Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If they put in FTTN, it will inevitably be replaced in the not too far"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:b4gq13F8n10U1@mid.individual.net...
On 15/07/2013 8:08 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 14-Jul-13 3:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 14/07/2013 9:31 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 13-Jul-13 2:45 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**You're kidding, right?
According to Nyquist, fibre has a maximum capacity somewhere around
150Tbs. And, unlike wireless, it is not affected by
the number of users (yet). Best of all, when (if) humans can tap the
maximum capacity of a single fibre (which no one
has yet managed to do), then another fibre can be dropped into the
hole. Presto: Bandwidth doubled.
Fibre has a maximum capacity?
Japan's incumbent telecommunications carrier, NTT, is claiming a
telecommunications speed record, demonstrating a fibre technology able
to carry 1 Petabit-per-second - a million gigabits - over a
distance of
50 kilometers, using a single fibre.
http://www.abc.net.au/technology/articles/2012/09/26/3598036.htm
There are many Dr Google hits that refer to faster fibre methods.
Don...
**Every medium MUST have some kind of limit. Fibre's is so damned high
that we are unlikely to reach it for several
decades. Wireless is, of course, limited.
What I am saying Trevor is that you have to keep an open mind on new
technology. Doesn't matter if it is cable or wireless.
**I do have an open mind on new technology. It is sad that so many
people are politically motivated to dismiss fibre, when it's true
capacity is decades away from being reached. Wireless will get better,
but can never reach the capacity of a single fibre. Further: Any
compression schemes that can be used with wireless to increase
bandwidth, can also be used with fibre. If people could remove their
political thinking from the issue, most technologically savvy people
will acknowledge that fibre is far superior to wireless. Less visually
intrusive, no arguments about radiation issues, too.
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will
become more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I
live 25km from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless
speeds are pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL
2+ speeds hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold
my breath waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless
capability.
The NBN may well do that.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Even if they do, you will still get it, because the coalition has changed
their policy on the NBN and now just want to do it using FTTN instead of
FTTP. And I bet they discover that that isnt feasible when they get
elected.
Again Dr Google will find some interesting results today:
http://gizmodo.com/5954407/scientists-promise-ten-times-more-bandwidth-with-no-new-hardware
In 5 to 20 years time, the rules will change again.
No question, wireless is nifty. Fibre is and always will be, superior
in all respects, save portability.
The most important question is whether wireless will
be good enough for most. It isnt currently, but its less
clear how long that will be true for, particularly if most
use wireless most of the times.
And, possibly, cost (though I don't have the data for this area).
Its certainly much cheaper than FTTP.
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I getAND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
FTTN after 8 years is a rubbish exercise already my Liberal MP's areAgain Dr Google will find some interesting results today:
http://gizmodo.com/5954407/scientists-promise-ten-times-more-bandwidth-with-no-new-hardware
In 5 to 20 years time, the rules will change again.
No question, wireless is nifty. Fibre is and always will be, superior
in all respects, save portability.
The most important question is whether wireless will
be good enough for most. It isnt currently, but its less
clear how long that will be true for, particularly if most
use wireless most of the times.
And, possibly, cost (though I don't have the data for this area).
Its certainly much cheaper than FTTP.
If they put in FTTN, it will inevitably be replaced in the not too far
different future, and will cost more in the end.
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchangeOn 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Tbox as part of package but as the ADSL2+ is as slow as a wet week IOn Mon, 15 Jul 2013 13:11:11 +1000, F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com
wrote:
Petzl wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 19:22:42 +0930, annily <annily@annily.invalid
wrote:
Everything will, including wifi.
Those that do get the FULL NBN plan
Fuck all do.
will find TV entertainment get better no need for TV aerial.
No need for one now with digital TV.
How do you receive digital TV successfully without an aerial?
--
Lifelong resident of Adelaide, South Australia
Once you get a NBN connection every Nation in the world has a network
that you can sign or subscribe into
Iinet already have an option for its customers to get
http://www.iinet.net.au/tv/fetchtv/
Telstra also provide tv through the copper network.
Don't work for majority of their copper wire customers
Used to be able to start downloading it then after 45 minutes start
watching. Now they have disabled this and only allow direct streaming.
So it don't work for me either. The quality was aways "dumbed down"
With the NBN you are talking about 3D HD 1080H TV from anywhere on
planet.
A pommy mate a Manchester United fan can have 9 screens on his BIG
screen TV all different views of the same match. He selects the view
of the moment and his family can also use the Internet without
interfering with each others use.
Probably won't work here, although they tried their darnedest to sell me
I doubt they will myself, essentially because it will turn outOn 15/07/2013 11:30 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
"Trevor Wilson" <trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au> wrote in message
news:b4gq13F8n10U1@mid.individual.net...
On 15/07/2013 8:08 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 14-Jul-13 3:57 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 14/07/2013 9:31 AM, Don McKenzie wrote:
On 13-Jul-13 2:45 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**You're kidding, right?
According to Nyquist, fibre has a maximum capacity somewhere around
150Tbs. And, unlike wireless, it is not affected by
the number of users (yet). Best of all, when (if) humans can tap the
maximum capacity of a single fibre (which no one
has yet managed to do), then another fibre can be dropped into the
hole. Presto: Bandwidth doubled.
Fibre has a maximum capacity?
Japan's incumbent telecommunications carrier, NTT, is claiming a
telecommunications speed record, demonstrating a fibre technology
able
to carry 1 Petabit-per-second - a million gigabits - over a
distance of
50 kilometers, using a single fibre.
http://www.abc.net.au/technology/articles/2012/09/26/3598036.htm
There are many Dr Google hits that refer to faster fibre methods.
Don...
**Every medium MUST have some kind of limit. Fibre's is so damned high
that we are unlikely to reach it for several
decades. Wireless is, of course, limited.
What I am saying Trevor is that you have to keep an open mind on new
technology. Doesn't matter if it is cable or wireless.
**I do have an open mind on new technology. It is sad that so many
people are politically motivated to dismiss fibre, when it's true
capacity is decades away from being reached. Wireless will get better,
but can never reach the capacity of a single fibre. Further: Any
compression schemes that can be used with wireless to increase
bandwidth, can also be used with fibre. If people could remove their
political thinking from the issue, most technologically savvy people
will acknowledge that fibre is far superior to wireless. Less visually
intrusive, no arguments about radiation issues, too.
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will
become more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I
live 25km from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless
speeds are pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL
2+ speeds hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold
my breath waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless
capability.
The NBN may well do that.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Even if they do, you will still get it, because the coalition has changed
their policy on the NBN and now just want to do it using FTTN instead of
FTTP. And I bet they discover that that isnt feasible when they get
elected.
Again Dr Google will find some interesting results today:
http://gizmodo.com/5954407/scientists-promise-ten-times-more-bandwidth-with-no-new-hardware
In 5 to 20 years time, the rules will change again.
No question, wireless is nifty. Fibre is and always will be, superior
in all respects, save portability.
The most important question is whether wireless will
be good enough for most. It isnt currently, but its less
clear how long that will be true for, particularly if most
use wireless most of the times.
And, possibly, cost (though I don't have the data for this area).
Its certainly much cheaper than FTTP.
If they put in FTTN,
Thats very arguable given how long the copper has lasted for.it will inevitably be replaced in the not too far different future,
Sure, and maybe even initially too.and will cost more in the end.
But it remains to be seen if he's just another lying politician...On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:25:21 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
Again Dr Google will find some interesting results today:
http://gizmodo.com/5954407/scientists-promise-ten-times-more-bandwidth-with-no-new-hardware
In 5 to 20 years time, the rules will change again.
No question, wireless is nifty. Fibre is and always will be, superior
in all respects, save portability.
The most important question is whether wireless will
be good enough for most. It isnt currently, but its less
clear how long that will be true for, particularly if most
use wireless most of the times.
And, possibly, cost (though I don't have the data for this area).
Its certainly much cheaper than FTTP.
If they put in FTTN, it will inevitably be replaced in the not too far
different future, and will cost more in the end.
FTTN after 8 years is a rubbish exercise already my Liberal MP's are
saying Campbelltown will be completed because the contracts are
already signed
Macarthur Liberal MP Russell Matheson has given assurances that
suburbs around Campbelltown would not miss out if the Coalition wins
on September 14.
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for theOn Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:25:21 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
Again Dr Google will find some interesting results today:
http://gizmodo.com/5954407/scientists-promise-ten-times-more-bandwidth-with-no-new-hardware
In 5 to 20 years time, the rules will change again.
No question, wireless is nifty. Fibre is and always will be, superior
in all respects, save portability.
The most important question is whether wireless will
be good enough for most. It isnt currently, but its less
clear how long that will be true for, particularly if most
use wireless most of the times.
And, possibly, cost (though I don't have the data for this area).
Its certainly much cheaper than FTTP.
If they put in FTTN, it will inevitably be replaced in the not too far
different future, and will cost more in the end.
FTTN after 8 years is a rubbish exercise already my Liberal MP's are
saying Campbelltown will be completed because the contracts are
already signed
Macarthur Liberal MP Russell Matheson has given assurances that
suburbs around Campbelltown would not miss out if the Coalition wins
on September 14.
You shouldn't live around Campbelltown if you can't take a joke.
I'd be very surprised if the modem gives link speeds as a multiple ofOn 15/07/2013 10:31 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for the
link itself from the modem are:
Model: Billion BiPAC 7800N Link uptime: 11 days 4 hours 55min
Uplink speed: 1063Khz SNR: 8.6dB attenuation 4.3
Downlink speed: 21383Khz SNR: 6.1dB attenuation 13.0
www.speedtest.net is simple to use and accurate enoughOn 16.07.13 20:57, keithr wrote:
On 15/07/2013 10:31 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for the
link itself from the modem are:
Model: Billion BiPAC 7800N Link uptime: 11 days 4 hours 55min
Uplink speed: 1063Khz SNR: 8.6dB attenuation 4.3
Downlink speed: 21383Khz SNR: 6.1dB attenuation 13.0
I'd be very surprised if the modem gives link speeds as a multiple of
kiloHertz, rather than kilobits per second.
the speed of your ADSL link, it just shows how fast you can eitherOn Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:15:15 +0930, annily <annily@annily.invalid
wrote:
On 16.07.13 20:57, keithr wrote:
On 15/07/2013 10:31 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for the
link itself from the modem are:
Model: Billion BiPAC 7800N Link uptime: 11 days 4 hours 55min
Uplink speed: 1063Khz SNR: 8.6dB attenuation 4.3
Downlink speed: 21383Khz SNR: 6.1dB attenuation 13.0
I'd be very surprised if the modem gives link speeds as a multiple of
kiloHertz, rather than kilobits per second.
www.speedtest.net is simple to use and accurate enough
http://www.speedtest.net/result/2840049758.png
Get suspicous of speed claims without the image
Be as suspicious as you want, speedtest does not give any indication of
On 16.07.13 20:57, keithr wrote:
On 15/07/2013 10:31 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will
become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless
capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for the
link itself from the modem are:
Model: Billion BiPAC 7800N Link uptime: 11 days 4 hours 55min
Uplink speed: 1063Khz SNR: 8.6dB attenuation 4.3
Downlink speed: 21383Khz SNR: 6.1dB attenuation 13.0
I'd be very surprised if the modem gives link speeds as a multiple of
kiloHertz, rather than kilobits per second.
picky, you know what was meant.
Exactly! I live 16,710Km from Australia's largest city and I getOn 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
I have a "Windows Gadget"On 16/07/2013 10:48 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:15:15 +0930, annily <annily@annily.invalid
wrote:
On 16.07.13 20:57, keithr wrote:
On 15/07/2013 10:31 PM, Petzl wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 21:31:37 +1000, keithr <user@domain.invalid
wrote:
On 15/07/2013 9:20 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
AND, I have already stated that wireless is very useful and will become
more useful in the future. It is, however, not a panacea. I live 25km
from the centre of the largest city in Australia. Wireless speeds are
pitifully inadequate and extremely variable. The best ADSL 2+ speeds
hover around 8 Mb/s. I look forward to fibre. I won't hold my breath
waiting for Telstra (or anyone else) to improve my wireless capability.
I know that the NBN will eventually arrive (provided enough people
don't
vote for that technologically illiterate moron, Abbott).
Err well I live 60Km from Australia's third largest city and I get
21Mb/s, at my old house, 500Km from the nearest capital and 50Km from
the nearest town of any size, I got 15Mb/s. ADSL+ certainly isn't
limited to 8Mb/s
Your copper wire is intact and less than 300 metres from exchange
A http://www.speedtest.net/ to verify would be good
Nope 1.8Km as the crow flies, probably the actual wire distance is
nearer to 3Km. Speedtest is a useless abortion, actual figures for the
link itself from the modem are:
Model: Billion BiPAC 7800N Link uptime: 11 days 4 hours 55min
Uplink speed: 1063Khz SNR: 8.6dB attenuation 4.3
Downlink speed: 21383Khz SNR: 6.1dB attenuation 13.0
I'd be very surprised if the modem gives link speeds as a multiple of
kiloHertz, rather than kilobits per second.
www.speedtest.net is simple to use and accurate enough
http://www.speedtest.net/result/2840049758.png
Get suspicous of speed claims without the image
Be as suspicious as you want, speedtest does not give any indication of
the speed of your ADSL link, it just shows how fast you can either
extract data or pump date into a particular server. You should be able
to work out for your self why that is not a valid indication of ADSL
speed. The only way to check that is looking what your modem sees.
We could, of course, always wait for some hypothetical better technologyWith the NBN fiber cable to almost ever home, at a cost that will only
be guessed at after 10+ years, I often wonder what new technologies will
arrive in the next 5, 10, 15, or 20 years that could make fiber optic to
every home plan, look like last centuries technology.
I doubt anything will. After all, in the last say 100 years, allParramatta launches Australias first free 802.11ac Wi-Fi network
Users can access 30 minutes a day of free Internet with speeds up to
100Mbps
Full Story at:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/520292/parramatta_launches_australia_first_free_802_11ac_wi-fi_network/
Councillor and ParraConnect committee member, Paul Garrard, came up with
the idea to build a network that would put Parramatta on the map and offer
almost the same standard of connectivity seen in cities such as New York,
Seoul and Barcelona.
This is an event that the New South Wales government said couldnt happen
three years ago, he said at the launch today.
Three years ago they spent a million dollars doing a feasibility study
that said we couldnt do what were launching today. So its thanks to the
capacity of the ParraConnect committee which is made up of a combination
of community and business people who have come together to work on this.
==============================
With the NBN fiber cable to almost ever home, at a cost that will only be
guessed at after 10+ years, I often wonder what new technologies will
arrive in the next 5, 10, 15, or 20 years that could make fiber optic to
every home plan, look like last centuries technology.
Hello,Fibre has a maximum capacity?
and fibre optics."Don McKenzie" <5V@2.5A> wrote in message
news:b4bhtrF4ue3U1@mid.individual.net...
Parramatta launches Australias first free 802.11ac Wi-Fi network
Users can access 30 minutes a day of free Internet with speeds up to
100Mbps
Full Story at:
http://www.computerworld.com.au/article/520292/parramatta_launches_australia_first_free_802_11ac_wi-fi_network/
Councillor and ParraConnect committee member, Paul Garrard, came up with
the idea to build a network that would put Parramatta on the map and
offer almost the same standard of connectivity seen in cities such as New
York, Seoul and Barcelona.
This is an event that the New South Wales government said couldnt
happen three years ago, he said at the launch today.
Three years ago they spent a million dollars doing a feasibility study
that said we couldnt do what were launching today. So its thanks to
the capacity of the ParraConnect committee which is made up of a
combination of community and business people who have come together to
work on this.
==============================
With the NBN fiber cable to almost ever home, at a cost that will only be
guessed at after 10+ years, I often wonder what new technologies will
arrive in the next 5, 10, 15, or 20 years that could make fiber optic to
every home plan, look like last centuries technology.
I doubt anything will. After all, in the last say 100 years, all
we have really seen is copper pairs, coax, wireless and fiber.
There may be another show up, but I doubt it will be in even 20 years.
Yep, 20 years sounds bit too ambitious for a newer technology to wireless