OT: Why is Germany so (apparently) stupid to give up nuclear

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d9223256-d3f3-410a-
be72-b8bfc8ef85f7@googlegroups.com:

Most of them are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction
and/or mental illness.

Nice job of being Trumplike, putz!

Social stigma much?

 

[whit3rd]

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 4:41:40 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy, and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

What regulations were 'nonsense'? Spurs are a torture device, and might
accurately symbolize his economic machinations. As for unemployment, his
'record' didn't document the real casualty toll in Puerto Rico, why would
you trust it on something else important?

And he's been nothing like a Hitler. Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

Not according to a half dozen court decisions. He hasn't show he can handle
responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his intention). The detention centers
have been called 'concentration camps', you know.


> If you ignore all the drama, Trump's done a very good job.

If you ignore his drama, we've got a void in the White House.

 

Lardy Louie <dirtylaughinglardass4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d6a018f6-e929-4eb9-8dea-d3bdb780f0b3@googlegroups.com:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in news:0cbc746a-8962-4d53-88fc-
137d3dc1665c@googlegroups.com:

And of course we have an armed citizenry who'd resist a Hitler,
if we ever made the mistake of electing one.


We sure illicitly put a Hitler wannabe in place.

As in NOT elected.

That;s a lie.

He wasn't elected. That is not a lie.

> You're just another sore loser snowflake.

I did not lose anything. I am not sore. I am a human, not a
snowflake.

Three strikes, you're out, lardass.

Good thing the dopey bastard is a complete buffoon.

Interesting admission. You'd rather have a buffoon than a
competent, fit president.

Your lack of litereacy is glaring again.

It simply means that the other dopey bastards around him won't let
him do anything that is too dopey.

Another sign of Trump Derangement
Syndrome.

You're an idiot.

> Want to tell us again how you claim to be a Republican?

I am. Just not like any of the low life bastards in office that
backed up a jackass and continue to do so. And not like any of the
total retards that voted for the stupid fuck either.

> ROFL

Proof that you are an idiot. I guess you should change your nym to
DirtyLaughingLardass4.

How do I know that you are dirty? Because YOU ROLL on the FLOOR.

How do I know that you are a lardy? Because YOU ROLL on the FLOOR.

How do I know that you are laughing? Because YOU said so.

Good job, idiot.

> I was a Republican, pre-Trump.

You were a retard then, and you are still a retard.

> I gave him a chance.

Apparently not. You said you did not vote for him.
I knew him to be a criminal long before the wussified putz ran.

Unlike you,
hoping that he was a dopey bastard buffoon,

What are you mumbling about now, boy?

I did no hoping. When I call Donald J. Trump a buffoon, it is a
report of fact. You are the dopey bat's turd.

I hoped that maybe he
could be presidential,

That is ONLY because you did not research just who the putz was.

> grow into the office.

Ask the director of Conan if he liked teaching Arnold how to act
throughout every scene of his first film.

That is something one does not do with our nation's reins in their
hands.

I know that there
was little chance of that, but at least I'm not like you, hoping
that he would prove to be a buffoon.

Again, there was no hoping, you illiterate twerp. I am fully
familiar with his lifelong behavior. It did not take me hoping for him
to reach and hold his exhaulted level of buffoonery. He sits right at
the bottom of that totem pole.

Funny, you sit a mere one notch above him.

Yes, now you have to go and relearn all about totem poles, fatass.

And in the Twilight Zone world that has ensued since, I cannot
safely say that despite the lesson they/we should have learned
that it wouldn't or couldn't happen again. Despite all this
information age scrutiny and even advanced human psychology.

Wake Up, America!

Wake Up, World!

Wake up DL!

You are mumbling again.

Wrong, always wrong.

And you still do not know how to make your Usenet sig correctly.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 11:22:38 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d9223256-d3f3-410a-
be72-b8bfc8ef85f7@googlegroups.com:

Most of them are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction
and/or mental illness.

Nice job of being Trumplike, putz!

Social stigma much?

It's not stigma, it's fact, stupid.

Wrong, always wrong.

Your not going to solve the problem, help reduce the homeless population
by ignoring the basic facts.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 1:07:34 AM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 4:41:40 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy, and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

What regulations were 'nonsense'? Spurs are a torture device, and might
accurately symbolize his economic machinations. As for unemployment, his
'record' didn't document the real casualty toll in Puerto Rico, why would
you trust it on something else important?

The casualty numbers in Puerto Rico were under the jurisdiction of
Puerto Rico's officials, they did the counts. And the Labor Dept
has calculated unemployment numbers the same way for 50+ years.
There is ZERO evidence that has been corrupted in any way.
The low numbers are confirmed by all the help wanted signs I
see.

And he's been nothing like a Hitler. Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

Not according to a half dozen court decisions. He hasn't show he can handle
responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his intention). The detention centers
have been called 'concentration camps', you know.

Anyone can call anything whatever they want, that does not make it so.
That's a really, really bad example to bring up. The libs came up with
that one. It's offensive to Jews and all people who know what concentration
camps really were. These illegals and others being detained are well fed,
they have shelter and free medical care. They have water too, despite
the lie from AOC (I think it was her), that they are drinking water out
of toilets. Even the other libs, ministers, etc that were on that visit
said they saw nothing like that. I saw NBC interviewing people being
detained, all they spoke with said they were being treated OK. A mother
said she had food and diapers for her baby. But if any of that isn't
good enough, why don't these illegals just stay where they were?
Stop in Mexico, instead of coming here? Hello?

If you ignore all the drama, Trump's done a very good job.

If you ignore his drama, we've got a void in the White House.

That I agree with. It's been a reality TV show, like a frat house,
with Trump as the star. After all, he previously was a reality TV
star.

 

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in news:0cbc746a-8962-4d53-88fc-
137d3dc1665c@googlegroups.com:

And of course we have an armed citizenry who'd resist a Hitler, if
we ever made the mistake of electing one.


We sure illicitly put a Hitler wannabe in place.

As in NOT elected.

Good thing the dopey bastard is a complete buffoon.

And in the Twilight Zone world that has ensued since, I cannot
safely say that despite the lesson they/we should have learned that
it wouldn't or couldn't happen again. Despite all this information
age scrutiny and even advanced human psychology.

Wake Up, America!

Wake Up, World!

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy,

That;s mostly BS. GDP growth since Q1 2017 has averaged 2.6% at an
annual rate. In 2016, it was 2%, in 2014 2.9%. This 2.6 is nothing'
extraordinary, it's just continuation of the trend that started in 2009.
Under Reagan, a real leader and decent human being, we had quarter after
quarter of 4% GDP growth. One quarter we hit 8% and created 1.2 mil
new jobs in a quarter. Now that is something to crow about, but unlike
the orange shyster, Reagan didn't crow.




and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and
his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler Trump has vilified
the press, vilified anyone and anything that opposes him. Like Hitler
Trump has used vilifying minorities for his political purposes. And like
Hitler he lies and lies and lies.


Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

ROFL

What we just uncovered that he did with Ukraine proves that's a lie.
Trump wasn't interested in corruption in Ukraine, Trump wasn't interested
in Ukraine at all, until he saw a means for personal gain, to try to
help him win re-election. And then he used the power of the office to
withhold vital aid that Congress had approved, to pressure Ukraine to
conduct investigations, including into the Bidens.

If you haven't seen it, Biden's on video tape boasting that he
blackmailed another country into firing their equivalent of the
U.S.' Attorney General.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/_jyT1rnW9fA?feature=oembed

Should corruption by high U.S. officials not be investigated?

How is interfering in other countries' law enforcement our business?

Meanwhile, Biden's kid was getting >$50k a month from the country
where Biden was setting policy, from people the prosecutor was
investigating.

That's corrupt.

The president of the United States, our chief law enforcement officer,
isn't allowed to investigate corruption by high U.S. officials? Of
course he is -- the law requires him to.

And he isn't allowed to ask a foreign leader to cooperate with our
law enforcement agencies investigating a crime committed overseas?
Per a mutual cooperation treaty we have with the country for that
purpose?

Also included was a
demand to investigate Crowdstrike, a pulbic Us company that has nothing whatever to
do with Ukraine and to investigate the DNC server that Trump claims
was spirited away to Ukraine. Not only is he a criminal, he's also insane,
this is really, really bizarre conspiracy nut stuff. He should be impeached
just for being nuts.


The previous president broke laws left and right, making illegal
appointments, spying, defying immigration law, re-writing Obamacare
on the fly, making huge illegal payments to insurance companies,
etc. That was authoritarian; this president hasn't done that at all.

If there is a case in any of the above, why hasn't big mouth, big balls
Trump brought it? For that matter, why hasn't he locked up Hillary?

Trump's not a dictator; if he were, Hillary certainly would be
locked up or dead. But he's reliant on the process.

We're sending actresses to prison for greasing their kids' ways
into college. Meanwhile, Hillary diverts sensitive official e-mail
to a private server to (unlawfully) evade public disclosure laws,
destroys the e-mails when subpoena'd (those are objective facts),
operates a shady influence-peddling foundation (whose #1 foreign
contributor was Ukraine), etc.

If you ignore all the drama,

If you ignore all the drama, there would be no Trump presidency. It's
always drama about Trump, Trump, Trump.

I was skeptical when he was elected. But he's been excellent.

Cheers,
James Arthur

 

dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in
news:cb6fdb18-db6a-4fce-90d7-1623324b42d1@googlegroups.com:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4,
dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in
news:0cbc746a-8962-4d53-88fc- 137d3dc1665c@googlegroups.com:

And of course we have an armed citizenry who'd resist a
Hitler, if we ever made the mistake of electing one.


We sure illicitly put a Hitler wannabe in place.

As in NOT elected.

Good thing the dopey bastard is a complete buffoon.

And in the Twilight Zone world that has ensued since, I
cannot
safely say that despite the lesson they/we should have
learned that it wouldn't or couldn't happen again. Despite
all this information age scrutiny and even advanced human
psychology.

Wake Up, America!

Wake Up, World!

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred
the economy,

That;s mostly BS. GDP growth since Q1 2017 has averaged 2.6% at
an annual rate. In 2016, it was 2%, in 2014 2.9%. This 2.6 is
nothing' extraordinary, it's just continuation of the trend that
started in 2009. Under Reagan, a real leader and decent human
being, we had quarter after quarter of 4% GDP growth. One
quarter we hit 8% and created 1.2 mil new jobs in a quarter. Now
that is something to crow about, but unlike the orange shyster,
Reagan didn't crow.




and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth
Ave and his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler
Trump has vilified the press, vilified anyone and anything that
opposes him. Like Hitler Trump has used vilifying minorities for
his political purposes. And like Hitler he lies and lies and
lies.


Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

ROFL

What we just uncovered that he did with Ukraine proves that's a
lie. Trump wasn't interested in corruption in Ukraine, Trump
wasn't interested in Ukraine at all, until he saw a means for
personal gain, to try to help him win re-election. And then he
used the power of the office to withhold vital aid that Congress
had approved, to pressure Ukraine to conduct investigations,
including into the Bidens.

If you haven't seen it, Biden's on video tape boasting that he
blackmailed another country into firing their equivalent of the
U.S.' Attorney General.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/_jyT1rnW9fA?feature=oembed

Should corruption by high U.S. officials not be investigated?

How is interfering in other countries' law enforcement our
business?

Meanwhile, Biden's kid was getting >$50k a month from the country
where Biden was setting policy, from people the prosecutor was
investigating.

That's corrupt.

The president of the United States, our chief law enforcement
officer, isn't allowed to investigate corruption by high U.S.
officials? Of course he is -- the law requires him to.

One does not inquire with another nation if while in the execution
of one's office, one 'hears of' corruption.

If as you say his office 'requires it", then why was it not brought
to the fore with US INVESTIGATORS? Oh... that's right... because
that is NOT what the stupid bastard was doing!

And he isn't allowed to ask a foreign leader to cooperate with our
law enforcement agencies investigating a crime committed overseas?
Per a mutual cooperation treaty we have with the country for that
purpose?

That is NOT what the stupid bastard did. He did not bring it up
with OUR US investigators, whom at which point would perform
inquiries. He rattled off at the mouth as a nation's leader.

And NO, one does NOT 'ask' for assistance from another nation.
That is for the US INVESTIGATORS, which he DID NOT initiate any
actions from.

IOW, you could not be more full of shit, spin boy.

Also included was a
demand to investigate Crowdstrike, a pulbic Us company that has
nothing whatever to do with Ukraine and to investigate the DNC
server that Trump claims was spirited away to Ukraine. Not only
is he a criminal, he's also insane, this is really, really
bizarre conspiracy nut stuff. He should be impeached just for
being nuts.


The previous president broke laws left and right, making
illegal appointments, spying, defying immigration law,
re-writing Obamacare on the fly, making huge illegal payments
to insurance companies, etc. That was authoritarian; this
president hasn't done that at all.

If there is a case in any of the above, why hasn't big mouth, big
balls Trump brought it? For that matter, why hasn't he locked
up Hillary?

Trump's not a dictator; if he were, Hillary certainly would be
locked up or dead. But he's reliant on the process.

Trump should be locked up down at GITMO along with Pompeo and
Gulianni.

We're sending actresses to prison for greasing their kids' ways
into college.

Yep. That's how it works.

Meanwhile, Hillary diverts sensitive official
e-mail to a private server to (unlawfully) evade public disclosure
laws, destroys the e-mails when subpoena'd (those are objective
facts), operates a shady influence-peddling foundation (whose #1
foreign contributor was Ukraine), etc.

Nice try, putz. Looks like crybaby retard whimperring because when
he told his mommy, she laughed at him.

If you ignore all the drama,

If you ignore all the drama, there would be no Trump presidency.
It's always drama about Trump, Trump, Trump.

I was skeptical when he was elected. But he's been excellent.

You are an abject idiot with slit fully closed horse blinders on,
and you are talking out of your ass, because your mouth knows better.

 

Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:c4aecf61-5c20-478f-bd63-9e4bcf500154@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 1:07:34 AM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 4:41:40 PM UTC-7,
dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred
the economy, and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on
record.

What regulations were 'nonsense'? Spurs are a torture device,
and might accurately symbolize his economic machinations. As
for unemployment, his 'record' didn't document the real casualty
toll in Puerto Rico, why would you trust it on something else
important?

The casualty numbers in Puerto Rico were under the jurisdiction of
Puerto Rico's officials, they did the counts. And the Labor Dept
has calculated unemployment numbers the same way for 50+ years.
There is ZERO evidence that has been corrupted in any way.
The low numbers are confirmed by all the help wanted signs I
see.





And he's been nothing like a Hitler. Trump has been one of the
most scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

Not according to a half dozen court decisions. He hasn't show
he can handle responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his
intention). The detention centers have been called
'concentration camps', you know.

Anyone can call anything whatever they want, that does not make it
so.

Like lardassedretard4 does with his libs stupidity.

That's a really, really bad example to bring up. The libs
came up with that one.

Case in point. You are such a retarded putz, boy.

It's offensive to Jews and all people who
know what concentration camps really were.

You apparently forgot to ask the Japanese folks we 'sequestered'.
You are offensive to presume what someone else thinks is offensive.

These illegals and
others being detained are well fed, they have shelter and free
medical care.

So were those Japanese folks we discriminated against. It was
still a concentration camp setting. The fact is that it is YOU whom
has assigned a single meaning to the term, and you without a clue as
to what is happening.

They have water too, despite the lie from AOC (I
think it was her), that they are drinking water out of toilets.

You really do not understand what a bare floor dormatory works
like, eh?

Even the other libs, ministers, etc that were on that visit said
they saw nothing like that.

Do you think they would parade the facts of the problem?

I saw NBC interviewing people being
detained, all they spoke with said they were being treated OK.

Cherry picked and paid interviewees.

A
mother said she had food and diapers for her baby. But if any of
that isn't good enough, why don't these illegals just stay where
they were? Stop in Mexico, instead of coming here? Hello?

You really have no grasp of what running from an oppressive nation
is like, do ya, boy?

Look up the word refugee, you stupid fuck.

If you ignore all the drama, Trump's done a very good job.

If you ignore his drama, we've got a void in the White House.


That I agree with. It's been a reality TV show, like a frat
house, with Trump as the star. After all, he previously was a
reality TV star.

Yes, and he should get fine $1M for each profane infraction of the
broadcaster's oath he took (SWORE ALLEGIANCE TO).

The FCC should hang his retarded, nation staining ass out to dry.

 

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and
his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler Trump has vilified
the press, vilified anyone and anything that opposes him. Like Hitler
Trump has used vilifying minorities for his political purposes. And like
Hitler he lies and lies and lies.

Hitler was also a vegetarian -- does that make vegetarians 'Hitler'?
I think you're a little confused about what Hitler did.

The press has thoroughly discredited itself. When you look at the
source documents, as I have over and over, the New York Times and
Bezo's newspaper are not just selling stories, they're making them
up. Trump's 100% right about that.

He's certainly unconventional. But you can't help yourself, you
just gotta love this guy, this brash irreverent New Yorker we call
'Donald Trump'. He's like Rodney Dangerfield in Caddyshack, as others
have noted, upsetting all the blue-blooded self-imagined elite phonies
in their little pseudo-exclusive country club, Washington D.C. His
policy has been generally excellent. And the theater is great fun to
watch, too.

Cheers,
James Arthur

 

dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in
news:edb7a930-150d-435c-bd6a-0a3cd59870d9@googlegroups.com:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4,
dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth
Ave and his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler
Trump has vilified the press, vilified anyone and anything that
opposes him. Like Hitler Trump has used vilifying minorities for
his political purposes. And like Hitler he lies and lies and
lies.

Hitler was also a vegetarian -- does that make vegetarians
'Hitler'? I think you're a little confused about what Hitler did.

The press has thoroughly discredited itself. When you look at the
source documents, as I have over and over, the New York Times and
Bezo's newspaper are not just selling stories, they're making them
up. Trump's 100% right about that.

He's certainly unconventional. But you can't help yourself, you
just gotta love this guy, this brash irreverent New Yorker we call
'Donald Trump'. He's like Rodney Dangerfield in Caddyshack, as
others have noted, upsetting all the blue-blooded self-imagined
elite phonies in their little pseudo-exclusive country club,
Washington D.C. His policy has been generally excellent. And the
theater is great fun to watch, too.

Cheers,
James Arthur

You are a Twilight Zone level hypnotized brain damaged sheep.
It is really pathetic to watch so many folks claiming to be
intelligent, unable to admit their original mistake, and unable to
let go, despite glaring behavioral red flags smaking them upside the
head on a daily basis.

No, dumbfuck, Bezo is not making up news. But you seem to want to
spew falshoods with every line.

We have a stupid fucktard here, standing behind a criminal level
(for decades) NYC landlord, who even failed at that! It does not get
any more pathetic than an asswipe backing a jerk whom insults
everyone, and then you stupid fucks stand behind him anyway.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 11:04:56 AM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in news:0cbc746a-8962-4d53-88fc-
137d3dc1665c@googlegroups.com:

And of course we have an armed citizenry who'd resist a Hitler, if
we ever made the mistake of electing one.


We sure illicitly put a Hitler wannabe in place.

As in NOT elected.

Good thing the dopey bastard is a complete buffoon.

And in the Twilight Zone world that has ensued since, I cannot
safely say that despite the lesson they/we should have learned that
it wouldn't or couldn't happen again. Despite all this information
age scrutiny and even advanced human psychology.

Wake Up, America!

Wake Up, World!

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy,

That;s mostly BS. GDP growth since Q1 2017 has averaged 2.6% at an
annual rate. In 2016, it was 2%, in 2014 2.9%. This 2.6 is nothing'
extraordinary, it's just continuation of the trend that started in 2009.
Under Reagan, a real leader and decent human being, we had quarter after
quarter of 4% GDP growth. One quarter we hit 8% and created 1.2 mil
new jobs in a quarter. Now that is something to crow about, but unlike
the orange shyster, Reagan didn't crow.




and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and
his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler Trump has vilified
the press, vilified anyone and anything that opposes him. Like Hitler
Trump has used vilifying minorities for his political purposes. And like
Hitler he lies and lies and lies.


Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

ROFL

What we just uncovered that he did with Ukraine proves that's a lie.
Trump wasn't interested in corruption in Ukraine, Trump wasn't interested
in Ukraine at all, until he saw a means for personal gain, to try to
help him win re-election. And then he used the power of the office to
withhold vital aid that Congress had approved, to pressure Ukraine to
conduct investigations, including into the Bidens.

If you haven't seen it, Biden's on video tape boasting that he
blackmailed another country into firing their equivalent of the
U.S.' Attorney General.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/_jyT1rnW9fA?feature=oembed

I've seen it and from all the reasonable, responsible sources that I've
seen, it was not Biden that initiated the demand for his removal and
I don't think it was his idea to use the aid to get it done either.
Biden even said if you don't believe me about not getting the aid unless
the prosecutor goes, you can call OBama. I supposed next conspiracy
theory is that Obama wanted to protect Hunter Biden too?

It was the position of the OBama administration,
most of Europe and the IMF that this prosecutor was himself corrupt and
not doing anything to address corruption. Nor is there any evidence that
any prosecutor in Ukraine ever investigated the Bidens. They were
investigating corruption at Burisma, stuff that occurred or was in place
before Hunter Biden joined their board and there has been no indication
that any of that corruption ever involved Hunter Biden or Joe Biden.

Should corruption by high U.S. officials not be investigated?

Sure, absolutely, if there is evidence. That's why there is now an
impeachment inquiry into Trump apparently withholding US aid to Ukraine
to try to get them to conduct "investigations" that would benefit
Trump personally. And three of the four things he demanded be investigated
are straight out of tin foil hat conspiracy nonsense, ie Crowdstrike,
some unnamed wealthy Ukranian, and the DNC server being in Ukraine?
I mean, come on. This is totally insane.

If Trump believes there is evidence of corruption with the Bidens,
then why didn't he refer it to the DOJ/FBI? Instead he has his personal
attorney screwing around in Ukraine. That's where the crime would be,
a US crime. But the simple fact is Trump has no evidence of any crime.
He just doesn't understand that because something is a conflict of
interest, unethical, it does not necessarily make it a crime. What
the Bidens did, politicians of both parties have been doing for
decades. Some place like Ukraine, they give a plumb job or contract
to someone's relative, friend, etc, hoping to curry favor. If there
is a US law against that, please cite it. I'm all in favor of helping
to change that, tightening up the laws and reporting reqts, but I don't
see politicians in either party doing that. Gee, I wonder why?
And what has Trump done? He hired his daughter and son-in-law,
what's up with that?

How is interfering in other countries' law enforcement our business?

It is our business in corruption in the country is so bad that it's
getting in the way aid, the country needs assistance from us,
wants to expand it's business relationship with the US, Europe, IMF, etc.
From what I see, Biden did what he did consistent with the above and
US policy at the time. Should it be explored? Should we find documents,
testimony to show that was true? Absolutely.

Now ask your question of Trump, who demanded Crazytown investigations into
pure BS in Ukraine. the whacko actually believes that the DNC server
is over there. What's next? Calling up the governor of TX and demanding
he investigate how Ted Cruz's father was involved in the JFK assassination?

Meanwhile, Biden's kid was getting >$50k a month from the country
where Biden was setting policy, from people the prosecutor was
investigating.

That's corrupt.

It's business as usual, politicians here of both parties have been doing
it. Did Hunter get that job only because his father is VP? Sure.
How did Ivanka and Jared Kushner get their govt jobs?

The president of the United States, our chief law enforcement officer,
isn't allowed to investigate corruption by high U.S. officials? Of
course he is -- the law requires him to.

The big problems here are that Trump was obviously not interested in
corruption in Ukraine, unless the investigation of it helped him
politically and that TRump put his personal lawyer square in the middle
of it.

And he isn't allowed to ask a foreign leader to cooperate with our
law enforcement agencies investigating a crime committed overseas?
Per a mutual cooperation treaty we have with the country for that
purpose?

Ruddy is law enforcement? And again, there is zero evidence of any
actual crime. It looks like typical pay-to-play. Trump is only
interested because an investigation can benefit, Trump. IT's always
been all about Trump, Trump, Trump. Did you see any discussion about
possible corruption affecting the $390 mil in new aid? Any discussion
about Russia being in half the country? No, it was all Trump's personal
agenda, what can help him get re-elected.

Also included was a
demand to investigate Crowdstrike, a pulbic Us company that has nothing whatever to
do with Ukraine and to investigate the DNC server that Trump claims
was spirited away to Ukraine. Not only is he a criminal, he's also insane,
this is really, really bizarre conspiracy nut stuff. He should be impeached
just for being nuts.


The previous president broke laws left and right, making illegal
appointments, spying, defying immigration law, re-writing Obamacare
on the fly, making huge illegal payments to insurance companies,
etc. That was authoritarian; this president hasn't done that at all.

If there is a case in any of the above, why hasn't big mouth, big balls
Trump brought it? For that matter, why hasn't he locked up Hillary?

Trump's not a dictator; if he were, Hillary certainly would be
locked up or dead. But he's reliant on the process.

well, make up your mind. First Trump is the top of law enforcement, can
order up any investigation he pleases. There is evidence that Hillary
broke the law with her email server and classified info. So, why isn't
Trump prosecuting her? I remember all the "lock her ups". The answer
is she's not running against Trump, Biden is. Also, look at the timing.
This Biden stuff is nothing knew, yet Trump only decides to try to go
after the Bidens a year before an election when Biden is the leading
opponent.

We're sending actresses to prison for greasing their kids' ways
into college. Meanwhile, Hillary diverts sensitive official e-mail
to a private server to (unlawfully) evade public disclosure laws,

Go tell Trump and ask why he hasn't had his DOJ charge her.


> destroys the e-mails when subpoena'd (those are objective facts),

No, it's a lie. The emails were not destroyed by Hillary, they were
destroyed by an employee at the firm in Colorado that had hosted them.
The employee was interviewed by the FBI and he says that Hillary's
people had ordered it months earlier, after she had handed over her
govt emails, she ordered the personal ones deleted. He says he later
found a copy that had not been deleted and deleted it and that happened
after the subpoena. Now, if you can prove any of that is false, good luck.
It may be, who knows. But the FBI did check it out and could not find
anything to show that anything improper had happened.

operates a shady influence-peddling foundation (whose #1 foreign
contributor was Ukraine), etc.

i suspect that's a lie too. Cites please.

If you ignore all the drama,

If you ignore all the drama, there would be no Trump presidency. It's
always drama about Trump, Trump, Trump.

I was skeptical when he was elected. But he's been excellent.

Cheers,
James Arthur

He's been a shit show from even before the election. There is absolutely
nothing excellent, he's a lying shyster, a disgrace to the office and
country.

 

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:11:55 -0700 (PDT), Whoey Louie
<trader4@optonline.net> wrote:

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 1:07:34 AM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 4:41:40 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy, and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

What regulations were 'nonsense'? Spurs are a torture device, and might
accurately symbolize his economic machinations. As for unemployment, his
'record' didn't document the real casualty toll in Puerto Rico, why would
you trust it on something else important?

The casualty numbers in Puerto Rico were under the jurisdiction of
Puerto Rico's officials, they did the counts. And the Labor Dept
has calculated unemployment numbers the same way for 50+ years.
There is ZERO evidence that has been corrupted in any way.
The low numbers are confirmed by all the help wanted signs I
see.





And he's been nothing like a Hitler. Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

Not according to a half dozen court decisions. He hasn't show he can handle
responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his intention). The detention centers
have been called 'concentration camps', you know.

Anyone can call anything whatever they want, that does not make it so.
That's a really, really bad example to bring up. The libs came up with
that one. It's offensive to Jews and all people who know what concentration
camps really were. These illegals and others being detained are well fed,
they have shelter and free medical care.

And they're not being held against their will. They can leave at any
time.

They have water too, despite
the lie from AOC (I think it was her), that they are drinking water out
of toilets. Even the other libs, ministers, etc that were on that visit
said they saw nothing like that. I saw NBC interviewing people being
detained, all they spoke with said they were being treated OK. A mother
said she had food and diapers for her baby. But if any of that isn't
good enough, why don't these illegals just stay where they were?
Stop in Mexico, instead of coming here? Hello?

The toilets and sinks are one integrated stainless steel unit. The
"drinking out of the toilet" was a language thing but it worked so
well, AOC just kept up the lie (it's all the left can do).

If you ignore all the drama, Trump's done a very good job.

If you ignore his drama, we've got a void in the White House.


That I agree with. It's been a reality TV show, like a frat house,
with Trump as the star. After all, he previously was a reality TV
star.

He's done a great job. Pissing off you lefty snowflakes is just icing
on the cake.

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 10:10:47 PM UTC-4, k...@notreal.com wrote:

On Mon, 7 Oct 2019 07:11:55 -0700 (PDT), Whoey Louie
trader4@optonline.net> wrote:

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 1:07:34 AM UTC-4, whit3rd wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 4:41:40 PM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

He seems excellent to me. He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy, and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

What regulations were 'nonsense'? Spurs are a torture device, and might
accurately symbolize his economic machinations. As for unemployment, his
'record' didn't document the real casualty toll in Puerto Rico, why would
you trust it on something else important?

The casualty numbers in Puerto Rico were under the jurisdiction of
Puerto Rico's officials, they did the counts. And the Labor Dept
has calculated unemployment numbers the same way for 50+ years.
There is ZERO evidence that has been corrupted in any way.
The low numbers are confirmed by all the help wanted signs I
see.





And he's been nothing like a Hitler. Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

Not according to a half dozen court decisions. He hasn't show he can handle
responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his intention). The detention centers
have been called 'concentration camps', you know.

Anyone can call anything whatever they want, that does not make it so.
That's a really, really bad example to bring up. The libs came up with
that one. It's offensive to Jews and all people who know what concentration
camps really were. These illegals and others being detained are well fed,
they have shelter and free medical care.

And they're not being held against their will. They can leave at any
time.


They have water too, despite
the lie from AOC (I think it was her), that they are drinking water out
of toilets. Even the other libs, ministers, etc that were on that visit
said they saw nothing like that. I saw NBC interviewing people being
detained, all they spoke with said they were being treated OK. A mother
said she had food and diapers for her baby. But if any of that isn't
good enough, why don't these illegals just stay where they were?
Stop in Mexico, instead of coming here? Hello?

The toilets and sinks are one integrated stainless steel unit. The
"drinking out of the toilet" was a language thing but it worked so
well, AOC just kept up the lie (it's all the left can do).







If you ignore all the drama, Trump's done a very good job.

If you ignore his drama, we've got a void in the White House.


That I agree with. It's been a reality TV show, like a frat house,
with Trump as the star. After all, he previously was a reality TV
star.

He's done a great job. Pissing off you lefty snowflakes is just icing
on the cake.

I'm not a lefty, I'm an honest conservative that won't sell my soul to
the despicable orange clown. What kind of "conservative" praises despots
like KJU, Duterte and Putin? Undermines NATO and says the US may not honor
our NATO treaty to come to the aid of a NATO member that is attacked?
Runs $1 tril deficits, doubling the deficit, the first trillion deficits
since the 2008 debacle. Insults was heroes and Gold Star mothers?
Kisses the ass of Putin and lobbies for Russia to be re-admitted to the G7?
Uses his office to try to get foreign countries to start investigations
into bizarre conspiracy BS and into his opponents? Impulsively green-lights
Turkey to invade Syria and kill Kurds, who were our allies in Iraq and Syria
until two days ago. Lies, and lies and lies?

That's not a conservative, not a Republican, not even a decent human being,
but sadly he's hijacked the GOP, destroyed it and 40% still follow him.
Those are the 40% he knew were fools, when he said he could shoot someone
on Fifth Ave and they would still support him. I left the GOP a few months
ago, I will no longer be associated with this disgusting display. The fool
GOP politicians are now reduced to either saying that his crimes don't matter
or that he was just kidding.


This clown needs to be removed, he will be impeached now for sure. But it's
too late for the Republican Party, I think it's finished. Trump has gutted
it of all it's principles, of it's integrity, and it's soul.

 

[whit3rd]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 7:10:47 PM UTC-7, k...@notreal.com wrote:

He hasn't show he can handle
responsible baby-sitting (if that is truly his intention). The detention centers
have been called 'concentration camps', you know.

Anyone can call anything whatever they want, that does not make it so.
That's a really, really bad example to bring up. The libs came up with
that one. It's offensive to Jews and all people who know what concentration
camps really were. These illegals and others being detained are well fed,
they have shelter and free medical care.

And they're not being held against their will. They can leave at any
time.

Infants, in detention, separated from their parents, can leave at any time?

Liar.

 

[whit3rd]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 8:04:56 AM UTC-7, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

And he isn't allowed to ask a foreign leader to cooperate with our
law enforcement agencies investigating a crime committed overseas?

He isn't to falsely accuse American citizens with business abroad of unspecified
'crimes' in an attempt to cause a witchhunt. The domestic equivalent crime, 'swatting',
has had a few prosecutions.

... Hillary diverts sensitive official e-mail
to a private server to (unlawfully) evade public disclosure laws,

Nonsense, just like it was the last dozen times. Hilary had e-mail correspondence going
through LOTS of servers, because that's the normal way e-mail is carried. It wasn't
her official work, though, just random chitchat (and sales announcements,
etc.).

When you send e-mail, you direct it through servers. That's what e-mail IS. That isn't
'diversion', it's 'routing'.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 2:04:56 AM UTC+11, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 3:43:47 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
dagmargoodboat@yahoo.com wrote in news:0cbc746a-8962-4d53-88fc-
137d3dc1665c@googlegroups.com:

And of course we have an armed citizenry who'd resist a Hitler, if
we ever made the mistake of electing one.

We sure illicitly put a Hitler wannabe in place.

As in NOT elected.

Good thing the dopey bastard is a complete buffoon.

And in the Twilight Zone world that has ensued since, I cannot
safely say that despite the lesson they/we should have learned that
it wouldn't or couldn't happen again. Despite all this information
age scrutiny and even advanced human psychology.

Wake Up, America!

Wake Up, World!

He seems excellent to me.

He would. He's another right-wing lunatic.

He's gotten lower marginal corporate
taxes through, stripped away nonsensical regulations, spurred the
economy,

That;s mostly BS. GDP growth since Q1 2017 has averaged 2.6% at an
annual rate. In 2016, it was 2%, in 2014 2.9%. This 2.6 is nothing'
extraordinary, it's just continuation of the trend that started in 2009..
Under Reagan, a real leader and decent human being, we had quarter after
quarter of 4% GDP growth. One quarter we hit 8% and created 1.2 mil
new jobs in a quarter. Now that is something to crow about, but unlike
the orange shyster, Reagan didn't crow.

and gotten black unemployment to the lowest on record.

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and
his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler Trump has vilified
the press, vilified anyone and anything that opposes him. Like Hitler
Trump has used vilifying minorities for his political purposes. And like
Hitler he lies and lies and lies.

Trump has been one of the most
scrupulously law-abiding presidents I've ever seen.

ROFL

What we just uncovered that he did with Ukraine proves that's a lie.
Trump wasn't interested in corruption in Ukraine, Trump wasn't interested
in Ukraine at all, until he saw a means for personal gain, to try to
help him win re-election. And then he used the power of the office to
withhold vital aid that Congress had approved, to pressure Ukraine to
conduct investigations, including into the Bidens.

If you haven't seen it, Biden's on video tape boasting that he
blackmailed another country into firing their equivalent of the
U.S.' Attorney General.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/_jyT1rnW9fA?feature=oembed

Biden and the International Monetary Fund, amongst others - the problem was that guy wasn't investigating corrupt behavior being exhibited by Ukraine's politicians. They were pressuring the Ukraine to clean up it's own house, as opposed to trying to get dirt on any of Biden's US political opponents.

Should corruption by high U.S. officials not be investigated?

How is interfering in other countries' law enforcement our business?

If US aid is being misappropriated by corrupt officials and politicians it does become your business.

Meanwhile, Biden's kid was getting >$50k a month from the country
where Biden was setting policy, from people the prosecutor was
investigating.

That's corrupt.

Not necessarily. And the problem was that that particular prosecutor was failing to prosecute politicians (not industrialists) who were corrupt.

The president of the United States, our chief law enforcement officer,
isn't allowed to investigate corruption by high U.S. officials? Of
course he is -- the law requires him to.

He isn't allowed to block Congress-appropriated aid in an effort to encourage it, and Biden was any kind of high US official at the time. Being an ex-vice president, and the current front-runner to oppose Trump in 2020 doesn't make you a US official.

And he isn't allowed to ask a foreign leader to cooperate with our
law enforcement agencies investigating a crime committed overseas?
Per a mutual cooperation treaty we have with the country for that
purpose?

He not allowed to block Congress-appropriated aid in an effort to encourage it.

And there's not a whit of evidence that either Biden committed any crime. Trump and his colleagues have had some rather dubious links with people from the ex-Soviet Union, and the Mueller investigation put a couple of those colleagues into prison for them, but neither Biden seems to have been on that kind of gravy train.

Also included was a
demand to investigate Crowdstrike, a public US company that has nothing whatever to do with Ukraine and to investigate the DNC server that Trump claims
was spirited away to Ukraine. Not only is he a criminal, he's also insane, this is really, really bizarre conspiracy nut stuff. He should be impeached just for being nuts.

The previous president broke laws left and right, making illegal
appointments, spying, defying immigration law, re-writing Obamacare
on the fly, making huge illegal payments to insurance companies,
etc. That was authoritarian; this president hasn't done that at all.

If there is a case in any of the above, why hasn't big mouth, big balls
Trump brought it? For that matter, why hasn't he locked up Hillary?

Trump's not a dictator; if he were, Hillary certainly would be
locked up or dead.

Probably not. Trump lost interest as soon as the electoral college gave him what he wanted (and didn't deserve).

> But he's reliant on the process.

He lacks the kind of attention span that would let him find out what the process might be.

We're sending actresses to prison for greasing their kids' ways
into college. Meanwhile, Hillary diverts sensitive official e-mail
to a private server to (unlawfully) evade public disclosure laws,
destroys the e-mails when subpoena'd (those are objective facts),
operates a shady influence-peddling foundation (whose #1 foreign
contributor was Ukraine), etc.

James Arthur isn't all that sane on the subject. His take on lot of the Obama administrations actions do owe a lot to far-right-wing myth-making.

If you ignore all the drama,

If you ignore all the drama, there would be no Trump presidency. It's
always drama about Trump, Trump, Trump.

I was skeptical when he was elected. But he's been excellent.

He done most of the stuff that the Koch brothers hoped he would - not from conviction, since his attention span isn't long enough to let him get convinced of anything, but because he knows enough to pander to the interests of people who have a lot more money than he does.

This makes him an excellent right-wing door-mat. The kind of person that Alexander Hamilton assured the country that the electoral college would block..

Like most of the rest of the US founding tax evaders, he wasn't too bright. Probably clever enough to know that he was lying in that particular instance - the electoral college was never anything more than an another bribe for the smaller states, but not bright enough to realise that it didn't offer the smaller states states anything worth having (unlike the Senate, which has been copied in other, more recent, constitutions).

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 1:02:02 AM UTC+11, Whoey Louie wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 11:22:38 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d9223256-d3f3-410a-
be72-b8bfc8ef85f7@googlegroups.com:

Most of them are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction
and/or mental illness.

Nice job of being Trumplike, putz!

Social stigma much?

It's not stigma, it's fact, stupid.

A stigma is a mark of disgrace. That fact that you've earned one is just a fact. There's no contradiction involved.

The assertion that most of the homeless "are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction and/or mental illness" marks you as a particular sort of ill-informed right-wing nitwit, not that we needed to be reminded of that depressing fact.

Wrong, always wrong.

Your not going to solve the problem, help reduce the homeless population
by ignoring the basic facts.

Right wing nitwits don't seem to see the irony involved in that kind of assertion. They won't spend money on disinterested observation to collect basic facts, but are happy to tell people who have done that kind of work that their results "ignore the basic facts" which is to say, don't reflect standard right-wing misconceptions.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 3:10:48 AM UTC+11, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 8:06:25 PM UTC-4, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 7:41:40 PM UTC-4, dagmarg...@yahoo.com wrote:

And he's been nothing like a Hitler.

Actually he has. Like Hitler, Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Ave and
his trumptards would still support him. Like Hitler Trump has vilified
the press, vilified anyone and anything that opposes him. Like Hitler
Trump has used vilifying minorities for his political purposes. And like
Hitler he lies and lies and lies.

Hitler was also a vegetarian -- does that make vegetarians 'Hitler'?

There's no suggestion that Trump is identical to Hitler - for a start Hitler was much better read - so this is one more of James Arthur's straw man arguments.

> I think you're a little confused about what Hitler did.

Why should you think that? I can see why you make the claim, purely for rhetorical effect, and it is one more mark of your contempt for the people you are trying to persuade.

The press has thoroughly discredited itself. When you look at the
source documents, as I have over and over, the New York Times and
Bezo's newspaper are not just selling stories, they're making them
up.

James Arthur has a way of seeing what he wants to see. If the main stream media doesn't look at the facts from his point of view - and ignore all the facts he doesn't like - they discredit themselves, at least from his bizarre perspective.

> Trump's 100% right about that.

Trump hasn't got a sufficiently consistent world view to be 100% right about anything.

He's certainly unconventional. But you can't help yourself, you
just gotta love this guy, this brash irreverent New Yorker we call
'Donald Trump'.

You left out crooked, incompetent, and egomaniac.

These are features that make him unattractive to more perceptive observers. You and John Larkin don't seem to notice them.

He's like Rodney Dangerfield in Caddyshack, as others
have noted, upsetting all the blue-blooded self-imagined elite phonies
in their little pseudo-exclusive country club, Washington D.C.

He also upsets quite a few people who are members of the real elite that also hangs around Washington DC. They don't happen to share James Arthur's bizarre delusions, so he pays no attention to their opinions.

> His policy has been generally excellent.

James Arthur seems to have had money (indirectly) from the Koch brothers to help astro-turf the Republican party into the Tea Party dominated disaster that couldn't find a better nomination for president that Donald Trump. His idea of "excellence" matches most people idea of "raving right-wing lunacy".

> And the theater is great fun to watch, too.

Like the Three Stooges, though the intellectual content isn't quite as high..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Three_Stooges

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

[Whoey Louie]

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 11:57:39 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 1:02:02 AM UTC+11, Whoey Louie wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 11:22:38 PM UTC-4, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Whoey Louie <trader4@optonline.net> wrote in news:d9223256-d3f3-410a-
be72-b8bfc8ef85f7@googlegroups.com:

Most of them are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction
and/or mental illness.

Nice job of being Trumplike, putz!

Social stigma much?

It's not stigma, it's fact, stupid.

A stigma is a mark of disgrace. That fact that you've earned one is just a fact. There's no contradiction involved.

The assertion that most of the homeless "are homeless because of drug or alcohol addiction and/or mental illness" marks you as a particular sort of ill-informed right-wing nitwit, not that we needed to be reminded of that depressing fact.

It's a very basic fact, stupid.

Wrong, always wrong.

Your not going to solve the problem, help reduce the homeless population
by ignoring the basic facts.

Right wing nitwits don't seem to see the irony involved in that kind of assertion.

Libs just deny the basic facts and base their decisions instead on feelings
and emotions. Thanks for demonstrating that again for all.

 

Lardassed Louie <lardytard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:20526094-4bca-4e6e-a1c5-a6f3f311b0f7@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, October 7, 2019 at 11:57:39 PM UTC-4, Bill Sloman
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 8, 2019 at 1:02:02 AM UTC+11, Whoey Louie
wrote:
On Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 11:22:38 PM UTC-4,
DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:
Lardassed Louie <lardytard4@optonline.net> wrote in
news:d9223256-d3f3-410a- be72-b8bfc8ef85f7@googlegroups.com:

Most of them are homeless because of drug or alcohol
addiction
and/or mental illness.

Nice job of being Trumplike, putz!

Social stigma much?

It's not stigma, it's fact, stupid.

A stigma is a mark of disgrace. That fact that you've earned one
is just a fact. There's no contradiction involved.

The assertion that most of the homeless "are homeless because of
drug or alcohol addiction and/or mental illness" marks you as a
particular sort of ill-informed right-wing nitwit, not that we
needed to be reminded of that depressing fact.

It's a very basic fact, stupid.

No, it is not a very basic fact. It is not even any fact at all,
stupid.

Ask the folks of Rochester New York if they were addicted when
Polaroid and Kodak pulled out and they all lost jobs and homes.

You take stupid non-stat boy to an all new low, boy.

Wrong, always wrong.

Your not going to solve the problem, help reduce the homeless
population by ignoring the basic facts.

Right wing nitwits don't seem to see the irony involved in that
kind of assertion.

Libs just deny the basic facts and base their decisions instead on
feelings and emotions. Thanks for demonstrating that again for
all.

Another couple of retarded assumptions, by the s.e.d grand
assumption retard.

There is a myriad of reasons why our homeless got that way, and you
only hit on a couple, so that decidedly does NOT count as "most of".
And THAT decidedly pegs you as the total nitwit you have been
showing yourself to be.