progress and he did that
with an economy that wasn't a disaster, it was a growing economy. If you
look at the charts of GDP, unemployment, job creation, it's been a steady
line improvement since 2009. With Trump's tax cut and spending increases,
he took a $580 bil deficit and turned it into a $1 tril deficit, with an
economy that according to Trump and the trumpets is absolutely booming,
the best in history. Running $1 tril deficits when the economy is doing
well is stupid and reckless, it's a danger to our national security. And
again, when is the last time you heard Trump mention the deficits or the
national debt? It stopped mattering when it became his deficits and debt.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 10:19:30 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:8e455841-af81-4a0e-92ae-885f57fddd56@googlegroups.com:

Without the qualifying clock, ANY observer would dispute and
discount and discard ANY reading on said stopped clock.

But with the reference clock, when it agrees with what the broken
clock is displaying, the broken clock is correct for that minute
or second, etc.



No. Only for an instant, you fucking dumass. STOP ignoring that.

It is not 'right' 'for a minute' or 'for a second'. It is only for a
ZERO length INSTANT.

Wrong, always wrong. A stopped clock with a minute hand is displaying the right time for two minutes a day. And a stopped clock with a second hand is displaying the right time for two seconds a day, fool. About the same accuracy that you have, which is why Bill made the reference.




That means ZERO times a day, and can NEVER be
> relied on. A concept apparently outside your 20 IQ aptitude

No, I know that just like you, a stopped clock can't be relied on, that was precisely the point.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:15 -0700, trader4 wrote:

Even if true, which given your record isn't likely, it's irrelevant.
Just because someone happens to have an X-Ray from 50 years ago doesn't
mean that everyone does or that it's typical.

X-rays from 50 years ago don't have any metadata that could verify they
belong to a specific individual anyway. A draft dodger could have bought
them, or bought contacts of originals, so their evidential value - if any
- is very low indeed. Possibly scores of draft-dodgers could have availed
themselves from just one original plate.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:8e455841-af81-4a0e-92ae-885f57fddd56@googlegroups.com:

Without the qualifying clock, ANY observer would dispute and
discount and discard ANY reading on said stopped clock.

But with the reference clock, when it agrees with what the broken
clock is displaying, the broken clock is correct for that minute
or second, etc.

No. Only for an instant, you fucking dumass. STOP ignoring that.

It is not 'right' 'for a minute' or 'for a second'. It is only for a
ZERO length INSTANT. That means ZERO times a day, and can NEVER be
relied on. A concept apparently outside your 20 IQ aptitude.

 

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:qak7l4$ve4$2@dont-email.me:

On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:15 -0700, trader4 wrote:

Even if true, which given your record isn't likely, it's
irrelevant. Just because someone happens to have an X-Ray from 50
years ago doesn't mean that everyone does or that it's typical.

X-rays from 50 years ago don't have any metadata that could verify
they belong to a specific individual anyway.

Bullshit. If offered as proof, a 'current' xray would show
current state, and validate the identity of the original. How can
you be that fucking dumb?

A draft dodger could
have bought them, or bought contacts of originals,

No. Trump did not even have to report to the AFEES station. He
received a medical deferment without even taking a step out the
door. The AFEES facility gave him the deferment based on the
'medical record' of a declared bone spur. He had no requisite to
produce proof or an xray.

The xray thing is simple, child. If Joltin Joe had one, it was
because he DID have a bone spur. The fact that Trump does NOT have
one (a bone spur OR an xray) is decided proof that he committed
evasion of the draft. This while he should have already lined up
and signed up years earlier as a result of his academy training, and
gone in as an officer. Being drafted would have meant regular
enlisted service. Real simple... Donald J. Trump does not now, nor
did he ever have a bone spur. What he had was 'assistance in
avoiding the draft' in a manner that appeared to be 'legal'. All
due to the FACT that the stupid bastard is a pussy. Landlords are a
special kind of lame fuck.

so their
evidential value - if any - is very low indeed.

You can mumble all you want. Xrays have been around a long time.
Joltin Joe's are still around and that was over 70 years ago.
TrumpTard's 45 year old shit should certainly still be around and
you know it, child.

Possibly scores of
draft-dodgers could have availed themselves from just one original
plate.

More likely that you are a TrumpTarded abject idiot.

 

On Sunday, May 5, 2019 at 12:30:00 AM UTC+10, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:15 -0700, trader4 wrote:

Even if true, which given your record isn't likely, it's irrelevant.
Just because someone happens to have an X-Ray from 50 years ago doesn't
mean that everyone does or that it's typical.

X-rays from 50 years ago don't have any metadata that could verify they
belong to a specific individual anyway. A draft dodger could have bought
them, or bought contacts of originals, so their evidential value - if any
- is very low indeed. Possibly scores of draft-dodgers could have availed
themselves from just one original plate.

Bones aren't identical from one individual to another, and there are lot of bones in the foot

They constitute their own metadata, and trying to pass off an X-ray of somebody else's foot as your own wouldn't be wise.

Nobody is ever going to accuse Cursitor Doom of wisdom, but even for him this a pretty dumb conceit.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 11:11:40 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 12:02:01 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence..org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in news:69434e38-5719-40e2-befa-
6e90a641f73c@googlegroups.com:

But I guess that's OK because...

Because ?

Because the nation was in the middle of a war prosecution, you dopey
dumbfuck.

Wrong, always wrong. The huge deficits under Obama had very little to do
with wars. As proof, in 2008, the last normal year before the Great
Recession,
the deficit under Bush was down to just $160 bil. And that was with TWO wars
raging near their peaks! With Obama, one war he completely withdrew US
forces from Iraq and then ignored what happened thereafter, allowing victory
to turn into defeat with the rise of ISIS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007#/media/File:Iraq_Troop_Strength.svg

First there was the "surge" under Bush in 2007 that got Irak clean enough for a partial withdrawal to look legitimate, down to 100,000 in 2010 and 10,000 in 2012 then the Arab Spring revolt in Syria, which started off without much ISIS involvement, but they moved in from about 2011 and and by 2014 had captured enough territory in Syria and Irak to form their caliphate.

The US (under Obama) started bombing them in Irak in August 2014, and in Syria the following month. By the end of 2017 the caliphate had lost 95% of its territory.

Bush's "victory" in Irak was never backed up by enough troops to hold the country, so it was a pretty hollow victory, and Obama wasn't silly enough to try to hang onto an asset which wasn't worth what it would have cost.

ISIS popped up out of the Arab Spring rather than out of the mess in Irak, and Obama's more economical strategy had pretty much snuffed it out by the end of his second term.

The other war was was drawn down
to very minimal level, yet the deficit in 2017 was $580 bil.

Wrong, always wrong.

You manage to be at least as wrong.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:c92bf1f3-23aa-49d7-9d32-aa8b61232eec@googlegroups.com:

No, I know that just like you, a stopped clock can't be relied on,
that was precisely the point.

"Can't be relied on" and "never right" are the same thing, idiot.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 10:44:17 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Cursitor Doom <curd@notformail.com> wrote in
news:qak7l4$ve4$2@dont-email.me:

On Fri, 03 May 2019 15:19:15 -0700, trader4 wrote:

Even if true, which given your record isn't likely, it's
irrelevant. Just because someone happens to have an X-Ray from 50
years ago doesn't mean that everyone does or that it's typical.

X-rays from 50 years ago don't have any metadata that could verify
they belong to a specific individual anyway.

Bullshit. If offered as proof, a 'current' xray would show
current state, and validate the identity of the original. How can
you be that fucking dumb?

A draft dodger could
have bought them, or bought contacts of originals,

No. Trump did not even have to report to the AFEES station. He
received a medical deferment without even taking a step out the
door. The AFEES facility gave him the deferment based on the
'medical record' of a declared bone spur. He had no requisite to
produce proof or an xray.

How do you know what Trump was required to provide as proof fifty years
ago. Were you there, involved in the process?

The xray thing is simple, child. If Joltin Joe had one, it was
because he DID have a bone spur. The fact that Trump does NOT have
one (a bone spur OR an xray) is decided proof that he committed
evasion of the draft.

Pure BS of course. There is no requirement that anyone keep any medical
records and it's just Trump derangement syndrome to say that Trump should
have them, should produce them, etc.




This while he should have already lined up

and signed up years earlier as a result of his academy training, and
gone in as an officer. Being drafted would have meant regular
enlisted service. Real simple... Donald J. Trump does not now, nor
did he ever have a bone spur. What he had was 'assistance in
avoiding the draft' in a manner that appeared to be 'legal'. All
due to the FACT that the stupid bastard is a pussy. Landlords are a
special kind of lame fuck.

I see, so landlords are all evil too. More derangement.
Is it likely Trump got out of the draft with another lie? Sure, given all
the lies and shystering we see today, that would fit in. But you can't prove
it and trying to claim that because Trump doesn't have a X-ray today, fifty
years later, makes hum guilty just makes you look nuttier than Trump.
The more Democrats keep this kind of thing up, the more likely he will get
a second term.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 11:11:44 AM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 11:11:40 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:
On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 12:02:01 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in news:69434e38-5719-40e2-befa-
6e90a641f73c@googlegroups.com:

But I guess that's OK because...

Because ?

Because the nation was in the middle of a war prosecution, you dopey
dumbfuck.

Wrong, always wrong. The huge deficits under Obama had very little to do
with wars. As proof, in 2008, the last normal year before the Great
Recession,
the deficit under Bush was down to just $160 bil. And that was with TWO wars
raging near their peaks! With Obama, one war he completely withdrew US
forces from Iraq and then ignored what happened thereafter, allowing victory
to turn into defeat with the rise of ISIS.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War_troop_surge_of_2007#/media/File:Iraq_Troop_Strength.svg

First there was the "surge" under Bush in 2007 that got Irak clean enough for a partial withdrawal to look legitimate, down to 100,000 in 2010 and 10,000 in 2012 then the Arab Spring revolt in Syria, which started off without much ISIS involvement, but they moved in from about 2011 and and by 2014 had captured enough territory in Syria and Irak to form their caliphate.

Yeah, because that fool Obama with Hillary at his side, decided that his
lame campaign promise was worth more than lives and treasure in Iraq.

The US (under Obama) started bombing them in Irak in August 2014, and in Syria the following month. By the end of 2017 the caliphate had lost 95% of its territory.

Bush's "victory" in Irak was never backed up by enough troops to hold the country, so it was a pretty hollow victory, and Obama wasn't silly enough to try to hang onto an asset which wasn't worth what it would have cost.

Which is obvious BS, because first Obama snatched defeat from the jaws of
victory, let Maliki do what he pleased, even bitch slapping Obama in public,
let Maliki run amok, screw the Sunnis, lose the country to ISIS, and only
then did Obama go back in, after it had turned to a total disaster.
Obama was so feckless, that he sat by and watched as ISIS overran Iraq
and as ISIS was driving US gear, Humvees, tanks, artillery and all kinds
of lethal weapons across hundreds of miles of open desert! That was absolutely
stunning and people are correct in thinking that OBama wanted them to have it
for the war in Syria. There is no other explanation, a few US air sorties
would have neutralized it and stopped it. All the blood that flowed from
that in Syria, all the dead, is on Obama's hands. Obama partially armed
ISIS.

ISIS popped up out of the Arab Spring rather than out of the mess in Irak, and Obama's more economical strategy had pretty much snuffed it out by the end of his second term.

More lies and BS. Only a lib could think that the correct military strategy
is to let a country that you had won go totally down the drain, be overrun
by the enemy, to then go back and reclaim it, because that is "easier" or
more cost effective. Then libs wonder why people say they are stupid.

The other war was was drawn down
to very minimal level, yet the deficit in 2017 was $580 bil.

Wrong, always wrong.

You manage to be at least as wrong.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

I notice you didn't refute the deficit numbers, that they are not correlated
to the wars.

 

> A stopped clock is NEVER 'right' because 'a clock' is an >indicator of a moving reference and cannot register ANY reference >if it is not advancing and displaying said registers.

I think you nailed it there.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:092f4548-9605-4c65-9e3f-e89d764b0073@googlegroups.com:

I see, so landlords are all evil too. More derangement.
Is it likely Trump got out of the draft with another lie? Sure,
given all the lies and shystering we see today, that would fit in.
But you can't prove it and trying to claim that because Trump
doesn't have a X-ray today, fifty years later, makes hum guilty
just makes you look nuttier than Trump. The more Democrats keep
this kind of thing up, the more likely he will get a second term.

You are a goddamned idiot. BTW, moniker jaw boy... I am a
Republican. Ooops! Looks like you are still batting 1000 on the
can't get shit right hayride.

And you said that stupid shit the other day too. Nothing *I* do
is going to give the retarded sub-human Doanld J. Trump a second
term.
And yes, dipshit, a person claiming to get a deferment from a draft
would very likely keep the evidence that proves he was disabled at
the time. It is absolutely ludicrous for you or anyone else to
think it was discarded. The fact is it does not exist, because it
never existed. Grow the fuck up, putz.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:092f4548-9605-4c65-9e3f-e89d764b0073@googlegroups.com:

How do you know what Trump was required to provide as proof fifty
years ago. Were you there, involved in the process?

I know how AFEES entrance examination stations work, and I know how
the draft worked and I know how rich fucktard's children paid for
various and sundry methods of not being drafted.

IOW, for you slow on the take up twerps, His daddy bought a bone spur
finding. Period. And yes, he went through all the channels he needed
to in order to get it. To the point where pussy boy Donald John did
not even have to report to the testing station.

So, yeah, jackass, I do know what the overtly rich Trump family was
required to provide in order to keep their pussified son out of serving
his nation in time of war.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 2:06:55 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:092f4548-9605-4c65-9e3f-e89d764b0073@googlegroups.com:

I see, so landlords are all evil too. More derangement.
Is it likely Trump got out of the draft with another lie? Sure,
given all the lies and shystering we see today, that would fit in.
But you can't prove it and trying to claim that because Trump
doesn't have a X-ray today, fifty years later, makes hum guilty
just makes you look nuttier than Trump. The more Democrats keep
this kind of thing up, the more likely he will get a second term.


You are a goddamned idiot. BTW, moniker jaw boy... I am a
Republican. Ooops! Looks like you are still batting 1000 on the
can't get shit right hayride.

Wrong again, always wrong. I never said you were a Republican. In fact,
the other day I told your butt buddy Bill that IDK where you are on the
political spectrum. You just have a reading comprehension problem, in
addition to many other obvious problems.

And you said that stupid shit the other day too. Nothing *I* do
is going to give the retarded sub-human Doanld J. Trump a second
term.

That's another lie. Wrong, always wrong. Here's a challenge for you.
It was just the other day, so provide us a link to the post where you
say that I said you were a Republican. Do it for us, big man.
Are you as sure of that as you are about Trump's X-rays and everything
else, like clocks?

And yes, dipshit, a person claiming to get a deferment from a draft
would very likely keep the evidence that proves he was disabled at
the time. It is absolutely ludicrous for you or anyone else to
think it was discarded.

You are so profoundly stupid that you don't even realize that the above
is self-contradictory. If something is "very likely" true, then there is
also still a reasonable chance that it's not and hence it;s not ludicrous
at all to think it was discarded.


Wrong, always wrong.

 

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 2:01:35 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:092f4548-9605-4c65-9e3f-e89d764b0073@googlegroups.com:


How do you know what Trump was required to provide as proof fifty
years ago. Were you there, involved in the process?



I know how AFEES entrance examination stations work, and I know how
the draft worked and I know how rich fucktard's children paid for
various and sundry methods of not being drafted.

No, you're always wrong. You don't even understand that a stopped clock
is right twice a day. So, I'm 99% sure your claims about what was
required to substantiate a medical draft exemption are just more of your
usual BS.

IOW, for you slow on the take up twerps, His daddy bought a bone spur
finding. Period.

Prove it.




And yes, he went through all the channels he needed

to in order to get it. To the point where pussy boy Donald John did
not even have to report to the testing station.

Prove that too.

So, yeah, jackass, I do know what the overtly rich Trump family was
required to provide in order to keep their pussified son out of serving
his nation in time of war.

You know so much about Trump that you told us in another post here that
the govt went after Trump in the early years of the business. That's
very wrong too. The Trump business they went after had been around for
decades, started by Fred Trump, they were already very rich and owned
40,000 apartments at the time. If you had any smarts, you might have
realized that the feds don't typically come after some landlord that's
just starting out. Nuff said on that pile of BS.

So, are you as sure about Trump's bone spurs as you were about the above?

 

>Like all the small businessmen and trades people he's screwed >over the years, where they do the work, then he refuses to pay.

Really. well if you had looked into it you would find that they were mostly trying to screw him. They saw t9ose deep pockets and thought he was not going to keep an eye on things. He refused to pay for CAUSE. He is the plaintiff in over half of the lawsuits you hear about.

I know all about the contracting business and I am almost sure that is what happened. He refused to pay for substandard work. Maybe we should look it up.

HE COULD NOT FILE THOSE SUITS IF THE CONTRACTORS HAD NOT BEEN IN BREACH OF CONTRACT. Do you understand ? A lawsuit starts with a letter, usually registered. It must be recorded and must explain to the person you are about to sue exactly why. You can't just put down "I don't wanna pay". It doesn't work.

And Trump NEVER filed bankruptcy. Ever. Some businesses did that were under his control but out of 500 of them I guess five or six of them might fail. And that's all there is, but they say he filed bankruptcy "many" times. That's fucking ridiculous, really. Anyone who knows anything about business doesn't put much stake in that bullshit. Bankruptcy is a tool. People used to use it all the time. they would rack up a ton of debt say in Ohio, then buy a house in Florida which had different ways of administering bankruptcy code. That is a complicated thing.

Main thing was they let you keep one car and one house of any value, so they bought the most expensive ones they could afford and then filed. You have to have a residence down there for 30 days to file there. That may have changed. what's more W Bush brought in some changes that made is much harder to get a true chapter seven. I got one anyway in 2010 because I know how to pick a lawyer. He was fucking good but now he is too old.

Anyway, discrimination in renting, well it was done under his direction even if he didn't order it. Like the captain of a ship[ he it therefore responsible. Just own it and be done with it and do something to not have it happen again. What the fuck else does anyone want ?

The deal with what's his face...Christie ? Well if someone offers you a way to pay off a debt cheaper what do YOU do ? Do YOU insist on paying the full amount ?

Go ahead and fucking tell me that you would. You KNOW it would be a lie.

Look Man, like I said the guy is far from perfect, but these accusations that are baseless actually serve to numb the public to things they might find that are real. I say let them keep up their stupidity.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:7998088d-a7d9-4d98-bcf8-3b4aa22219e8@googlegroups.com:

On Saturday, May 4, 2019 at 2:06:55 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:092f4548-9605-4c65-9e3f-e89d764b0073@googlegroups.com:

I see, so landlords are all evil too. More derangement.
Is it likely Trump got out of the draft with another lie?
Sure, given all the lies and shystering we see today, that
would fit in.
But you can't prove it and trying to claim that because Trump
doesn't have a X-ray today, fifty years later, makes hum guilty
just makes you look nuttier than Trump. The more Democrats keep
this kind of thing up, the more likely he will get a second
term.


You are a goddamned idiot. BTW, moniker jaw boy... I am a
Republican. Ooops! Looks like you are still batting 1000 on the
can't get shit right hayride.

Wrong again, always wrong. I never said you were a Republican.

You also cannot read. I never said that you said I was anything
you dumbfuck! *I* said that *I* am a republican, you goddamned
retarded piece of shit! Learn to read, dumbfuck.

In fact, the other day I told your butt buddy Bill that IDK where
you are on the political spectrum.

*I* answered that post too. So you cannot even keep short term
memory worth a shit either!

You just have a reading
comprehension problem, in addition to many other obvious problems.

You are an idiot. A fat 350+ pound dipshit.

And you said that stupid shit the other day too. Nothing *I*
do
is going to give the retarded sub-human Doanld J. Trump a second
term.

That's another lie. Wrong, always wrong. Here's a challenge for
you. It was just the other day, so provide us a link to the post
where you say that I said you were a Republican.

Learn to read, dumbfuck. I never said that you said anything.
Goddamn boy grow the fuck up.

Do it for us, big
man.

Does writing stupid shit like this get you off or something,
child? It really is about as immature as it gets.

Are you as sure of that as you are about Trump's X-rays and
everything else, like clocks?

Nice try, pissy little bitch.

You could not handle the clock argument so stamped off and left it
as comments made during other arguments where you claim you were
right. How special. You really are an immature little bitch, and I
do not need any calculus for that, despite knowing it, whereas you
state stupid shit like 'only libs use calculus'. You have pretty
much dug your own grave, child.

And yes, dipshit, a person claiming to get a deferment from a
draft would very likely keep the evidence that proves he was
disabled at the time. It is absolutely ludicrous for you or
anyone else to think it was discarded.

You are so profoundly stupid that you don't even realize that the
above is self-contradictory. If something is "very likely" true,
then there is also still a reasonable chance that it's not and
hence it;s not ludicrous at all to think it was discarded.

Wow... your eleven year old pissy bitch mentality is really
showing through. Bwuahahahahaha!

It is unreasonable to think a medical record was discarded. You
dig, boy?

Wrong, always wrong.

You have really chosen a good sig there, child.
Funny how you are the only one spouting it, and you are the one it
fits.