T
Terry Given
Guest
YD wrote:
To be honest I cannot remember anything at all about grammar, and
wouldnt know a past-participle if it bit me. Hell, I can't even remember
what an adverb is.
Cheers
Terry
LOL.Terry Given wrote:
YD wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:59:55 +1200, Terry Given <my_name@ieee.org
wrote:
Guy Macon wrote:
Al Borowski wrote:
I'm just wondering what the point is. Obviously people are
smart enough to remove the alt.dev.null silliness because
they're replying. Presumably it takes extra effort on your
part to add it. So why keep doing it?
[1] Setting followups to alt.dev.null is, like all followups,
a suggestion to those who reply as to where they should reply.
Because I won't see any reply from the person I killfiled and
because I don't care what anyone else thinks, I insert a
suggestion of no reply from either group. You are, of course,
free to ignore my suggestion.
[2] Because certain flamers who are now in my killfile posted
personal attacks and stated a preference that I not set
followups. If such flaming is rewarded, there will be more
of it. I prefer less flaming, and thus choose to never, ever
give someone what they ask for if the request contains a
personal attack.
Am I in your kill file (which I presume I must be, given your
previous definition of plonk), because I had the temerity to
laugh at you?
that is rather sad. Although pathetic might be a better word.
Luckily I find fragile people amusing.
ROTFLMAOYA,
Terry
I don't, except when they wave their fragility like a banner making
a nuisance of themselves. For the most part they're to be pitied,
but in the case of GM all one can really do is to point and laugh
at their antics. In the long run this won't do much good either,
I've a feeling he really needs help, but he won't get it until he
admits it himself.
- YD.
After Rich's post, I thought about what I meant a bit more. I find it
amusing to see people hoist by their own petards. I laugh at, say,
anti-smut campaigners who go out of their way to find and view films
etc. which they find "disgusting." hilarious. Actually not a bad
analogy in this case.
I like the way you put it so much I'll repeat it:
"when they wave their fragility like a banner, making a nuisance of
themselves"
lovely. I couldnt help but add the comma though.
Cheers
Terry
Glad you liked it, feel free to use it as you like. I did think it
sounded a bit forced without the comma, but I'm no grammarian so I let
it slip by. Let's just hope the Apostrophe Police doesn't create a
Comma Branch
- YD.
To be honest I cannot remember anything at all about grammar, and
wouldnt know a past-participle if it bit me. Hell, I can't even remember
what an adverb is.
Cheers
Terry