rant: filenames...

[bitrex]

On 11/13/2021 5:37 PM, Ed Lee wrote:

On Saturday, November 13, 2021 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/13/2021 4:09 PM, Peter wrote:

bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote

On 11/13/2021 2:09 AM, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
11.11.21 22:12, LM wrote:
If they stay in stock, life is getting better.

Yes, also other sites are showing stock

Maybe we are soon getting back to normal. Will be interesting to see if
prices go back to normal
--
Klaus

Pandemic shortages made a lot of manufacturers of various products
realize \"ugh we\'ve been selling this stuff way too cheap all along\" I think

I doubt it; this is just the usual cyclic thing, where a shorateg is
artifically created (by various events, which usually merge into the
distis telling everybody that x is on allocation, upon which the users
shit themselves and multi-order everything they can) and then
collapses a year or so later.

This will go the same way.

I have quite enjoyed designing out parts by Mr Ripoff (Maxim) and
replacing them with ST parts, and some TI parts.


Herr Ripoff:

https://www.motor1.com/news/532591/mercedes-bmw-keep-prices-high/

\"We could lower them again but why\"

It\'s the same for all auto makers. They can keep price high as long as everybody is doing it. Anyway, we have to adjust to having less cars. There is no need for 1.88 car per household.

Not every luxury/performance manufacturer is doing great I don\'t think:

<https://www.mclaren.com/racing/inside-the-mtc/mclaren-group-statement-sale/>

McLaren on Monday: These accusations are outrageous!

McLaren on Friday: We are proud to announce our new corporate
partnership with Audi Group...

 

[bitrex]

On 11/13/2021 5:37 PM, Ed Lee wrote:

On Saturday, November 13, 2021 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/13/2021 4:09 PM, Peter wrote:

bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote

On 11/13/2021 2:09 AM, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
11.11.21 22:12, LM wrote:
If they stay in stock, life is getting better.

Yes, also other sites are showing stock

Maybe we are soon getting back to normal. Will be interesting to see if
prices go back to normal
--
Klaus

Pandemic shortages made a lot of manufacturers of various products
realize \"ugh we\'ve been selling this stuff way too cheap all along\" I think

I doubt it; this is just the usual cyclic thing, where a shorateg is
artifically created (by various events, which usually merge into the
distis telling everybody that x is on allocation, upon which the users
shit themselves and multi-order everything they can) and then
collapses a year or so later.

This will go the same way.

I have quite enjoyed designing out parts by Mr Ripoff (Maxim) and
replacing them with ST parts, and some TI parts.


Herr Ripoff:

https://www.motor1.com/news/532591/mercedes-bmw-keep-prices-high/

\"We could lower them again but why\"

It\'s the same for all auto makers. They can keep price high as long as everybody is doing it. Anyway, we have to adjust to having less cars. There is no need for 1.88 car per household.

Not every luxury/performance manufacturer is doing great I don\'t think:

<https://www.mclaren.com/racing/inside-the-mtc/mclaren-group-statement-sale/>

McLaren on Monday: These accusations are outrageous!

McLaren on Friday: We are proud to announce our new corporate
partnership with Audi Group...

 

[bitrex]

On 11/13/2021 5:37 PM, Ed Lee wrote:

On Saturday, November 13, 2021 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/13/2021 4:09 PM, Peter wrote:

bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote

On 11/13/2021 2:09 AM, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
11.11.21 22:12, LM wrote:
If they stay in stock, life is getting better.

Yes, also other sites are showing stock

Maybe we are soon getting back to normal. Will be interesting to see if
prices go back to normal
--
Klaus

Pandemic shortages made a lot of manufacturers of various products
realize \"ugh we\'ve been selling this stuff way too cheap all along\" I think

I doubt it; this is just the usual cyclic thing, where a shorateg is
artifically created (by various events, which usually merge into the
distis telling everybody that x is on allocation, upon which the users
shit themselves and multi-order everything they can) and then
collapses a year or so later.

This will go the same way.

I have quite enjoyed designing out parts by Mr Ripoff (Maxim) and
replacing them with ST parts, and some TI parts.


Herr Ripoff:

https://www.motor1.com/news/532591/mercedes-bmw-keep-prices-high/

\"We could lower them again but why\"

It\'s the same for all auto makers. They can keep price high as long as everybody is doing it. Anyway, we have to adjust to having less cars. There is no need for 1.88 car per household.

Not every luxury/performance manufacturer is doing great I don\'t think:

<https://www.mclaren.com/racing/inside-the-mtc/mclaren-group-statement-sale/>

McLaren on Monday: These accusations are outrageous!

McLaren on Friday: We are proud to announce our new corporate
partnership with Audi Group...

 

[bitrex]

On 11/13/2021 5:37 PM, Ed Lee wrote:

On Saturday, November 13, 2021 at 2:29:51 PM UTC-8, bitrex wrote:
On 11/13/2021 4:09 PM, Peter wrote:

bitrex <us...@example.net> wrote

On 11/13/2021 2:09 AM, Klaus Kragelund wrote:
11.11.21 22:12, LM wrote:
If they stay in stock, life is getting better.

Yes, also other sites are showing stock

Maybe we are soon getting back to normal. Will be interesting to see if
prices go back to normal
--
Klaus

Pandemic shortages made a lot of manufacturers of various products
realize \"ugh we\'ve been selling this stuff way too cheap all along\" I think

I doubt it; this is just the usual cyclic thing, where a shorateg is
artifically created (by various events, which usually merge into the
distis telling everybody that x is on allocation, upon which the users
shit themselves and multi-order everything they can) and then
collapses a year or so later.

This will go the same way.

I have quite enjoyed designing out parts by Mr Ripoff (Maxim) and
replacing them with ST parts, and some TI parts.


Herr Ripoff:

https://www.motor1.com/news/532591/mercedes-bmw-keep-prices-high/

\"We could lower them again but why\"

It\'s the same for all auto makers. They can keep price high as long as everybody is doing it. Anyway, we have to adjust to having less cars. There is no need for 1.88 car per household.

Not every luxury/performance manufacturer is doing great I don\'t think:

<https://www.mclaren.com/racing/inside-the-mtc/mclaren-group-statement-sale/>

McLaren on Monday: These accusations are outrageous!

McLaren on Friday: We are proud to announce our new corporate
partnership with Audi Group...

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:08:39 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<3bbtogh6jstka4039uimng3q8baguk94i3@4ax.com>:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:09:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje
pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:01:33 +0000) it happened Peter
nospam@nospam9876.com> wrote in <smk3rt$72m$1@dont-email.me>:

Sometimes one needs to power a circuit from one source or another.

Most LDOs, or indeed most normal regs, feed current back up to the
source. LDOs tend to use a PMOS pass transistor which has a parasitic
diode.

I am doing a design where I am using the Ricoh R1191 for this

https://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Ricoh-Electronic-Devices-Company/R1191N033B-TR-FE?qs=%2Fha2pyFaduhEV6ZG3xOqbaXpStP%2FIzlm74
g8
V5lGNcwdefxpMkR8XA%3D%3D

which has a series diode, so the dropout voltage is about 0.7V.

It\'s not dirt cheap but not crazy-priced either.

I am wondering why this is rare. Is it not possible to make a PMOS
device without the parasitic diode? Or have some other series element
which gets turned off when there is no input? It reminds me of an
active rectifier in switching power supplies, to avoid the Vf of the
diode(s). There is even a circuit for a bridge rectifier, although
that was commercially implemented with a complicated chip to drive the
four gates, IIRC.

One obvious solution is to use a normal LDO and have a diode in series
with the input, so long as you can be sure nothing funny will be
hapenning inside with the ground lead which could still pass negative
current.

IIRC the correct way to parallel 2 voltage regulators is have each one sense its output current
and if too high drive the current reference of the other one higher until both deliver the same current.
If you just parallel voltage controlled ones then one is likely to do all the work
due to minuscule output voltage differences.
For example one could go into current limit at 100% current and the other will then do say 10%.
Much simpler to get or design one bigger one?




You can certainly diode OR the input of a single reg, from two
sources.

Of course, but that is different, and even then the highest input will deliver everything,
although having high internal resistance sources / \'feeble\' diodes would share ..

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:08:39 -0800) it happened John Larkin
<jlarkin@highland_atwork_technology.com> wrote in
<3bbtogh6jstka4039uimng3q8baguk94i3@4ax.com>:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 08:09:35 GMT, Jan Panteltje
pNaOnStPeAlMtje@yahoo.com> wrote:

On a sunny day (Thu, 11 Nov 2021 22:01:33 +0000) it happened Peter
nospam@nospam9876.com> wrote in <smk3rt$72m$1@dont-email.me>:

Sometimes one needs to power a circuit from one source or another.

Most LDOs, or indeed most normal regs, feed current back up to the
source. LDOs tend to use a PMOS pass transistor which has a parasitic
diode.

I am doing a design where I am using the Ricoh R1191 for this

https://eu.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Ricoh-Electronic-Devices-Company/R1191N033B-TR-FE?qs=%2Fha2pyFaduhEV6ZG3xOqbaXpStP%2FIzlm74
g8
V5lGNcwdefxpMkR8XA%3D%3D

which has a series diode, so the dropout voltage is about 0.7V.

It\'s not dirt cheap but not crazy-priced either.

I am wondering why this is rare. Is it not possible to make a PMOS
device without the parasitic diode? Or have some other series element
which gets turned off when there is no input? It reminds me of an
active rectifier in switching power supplies, to avoid the Vf of the
diode(s). There is even a circuit for a bridge rectifier, although
that was commercially implemented with a complicated chip to drive the
four gates, IIRC.

One obvious solution is to use a normal LDO and have a diode in series
with the input, so long as you can be sure nothing funny will be
hapenning inside with the ground lead which could still pass negative
current.

IIRC the correct way to parallel 2 voltage regulators is have each one sense its output current
and if too high drive the current reference of the other one higher until both deliver the same current.
If you just parallel voltage controlled ones then one is likely to do all the work
due to minuscule output voltage differences.
For example one could go into current limit at 100% current and the other will then do say 10%.
Much simpler to get or design one bigger one?




You can certainly diode OR the input of a single reg, from two
sources.

Of course, but that is different, and even then the highest input will deliver everything,
although having high internal resistance sources / \'feeble\' diodes would share ..

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 6:24:23 PM UTC-4, John S wrote:

On 11/9/2021 4:23 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

Non sequitur. You just want to be an argumentative asshole.

In this case he gets what he wants! Was that ever in doubt?

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 6:24:23 PM UTC-4, John S wrote:

On 11/9/2021 4:23 PM, Phil Allison wrote:

Non sequitur. You just want to be an argumentative asshole.

In this case he gets what he wants! Was that ever in doubt?

--

Rick C.

+ Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
+ Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Dimiter_Popoff]

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!

Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.
Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.

Their file names are case dependent;

And that is a GOOD thing!
You need to learn how to search with
locate -i
As you likely know mA is not the same as MA and mOhm is not MOhm

Yeah, good thing you figured out an exception to cling to,
see my comment above.

Then the naming is not the only shortcoming of the unix filesystem,
it (like that of windows) makes worst fit allocation impractical.
The latter can be fixed by writing/adopting a well designed filesystem;
the naming flaw cannot be fixed.

 

[Dimiter_Popoff]

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:

On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!

Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.
Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.

Their file names are case dependent;

And that is a GOOD thing!
You need to learn how to search with
locate -i
As you likely know mA is not the same as MA and mOhm is not MOhm

Yeah, good thing you figured out an exception to cling to,
see my comment above.

Then the naming is not the only shortcoming of the unix filesystem,
it (like that of windows) makes worst fit allocation impractical.
The latter can be fixed by writing/adopting a well designed filesystem;
the naming flaw cannot be fixed.

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 11:22:49 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 1:52:54 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
https://www.euronews.com/2021/11/10/france-vows-to-build-new-nuclear-reactors-to-meet-climate-goals

Lately France has been bashing us for being pansies.

That\'s so embarrassing.
France is being stupidly macho about nuclear reactors - essentially they made a foolish investment because De Gaulle wanted France to be nuclear power, and they\'ve never had to guts to admit that it was a silly idea.

John Doe is silly enough to see this as a virtue.

I don\'t see how that gives France any bragging right. While the latest reactors they designed were being built a startup electric automobile company was formed and grew to be a top 10 market cap company in the world. By the time France completes construction of any new reactors you can expect most of us in this group will be dead and another phase of history will have passed. Watching a time lapse video of their plants being built would be a bit like watching the time travel scenes in the movie, \"The Time Machine\".

I\'ve always thought the time machine from that movie should have ape hangers rather than Victorian lights and levers.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 11:22:49 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 1:52:54 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
https://www.euronews.com/2021/11/10/france-vows-to-build-new-nuclear-reactors-to-meet-climate-goals

Lately France has been bashing us for being pansies.

That\'s so embarrassing.
France is being stupidly macho about nuclear reactors - essentially they made a foolish investment because De Gaulle wanted France to be nuclear power, and they\'ve never had to guts to admit that it was a silly idea.

John Doe is silly enough to see this as a virtue.

I don\'t see how that gives France any bragging right. While the latest reactors they designed were being built a startup electric automobile company was formed and grew to be a top 10 market cap company in the world. By the time France completes construction of any new reactors you can expect most of us in this group will be dead and another phase of history will have passed. Watching a time lapse video of their plants being built would be a bit like watching the time travel scenes in the movie, \"The Time Machine\".

I\'ve always thought the time machine from that movie should have ape hangers rather than Victorian lights and levers.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Rick C]

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 11:22:49 PM UTC-4, bill....@ieee.org wrote:

On Thursday, November 11, 2021 at 1:52:54 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
https://www.euronews.com/2021/11/10/france-vows-to-build-new-nuclear-reactors-to-meet-climate-goals

Lately France has been bashing us for being pansies.

That\'s so embarrassing.
France is being stupidly macho about nuclear reactors - essentially they made a foolish investment because De Gaulle wanted France to be nuclear power, and they\'ve never had to guts to admit that it was a silly idea.

John Doe is silly enough to see this as a virtue.

I don\'t see how that gives France any bragging right. While the latest reactors they designed were being built a startup electric automobile company was formed and grew to be a top 10 market cap company in the world. By the time France completes construction of any new reactors you can expect most of us in this group will be dead and another phase of history will have passed. Watching a time lapse video of their plants being built would be a bit like watching the time travel scenes in the movie, \"The Time Machine\".

I\'ve always thought the time machine from that movie should have ape hangers rather than Victorian lights and levers.

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:03:50 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
<dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smu3tn$8jl$1@dont-email.me>:

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!


Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.

Cool!

Read:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/48770/how-to-match-case-insensitive-patterns-with-ls
to list files ignoring case

Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.



Their file names are case dependent;

And that is a GOOD thing!
You need to learn how to search with
locate -i
As you likely know mA is not the same as MA and mOhm is not MOhm


Yeah, good thing you figured out an exception to cling to,
see my comment above.

Then the naming is not the only shortcoming of the unix filesystem,
it (like that of windows) makes worst fit allocation impractical.

You really need to read up on this stuff if you want to use it.
I have NEVER encoutered a problem with Linux file systems, and tried many and use many.

But MS windows crap filesystem as it comes with some USB sticks or is used by my Chinese digital TV receivers
even limit file size to 4293402624 bytes.
4293402624 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_1.ts
41383680 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_2.ts

-> 2^32 = 4294967296

The latter can be fixed by writing/adopting a well designed filesystem;
the naming flaw cannot be fixed.

You are just blaming the car that you do not know how to drive.

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:03:50 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
<dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smu3tn$8jl$1@dont-email.me>:

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!


Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.

Cool!

Read:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/48770/how-to-match-case-insensitive-patterns-with-ls
to list files ignoring case

Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.



Their file names are case dependent;

And that is a GOOD thing!
You need to learn how to search with
locate -i
As you likely know mA is not the same as MA and mOhm is not MOhm


Yeah, good thing you figured out an exception to cling to,
see my comment above.

Then the naming is not the only shortcoming of the unix filesystem,
it (like that of windows) makes worst fit allocation impractical.

You really need to read up on this stuff if you want to use it.
I have NEVER encoutered a problem with Linux file systems, and tried many and use many.

But MS windows crap filesystem as it comes with some USB sticks or is used by my Chinese digital TV receivers
even limit file size to 4293402624 bytes.
4293402624 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_1.ts
41383680 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_2.ts

-> 2^32 = 4294967296

The latter can be fixed by writing/adopting a well designed filesystem;
the naming flaw cannot be fixed.

You are just blaming the car that you do not know how to drive.

 

[Jan Panteltje]

On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 19:03:50 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
<dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smu3tn$8jl$1@dont-email.me>:

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!


Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.

Cool!

Read:
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/48770/how-to-match-case-insensitive-patterns-with-ls
to list files ignoring case

Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.



Their file names are case dependent;

And that is a GOOD thing!
You need to learn how to search with
locate -i
As you likely know mA is not the same as MA and mOhm is not MOhm


Yeah, good thing you figured out an exception to cling to,
see my comment above.

Then the naming is not the only shortcoming of the unix filesystem,
it (like that of windows) makes worst fit allocation impractical.

You really need to read up on this stuff if you want to use it.
I have NEVER encoutered a problem with Linux file systems, and tried many and use many.

But MS windows crap filesystem as it comes with some USB sticks or is used by my Chinese digital TV receivers
even limit file size to 4293402624 bytes.
4293402624 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_1.ts
41383680 Jul 8 2020 /mnt/sda2/video/satellite/magnum_3x_part_2.ts

-> 2^32 = 4294967296

The latter can be fixed by writing/adopting a well designed filesystem;
the naming flaw cannot be fixed.

You are just blaming the car that you do not know how to drive.

 

[bitrex]

On 11/12/2021 9:24 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:07:56 +0000, Peter <nospam@nospam9876.com
wrote:


jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote

One obvious solution is to use a normal LDO and have a diode in series
with the input, so long as you can be sure nothing funny will be
hapenning inside with the ground lead which could still pass negative
current.

Or put a schottky diode on the output but take the feedback from after
the diode.

Sure, but then you are building your own regulator.

No, just using a chip that has a feedback pin. That\'s common in LDOs.

What regs are you considering?

Note: an LM317 is not an LDO. A lot of people have taken to using
\"LDO\" for most any linear reg.

Some LDOs tie the bulk of the FET to ground so they don\'t conduct in
reverse, as so:

<https://www.ti.com/product/TPS7A37>

 

[bitrex]

On 11/12/2021 9:24 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 07:07:56 +0000, Peter <nospam@nospam9876.com
wrote:


jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote

One obvious solution is to use a normal LDO and have a diode in series
with the input, so long as you can be sure nothing funny will be
hapenning inside with the ground lead which could still pass negative
current.

Or put a schottky diode on the output but take the feedback from after
the diode.

Sure, but then you are building your own regulator.

No, just using a chip that has a feedback pin. That\'s common in LDOs.

What regs are you considering?

Note: an LM317 is not an LDO. A lot of people have taken to using
\"LDO\" for most any linear reg.

Some LDOs tie the bulk of the FET to ground so they don\'t conduct in
reverse, as so:

<https://www.ti.com/product/TPS7A37>

 

[Jeroen Belleman]

On 2021-11-15 18:03, Dimiter_Popoff wrote:

On 11/15/2021 17:51, Jan Panteltje wrote:
On a sunny day (Mon, 15 Nov 2021 17:35:02 +0200) it happened Dimiter_Popoff
dp@tgi-sci.com> wrote in <smtun7$6v6$1@dont-email.me>:

The unix filenaming system is broken by design.

It is super good!


Yeah, you can have 512 files named Panteltie using different cases.
Very advanced, how stupid people have been to stick to the Latin
alphabet for millenia.

Now, now Dimiter, just because you can does not mean it\'s a good
idea to do so. But I would resent any filesystem *preventing* me
from doing so. Nothing in UNIX prevents you from naming your all
your files in all upper case, should you want to. Choose your evil.

Jeroen Belleman

 

[LM]

Yes, my wallet is getting lighter every day

On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 18:58:26 -0500, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 11/11/2021 4:12 PM, LM wrote:
If they stay in stock, life is getting better.


The STM32 theory of economic recovery