OT: Wow, compact fluorescent light bulbs already obsolete

J

John Doe

Guest
I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.
 
On 2020-01-17 19:57, John Doe wrote:
I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On 1/17/20 8:57 PM, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance.  CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours.  Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial.   LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights.  LED Christmas lights are hideous.  (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

The ballast circuits that provided reliable and safe operation for the
tubes were relatively complex which allowed ample opportunity for
"Muntzing" by unscrupulous mfgrs; take a stock design under-rate the
drive transistors or pull a cap here, resistor there, seems to still
work ok...I guess...
 
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.
 
On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.

They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous. (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
John Doe <always.look@message.header> wrote in
news:qvtl53$4l4$1@dont-email.me:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around
and they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a
short-lived technology.

Hahahaha... says the guy who lived as long as Noah...
 
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:57:34 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous. (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

LED street lights could use some diffusers too.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

The cork popped merrily, and Lord Peter rose to his feet.
"Bunter", he said, "I give you a toast. The triumph of Instinct over Reason"
 
On Friday, January 17, 2020 at 8:47:01 PM UTC-5, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.

Yeah, really! If they weren't so good, why would I buy so many?

--

Rick C.

- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 1/17/20 10:13 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:57:34 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous. (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

LED street lights could use some diffusers too.

Harsh white lighting supposedly deters crime in urban areas, even
somewhat rough neighborhoods in Providence "feel" much safer with LED
lighting as compared to sodium vapor

<https://www.ledsmagazine.com/architectural-lighting/article/16701511/major-study-finds-outdoor-lighting-cut-crime-by-39>
 
On 2020-01-17 22:13, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:57:34 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous. (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

LED street lights could use some diffusers too.

They're hell on astromomers, too.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 03:09:14 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 22:13, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:57:34 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous. (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

LED street lights could use some diffusers too.

As long as the light is beamed sharply downwards only, there should
not be a great risk of getting the light directly in your field of
view, unless you explicitly look upwards.

They're hell on astromomers, too.

Astronomers would prefer low pressure sodium lights with just two
narrow yellow spectral lines at (589 nm) that are easy to filter out.

LED street nights are nice, since it is easier to aim it at the street
were the light is needed, not into windows or directly towards sky
(causing light pollution).

Contrary to gas discharge lamps, the light output from LEDs is easily
adjustable, so fitting a light sensor into a street lamp, it is
possible to adjust lamp power depending of amount of reflected light
from dry, wet or snowy surfaces. Using movement sensors it is possible
to switch between half and full power, when there are actually someone
moving on a quiet street.
 
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote in
news:56d2b61b-d473-d2fe-9dc8-d74adb4f2e78@electrooptical.net:

On 2020-01-17 22:13, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 20:57:34 -0500, Phil Hobbs
pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn
around and they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That
was a short-lived technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not
dimmable, and produce ugly colours. Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric
light is pretty trivial. LEDs are dramatically better than
CFLs, and almost competitive with incandescents for appearance,
except in Christmas lights. LED Christmas lights are hideous.
(There's no reason you couldn't make the nice diffused colours
the same way as with tungsten, but apparently nobody does.)

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

LED street lights could use some diffusers too.

They're hell on astromomers, too.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

The lights cast downward. They do not have any spherical radiation
like old light diffusers on old lighting tech does. They created
huge amounts of light using huge amounts of power and kind of pointed
it downward but a lot glares upwards. With LED lighting, I have only
seen purely downward casting arrays. How does that tick off the
astronomy guys other than lighting the ground so well that is glares
against the atmosphere more. Diffusion will not likely help if that
is the case because the goal IS lighting the ground.
 
upsidedown@downunder.com wrote in
news:ajf52fhe9j5i5e57bia71hi9q9v89fh4pm@4ax.com:

Contrary to gas discharge lamps, the light output from LEDs is
easily adjustable, so fitting a light sensor into a street lamp,
it is possible to adjust lamp power depending of amount of
reflected light from dry, wet or snowy surfaces. Using movement
sensors it is possible to switch between half and full power, when
there are actually someone moving on a quiet street.

Possible but major overkill.

They turn them on. They do not adjust them outside the mfg
facility.

And your "adjustment" version is pulse width modulation, which my
eyes would dislike even more.

Proper adjustment would be a 50 lamp array where they turn off some
of the array to lessen the light without modulating it with pulsed
power. Hell, that way, they could run 25 and then run the other 25
the next period providing twice the life and at least one extra
service call buffer period after a failure.

The biggest fail I have seen with the "new technology" LED street
lamps are the fact that the total retards are STILL using 65 year old
day/night sensors up on top of the light. KEERIMANY boys! Clock
chips have been around for decades! They could KNOW when it was day
or night. I see units that do not know when to turn on, others that
do not know how to turn off... with the sodiums it was a HUGE waste
of power to sit there and cycle on and off and on and off. Those old
sensors and that entire wait for daylight paradigm is STUPID. We
know better now. These lamps could ALL have 8 hr battery backups for
power outages. They could ALL be controlled by one lamp in the
street's entire string that tells them when to turn on and off. They
could talk by the power line or by radio. This stuff is easy.

I had LED designs for street lamps years ago that would even
eliminate the bucket truck service vehicle fleet to just a few per
yard.


I also have traffic light revamps that put the super rich jerks
that have been selling cities '70s technology for the last 50 years
but at huge prices and service contracts to shame.

I would put the entire nation to work on the nation's
infrastructure.
 
On 18/01/2020 01:57, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:

John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance.  CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.

He is spot on.
CFL's were only ever a stop gap until LED efficiency improved.
They're dim, slow, highly temperature-sensitive, fragile, not dimmable,
and produce ugly colours.  Other than that, they rock.

You missed out get much dimmer with age and even slower to start up and
contain mercury (although not very much) and that the phosphors on the
glass envelope are also nasty as well. Very messy to dispose of.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial.   LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs, and almost
competitive with incandescents for appearance, except in Christmas
lights.  LED Christmas lights are hideous.  (There's no reason you
couldn't make the nice diffused colours the same way as with tungsten,
but apparently nobody does.)

It is impressive how much LEDs have improved in QE since the early
indicator LEDs of the 1970's which could barely be seen in daylight.
Though they did brighten up enormously when dunked in LN2 to stiffen the
crystal lattice (at least until thermal cycling killed them).

There are some Xmas lights with diffusers on in the UK. Typically
icosahedral clear plastic diffusers with an LED in the middle.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B07Y3C1LS2/

Crystal ball fairy lights in Amazon search should get them.

--
Regards,
Martin Brown
 
On Saturday, 18 January 2020 09:16:53 UTC, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
They could ALL be controlled by one lamp in the
street's entire string that tells them when to turn on and off. They
could talk by the power line or by radio. This stuff is easy.
The street lamps around here are remotely controlled so that after 10pm
they reduce in brightness and after 1am turn off completely in some areas.

https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/roads-and-transport/roadworks-and-maintenance/street-lights-traffic-signals-and-signs/part-night-street-lighting

John
 
On Saturday, 18 January 2020 01:57:45 UTC, Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-01-17 20:46, John Doe wrote:
Phil Hobbs wrote:
John Doe wrote:

I bought CFL lightbulbs once. Now I need some more, I turn around and
they're gone! Replaced by LED light bulbs. That was a short-lived
technology.

Good riddance. CFLs stink on ice.

The poster is uninformed.


They're dim,

not a bit, they're available from 3w to 100s of watts & many thousand lumens.
There was an issue with mfrs claiming wattage equivalence to nonstandard filament lamps, but that is not due to any problem with the CFLs obviously.


> slow,

There were 2 types of CFL, general purpose & facilities. The former were not slow. The latter were very slow to warm up, trading that off for better efficacy, and were never intended for domestic use. I think the reason facilities lamps occasionally ended up in homes was the complete failure of mfrs to explain what they were on the pack - just stating 'facilities' meant nothing to the home buyer.


> highly temperature-sensitive,

some were intolerant of small enclosed spaces, most weren't. Depended on the mercury technology & dose.


> fragile,

indeed

> not dimmable,

they were but...
a) the cheapest ballast types could only be dimmed with something other than the standard dimmer of the day
b) dimmable ballasted cost more


> and produce ugly colours.

nonsense. The vast majority were triphosphor in sane CCTs, but it was possible to find outliers with excessively high CCT, and occasional junk products with old halophosphate phosphors.


Other than that, they rock.

They do save a bit of money, but the amount I spend on electric light is
pretty trivial.

they were a move forward in technology, saving more than they cost.


> LEDs are dramatically better than CFLs,

they are finally getting better


NT
 
On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 4:44:58 AM UTC-5, Martin Brown wrote:

It is impressive how much LEDs have improved in QE since the early
indicator LEDs of the 1970's which could barely be seen in daylight.
Though they did brighten up enormously when dunked in LN2 to stiffen the
crystal lattice (at least until thermal cycling killed them).

An (older and wiser) friend and colleague once told me: "Successful technologies tend to take off immediately."
The internal combustion engine overtook steam very quickly in transportation. Trains replaced canal barges. Word processors replaced typewriters. The list goes on and on.

By comparison, "game-changing" advances in wind, solar, and even battery design have been significantly more sluggish. The business lesson here is that a technology venture that takes off quickly, has a chance, but one that struggles too long to launch is probably doomed from the start! (He puts nuclear power into this latter category, for example.) I haven't asked him (yet) where he might slot Tesla electric cars.

He has two PhD degrees from MIT.

I would add LED lighting to that list. Look around and there can be little doubt it is a highly successful technology. They are everywhere. They have plenty of advantages over just about every other lighting technology. Specifically including, I would add, CFL - which in my limited, (i.e., short-lived) experience with them, they were fairly expensive (but so were early LED blubs), not particularly bright for their size, didn't last very long, were fragile, and often wouldn't even fit a lamp shade.

Maybe the question should be:
What real advantages do CFL have over LED (or other types of lighting).
I can't think of any?
 
On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 11:22:53 PM UTC+11, mpm wrote:
On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 4:44:58 AM UTC-5, Martin Brown wrote:

It is impressive how much LEDs have improved in QE since the early
indicator LEDs of the 1970's which could barely be seen in daylight.
Though they did brighten up enormously when dunked in LN2 to stiffen the
crystal lattice (at least until thermal cycling killed them).

An (older and wiser) friend and colleague once told me: "Successful technologies tend to take off immediately."
The internal combustion engine overtook steam very quickly in transportation. Trains replaced canal barges. Word processors replaced typewriters. The list goes on and on.

By comparison, "game-changing" advances in wind, solar, and even battery design have been significantly more sluggish. The business lesson here is that a technology venture that takes off quickly, has a chance, but one that struggles too long to launch is probably doomed from the start! (He puts nuclear power into this latter category, for example.) I haven't asked him (yet) where he might slot Tesla electric cars.

He has two PhD degrees from MIT.

I would add LED lighting to that list. Look around and there can be little doubt it is a highly successful technology. They are everywhere. They have plenty of advantages over just about every other lighting technology. Specifically including, I would add, CFL - which in my limited, (i.e., short-lived) experience with them, they were fairly expensive (but so were early LED bulbs), not particularly bright for their size, didn't last very long, were fragile, and often wouldn't even fit a lamp shade.

They were quite a bit more efficient than the filaments lamps they were intended to replace, and last quite a bit longer.

Once the manufactures managed to work out how to get enough light out of an LED bulb to let it compete with filament lamp or a CFL it was game over, but they've only recently started selling cheaply enough to compete with CFLs on initial price.

Maybe the question should be:
What real advantages do CFL have over LED (or other types of lighting).
I can't think of any.

The right question is what advantages did CFLs have over filament lamps when they were first introduced.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Sat, 18 Jan 2020 03:09:14 -0500, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

>They're hell on astromomers, too.

That's *very* surprising. I was under the impression they're highly
directional. For example in car headlights now they require next to
nothing in the way of reflector bowls. That's why all the newest cars
only have mean lookin' slits where headlamps used to be.
--

No deal? No problem! :-D
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top