Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Were you inspired to this vision by a Mexican Jumping Bean?Only proper engineering which I would very much like to do, can show
conclusively that you can move from 0 to v with internal force. I
think I can do it next year.
thus:Light is a travelling electromagnetic wave motion, and its velocity
depends upon the medium through which it travels, and the speed of its
emitter. The former is proved in any microwave device with
dielectric, and the latter is proved by the null result of the MMI
experiment. The Doppler effect, where the frequency apparently varies
for a moving source or receiver, is a further indication.
Thus f = (c(mu, ep, v)/wavelength;
where c(mu, ep, v) = c(mu, ep) + v
einsteinians.
thus:UTM is not needed here. No geodesics required at this time.
I'm just trying to find a coord system or method that allows me to
position my view at each station to determine alt/az from the two
stations of two points on the path of an event, start and end.
--les ducs d'oil!A number is prime if and only if it have two divisors.
--les ducs d'oil!Thus f = (c(mu, ep, v)/wavelength;
Wrong, Dildo-breath. Its discovery (the "known" part) certainly *was*That's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
The Bible makes several references that can be interpreted as
meaning the sun goes around the earth. The target audience was
obviously people who thought the sun may go around a flat earth.
However, most of the Bible was probably written down earlier than 700
BC.
In my searches, I have found only one person after 700 BC
actually wrote that the sun goes around the earth.
Herodotus, the Greek/Egyptian historian, wrote a history on or
about 650 BC. He describes a Persian explorer who tried to circle
Africa. This explorer found the angle of the sun a bit anomalous.
Herodotus thought the explorer misinterpreted his data. Herodotus
proposed another model where the sun is close to flat earth.
There were Greeks in Herodotus' time who thought that the earth
was round. Herodotus said that those Greeks were obviously wrong and
were just trying to attract attention.
Although Herodotus was wrong, he was scientific. The odd anomalies
Herodotus describes prove that the Persian explorer really made the
trip.
Herodotus also proved that the issue of a spherical/motionless
earth was still controversial in 650 BC.
There was also a Greek/Egyptian astronomer who claimed, on or
around 50 BC, that the sun went around the earth. I forgot his name
and exact date. However, his ideas were not picked up again till
Copernicus.
Thanks.
They had math and empirical / qualitative science before Galileo but
science wasn't quantitative.
Not true. Pi was rather well known 4K years ago. Earth's size has
been known for some time, too.
Geometry is math, not science.
No, Cahill, I wasn't your mother's only born-alive offspring. There weren'tAre you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pulling
our legs?
We know you're as stupid as DimBulb. ...and snip like him too. Say...That's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
The Bible makes several references that can be interpreted as
meaning the sun goes around the earth. The target audience was
obviously people who thought the sun may go around a flat earth.
However, most of the Bible was probably written down earlier than 700
BC.
In my searches, I have found only one person after 700 BC
actually wrote that the sun goes around the earth.
Herodotus, the Greek/Egyptian historian, wrote a history on or
about 650 BC. He describes a Persian explorer who tried to circle
Africa. This explorer found the angle of the sun a bit anomalous.
Herodotus thought the explorer misinterpreted his data. Herodotus
proposed another model where the sun is close to flat earth.
There were Greeks in Herodotus' time who thought that the earth
was round. Herodotus said that those Greeks were obviously wrong and
were just trying to attract attention.
Although Herodotus was wrong, he was scientific. The odd anomalies
Herodotus describes prove that the Persian explorer really made the
trip.
Herodotus also proved that the issue of a spherical/motionless
earth was still controversial in 650 BC.
There was also a Greek/Egyptian astronomer who claimed, on or
around 50 BC, that the sun went around the earth. I forgot his name
and exact date. However, his ideas were not picked up again till
Copernicus.
Thanks.
They had math and empirical / qualitative science before Galileo but
science wasn't quantitative.
Not true. Pi was rather well known 4K years ago. Earth's size has
been known for some time, too.
Geometry is math, not science.
Wrong,
Are you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pulling
our legs?
You're so wrong. Like DimBulb, you have a lot of "fans".That's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
The Bible makes several references that can be interpreted as
meaning the sun goes around the earth. The target audience was
obviously people who thought the sun may go around a flat earth.
However, most of the Bible was probably written down earlier than 700
BC.
In my searches, I have found only one person after 700 BC
actually wrote that the sun goes around the earth.
Herodotus, the Greek/Egyptian historian, wrote a history on or
about 650 BC. He describes a Persian explorer who tried to circle
Africa. This explorer found the angle of the sun a bit anomalous.
Herodotus thought the explorer misinterpreted his data. Herodotus
proposed another model where the sun is close to flat earth.
There were Greeks in Herodotus' time who thought that the earth
was round. Herodotus said that those Greeks were obviously wrong and
were just trying to attract attention.
Although Herodotus was wrong, he was scientific. The odd anomalies
Herodotus describes prove that the Persian explorer really made the
trip.
Herodotus also proved that the issue of a spherical/motionless
earth was still controversial in 650 BC.
There was also a Greek/Egyptian astronomer who claimed, on or
around 50 BC, that the sun went around the earth. I forgot his name
and exact date. However, his ideas were not picked up again till
Copernicus.
Thanks.
They had math and empirical / qualitative science before Galileo but
science wasn't quantitative.
Not true. Pi was rather well known 4K years ago. Earth's size has
been known for some time, too.
Geometry is math, not science.
Wrong,
Are you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pulling
our legs?
We know
1. There is no "we." You don't even have a sock puppet on your side.
Now you sound like Ron Reaugh (Rod Speed). I wish you'd make up your mind2. You know so little you couldn't even bs your way out of a wet
paper bag.
The question makes no sense, but that's to be expected of you.3. You're dodgin' 'n dodgin' the question:
Are you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pulling
our legs?
Are you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pullingThat's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
The Bible makes several references that can be interpreted as
meaning the sun goes around the earth. The target audience was
obviously people who thought the sun may go around a flat earth.
However, most of the Bible was probably written down earlier than 700
BC.
In my searches, I have found only one person after 700 BC
actually wrote that the sun goes around the earth.
Herodotus, the Greek/Egyptian historian, wrote a history on or
about 650 BC. He describes a Persian explorer who tried to circle
Africa. This explorer found the angle of the sun a bit anomalous.
Herodotus thought the explorer misinterpreted his data. Herodotus
proposed another model where the sun is close to flat earth.
There were Greeks in Herodotus' time who thought that the earth
was round. Herodotus said that those Greeks were obviously wrong and
were just trying to attract attention.
Although Herodotus was wrong, he was scientific. The odd anomalies
Herodotus describes prove that the Persian explorer really made the
trip.
Herodotus also proved that the issue of a spherical/motionless
earth was still controversial in 650 BC.
There was also a Greek/Egyptian astronomer who claimed, on or
around 50 BC, that the sun went around the earth. I forgot his name
and exact date. However, his ideas were not picked up again till
Copernicus.
Thanks.
They had math and empirical / qualitative science before Galileo but
science wasn't quantitative.
Not true. Pi was rather well known 4K years ago. Earth's size has
been known for some time, too.
Geometry is math, not science.
Wrong,
Wave motion has velocity. Since you know nothing about basic physics,waves don't have velocity;
Never seen one. I am however inspired by the desire to rub the facesIn article
81d966d2-e41b-4fd7-9f01-cd92fa75a...@k8g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote:
Only proper engineering which I would very much like to do, can show
conclusively that you can move from 0 to v with internal force. I
think I can do it next year.
Were you inspired to this vision by a Mexican Jumping Bean?
1. There is no "we." You don't even have a sock puppet on your side.That's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
The Bible makes several references that can be interpreted as
meaning the sun goes around the earth. The target audience was
obviously people who thought the sun may go around a flat earth..
However, most of the Bible was probably written down earlier than 700
BC.
In my searches, I have found only one person after 700 BC
actually wrote that the sun goes around the earth.
Herodotus, the Greek/Egyptian historian, wrote a history on or
about 650 BC. He describes a Persian explorer who tried to circle
Africa. This explorer found the angle of the sun a bit anomalous.
Herodotus thought the explorer misinterpreted his data. Herodotus
proposed another model where the sun is close to flat earth.
There were Greeks in Herodotus' time who thought that the earth
was round. Herodotus said that those Greeks were obviously wrong and
were just trying to attract attention.
Although Herodotus was wrong, he was scientific. The odd anomalies
Herodotus describes prove that the Persian explorer really made the
trip.
Herodotus also proved that the issue of a spherical/motionless
earth was still controversial in 650 BC.
There was also a Greek/Egyptian astronomer who claimed, on or
around 50 BC, that the sun went around the earth. I forgot his name
and exact date. However, his ideas were not picked up again till
Copernicus.
Thanks.
They had math and empirical / qualitative science before Galileo but
science wasn't quantitative.
Not true. Pi was rather well known 4K years ago. Earth's size has
been known for some time, too.
Geometry is math, not science.
Wrong,
Are you this doggy poopy stoopid in real life or are you just pulling
our legs?
We know
--les ducs d'oil!Wave motion has velocity.
A wave front from an omnidirectional goes in all directions, a wavedon't be silly. waves are generally spherical, thence only have a
speed,
sans direction.
Maybe needful to add, that if chaps studied engineering especiallyOn Jul 28, 9:42 am, spudnik <Space...@hotmail.com> wrote:
don't be silly. waves are generally spherical, thence only have a
speed,
sans direction.
A wave front from an omnidirectional goes in all directions, a wave
can be directed as in a wave guide. If you had studied
electromagnetic wave propagation in a rectangular waveguide, you would
have heard of such terms as phase velocity and group velocity of the
wave. That is how it is described, in the standard literature. Now
that would be too much for einstieinians and their fools to grasp, of
course.
Obviously, a line of sight situation between transmission and
reception is as a guided wave, only with much more losses because the
wave is not guided. The reflections, refractions involved in wave
interactions with matter, can only be analysed with wave velocity
components.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee
libertarian there ever was. He may have surpassed Anne Rynd.This is easy to know because libertarianism consists of denying that
relationships exist. Not only are all equations linearly independent
in Libertaria, but variables in one equation never appear anywhere
else.
I agree....
Bret Cahill
"Math is applied logic."
-- Nietzsche
..., however, I despise Nietze. Nietze was perhaps the worse
It is a shame that you despise Nietze, whoever the hell that is. OneOn Jul 15, 2:30 pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
This is easy to know because libertarianism consists of denying that
relationships exist. Not only are all equations linearly independent
in Libertaria, but variables in one equation never appear anywhere
else.
I agree....
Bret Cahill
"Math is applied logic."
-- Nietzsche
..., however, I despise Nietze. Nietze was perhaps the worse
libertarian there ever was. He may have surpassed Anne Rynd.
Nietzsche was reacting against the 1848 revolutions in Europe which isThis is easy to know because libertarianism consists of denying that
relationships exist. Not only are all equations linearly independent
in Libertaria, but variables in one equation never appear anywhere
else.
I agree....
Bret Cahill
"Math is applied logic."
-- Nietzsche
..., however, I despise Nietze. Nietze was perhaps the worse
libertarian there ever was.
No comparison. Ayn Rand, a silly girl fiction writer, was like thoseHe may have surpassed Anne Rynd.
I think he's referring the linebacker Ray Nitschke.On Jul 28, 12:53=A0pm, Darwin123 <drosen0...@yahoo.com> wrote:
On Jul 15, 2:30=A0pm, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@peoplepc.com> wrote:
"Math is applied logic."
-- Nietzsche
=A0 =A0 =A0 ..., however, I despise Nietze. Nietze was perhaps the worse
libertarian there ever was. He may have surpassed Anne Rynd.
It is a shame that you despise Nietze, whoever the hell that is. One
wonders who "Anne Rynd" was, as well. There was an author named "Ayn
Rand", who had some interesting points of view that could well be
described as libertarian.
Nietzsche, on the other hand, (as opposed to this "Nietze" person) had
many powerful insights. By no stretch of the imagination, though,
could Nietzsche be described as a "libertarian".
Or are you a conspiracy theorist who believes 98% of the scientists on
the planet are in on a conspiracy?
That's about the same percentage who held that the Sun went round the
Earth.
When did who believe that?
Bret Cahill
Except that all pure sciences depend heavily on it.Yet you believe that those in the "soft sciences" are qualified to
comment on the "hard sciences"? ...particularly those that are not
well understood?
I would offer one example of how the hard sciences absolutely require
the soft social sciences. Peer review, which is a social science based
upon various sociology methodologies
Peer review is not based upon any social science whatsoever. A person
chooses those to review an article.
Peer review is based upon social science methodology and statistics, a
soft science.
When, for example, a mathematical theory is reviewed, a chairperson
chooses the reviewers. That is the method.
Math ain't science.
Bret Cahill
As well as a lot of other thangs.Yet you believe that those in the "soft sciences" are qualified to
comment on the "hard sciences"? ...particularly those that are not
well understood?
I would offer one example of how the hard sciences absolutely require
the soft social sciences. Peer review, which is a social science based
upon various sociology methodologies
Peer review is not based upon any social science whatsoever. A person
chooses those to review an article.
Peer review is based upon social science methodology and statistics, a
soft science.
When, for example, a mathematical theory is reviewed, a chairperson
chooses the reviewers. That is the method.
Math ain't science.
Bret Cahill
Except that all pure sciences depend heavily on it.