Resistance in W??

  • Thread starter The little lost angel
  • Start date
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:13:05 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

Be careful or you just might wind up with bars in front of your face
instead of at the end of the universe.
Be careful, you could end up with a bar across the face.
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:11:13 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:01:24 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

You'd like that wouldn't you? Just think, you wouldn't have to listen
to me proving to you that you're such a perverted little shit.

You'd better hope that I don't become so "perverted" as to come find
your ass.
---
Thanks for the warning.

--
John Fields
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:12:30 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:04:33 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:16:31 -0800, DarkMatter
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:56:16 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

"Perhaps it's because...

Perhaps you should fuck off, and die, before I fuck you off.

---
Be careful. Threats of physical violence are not looked upon favorably
by _anyone_ and, I'm sure, violate Cox's TOS.


Be careful, pissing and moaning about innuendo, that is NOT a threat
can have a reverse effect.
---
I've noticed that this is another one of your little slimy bully tricks.
Once you've been beaten intellectually and you have no resources left
you start alluding to physical retaliation by creating images in which
you wield something which you want to seem dangerous, but which you can
slither away from when you're later taken to task. A thoroughly
obnoxious and reprehensible cowardly thug wannabe who always wants to
have the last word is what you are.

BTW, your statement doesn't really have much meaning unless you remove
the second comma.

--
John Fields
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 06:13:22 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 07:13:05 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

Be careful or you just might wind up with bars in front of your face
instead of at the end of the universe.

Be careful, you could end up with a bar across the face.
---
More chickenshit innuendo?

--
John Fields
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:27:58 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:


BTW, your statement doesn't really have much meaning unless you remove
the second comma.
No, dipshit... the comma was in the wrong place.

Be careful, pissing and moaning about innuendo that is NOT a threat,
can have a reverse effect.
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:29:49 -0600, John Fields
<jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

More chickenshit innuendo?

No, retard boy. You threatened my livelihood.

If you cannot interpret the reply to that threat, that is your
problem.
 
In article <lb16uv8drb2oq0pkgo2jc392voeutsd6gm@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 22:38:54 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

In article <6rn4uvg5h8knrnpj2phdajfd88bb51r5ur@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Thu, 18 Dec 2003 11:56:16 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

"Perhaps it's because...

Perhaps you should fuck off, and die, before I fuck you off.

It's a long way from Cincinatti to Phoenix. Are you sure you're
up to the trip DimBulb?


Looks like you don't know where either of us are.
Squirm worm! ...I like that.

--
Keith
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:59:48 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:29:49 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:

More chickenshit innuendo?


No, retard boy. You threatened my livelihood.

If you cannot interpret the reply to that threat, that is your
problem.
---
Well, perhaps you and I perceive threats differently. What are you
talking about, specifically?

--
John Fields
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 18:58:18 -0800, DarkMatter
<DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org> wrote:

On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:27:58 -0600, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> Gave us:


BTW, your statement doesn't really have much meaning unless you remove
the second comma.

No, dipshit... the comma was in the wrong place.

Be careful, pissing and moaning about innuendo that is NOT a threat,
can have a reverse effect.
---
No, the second comma has no business being there since 'can' is not a
conjunction and "pissing and moaning about innuendo that is not a
threat" is not a parenthetical phrase.

See http://ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/commas.htm for more information.

--
John Fields
 
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:32:32 -0500, Keith R. Williams
<krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

Looks like you don't know where either of us are.

Squirm worm! ...I like that.
Like I said. You don't know where either of us are at.
 
In article <vq89uv4urdqdvasv4jtuguu1366c22cd76@4ax.com>,
DarkMatter@thebarattheendoftheuniverse.org says...
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:32:32 -0500, Keith R. Williams
krw@attglobal.net> Gave us:

Looks like you don't know where either of us are.

Squirm worm! ...I like that.

Like I said. You don't know where either of us are at.
I know you like living in shit. ...Cincinatti works.


--
Keith
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top