RF through water question

On Wed, 12 May 2004 23:43:06 -0700, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com> wrote:


"Repeating Rifle" <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:BCC724F2.17403%SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net...

maxREMOVE@THIStdl.com wrote on 5/11/04 11:20 PM:
vinyl records over compact disks, and my favorite, a green marker to green
up the area around a CD spindle hole? To tell the truth, I have not heard
much about that last on letely. Is it still in vogue?

I thought it was green marker around the outside edge. No wonder it didn't
work.
isn't the use of a marker on the outside to defeat one method of copy
protection ?
--
refillable drysuit talc bag $9.95 ppd
http://www.underwaterusa.com
 
jriegle wrote:

Damn! Please turn of that HTML! Red text on bright blue! Who are you trying
to annoy?

"Alan McClure" <mcclures+AEA-gwis.com> wrote in message
news:10a4pnvm3vsqe42+AEA-corp.supernews.com...


Ken Smith wrote:



In article <c7t1i902kvo+AEA-drn.newsguy.com>,
Winfield Hill <Winfield+AF8-member+AEA-newsguy.com> wrote:
[....]




"The coded message sent is a repeated, error correcting code. The
bit rate is a few bits per minute, repeated until enough data..."




This is why a familigram might say something like this "..Born 010613 1
ok". Until the sailor comes home he doesn't know the eye color of his
kid.

BTW: They don't trail anything to receive, as far as I know. Trailing
something isn't something they want to have to do to get orders. They do
trail a sonar array which looks like a firehose on the end of a longish
cable. The sonar array isn't deployed all of the time and they can chop
it off if they have to.





Boy, I would love to correct some of the mis-information expounded in
this thread so far.
It's been over thirty years since my last cruise in a fleet balistic
missile submarine and I'm not
sure how much of what I know is still classified.
I will tell you that family grams were limited to about 20 words each
and 3 per patrol.
The boat was nearly continuously receiving civilian teletype news feeds
(AP,UPI, REUTERS).
Reception of relatively high speed message traffic was never a problem
at our normal
operating depth.
Transmitting, however, is/was somewhat problematical. FBMs due to their
mission DO NOT
transmit/radiate any more energy than they have to. Most equipment with
the ability to generate
a signal had its fuses pull to preclude accidentally exposing the boats
position. That included
radio, radar, and sonar.

ARM







Sorry!!! Just started using a new/different news client.
ARM
 
"Roy McCammon" <rbmccammon@mmm.com> wrote in message
news:40A38A38.7030807@mmm.com...
Winfield Hill wrote:
Tim Auton <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote...

What I can find on the ELF system in use by the US (76Hz)
suggests they can receive ELF at operational speed and depth...


Wow, 76Hz? And this stuff is being discussed in public?

yup.
They considered basing the antenna here in the Texas Hill
country. It was greatly opposed. Fear of ELF. Anyway,
I think the only message is "come up and listen".
The Navy has a program called TACAMO (TA Charge And Move Out - anything for
a good acronym) which was originally C130s equippped with a long-wire
antenna on a reel and an ELF transmitter. Two aircraft were supposed to be
on station at all times, one Atlantic and one Pacific, flying in shifts, so
all ballistic misslile subs cold be contacted instantly.
 
On Tue, 11 May 2004 10:59:28 -0500, "Ron H." <ronharshbarger@mmm.com>
Gave us:

What are the design issues involved with passing medium wave ( 10s of MHz )
higher power ( KWatts) RF through a water jacket. Assume "tap" water and of
course non conductive non ferrous housing material.

Ron H.
It will act as a resistor. At low power, perhaps a bit different.
At high power, it is a bulk resistor. The dimensions of the cavity
would help.
 
On Tue, 11 May 2004 14:29:31 -0500, crusty@usa.net Gave us:

On Tue, 11 May 2004 10:59:28 -0500, "Ron H." <ronharshbarger@mmm.com> wrote:

What are the design issues involved with passing medium wave ( 10s of MHz )
higher power ( KWatts) RF through a water jacket. Assume "tap" water and of
course non conductive non ferrous housing material.

Ron H.



Um.. unless your water is de-ionized or distilled, you don't pass RF through it.
It gets absorbed and turned into heat just like in a microwave oven. Tap water
is not de-ionized.

It is a series element, not a shunt to ground. It will act as a
resistor.
 
On Wed, 12 May 2004 04:36:27 GMT, "The other John Smith"
<jocjo-john@yooha.com> Gave us:

"Winfield Hill" <Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote in message
news:c7rsjb027tj@drn.newsguy.com...
Tim Auton <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote...

What I can find on the ELF system in use by the US (76Hz)
suggests they can receive ELF at operational speed and depth...

Wow, 76Hz? And this stuff is being discussed in public?

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)



Yes. About 10 or so years ago, when I worked for a company who made variable
speed motor controllers, an engineer with Continental Electronics called and
asked about our 250 kW inverters. During the question/answer process, it
came out that he wanted an output of about 250 kW with frequency variation
of something less than 60 Hz to near 100 Hz to communicate with submarines.
Huh? I said, you can't pass any information with a carrier at that
frequency. He said it all depends on how it's modulated and how much time
you take to decode it. That shut me up.

I'll never forget that phone call.

John

I have heard of 3Hz systems.

I takes a long time to get 1kbyte across.
 
On Tue, 11 May 2004 23:34:01 -0700, "Max Hauser"
<maxREMOVE@THIStdl.com> Gave us:

"The other John Smith" in message
news:fRhoc.17005$V97.15931@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...

During the question/answer process, it came out that he wanted
an output of about 250 kW with frequency variation of
something less than 60 Hz to near 100 Hz to communicate with
submarines. Huh? I said, you can't pass any information with a
carrier at that frequency. He said it all depends on how it's
modulated and how much time you take to decode it.

You're damn right it does. (The intuitive notion of a tight relationship
between bit rate and analog bandwidth disappears like parted waters if you
study communication theory -- you can have data rates far greater or far
less than bandwidths, in exchange for requirements for SNR or other
constraints.) But the subject tends to the counterintuitive, so it
collects notions and suppositions and opinions. (Like various other areas
of electronics.) This by the way is partly the domain of the newsgroup
comp.dsp .
Is this why QAM 256 is far better than simple modulation schemes?

I mean it allows for so much more *use* of the signal as it is being
sent.

Anyway, this is party why one can get so many more channels per
transponder on a comm bird than was available in the past. That 6MHz
wide channel is being filled to the brim with data (and that data
compressed as well), as opposed to the signals they repeated in the
60s and 70s.

Thank God for General Instrument (now a division of Motorola).

They (along with others) brought you wide screen form factors,
MPEG-2, and HDTV. As well as twelve channel per carrier uplink
encoding and decoding. They made your Video/TV life over ten times
richer.

GI was not just another cable box maker.

Then the Cable Cos ream us up the ass with their pricing. All the
while letting their hardware age, and fester, instead of keeping up.
They call that "a good value service".

Cox's news server is one fine example. I'd be surprised if it is
even one terabyte in archive size.
 
On Wed, 12 May 2004 07:47:15 GMT, Repeating Rifle
<SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:

in article 10a3gi85h0aum79@corp.supernews.com, Max Hauser at
maxREMOVE@THIStdl.com wrote on 5/11/04 11:20 PM:

There you may read (with growing awe, if you know the subject) one Commander
Brett Maraldo describing speaker cables of mercury-filled tubing, and an
ensuing Grand Debate -- as popular then as now -- on skin depth in
conductors: one camp insisting that depth of penetration is the electrical
wavelength at frequency, and the other group countering that it's the (!)
acoustical wavelength instead.

I sometimes wonder about the sanity of some audiophiles. Although many do
indeed know what they are talking about, others are like Art Bell. What else
would explain the love affair with tube ampifiers, monster litz cables,
vinyl records over compact disks, and my favorite, a green marker to green
up the area around a CD spindle hole? To tell the truth, I have not heard
much about that last on letely. Is it still in vogue?

Bill
Let's just say that you have your eccentricities too.

For a litz wire to give an advantage that is indeed audibly notable,
the base system needs to start at around $40k. Some dipshit's $5k or
10k "stereo" ain't gonna get it, and the $20k jobs can barely make the
difference any greater than negligible. It takes a truly knowledgable
person to quell acoustic demons at this level.

However, on said $40k system, the differences indeed do show
themselves, and make such purchases viable for such systems.

For Joe Blow's shitbox, however, they are a laugh. Monster laughs
all the way to the bank.

Tube amps have advantages for live performers, such as a bassist.

Since the days of FET driven, and module driven amplifiers, however,
even those guys would have a hard time telling the difference without
introducing high slew rate transients at the pickups in order to
"tell" what is driving the acoustic transducers (speakers). Those
amps have their place though.

Acoustics plays into electronics more than one may think.

Take HF cores and magnetics. Why do they sing when they are not
varnish impregnated? What do you think magnetostriction is?
It is a mechanical action, and therefore will have acoustical
resonances and interplay. A flyback uses magnetic core saturation as
the resonant function for making an oscillation. Placing a clamp on an
E core will at some point of increased pressure, restrict it's flux
flow, and will be exhibited as heat, and electrical losses. At normal
pressures, it minimizes air gap, and maximizes efficiency in cases
where the gap is not an element of the circuit function, just
transformer efficiency.

Other HF transformers have operation which IS gap dependant, such as
PWM driven units which cause drivers to ring or clip if the gap is too
small, and are too lossy if it gets too big.

At human audible frequencies copper wire has no notable skin effect,
and skin effect itself is an effect of the e-field pushing the
electrons to the outside of the conductor, not any kind of acoustic
demon.

When there is a lot of time (long period), a lot (thickness) of
electrons flow near the surface. When the period is less, the same
number of electrons flow (for a given amperage) in a thickness (skin)
that is much closer to the surface of the conductor. So, the faster
the AC frequency, the lower the cross sectional thickness of a given
conductor gets used. This is why litz works so well at high
frequencies. All those presumably small "skins" add up to way more
cross sectional thickness for the purpose of actual flow than does a
single strand that matches the thickness of the entire litz bundle.
 
On Wed, 12 May 2004 21:50:20 -0400, Boris Mohar
<borism_-void-_@sympatico.ca> Gave us:

On Wed, 12 May 2004 07:47:15 GMT, Repeating Rifle <SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net
wrote:

in article 10a3gi85h0aum79@corp.supernews.com, Max Hauser at
maxREMOVE@THIStdl.com wrote on 5/11/04 11:20 PM:


I sometimes wonder about the sanity of some audiophiles. Although many do
indeed know what they are talking about, others are like Art Bell. What else
would explain the love affair with tube ampifiers, monster litz cables,
vinyl records over compact disks, and my favorite, a green marker to green
up the area around a CD spindle hole? To tell the truth, I have not heard
much about that last on letely. Is it still in vogue?

Bill

Black produces much better results

http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,52665,00.html



Regards,

Boris Mohar
That's not what the green MM's function was purported to be.

It was supposed to make it sound better.

It was NOT about copy protected discs.

It was, and is BULLSHIT. Laser read head assemblies pick up
directly reflected "lands". That is the opposite of "pits", and is
quite bright bouncing back into the pickup for a "one" binary read.

The "pits", and all other extraneous reflections, such as the
friggin' scatter that is claimed to be reduced or negated by this
green Magic Marker technique, does NOT get read at all, so it is, and
has always been bullshit.
 
On Thu, 13 May 2004 06:17:53 GMT, Repeating Rifle
<SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> Gave us:



This use of a marker is a new one for me, but makes reasonable sense. The
use of the green marker that was publicized over five years ago was to
improve the fidelity over that of the digital sound as extracted from the
unmarked CD. That is what I consider to be koo-koo.
It is.
 
On Wed, 12 May 2004 23:43:06 -0700, "Richard Henry" <rphenry@home.com>
Gave us:

I thought it was green marker around the outside edge. No wonder it didn't
work.
It was. It didn't work, because it DOESN'T work.
 
On Thu, 13 May 2004 23:15:17 -0500, "Dave VanHorn"
<dvanhorn@cedar.net> Gave us:

Thank God for General Instrument (now a division of Motorola).

I thought they became microchip?
Motorola only bought the uplink encoder division from what I know...
which is not exactly what happened... :]

GI has been around for decades, they bought the encoder division
which was formerly an arm of Titan/ Linkabit. Or was them.

Anyway... thank them and Woo Paik in particular (now in S. Korea as
Pres of his own company) specifically for HDTV in digital form. Were
it not for them, the idiots in the consortium would have made an
analog version... Oh boy.
 
In alt.engineering.electrical,sci.electronics.design, Repeating Rifle
<SalmonEgg@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

in article c7rsjb027tj@drn.newsguy.com, Winfield Hill at
Winfield_member@newsguy.com wrote on 5/11/04 5:54 PM:

Tim Auton <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote...

What I can find on the ELF system in use by the US (76Hz)
suggests they can receive ELF at operational speed and depth...

Wow, 76Hz? And this stuff is being discussed in public?
It's been on the web for years, and apparently been public for a
lot longer. I googled and looked through several links, this one (a MS
Word file) seems to have the most tech info:

www.oldradio.com/archives/jurassic/ELF.doc

I read about this on webpages a year or two ago (promted by
messages here on SED, IIRC), I recall that this was supposed to be a
system that just transmits carrier, and when submarines received it
they would rise closer to the surface where they could recieve the
actual message through a higher frequency (but still VLF)
transmission. But from the link above, they actually modulate the 76
Hz to send short (perhaps as short as one byte or less) messages. So
of course the messages are in the clear, but the exact meaning of,
say, 10111001, is surely a closely guarded secret.

Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dot-org for now)


There is not much secret to it. The physics is well known and not
complicated. The trick will be to implement a working system. That is not
easy. There will be no way to prevent interception. I am sure that any
potential adversary is listening now. The key will be encryption and hiding
that there may have been successful communication.

Bill
-----
http://mindspring.com/~benbradley
 
"bushbadee" <bushbadee@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:aNAoc.191494$L31.102119@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
Ha, ha, water skiing seagulls.Couldn't they put weights on it to hold it
below the surface.
That would kind of defeat the purpose of having a 'floating wire' now
wouldn't it? The whole idea was to have the black 'wire' float along the
surface and receive incoming transmissions without the submarine having to
surface. Sinking the wire would make it harder to receive RF.

daestrom
 
They probly use blue light any way.

Some years ago I designed a power supply for an 155 mm artillery shell or a
rocket.
The thing only had to work for about 1 minute.
It powered a transmitter which would be used to call back SAC bombers in the
event that they were on a bombing mission.
The idea was to get the transmitter high into the air for maximum
transmission distance.





"daestrom" <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote in message
news:VZ2pc.187154$M3.22126@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
"bushbadee" <bushbadee@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:aNAoc.191494$L31.102119@nwrddc01.gnilink.net...
Ha, ha, water skiing seagulls.Couldn't they put weights on it to hold it
below the surface.


That would kind of defeat the purpose of having a 'floating wire' now
wouldn't it? The whole idea was to have the black 'wire' float along the
surface and receive incoming transmissions without the submarine having to
surface. Sinking the wire would make it harder to receive RF.

daestrom
 
In article <yrwoc.247311$e17.176084@twister.nyroc.rr.com>,
daestrom <daestrom@NO_SPAM_HEREtwcny.rr.com> wrote:
[.. no trailing antenna..]
We did have a 'floating wire antenna', but it was not for ELF.
I guess I should have been clearer. I meant they don't trail an antenna
for the ELF we were talking about.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
In article <k4v2a05qjmhjsgql95tbdsig7flqaq7urs@4ax.com>,
Tim Auton <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote:
[...]
76Hz indeed. Wavelengths of thousands of km. Antenna *feedlines* tens
of km long. It's fascinating stuff. If it's meant to be a secret
they're not doing a very good job of keeping it :)
I know that the geophysics industry used the 15KHz transmitters as a
signal source for doing EM. I don't know if anyone uses the 75Hz on
purpose for the same job. Its a bit too low.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
"bushbadee" <bushbadee@verizon.net> wrote:
[ELF and submarine comms in general]
They probly use blue light any way.
Perhaps they do they do, but that doesn't mean they don't also use
ELF, VLF, acoustic signaling and a variety of other systems.


Tim
--
Love is a travelator.
 
kensmith@violet.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote:
In article <k4v2a05qjmhjsgql95tbdsig7flqaq7urs@4ax.com>,
Tim Auton <tim.auton@uton.[groupSexWithoutTheY]> wrote:
[...]
76Hz indeed. Wavelengths of thousands of km. Antenna *feedlines* tens
of km long. It's fascinating stuff. If it's meant to be a secret
they're not doing a very good job of keeping it :)

I know that the geophysics industry used the 15KHz transmitters as a
signal source for doing EM. I don't know if anyone uses the 75Hz on
purpose for the same job. Its a bit too low.
If you'd read the link I gave you'd know they do use ELF (the 82Hz
Russian one at least) for geophysics research.


Tim
--
Love is a travelator.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top