Tax Refunds are less this year, must be Trumps fault

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:d73a65a8-cc25-4a04-a974-4d87485c5cab@googlegroups.com:

Wrong again. One instant plus one instant equals two instants.
One instant plus a negative instant would be zero. Another
failure at basic algebra. Bill must be proud.

You are the failure. One instant equals zero, therefore one instant
plus one instant may equal two instants, but it still also equals zero.

You can squirm all you want, boy. The fact is I do know math, and
all you do is spout horseshit.

 

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:57:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 12:31:48 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 8:55:09 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:56341c1c-429d-4a68-8a90-
70894c04ce1b@googlegroups.com:

Wrong again, always wrong. A stopped clock is right twice a day,
which is more than I can say about you.

You missed the point yet again, child.

A stopped clock is right twice a day for only an instant. One
instant plus one instant equals zero.

Wrong again. One instant plus one instant equals two instants. One instant plus a negative instant would be zero. Another failure at basic algebra. Bill must be proud.

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are intelligent
and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they should make decisions
for all of us, because we are incapable.

Basic algebra does have its place, but the concepts of "limits" is more subtle, and you've obviously not mastered it and probably haven't even been exposed to it.

A Dirac impulse has zero width but a finite area, which is obvious nonsense, but doesn't stop it from being a useful concept.

Thanks for dragging that into the discussion, lamebrain. So, if I have
an impulse function at 8AM I have one impulse function. And if I have an
impulse function at 8PM, I have one impulse function. But I don't have
TWO a day? I have ZERO? Where did you learn to count?


ROFL

And that is EXACTLY what the discussion was about. You're quite amazing.
That fool DL posts one stupid, incorrect thing after another. For example,
he denied that a stopped clock is right twice a day! Not a peep from you.
But I say that a stopped clock is right 99.99% of the time, and woooah,
here you come. According to you and the nitwit it's all wrong.
He even got his dick
wrapped around the axle by trying to use 1440 minutes in a day, instead of
SECONDS! No math from him, or you either, just more BS piled on top of BS.
Are you related?

So your percentage is off, because you are not even aware of the
numbers you are working with, CHILD.

Like K says, always wrong.

Not exactly a reliable authority.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

Clearly way more reliable that either you or your butt buddy DL.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:29cd0318-0528-4fc4-b167-
67092a9b44f4@googlegroups.com:

Since a stopped clock is NOT correct for ANY minutes or ANY
seconds a day, but only for an instant twice a day, you are
obviously again incorrect.

BS. A clock with a second hand is correct for two seconds a day.

No, it is not. It is stopped. Time sweps by, and only for an
instant it matches up. Not for a minute... not for a second...
An instant! A concept apparently miles above your head.

> A clock with a minute hand is correct for two minutes a day, fool.

You seem to have an emotional attachment to calling folks fool and
lib. I would suggest that you have your psychiatrist up your
lithium dose. Ideally, he could prescribe 400mg of Thorazine a day
for you. That way, we would not see your fat ass retard posts any
more. Do us a favor and take 3 days dose all at once.

> Even an elementary school kid can grasp that.

But not an elementary school playbaby jock wannabe mentality fat
assed retarded piece of shit like you.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-
a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

For example,
he denied that a stopped clock is right twice a day!

No, I did not.

I stated that your number is incorrect, nothing more.

From there, you have done anything but show how the number you gave
is right, and even when you did attempt to do so, you made your number
even further off the mark.

You are a childish twerp, at best.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are
intelligent and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they
should make decisions for all of us, because we are incapable.

Clearly he is correct as instead of refuting what he said and proving
otherwise, you instead went back to your standard, LAME, childish petty
moniker mouthings. You are as immature and pathetic as any adult aged
man can get. You need twenty more years to allow your mental age to
catch up to even a recent high school graduate.

 

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 11:15:25 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

jurb6006@gmail.com wrote in
news:f9ff2655-e25b-444c-9c32-1a90d63842b9@googlegroups.com:

"You are like a fucking blind zombie walking around with
vantablack level pits where your eyes were. "

And you cannot support the three claims you made.

Want to prove me wrong ? DO IT.


WTF are you mumbling about now, boy?

He DID evade the draft, That WAS and still IS a crime.

Thing is, in the US at least, one is innocent until PROVEN guilty.
As usual, you're not clear in what exactly you're claiming, but I
would assume it's that you claim Trump didn't have bone spurs.
Only problem is that there is no proof, nothing that I've seen.
His use of student deferments was legal, many people did that.

He did commit racial discrimination in units he owned in NYC and
in units he buolt and owned in Cincinnati. It is historical fact.

That is true, at least the NYC part, I hadn't heard about Cincinnati.

He DID conspire with former NJ Governor Christie to pay a
ridiculously low amount against a huge debt to the state. Both of
the stupid bastards should go to prison.

Show us any evidence of that. First, the tax debt was not Trump's personally,
but for the casinos that had gone bankrupt and were out of Trump's control
at the point that the debt was settled. Trump, AFAIK, only held a small
stock position in maybe one of the casinos at that point. So, it's not
clear to me that this had much, if any direct effect on Trump's finances
and for sure most of that settlement money did not come out of Trump's
pocket personally.
And I've never seen any evidence that Christie intervened or did anything to
make it happen. The tax claims were being litigated, it's common for govts
or anyone else to settle these out of court. Especially companies that
have gone bankrupt, re-organized. So, if you have evidence,
I'd love to see it. This started with the NY Times. Remember how many
stories they and WAPO ran about all kinds of alleged collusion with Russia?
And after two years of intensive investigation how the collusion allegations, turned out?

I do not need to prove you wrong, dumbfuck. You need to disprove
the events given, because they most certainly DID occuur, and you
and all the wired tight shut horse blinders in the world will not
change that fact.

Wrong again. That's not how justice works, nor is it how logic works.
YOU make the assertion, YOU prove it.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:16:55 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

He even got his dick
wrapped around the axle by trying to use 1440 minutes in a day,
instead of SECONDS! No math from him, or you either, just more BS
piled on top of BS. Are you related?

You are such a fucking child.

Posit that a stopped clock is right for two minutes a day, the
rest of the world would stop. I know that went over your head
though.

If a stopped clock was right for two seconds a day, your number is
off the mark.

Geeez, how stupid can you be? I even posted the numbers for you, yet
you can't do the division and figure out the percentages? OK, for you
and your buddy Bill. There are 86,400 seconds in a day. A stopped clock
with second hand, would be right for 2 seconds each day, wrong for
86,398 seconds. So, it would be wrong 86,398/86,400 * 100 percent of the
time, which is? 99.99%, which is EXACTLY what I posted. So, once again,
you're WRONG, always wrong.

Since a stopped clock is NOT correct for ANY minutes or ANY
seconds a day, but only for an instant twice a day, you are
obviously again incorrect.

BS. A clock with a second hand is correct for two seconds a day.
A clock with a minute hand is correct for two minutes a day, fool.
Even an elementary school kid can grasp that.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3-5eed0970fb71@googlegroups.com:

This started with the NY Times. Remember how many
stories they and WAPO ran about all kinds of alleged collusion
with Russia? And after two years of intensive investigation how
the collusion allegations, turned out?

Bullshit. I never read or followed them. You are an abject idiot,
grasping at straws.

Donald J. Trump had a tax debt with the state of New Jersey. It
matters not that he handed over the casinos to others. The tax debt
was already there, as yet unpaid. You dig, BOY?

And NO tax hearing is going to drop a tax debt to apoint where 10% of
the original debt is accepted.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3-
5eed0970fb71@googlegroups.com:

That is true, at least the NYC part, I hadn't heard about Cincinnati.

You are an idiot. You 'haven't heard' because you are oblivious to
reality. Obviously so.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3-
5eed0970fb71@googlegroups.com:

> Thing is, in the US at least, one is innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Joltin' Joe DiMaggio had real bone spurs. He also had real bone
spur xrays. The impact was almost debilitating. However, he lined
up and signed up to go to war to defend our nation. And those REAL
bone spurs are what eventually forced him to retire from baseball.

Donald J. Trump cannot produce any xrays, because there are none.
And less than two days after he "was diagnosed" and "got out of the
draft", he was out playing sports again. Even now, the bastard
roams around golf courses with his thumb up his ass, waiting for the
twits around him to inform him about his most recent lackings.

So, you retarded piece of shit... WAKE THE FUCK UP, BOY!

> As usual, you're not clear in what exactly you're claiming,

Nope. It was absolutely clear to anyone with even half a brain.
That obviously rules you out.

but I
would assume it's that you claim Trump didn't have bone spurs.

He does not have bone spurs. If he did, he would not be walking
golf courses.

> Only problem is that there is no proof,

The fact that he has no proof IS the proof that he has no bone
spurs, idiot. Show us the xrays, dipshit. While you are at it,
give up the tax documents, you fucking PUSSY! The retarded bastard
cannot even stand up for his own actions and life behavior. He is
as bad as it gets, literally.

> nothing that I've seen.

Except that you are a horse blinder wearing idiot, and I have
doubts you have the aptitude to get it even if you did not have
horse blinders on.

> His use of student deferments was legal, many people did that.

No, his use of student deferments was *ALSO* contrived.

Can you really be that fucking batshit stupid?

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:09:23 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are
intelligent and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they
should make decisions for all of us, because we are incapable.



Clearly he is correct as instead of refuting what he said and proving
otherwise,

You;re lying again. You edited out where I did refute his and your BS:


"Thanks for dragging that into the discussion, lamebrain. So, if I have
an impulse function at 8AM I have one impulse function. And if I have an
impulse function at 8PM, I have one impulse function. But I don't have
TWO a day? I have ZERO? Where did you learn to count?


ROFL

And that is EXACTLY what the discussion was about."



You two are perfect together.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-
a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

Clearly way more reliable that either you or your butt buddy DL.

Nice job of showing us how much of a homophobe you are as well.

Like I said early on... A dumbfuck like you sullies the complexion
of America. You make some good Florida gator food. But not any good
for anything else.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

He even got his dick
wrapped around the axle by trying to use 1440 minutes in a day,
instead of SECONDS! No math from him, or you either, just more BS
piled on top of BS. Are you related?

You are such a fucking child.

Posit that a stopped clock is right for two minutes a day, the
rest of the world would stop. I know that went over your head
though.

If a stopped clock was right for two seconds a day, your number is
off the mark.

Since a stopped clock is NOT correct for ANY minutes or ANY
seconds a day, but only for an instant twice a day, you are
obviously again incorrect.

Being that an instant represents zero accumulated time, two
instances ALSO equates to ZERO accumulated time. And your
simpleton, lame fat ass cannot get that simple, undeniable fact.

Squirm all you want, fat fucktard4. Your math skills are as lame
as your Usenet skills.

 

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:7e6092de-42cf-43f0-bfb1-ce311aaf1e68@googlegroups.com:

You;re lying again. You edited out where I did refute his and
your BS:

You did not refute it. That would require proving otherwise. All
you did was blather on about 'Libs'. There was no 'showing of your
work'. You, in fact, are so bad at math, I doubt you even know what
calculus is, much less anything about it.

I edited nothing. This is Usenet, idiot. Your lame response is
still there for all to see.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:43:01 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:29cd0318-0528-4fc4-b167-
67092a9b44f4@googlegroups.com:

Since a stopped clock is NOT correct for ANY minutes or ANY
seconds a day, but only for an instant twice a day, you are
obviously again incorrect.

BS. A clock with a second hand is correct for two seconds a day.

No, it is not. It is stopped. Time sweps by, and only for an
instant it matches up. Not for a minute... not for a second...

Well that's a lie. It clearly matches the correct time for a second,
the resolution level of the stopped clock. If the clock has no second
hand, then it matches for a minute. Like K says, wrong, always wrong.
It's quite amazing, given that the expression "even a stopped clock is
correct twice a day", is common, has been around for a long time and
is accepted, that you'd even be here making a fool of yourself,
but here you are.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:35:27 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3-5eed0970fb71@googlegroups.com:

This started with the NY Times. Remember how many
stories they and WAPO ran about all kinds of alleged collusion
with Russia? And after two years of intensive investigation how
the collusion allegations, turned out?



Bullshit. I never read or followed them.

I see, that explains a lot. So, you just hate Trump, but you don't follow
the news, you're not interested in the facts.




You are an abject idiot,

grasping at straws.

Donald J. Trump had a tax debt with the state of New Jersey.

That's not true. It was the casino business entities that had an
alleged tax debt. Casinos that had gone bankrupt and most of them
had changed ownership, with Trump left with maybe a small stock share
in some of them at the time the debts were settled.




It

matters not that he handed over the casinos to others. The tax debt
was already there, as yet unpaid. You dig, BOY?

The tax debt goes with the business entity, it's not Trump's personally,
capiche?

And NO tax hearing is going to drop a tax debt to apoint where 10% of
the original debt is accepted.

It wasn't a hearing. It was a negotiated settlement to a law suit.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:31:02 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:f036ce04-df96-4c2d-8cd3-
5eed0970fb71@googlegroups.com:

Thing is, in the US at least, one is innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Joltin' Joe DiMaggio had real bone spurs. He also had real bone
spur xrays. The impact was almost debilitating. However, he lined
up and signed up to go to war to defend our nation. And those REAL
bone spurs are what eventually forced him to retire from baseball.

Donald J. Trump cannot produce any xrays, because there are none.

Right, like he's going to have X-Rays from 50 years ago. And there is
no requirement that he produce them even if he had them.

And less than two days after he "was diagnosed" and "got out of the
draft", he was out playing sports again.

I'd like to see the proof you have for that claim.




Even now, the bastard

roams around golf courses with his thumb up his ass, waiting for the
twits around him to inform him about his most recent lackings.

Bone spurs can be treated and also removed, they are not generally
a lifetime debilitating condition.

So, you retarded piece of shit... WAKE THE FUCK UP, BOY!

As usual, you're not clear in what exactly you're claiming,

Nope. It was absolutely clear to anyone with even half a brain.
That obviously rules you out.

but I
would assume it's that you claim Trump didn't have bone spurs.

He does not have bone spurs. If he did, he would not be walking
golf courses.

Only problem is that there is no proof,

The fact that he has no proof IS the proof that he has no bone
spurs, idiot. Show us the xrays, dipshit.

Why don't you show us all of your medical records from 50 years ago.
I'm sure you must have them, right? ROFL




While you are at it,

give up the tax documents, you fucking PUSSY! The retarded bastard
cannot even stand up for his own actions and life behavior. He is
as bad as it gets, literally.

Trump does a tremendous job of standing up for his own actions.
You may disagree with it, but that's one thing Trump does, he stands
up and fights back.

nothing that I've seen.

Except that you are a horse blinder wearing idiot, and I have
doubts you have the aptitude to get it even if you did not have
horse blinders on.

His use of student deferments was legal, many people did that.

No, his use of student deferments was *ALSO* contrived.

You show us that Trump was not actually in school when
he received the deferments. See, this is how Trump wins, idiots like
you make all kinds of silly, unsubstantiated claims and then it backfires.
How did that all that collusion that was reported in the press over the
last two years turn out? We heard everything from Cohen meeting with
Russian agents in Prague, to the Russians funneling money into the NRA
to support Trump. In the end, after two years of intensive investigation
and $40 mil spent, there was no Russian collusion. So now it's on to
something else.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:08:19 AM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:26:46 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:57:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 12:31:48 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 8:55:09 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:56341c1c-429d-4a68-8a90-
70894c04ce1b@googlegroups.com:

Wrong again, always wrong. A stopped clock is right twice a day,
which is more than I can say about you.

You missed the point yet again, child.

A stopped clock is right twice a day for only an instant. One
instant plus one instant equals zero.

Wrong again. One instant plus one instant equals two instants. One instant plus a negative instant would be zero. Another failure at basic algebra. Bill must be proud.

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are intelligent
and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they should make decisions
for all of us, because we are incapable.

You are certainly seem incapable of working out why I might have said that.

Basic algebra does have its place, but the concepts of "limits" is more subtle, and you've obviously not mastered it and probably haven't even been exposed to it.

A Dirac impulse has zero width but a finite area, which is obvious nonsense, but doesn't stop it from being a useful concept.

Thanks for dragging that into the discussion, lamebrain. So, if I have
an impulse function at 8AM I have one impulse function. And if I have an
impulse function at 8PM, I have one impulse function. But I don't have
TWO a day? I have ZERO? Where did you learn to count?

That's the whole problem. You don't count impulse functions, you integrate over them.

BS. If I have an impulse at 8AM and one at 8PM, I have TWO impulses, fool.



Calculus is a process of dividing up the natural (as opposed to the integral) numbers into progressively finer divisions, and seeing what would happen when you make the intervals small enough so that everything looks linear.

Thanks for further demonstrating the lib mentality. Only libs could
understand calculus, not that it matters, because it's just your
lame attempt at diversion.

It only works when the process being looked at is single-valued and continuous, but time of day is exactly that.

ROFL

Actually rolling around the floor looking like a half-wit, but you don't see it that way.

And that is EXACTLY what the discussion was about. You're quite amazing.
That fool DL posts one stupid, incorrect thing after another. For example,
he denied that a stopped clock is right twice a day! Not a peep from you.

He's right, in the sense that stopped clock is never right. It looks like a clock showing the correct time twice a day (if it hasn't got a second hand) so it is obviously wrong 99.99861111% of the time (where the last digit recurs).

Well, duh! You finally get it! Kind of. But you're still wrong, because
even if it has a second hand, then it's still right twice a day! All the
other BS, is well, BS. Sure, anyone could argue with what is the real
accuracy of any clock, for example. But only true morons or dishonest libs
would argue that the expression "even a stopped clock is right twice a day",
isn't true.

But I say that a stopped clock is right 99.99% of the time, and woooah,
here you come. According to you and the nitwit it's all wrong.

It was an inadequate approximation to the correct figure and he called you on it.

That;s another lie, why do you libs lie so much? It's absolutely true
that a stopped clock with a second hand is right twice a day. And the
99.99% wrong flows directly from that. It's correct two seconds in a day!
Notably absent is your math, because, well you know you're wrong and lying.

He even got his dick wrapped around the axle by trying to use 1440 minutes in > a day, instead of SECONDS!

If a clock has a second hand, you can see it moving, so the idea doesn't work.

Totally irrelevant of course. The indicated time is correct, to the second,
twice a day. Why do libs lie so much? Geez, it's a common expression,
even a stopped clock is correct twice a day! And it's true. Only morons
and screwy libs would argue otherwise.

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 11:27:24 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 9:09:23 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in
news:05082b8a-58dd-4ec7-81f8-a362f32100c0@googlegroups.com:

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are
intelligent and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they
should make decisions for all of us, because we are incapable.

Clearly he is correct as instead of refuting what he said and proving
otherwise,

You;re lying again. You edited out where I did refute his and your BS:

"Thanks for dragging that into the discussion, lamebrain. So, if I have
an impulse function at 8AM I have one impulse function. And if I have an
impulse function at 8PM, I have one impulse function. But I don't have
TWO a day? I have ZERO? Where did you learn to count?


ROFL

And that is EXACTLY what the discussion was about."

Actually, it wasn't. Impulse functions don't come into it at all.

As a "refutation", your text qualifies as incoherent word salad.

> You two are perfect together.

Both, in our separate and decidedly different ways, more nearly perfect than you are. You don't have to be all that perfect to be more nearly perfect than a gibbering idiot.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 10:26:46 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:

On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:57:28 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:
On Friday, May 3, 2019 at 12:31:48 PM UTC+10, tra...@optonline.net wrote:
On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 8:55:09 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:56341c1c-429d-4a68-8a90-
70894c04ce1b@googlegroups.com:

Wrong again, always wrong. A stopped clock is right twice a day,
which is more than I can say about you.

You missed the point yet again, child.

A stopped clock is right twice a day for only an instant. One
instant plus one instant equals zero.

Wrong again. One instant plus one instant equals two instants. One instant plus a negative instant would be zero. Another failure at basic algebra. Bill must be proud.

Clearly you've never done calculus.

Typical and expected from a lib. Libs think only they are intelligent
and knowledgeable, superior in every way and that they should make decisions
for all of us, because we are incapable.

You are certainly seem incapable of working out why I might have said that.

Basic algebra does have its place, but the concepts of "limits" is more subtle, and you've obviously not mastered it and probably haven't even been exposed to it.

A Dirac impulse has zero width but a finite area, which is obvious nonsense, but doesn't stop it from being a useful concept.

Thanks for dragging that into the discussion, lamebrain. So, if I have
an impulse function at 8AM I have one impulse function. And if I have an
impulse function at 8PM, I have one impulse function. But I don't have
TWO a day? I have ZERO? Where did you learn to count?

That's the whole problem. You don't count impulse functions, you integrate over them. Calculus is a process of dividing up the natural (as opposed to the integral) numbers into progressively finer divisions, and seeing what would happen when you make the intervals small enough so that everything looks linear.

It only works when the process being looked at is single-valued and continuous, but time of day is exactly that.

> ROFL

Actually rolling around the floor looking like a half-wit, but you don't see it that way.

And that is EXACTLY what the discussion was about. You're quite amazing.
That fool DL posts one stupid, incorrect thing after another. For example,
he denied that a stopped clock is right twice a day! Not a peep from you..

He's right, in the sense that stopped clock is never right. It looks like a clock showing the correct time twice a day (if it hasn't got a second hand) so it is obviously wrong 99.99861111% of the time (where the last digit recurs).

But I say that a stopped clock is right 99.99% of the time, and woooah,
here you come. According to you and the nitwit it's all wrong.

It was an inadequate approximation to the correct figure and he called you on it.

> He even got his dick wrapped around the axle by trying to use 1440 minutes in > a day, instead of SECONDS!

If a clock has a second hand, you can see it moving, so the idea doesn't work.

Digital displays that show seconds do step from one integral number to another, but if you look at such a display for long enough to register the time it is displaying, you look at it for more than second.

No math from him, or you either, just more BS
piled on top of BS.

Your idea of what constitutes BS includes anything too complicated for your tiny mind.

> Are you related?

Not that I know of. It's unlikely.

So your percentage is off, because you are not even aware of the
numbers you are working with, CHILD.

Like K says, always wrong.

Not exactly a reliable authority.

Clearly way more reliable that either you or your butt buddy DL.

"Clearly"? You do suffer from delusions of competence.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney