Quantiative Science Before Galileo

[spudnik]

she got the name from her Remington-Rand typewriter,
y'know. the sophomores on campus who thrill to it ...
nevermind.

"What Galileo Avoided" re Kepler:
http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/2005/2005_50-52/2005-51/pdf/box9_49.pdf

 Ayn Rand, a silly girl fiction writer, was like those
immigrants who always adopt the extreme vices of their new country and
then make the vices 100 times worse than the original.

thus:
the "dimensionality," or at leat the base
of digitization, has always been implicit
to le theorem <<derniere>> de Fermatttt, as
well as to les courbes de ... duh.

thus:
where did that PDF go, of M&M's paper,
where they show the soi-dissant "null resultage?..." anyway,
I thank the dood that posted it.

thus:
I've been saying thus-like for years,
after reading of it apres XXXValdez:
Typically, there are enough microbes in the ocean to consume half of
any oil spilled in a month or two, says Howarth. Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html

 

[Chazwin]

On Jul 29, 9:40 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:

Yet you believe that those in the "soft sciences" are qualified to
comment on the "hard sciences"?  ...particularly those that are not
well understood?

I would offer one example of how the hard sciences absolutely require
the soft social sciences. Peer review, which is a social science based
upon various sociology methodologies

Peer review is not based upon any social science whatsoever. A person
chooses those to review an article.

Peer review is based upon social science methodology and statistics, a
soft science.

When, for example, a mathematical theory is reviewed, a chairperson
chooses the reviewers. That is the method.

Math ain't science.

Bret Cahill

Except that all pure sciences depend heavily on it.

As well as a lot of other thangs.

Bret Cahill

Well not really. maths and observation are usually enough.

 

[spudnik]

we aren't all einsteinians; you are the one,
who insists upon his reification of the corpuscle,
which is just a willy-nilly, mere interpretation of "quantum
of light," vis-a-vu Planck's great idea and
the electonic trace in the photo-electrical effect .... well,
his and Infeld's acoustic fridge was pretty cool!

thus:
there are two 3d versions of the pythag.thm.,
each with different dimensional attributes.

iff you don't study Fermat's numbertheorie,
you're up Shitz Creek without a paddle; however,
it is better to start with his "reconstruction
of Euclid's porisms," although they are just planar
(synthetic geometry: see "Geometrical Fragments,"
belowsville .-)

NO!

thus:
and, the other half d'oil evaporates, as has
been shown of late (again) in the newspapers. Congress and
the Administration are a bit behind, in using Iran Oil's
big blow-out in the Gulf, to leverage BP's cap&trade nostrum;
eh?

a-yup:
Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html

 

[Arindam Banerjee]

enough of idiocy

 

[spudnik]

I know; cracking the books & the lab-door are quite
a bit more of interest than the self-imposed ghettos
of Usenet.

enough of idiocy

thus:
I just found abok that addresses many of the concerns
-- from a brief perusal of about three "random" openings, and
of the index -- of the Truthers;
it's from 2005, by a couple of NYTimes reporters,
_102 Minutes_, which was the time
from the attack of the north tower (WTC1) to its fall (as you know,
the first to be hit & last to fall).

thus: I'll huff and I'll puff....
have you ever proven a theorem in (say) constructive geometry?

Ahahahaha...

thus: there are two 3d versions of the pythag.thm.,
each with different dimensional attributes....
iff you don't study Fermat's numbertheorie,
you're up Shitz Creek without a paddle; however,
it is better to start with his "reconstruction
of Euclid's porisms," although they are just planar
(synthetic geometry: see "Geometrical Fragments,"
belowsville .-)

thus: and, the other half d'oil evaporates, as has
been shown of late (again) in the newspapers. Congress and
the Administration are a bit behind, in using Iran Oil's
big blow-out in the Gulf, to leverage BP's cap&trade nostrum; eh?

a-yup: Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html