Guest
On Thursday, May 2, 2019 at 10:54:01 AM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
That is obviously wrong and another example of your lack of grasp of
math. Here;s a clue, the very simple clock I'm looking at has a minute
hand.
1440 minutes in a
> day.
Wow, how did you get that right?
You do the math, dumbfuck. Your 99.99% is about as far off as
> it gets.
Even if I accepted your faulty premise, that time is limited to granularity
of one minute, you're still WRONG. Using your numbers, that would give
a win rate of 99.861%, which clearly is not "as far off as it gets" from
my stated 99.99%. So, again, you're wrong, always wrong.
But that was already glaringly obvious, because you have
That's a lie. I've only called a very select few libs, because, they are.
Oh, really? I first encountered you just a couple weeks ago, so that;s
another obvious lie. Wrong again.
and have
That's another lie, wrong again.
Cite for us where I ever said I was a member of the Republican Party.
Some of you fucktards came here from the 'Tea
> Party' after previously abandoning a party once already.
Where is this "here" that you speak of? Sci.electronics.design is now
a political party? Wrong again, always wrong.
You claim
Wrong again, always wrong.
trader4@optonline.net wrote in news:c4cc9b5b-867e-40e7-98b9-
d20c7c711f65@googlegroups.com:
Do tell, dear.
More retarded playbaby stupid shit. Your mother called me dear,
fuckhead. I hope that bothers your elementary school brained
mentality.
What is the correct number according to you?
Stopped clock is correct for two minutes a day.
That is obviously wrong and another example of your lack of grasp of
math. Here;s a clue, the very simple clock I'm looking at has a minute
hand.
1440 minutes in a
> day.
Wow, how did you get that right?
You do the math, dumbfuck. Your 99.99% is about as far off as
> it gets.
Even if I accepted your faulty premise, that time is limited to granularity
of one minute, you're still WRONG. Using your numbers, that would give
a win rate of 99.861%, which clearly is not "as far off as it gets" from
my stated 99.99%. So, again, you're wrong, always wrong.
But that was already glaringly obvious, because you have
been calling nearly everyone in the group 'libs' for several days,
whatever that stupid non-term means. The depth of your lack of
adult maturity is glaringly obvious.
That's a lie. I've only called a very select few libs, because, they are.
But you false stat spewing Republican party interlopers have always
had problems with maturity and facts and intelligence
Oh, really? I first encountered you just a couple weeks ago, so that;s
another obvious lie. Wrong again.
and have
always declared yourselves to be part of something you are not a
part of. You retarded jackasses have all but highjacked the entire
Republican party.
That's another lie, wrong again.
Cite for us where I ever said I was a member of the Republican Party.
Some of you fucktards came here from the 'Tea
> Party' after previously abandoning a party once already.
Where is this "here" that you speak of? Sci.electronics.design is now
a political party? Wrong again, always wrong.
You claim
to be intelligent, yet all you have ever done is point fingers and
spout lame monikers around and put up pidgeon holes to attempt to
hoist folks into. You party interloping motherfuckers are the very
thing that is wrong with our current system.
Wrong again, always wrong.