J
John Fields
Guest
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 06:57:34 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
Well, it looks like you need an English lesson. I'll try to dumb it
down so you can understand it, but if you're still in the dark after
you read it post back and I'll dumb it down some more.
Once again, here's the salient post:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:05:22 GMT,
a?n?g?e?l@lovergirl.lrigrevol.moc.com (The little lost angel) Gave us:
the only requisite for a user to select one by is dissipation ability.
"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, from that post, let's extract the two sentences in the exchange and
look at them rather more critically:
From L'A we have:
"Could anybody please enlighten me why is the resistance value given in
watts instead of ohms?"
And from you:
"Perhaps because such resistors are always the same value in Ohms, and
the only requisite for a user to select one by is dissipation ability."
I added the 'a' to the 're' to fix the typo you made. It makes the
sentence easier to understand, unless you specifically meant 're' for
some reason or other...
Now, notice that you did not contest her belief that the resistance was
given in watts, but rather reinforced her belief by offering one of
several reasons (as indicated by the 'perhaps') why her belief was
valid. Here... I'll give you an example of a similar exchange which,
hopefully, you'll have little trouble in understanding.
Q. "Could anybody please enlighten me as to why DarkMatter appears to be
so stupid?"
A1. "Perhaps because he is."
A2. "Perhaps because he can't help it."
A3. "Perhaps it's because it's a game he's playing."
Notice in all three of the answers that no refutation of your appearing
to be stupid is given, only reasons agreeing with the premise and
offering reasons for its substantiation.
possible indecision introduced by the 'Perhaps'.
--
John Fields
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:
---On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 04:20:22 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:
Perhaps because such resistors re always the same value in Ohms, and
the only requisite for a user to select one by is dissipation ability.
"
Squirm, worm.
What part of the word "perhaps" do you not understand, you cro
magnon, twit?
Well, it looks like you need an English lesson. I'll try to dumb it
down so you can understand it, but if you're still in the dark after
you read it post back and I'll dumb it down some more.
Once again, here's the salient post:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:05:22 GMT,
a?n?g?e?l@lovergirl.lrigrevol.moc.com (The little lost angel) Gave us:
Perhaps because such resistors re always the same value in Ohms, andCould anybody please enlighten me why is the resistance value given in
watts instead of ohms?
http://www.brakingresistor.com/metal.htm
Thanks!![]()
the only requisite for a user to select one by is dissipation ability.
"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, from that post, let's extract the two sentences in the exchange and
look at them rather more critically:
From L'A we have:
"Could anybody please enlighten me why is the resistance value given in
watts instead of ohms?"
And from you:
"Perhaps because such resistors are always the same value in Ohms, and
the only requisite for a user to select one by is dissipation ability."
I added the 'a' to the 're' to fix the typo you made. It makes the
sentence easier to understand, unless you specifically meant 're' for
some reason or other...
Now, notice that you did not contest her belief that the resistance was
given in watts, but rather reinforced her belief by offering one of
several reasons (as indicated by the 'perhaps') why her belief was
valid. Here... I'll give you an example of a similar exchange which,
hopefully, you'll have little trouble in understanding.
Q. "Could anybody please enlighten me as to why DarkMatter appears to be
so stupid?"
A1. "Perhaps because he is."
A2. "Perhaps because he can't help it."
A3. "Perhaps it's because it's a game he's playing."
Notice in all three of the answers that no refutation of your appearing
to be stupid is given, only reasons agreeing with the premise and
offering reasons for its substantiation.
A4. "Because he is." seems to sum it up pretty well and removes theFuck you. You are wrong.
possible indecision introduced by the 'Perhaps'.
--
John Fields