PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[Art Deco]

SuperM <SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 02:55:21 -0400, "Paul E. Schoen" <pstech@smart.net
Gave us:


The best response may be no response. People who act up and do childish
things like this are often socially deficient and thrive on attention,
especially if they don't have to actually interact in person with those
they annoy. I'm not fully convinced this was actually the work of Prong or
SuperM or whatever, and there may be others forging nyms to confuse
matters. Boastful and childish responses just litter the newsgroup with
more crap. Better to remain silent, ignore the stupid stuff, and focus on
the true intent of the group.

Paul

Best post the group has had in a month.

You can compile your list of those culpable, and those to ignore by
simply looking at the alt.usenet.kooks "regular" posters starting back
about 7 weeks so you skip those of us the dirty bastards dragged into
their shit world.

Irony Alert! Shields Up!

--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

 

[Eeyore]

coyote wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
Niemadre wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
It had a remarkable effect. The server in question went off-air rather promptly.
Liar.

Oh dear ! Who wrote "Liar" ?

Supernews says " Error ! News server responded: no such article found "

I guess that's Niemadre gone then.

You are making no sense.

You wouldn't know sense if it came up to you and smacked you round the face.

Graham

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:23:17 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:47:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:21:54 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:53 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
Try being part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
You are going the right way to be taken out along with Prong.

The Meow tried and failed. They got a bloody nose into the bargain too. Uncle
Antny was surprised at being phoned up btw.

Reminiscences are not likely to get you far in 2007.
Complacent,effete and burnt out is no match for lean, mean and keen.

This is a new breed.

---
No, it isn't.

It's just a bunch of hateful bullies who like to push people around
using the excuse that it's the responsibility of the group to bear
the "punishment" they can't mete out to a single individual.

That is, they flood the group and say that it's MP's fault.

Pretty much like if the member of a gang of outlaws was in town,
cheating at cards and got caught and slapped around for it, he'd
ride back to his gang's hideout and get everyone fired up about
riding in and shooting up the town and then say it was the fault of
the person who caught him cheating.

I don't know if you're aware of what started this whole thing, but
it was Lionel's getting spanked, by me, on sci.electronics.basics.
He said he'd get revenge by invoking the AUKish horde, and when MP
got into it, on my side, is when the unpleasantness started.

Guess he shouldn't have netkopped huh?

---
I don't recall that he did, but even if he did, so what? You all
claim that you're omnipotent and undetectable, so what are you
afraid of?

ISTM that all he did was to support me in my criticism of Lionel.

Can you cite evidence to the contrary?
---

That is, he started posting messages crossposted to auk and seb
and from that point on the mess has just gotten worse. All thanks
to a miserable piece of shit like Lionel, who can't take
well-deserved correction and get on with his life knowing more than
he did before, but rather has to try to make life as miserable for
everyone else as it is for him with his bruised ego.

You spanked no one. Get on with your life and stop living a fantasy.

---
The fantasy's yours. Lionel, being the cowardly prick that it is,
covered its tracks by not allowing Google to archive its posts past
a few days, allowing it to later disavow what it had originally
posted once that window closed.

You seem to be of the same ilk.

That is, one who vehemently denies fact in favor of any fiction
which "proves" you right.


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:24:21 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:53:18 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



John Fields wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
Try being part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
You are going the right way to be taken out along with Prong.

The Meow tried and failed. They got a bloody nose into the bargain too. Uncle
Antny was surprised at being phoned up btw.

Reminiscences are not likely to get you far in 2007.
Complacent,effete and burnt out is no match for lean, mean and keen.

This is a new breed.

---
No, it isn't.

It's just a bunch of hateful bullies who like to push people around
using the excuse that it's the responsibility of the group to bear
the "punishment" they can't mete out to a single individual.

That is, they flood the group and say that it's MP's fault.

Pretty much like if the member of a gang of outlaws was in town,
cheating at cards and got caught and slapped around for it, he'd
ride back to his gang's hideout and get everyone fired up about
riding in and shooting up the town and then say it was the fault of
the person who caught him cheating.

Exactly. It's the cowards' way.


I don't know if you're aware of what started this whole thing, but
it was Lionel's getting spanked, by me, on sci.electronics.basics.
He said he'd get revenge by invoking the AUKish horde, and when MP
got into it, on my side, is when the unpleasantness started.

That is, he started posting messages crossposted to auk and seb
and from that point on the mess has just gotten worse. All thanks
to a miserable piece of shit like Lionel, who can't take
well-deserved correction and get on with his life knowing more than
he did before, but rather has to try to make life as miserable for
everyone else as it is for him with his bruised ego.

Hey, in a clear cut case like this I'll even side with you here John.

Graham

Kissing his ass wont help donkeyboi.

---
Finding common ground is kissing someone's ass?


--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:24:58 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:04:42 -0700, Jim Thompson
To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon@My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 15:47:37 -0500, John Fields
jfields@austininstruments.com> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:21:54 -0700, Brandon D Cartwright
user@example.net> wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 17:58:53 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
Try being part of the solution instead of part of the problem.
You are going the right way to be taken out along with Prong.

The Meow tried and failed. They got a bloody nose into the bargain too. Uncle
Antny was surprised at being phoned up btw.

Reminiscences are not likely to get you far in 2007.
Complacent,effete and burnt out is no match for lean, mean and keen.

This is a new breed.

---
No, it isn't.

It's just a bunch of hateful bullies who like to push people around
using the excuse that it's the responsibility of the group to bear
the "punishment" they can't mete out to a single individual.

That is, they flood the group and say that it's MP's fault.

Pretty much like if the member of a gang of outlaws was in town,
cheating at cards and got caught and slapped around for it, he'd
ride back to his gang's hideout and get everyone fired up about
riding in and shooting up the town and then say it was the fault of
the person who caught him cheating.

I don't know if you're aware of what started this whole thing, but
it was Lionel's getting spanked, by me, on sci.electronics.basics.
He said he'd get revenge by invoking the AUKish horde, and when MP
got into it, on my side, is when the unpleasantness started.

That is, he started posting messages crossposted to auk and seb
and from that point on the mess has just gotten worse. All thanks
to a miserable piece of shit like Lionel, who can't take
well-deserved correction and get on with his life knowing more than
he did before, but rather has to try to make life as miserable for
everyone else as it is for him with his bruised ego.

Reminds me of the old parking lot situation here in Phoenix... "That's
what you can do when you're old and RICH" ;-)

If anyone gets hacked, call me... I'll provide the prosecutorial
connection... and put another feather in my son-in-law's hat ;-)

...Jim Thompson

You're so full of shit.

---
Think so?

Fuck with him and, as he said, with any of us that gets hacked,
you'll find a world of hurt waiting to take you down.


--
JF

 

[blu]

Niemadre wrote in news:465f2d16.152237921@news.alt.net:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:20:58 +0000 (UTC), blu <not@this.tm> wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
news:v08a3390al5v6qlvvh5uak2i8nmhbfh3bk@4ax.com:


approximately 30 posts/Hr so far
between 1445 and 1545

Can't you just see him two-fingering it like a mad man?


Hmmm!

Whut?

--
blu*goddess.of.groundhogs*juju
blu 3=3
master of irrelevance
Lits Slut#5
Gutter Chix0r #2
Cancel my subscription to the resurrection.
-Jim Morrison http://blu05.port5.com/
"This whole deal has gone nineteen." -Eddie

 

[blu]

Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
news:m0ca33t80dm2i9utk319840hfptj8hmbcf@4ax.com:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:41:17 GMT, Niemadre wrote:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:20:58 +0000 (UTC), blu <not@this.tm> wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
news:v08a3390al5v6qlvvh5uak2i8nmhbfh3bk@4ax.com:


approximately 30 posts/Hr so far
between 1445 and 1545

Can't you just see him two-fingering it like a mad man?


Hmmm!

The bot flooded via Prongy's ISP.
NO doubt about it !

Let him try to worm his way out of this!

He'll call you a moron/idiot/some scathing name and call me some *c*
word.. and foam and fume.

At last count, this particular foam-flood was 2,500 and going strong.
He's in it deep this time.

https://account.suddenlink.net/selfcare/

< snip >

I snipped all that..
Charter.net was *horrible*
That's why I got a paid-for service to begin with, many moons ago.

What do you want to bet that MP/SM will be posting through a paid-for
server come the 3rd? (check day)

--
blu*goddess.of.groundhogs*juju
blu 3=3
master of irrelevance
Lits Slut#5
Gutter Chix0r #2
Cancel my subscription to the resurrection.
-Jim Morrison http://blu05.port5.com/
"This whole deal has gone nineteen." -Eddie

 

[Paul Hovnanian P.E.]

Niemadre wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:07:34 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote:

Zach wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:58:55 GMT
teandson@hotmail.com (Lamey)
Kissed my ass and whined:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:53:58 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
dirk.bruere@gmail.com> wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 23:20:58 +0000 (UTC), blu <not@this.tm> wrote:

Brandon D Cartwright <user@example.net> wrote in
news:v08a3390al5v6qlvvh5uak2i8nmhbfh3bk@4ax.com:

approximately 30 posts/Hr so far
between 1445 and 1545
Can't you just see him two-fingering it like a mad man?
Like you said mind boggling.

That's a post every two minutes including reading and scrolling.
His mouse finger alone must be scorched.

but it's probably already scorched from U-no-Wot
Well one of your lot is really pissed and running a bot against the NG.
Keep it up suckers.

It's Prongie again. He can't stand getting spnaked.

Amazing. All these nonsense psots he's generating must really screw
the froup up.

Not really.
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.

Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.

Its pretty easy to filter if one knows which host these messges are
being injected into. Just put them into the blacklist.


--
Paul Hovnanian mailtoaul@Hovnanian.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, but you're taking the universe out of context.

 

[Lionel]

Lionel wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:49:00 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk,
then wrote:

On 29 Apr 2007 21:00:56 -0700, MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> wrote:

On Apr 29, 7:32 pm, Niemadre wrote:
[...]
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.
Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.
No actually we are a very active group, even without the "Prongies
bot". If you want to see a huge number of posts, all you have to do
is get into one of the many religous wars of electronics. Just try,
foolishly, suggesting that 0.1 uF bypass capacitors are optimal and
jump back and watch the results.

0.33 uF, and don't you forget it!

LOL!

100nF for each DIP & a tanty for every 1/2 dozen packages has always
been 100% reliable for me.

Hey faggit try and get my account nuked again.

It worked so well last time.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[WhyDidLoonel/PLaneJaneMur]

Lionel wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:27:42 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk, then
wrote:


purpurroterwald wrote:

They had been dealing with a real UDP threat that had nothing to do with
you, and they were undoubtedly much more concerned about that than your
childish netkkkop crying.
Trust me. It wasn't crying that did it.

You he<stomp
Nobody cares, RooF*cker. You're boring & useless.

>

 

[Aratzio]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:04:54 -0400, coyote <no@spam.here>
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:15:58 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
transparently proposed:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:11:45 -0400, coyote wrote:

Lionel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:26 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:26 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
got double secret probation because:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:30:10 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:

Lionel wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

And you cannot "win" because auk will
just continue to do what it does--trash your group.
We can trash a.u.k !
Good luck with that. ;^)
Should be simple enough.

Employ the usual methods.

Graham
Film at 11.
Laughing at 12.
How will we ever survive the destruction of AUK, again.
The same way we survived its 273,642 previous destructions, of course!
- In the AUK *FLAME BUNKERS OF DOOM!*

I presume y'all have in those bunkers a good stock of chocolate to tide
you over?
That and BEERZ!!

We installed Nacho machines and a wine cellar in the executive bunker.


Ooooh. Got some Brunello in there? Maybe a 1997? Hm? *drool*

1998 Robert Young Scion
2002 Rosenblum "Carla's Vineyard" Zinfandel
2004 Turnbull Viogner
....

--

Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?

Aratzio - Usenet ruiner #2

 

[WhyDidLoonelButcherlHisMo]

Lionel wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 23:06:07 +1000, "Gary R. Schmidt"
grschmidt@acm.org> spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk, then wrote:

SuperM@ssiveBlackHoleAtTheCenterOfTheMilkyWayGalaxy.org wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 02:40:51 GMT, Niemadre Gave us:


Have you dipshit? It's all fake. Good luck with that. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You cannot fake the path statement, idiot.
It's trivially *easy* to fake the path statement. But I doubt any of
you newbie's ever saw the original messages via "moscvax!kremvax".

grin> I first saw that one on a friend's archive. I believe that
Google eventuall got a copy of it for their own "history of Usenet"
archive, though.

Yer google account got nuked eons ago faggit

 

[coyote]

Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:04:54 -0400, coyote <no@spam.here
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:15:58 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
transparently proposed:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:11:45 -0400, coyote wrote:

Lionel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:26 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:26 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
got double secret probation because:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:30:10 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:

Lionel wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

And you cannot "win" because auk will
just continue to do what it does--trash your group.
We can trash a.u.k !
Good luck with that. ;^)
Should be simple enough.

Employ the usual methods.

Graham
Film at 11.
Laughing at 12.
How will we ever survive the destruction of AUK, again.
The same way we survived its 273,642 previous destructions, of course!
- In the AUK *FLAME BUNKERS OF DOOM!*

I presume y'all have in those bunkers a good stock of chocolate to tide
you over?
That and BEERZ!!
We installed Nacho machines and a wine cellar in the executive bunker.

Ooooh. Got some Brunello in there? Maybe a 1997? Hm? *drool*

1998 Robert Young Scion
2002 Rosenblum "Carla's Vineyard" Zinfandel
2004 Turnbull Viogner
...

Not really a Zin fan, but the Viogner sounds excellent.


--
~coyote

 

[Meat Plow]

On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:24:02 +1000, Lionel wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:33:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk, then wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:28:40 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT@techie.com
transparently proposed:

Late at night, by candle light, MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> penned
this immortal opus:

On Apr 29, 7:32 pm, Niemadre wrote:
[...]
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.

Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.

No actually we are a very active group, even without the "Prongies
bot". If you want to see a huge number of posts, all you have to do
is get into one of the many religous wars of electronics. Just try,
foolishly, suggesting that 0.1 uF bypass capacitors are optimal and
jump back and watch the results.


100 nF are better.
100,000pF are better still.

They'll never replace good old 0.0001mF caps.

Teh bets cap is .047mf/200v.


--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#1 Bartlo Pset, March 13-24 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794

 

[John Fields]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:33:54 GMT, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:28:40 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT@techie.com
transparently proposed:

Late at night, by candle light, MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> penned
this immortal opus:

On Apr 29, 7:32 pm, Niemadre wrote:
[...]
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.

Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.

No actually we are a very active group, even without the "Prongies
bot". If you want to see a huge number of posts, all you have to do
is get into one of the many religous wars of electronics. Just try,
foolishly, suggesting that 0.1 uF bypass capacitors are optimal and
jump back and watch the results.


100 nF are better.
100,000pF are better still.
100,000,000fF better yet.

--
JF

 

[Meat Plow]

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:06:57 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:04:54 -0400, coyote <no@spam.here
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:15:58 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
transparently proposed:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:11:45 -0400, coyote wrote:

Lionel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:26 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:26 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
got double secret probation because:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:30:10 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:

Lionel wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

And you cannot "win" because auk will
just continue to do what it does--trash your group.
We can trash a.u.k !
Good luck with that. ;^)
Should be simple enough.

Employ the usual methods.

Graham
Film at 11.
Laughing at 12.
How will we ever survive the destruction of AUK, again.
The same way we survived its 273,642 previous destructions, of course!
- In the AUK *FLAME BUNKERS OF DOOM!*

I presume y'all have in those bunkers a good stock of chocolate to tide
you over?
That and BEERZ!!

We installed Nacho machines and a wine cellar in the executive bunker.


Ooooh. Got some Brunello in there? Maybe a 1997? Hm? *drool*

1998 Robert Young Scion
2002 Rosenblum "Carla's Vineyard" Zinfandel
2004 Turnbull Viogner

2007 MD 20/20
2007 Ripple
2007 Wild Irish Rose
2007 Muscatel

--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#1 Bartlo Pset, March 13-24 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
COOSN-266-06-25794

 

[coyote]

Meat Plow wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:06:57 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:04:54 -0400, coyote <no@spam.here
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:15:58 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
transparently proposed:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:11:45 -0400, coyote wrote:

Lionel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:26 -0700, Aratzio <a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:26 -0400, Meat Plow <meat@meatplow.local
got double secret probation because:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:30:10 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> got double secret probation
because:

Lionel wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

And you cannot "win" because auk will
just continue to do what it does--trash your group.
We can trash a.u.k !
Good luck with that. ;^)
Should be simple enough.

Employ the usual methods.

Graham
Film at 11.
Laughing at 12.
How will we ever survive the destruction of AUK, again.
The same way we survived its 273,642 previous destructions, of course!
- In the AUK *FLAME BUNKERS OF DOOM!*

I presume y'all have in those bunkers a good stock of chocolate to tide
you over?
That and BEERZ!!
We installed Nacho machines and a wine cellar in the executive bunker.

Ooooh. Got some Brunello in there? Maybe a 1997? Hm? *drool*
1998 Robert Young Scion
2002 Rosenblum "Carla's Vineyard" Zinfandel
2004 Turnbull Viogner

2007 MD 20/20
2007 Ripple
2007 Wild Irish Rose
2007 Muscatel

Aghad! Thats more a effective defense against coyotes than garlic vs
vampire.

(And you forgot the Little Kings 2007)



--
~coyote

 

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

"coyote" <no@spam.here> wrote in message
news:y6SdnReaMOzy-KvbnZ2dnUVZ_oWdnZ2d@giganews.com

Meat Plow wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:06:57 +0000, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:04:54 -0400, coyote <no@spam.here
transparently proposed:

Aratzio wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:15:58 -0400, Meat Plow
meat@meatplow.local> transparently proposed:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:11:45 -0400, coyote wrote:

Lionel wrote:
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:48:26 -0700, Aratzio
a6ahlyv02@sneakemail.com> wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:43:26 -0400, Meat Plow
meat@meatplow.local> got double secret probation because:

On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 21:32:08 -0700, Aratzio wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 03:30:10 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> got double secret
probation because:

Lionel wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:

And you cannot "win" because auk will
just continue to do what it does--trash your group.
We can trash a.u.k !
Good luck with that. ;^)
Should be simple enough.

Employ the usual methods.

Graham
Film at 11.
Laughing at 12.
How will we ever survive the destruction of AUK, again.
The same way we survived its 273,642 previous destructions, of
course! - In the AUK *FLAME BUNKERS OF DOOM!*

I presume y'all have in those bunkers a good stock of chocolate
to tide you over?
That and BEERZ!!
We installed Nacho machines and a wine cellar in the executive
bunker.
Ooooh. Got some Brunello in there? Maybe a 1997? Hm? *drool*
1998 Robert Young Scion
2002 Rosenblum "Carla's Vineyard" Zinfandel
2004 Turnbull Viogner

2007 MD 20/20
2007 Ripple
2007 Wild Irish Rose
2007 Muscatel


Aghad! Thats more a effective defense against coyotes than garlic vs
vampire.

(And you forgot the Little Kings 2007)

<gags>

http://www.boonesfarm.net/

<gags again>

--
Rhonda Lea Kirk

Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:21:25 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 08:25:31 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk,
then wrote:

On Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:54 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:49:00 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> spat on Rhonda Lea Kirk,
then wrote:

On 29 Apr 2007 21:00:56 -0700, MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> wrote:

On Apr 29, 7:32 pm, Niemadre wrote:
[...]
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.

Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.

No actually we are a very active group, even without the "Prongies
bot". If you want to see a huge number of posts, all you have to do
is get into one of the many religous wars of electronics. Just try,
foolishly, suggesting that 0.1 uF bypass capacitors are optimal and
jump back and watch the results.


0.33 uF, and don't you forget it!

LOL!

100nF for each DIP & a tanty for every 1/2 dozen packages has always
been 100% reliable for me.

DIP? What's a DIP? Is that some sort of vacuum tube?

But seriously, don't use tantalums as power rail bypasses. They tend
to detonate.

I've heard that for I don't know how many years, but I've only ever
seen blown up tanties when some genius has reversed them, or run them
over-voltage.

Nowadays, a 10 or even 22 uF creamic is affordable and
all-around a better bulk bypass than a tantalum.

They didn't exist in any reasonable size when I first started doing
design work, so it was tants, electros, or nothing, but these days,
definitely.

---
Just so you know, what you call a "tant" is an electrolytic
capacitor, as is what you call an "electro", the difference being in
their plates; tantalum in one and aluminum in the other. AFAIK
their electrolytes are also different, but because of the
electrolyte (which is used to form the oxide dielectric) they're
both 'electrolytic' capacitors.



--
JF

 

[John Fields]

On Tue, 01 May 2007 03:22:23 +1000, Lionel <usenet@imagenoir.com>
wrote:

On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:28:40 -0300, YD <ydtechHAT@techie.com> spat on
Rhonda Lea Kirk, then wrote:

Late at night, by candle light, MooseFET <kensmith@rahul.net> penned
this immortal opus:

On Apr 29, 7:32 pm, Niemadre wrote:
[...]
SED is a very high traffic NG
IIRC one thread here ran to some 20,000+ posts in the space of a couple
of months.

Bullshit, anyway, the only ones posting is Prongies bot.

No actually we are a very active group, even without the "Prongies
bot". If you want to see a huge number of posts, all you have to do
is get into one of the many religous wars of electronics. Just try,
foolishly, suggesting that 0.1 uF bypass capacitors are optimal and
jump back and watch the results.


100 nF are better.

grin> How do you tell the difference?

---
Check the tolerance.


--
JF