PRC as a amplifier in GPS question.

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 4:51 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

On 30/10/2012 2:36 PM, John-Melb wrote:









On Oct 30, 1:29 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

Who you? You might like to do a count of posts you've made to
aus.electronics that generate anti-gun feeling despite what you think
you are doing.

Your recollection of the circumstances which first brought me to
aus.electronics appears somewhat faulty.

Trevor Tosspot, not once, but repeatedly, posted his anti-gun and anti-
gun owner rhetoric on aus.electronics, not once was he challenged, not
once was he told his postings were off topic.

As soon (from the very first post) as I responded, I was shit-canned.

Trevor Tosspot is aus.electronics "long standing and highly respected"
poster, anybody who choose to post alternative viewpoint was simply a
troll.

Interesting that the original thread that you barged in on was actually
from aus.tv cross posted to aus.electronics. You never bothered to go
and annoy them. Are the posters there too scary for you?

I was told it was on aus.electronics, that's where I found it, that it
may have been cross posted elsewhere is something I didn't know at the
time and after the initial responses I received, never bothered to
investigate.

So, everybody else was posting, I was "barging in". That comment says
much about your attitude to others being allowed to have opinions

Still posting here solely to "annoy the crap" out of me I see.

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 4:51 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

Interesting that the original thread that you barged in on was actually
from aus.tv cross posted to aus.electronics. You never bothered to go
and annoy them. Are the posters there too scary for you?

Also, you will note I hadn't posted anything to aus.electronics in
months, I only resumed posting there when you thought it would be
funny to post crap about old airplanes crashing on aus.politics.guns.

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2012-10-28, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:

No reasonable person doubts anyone's entitlement to voice their
opinion, isn't it a shame when so many on aus.electronics don't
recognise the same when the person voicing the opinion happens to be a
gun owner?

LMAO, you expect to be respected for owning a gun?

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2012-10-28, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 29, 10:16 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

Lol, who needs to stereotype. You waltz right up on queue with neon
flashing lights. You are definitely not doing gun owners any favour.
OTOH, that is probably your objective little weenie greenie.

Remind me again how you didn't have a problem with Trevor Tosspot
repeatedly posting his anti-gun and anti-gunowner rhetoric on
aus.electronics, but get so upset at alternative viewpoint appearing.

It's real simple.




He stopped.





will you?








--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2012-10-29, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 29, 12:31 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

Simple m0ron. He isn't a deliberate cross posting twat like you. We
ignore him. When you post your extreme alternative view, it just pisses
people off in non-relevant usenet groups.

Terry, just wondering, when another aus.electronics stalwart, Keefy,
admitted that he only posts on aus.politics.guns to "annoy the crap
out of" me, and posted some garbage about plane crashes on
aus.politics.guns, were you fine with that?

"aus.electronics stalwart"

When was the last time he posted to here?

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 8:27 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2012-10-28, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:



No reasonable person doubts anyone's entitlement to voice their
opinion, isn't it a shame when so many on aus.electronics don't
recognise the same when the person voicing the opinion happens to be a
gun owner?

LMAO, you expect to be respected for owning a gun?

That's not what I said, I'm not in the least bit surprised that you're
too ignorant to realise that.

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...@netfront.net ---

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 7:12 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

On 30/10/2012 1:29 PM, terryc wrote:







On 30/10/12 13:08, John-Melb wrote:
On Oct 30, 11:12 am, terryc<newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>  wrote:
On 30/10/12 09:14, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:24:41 +1100, terryc
newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>    wrote:

On 29/10/12 14:12, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:

. Aus laws restrict the availability of guns to those
who need them

Does a 100 pound woman need a gun to defend herself from a 250 pound
attacker?

no.

Why not?

Sad, sad, how very sad that all you can think of is phallic replacement
symbols. Try exercising your brain and working it out.

Isn't it interesting that the first person who has mentioned phallic
symbols during this discussion is one of the anti's from
aus.electronics

Who you? You might like to do a count of posts you've made to
aus.electronics that generate anti-gun feeling despite what you think
you are doing.

You have to realise that john is only capable of seeing things in black
and white. Either you are "Pro gun" or "Anti gun" he doesn't realise
that both those extremes represent 10% of the population at most and 90%
fall into the "Don't give a flying fuck" group.

And which group are those who didn't have a problem with Trevor's
dribble going up on aus.electronics, but who got so upset when
alternative viewpoint appeared belong in?

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 7:52 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

Paranoia is rampant.

Paranoia is but a total awareness of your environment

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 8:29 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

It's real simple.

                      He stopped.

will you?

Even simpler,

He started,

You lot didn't care,

I replied,

You lot suddenly got all vocal,

Get it?

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 8:32 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

 "aus.electronics stalwart"

 When was the last time he posted to here?

I don't know and I don't care, why don't you ask him, he'll be around,
he only posts to aus.politics.guns to "annoy the crap" out of me

 

[keithr]

On 31/10/2012 12:10 AM, John-Melb wrote:

On Oct 30, 7:52 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

Paranoia is rampant.

Paranoia is but a total awareness of your environment

Only a paranoid would come up with an excuse like that.

 

[Jeßus]

On 30 Oct 2012 09:29:08 GMT, Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2012-10-28, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 10:16 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

Lol, who needs to stereotype. You waltz right up on queue with neon
flashing lights. You are definitely not doing gun owners any favour.
OTOH, that is probably your objective little weenie greenie.

Remind me again how you didn't have a problem with Trevor Tosspot
repeatedly posting his anti-gun and anti-gunowner rhetoric on
aus.electronics, but get so upset at alternative viewpoint appearing.


It's real simple.




He stopped.





will you?

The guy clearly has some problems and trying to reason with him won't
help. Many have tried before... Only thing to do is try to ignore him,
best thing for everyone concerned I think..

 

[Jasen Betts]

On 2012-10-30, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:

On Oct 30, 11:12 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:
On 30/10/12 09:14, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:24:41 +1100, terryc
newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>  wrote:

On 29/10/12 14:12, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:

. Aus laws restrict the availability of guns to those
who need them

Does a 100 pound woman need a gun to defend herself from a 250 pound
attacker?

no.

Why not?

Sad, sad, how very sad that all you can think of is phallic replacement
symbols. Try exercising your brain and working it out.

Isn't it interesting that the first person who has mentioned phallic
symbols during this discussion is one of the anti's from
aus.electronics

No, this month atleast you started it John-Thomas, with your insults to
Trevor (whoever that is).

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news@netfront.net ---

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 31, 10:04 am, Jeßus <n...@all.org> wrote:

On 30 Oct 2012 09:29:08 GMT, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:









On 2012-10-28, John-Melb <mcnamara_j...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 29, 10:16 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

Lol, who needs to stereotype. You waltz right up on queue with neon
flashing lights. You are definitely not doing gun owners any favour.
OTOH, that is probably your objective little weenie greenie.

Remind me again how you didn't have a problem with Trevor Tosspot
repeatedly posting his anti-gun and anti-gunowner rhetoric on
aus.electronics, but get so upset at alternative viewpoint appearing.

It's real simple.

                 He stopped.

will you?

The guy clearly has some problems and trying to reason with him won't
help. Many have tried before... Only thing to do is try to ignore him,
best thing for everyone concerned I think..

Reason? "little weenie greenie", yep, you lot often confuse childish
name-calling with "reason"

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 31, 8:10 am, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

The 90% only got upset when you tried to take over the news group. They
didn't object to your original reply. Just check your reaction when I
accidentally posted an off topic message here, it amounts to hypocrisy.

Who tried to "take over" a news group?

I copped flack from the very first post, sorry "barging in" on that
group.

(You'll note, according to you, others post, I "barge in")

You clearly don't believe that law abiding gun owners have the same
freedom of speech as some anti-gun zealot, I'm real sorry that I don't
accept that, I guess you'll just have to live with it. <sarcasm mode
off>

Considering previous assertions you've made on aus.politics.guns, your
little accident was just too convenient.

 

[keithr]

On 31/10/2012 5:40 PM, John-Melb wrote:

On Oct 31, 5:32 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:
On 31/10/2012 4:57 PM, John-Melb wrote:> On Oct 31, 8:05 am, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:
On 31/10/2012 12:14 AM, John-Melb wrote:> On Oct 30, 8:32 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

"aus.electronics stalwart"

When was the last time he posted to here?

I don't know and I don't care, why don't you ask him, he'll be around,
he only posts to aus.politics.guns to "annoy the crap" out of me

When did wilson say that?

He didn't, you did

My apologies john, you usually apply that term to wilson and you are so
predictable that I didn't think to check further.

As for only posting to annoy the crap out of you, I do tend to treat
arseholes as arseholes, its a little weakness of mine. Of course, if
they cease to behave like arseholes, I treat them as normal people which
is preferable all round, its entirely up to them.

We're more alike than you'd care to admit, must piss you off big
time..............

I don't get pissed off john, its pointless trying to make me.

We are alike in that I am not "Anti-gun" no matter what people around
here want to believe.

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 31, 5:32 pm, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:

On 31/10/2012 4:57 PM, John-Melb wrote:> On Oct 31, 8:05 am, keithr <u...@domain.invalid> wrote:
On 31/10/2012 12:14 AM, John-Melb wrote:> On Oct 30, 8:32 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

   "aus.electronics stalwart"

   When was the last time he posted to here?

I don't know and I don't care, why don't you ask him, he'll be around,
he only posts to aus.politics.guns to "annoy the crap" out of me

When did wilson say that?

He didn't, you did

My apologies john, you usually apply that term to wilson and you are so
predictable that I didn't think to check further.

As for only posting to annoy the crap out of you, I do tend to treat
arseholes as arseholes, its a little weakness of mine. Of course, if
they cease to behave like arseholes, I treat them as normal people which
is preferable all round, its entirely up to them.

We're more alike than you'd care to admit, must piss you off big
time..............

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 30, 8:40 pm, Jasen Betts <ja...@xnet.co.nz> wrote:
<SNIP>

I don't understand what you're waffling about, hang on, I'll try and
find someone who can translate Fucktard for me.

 

[atec77]

On 30/10/2012 7:40 PM, Jasen Betts wrote:

On 2012-10-30, John-Melb <mcnamara_john@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Oct 30, 11:12 am, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:
On 30/10/12 09:14, ozarkhe...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:24:41 +1100, terryc
newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:


Isn't it interesting that the first person who has mentioned phallic
symbols during this discussion is one of the anti's from
aus.electronics

No, this month atleast you started it John-Thomas, with your insults to
Trevor (whoever that is).

anything derogatory about tweva tosser is probably accurate hence no insult

--


--









X-No-Archive: Yes

 

[John-Melb]

On Oct 31, 9:49 pm, terryc <newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au> wrote:

On 30/10/12 14:36, John-Melb wrote:

On Oct 30, 1:29 pm, terryc<newsninespam-s...@woa.com.au>  wrote:

Who you? You might like to do a count of posts you've made to
aus.electronics that generate anti-gun feeling despite what you think
you are doing.

Your recollection of the circumstances which first brought me to
aus.electronics appears somewhat faulty.

Considering the content of your posts, pigs fly.

I find your continued struggle with reality rather entertaining