J
John Doe
Guest
Another Australian troll...
--
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
--
Phil Allison <pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
OT: The media encouraging Ukrainians to attack Russian soldiers......
W
whit3rd
Guest
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 7:44:44 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
> Idiot...
Accompanied by no facts whatever... I guess facts wouldn\'t impress the
KGB officer looking over John Doe\'s shoulder
Fatuous, and false.
History defines parts of our reality. whit3rd noted historic facts
> Idiot...
Accompanied by no facts whatever... I guess facts wouldn\'t impress the
KGB officer looking over John Doe\'s shoulder
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 6:43:46 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
But of course in reality there is no such thing as a \"war crime\".
Fatuous, and false.
History defines parts of our reality. whit3rd noted historic facts
Who makes \"war crime\" law? The winner of the last war.
Well, no. In the case of WW II Germany, it was prosecution under German
law that was definitive. If it was illegal under German law to round up
a few dozen citizens and execute them without trial, then it was illegal
in German-held territories. Effective war tactics, while brutal, were
not found to be illegal (notably, Otto Skorzeny was not prosecuted for war crimes).
There are treaties on treatment of prisoners of war, for example, that
are also enforceable law. There are US examples of conviction of US
military jailers for such things, from Iraq.
J
John Doe
Guest
Go help Ukraine defend itself against Russia.
Being a keyboard cheerleader doesn\'t help Ukrainians.
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
Being a keyboard cheerleader doesn\'t help Ukrainians.
whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 7:44:44 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Idiot...
Accompanied by no facts whatever... I guess facts wouldn\'t impress the
KGB officer looking over John Doe\'s shoulder
whit3rd <whi...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 6:43:46 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
But of course in reality there is no such thing as a \"war crime\".
Fatuous, and false.
History defines parts of our reality. whit3rd noted historic facts
Who makes \"war crime\" law? The winner of the last war.
Well, no. In the case of WW II Germany, it was prosecution under German
law that was definitive. If it was illegal under German law to round up
a few dozen citizens and execute them without trial, then it was
illegal
in German-held territories. Effective war tactics, while brutal, were
not found to be illegal (notably, Otto Skorzeny was not prosecuted for
war crimes).
There are treaties on treatment of prisoners of war, for example, that
are also enforceable law. There are US examples of conviction of US
military jailers for such things, from Iraq.
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 14-Mar-22 4:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a judgement
to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war crime.
Sylvia.
Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing
against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a judgement
to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war crime.
Sylvia.
J
John Doe
Guest
I said civilians attacking soldiers LEADS to \"war crimes\".
Of course FOOLISHNESS is not a war crime, it\'s just FOOLISH.
Encouraging such FOOLISHNESS is CRIMINAL unless you are a
non-consequential blowhard.
How can any grown-up be THAT stupid?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
Of course FOOLISHNESS is not a war crime, it\'s just FOOLISH.
Encouraging such FOOLISHNESS is CRIMINAL unless you are a
non-consequential blowhard.
How can any grown-up be THAT stupid?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
On 14-Mar-22 4:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing
against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a judgement
to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war crime.
Sylvia.
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 4:16:07 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> Cannibal leftists love destruction and death.
Since whole idea of \"cannibal leftists\" is an invention of John Doe\'s diseased brain, he\'s the only person who can tell us about them.
Identifying real people as \"cannibal leftists\" is known as \"projection\". Since they don\'t actually correspond to John Doe\'s demented delusions, it\'s not to be taken seriously.
<snipped more fatuous nonsense>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
> Cannibal leftists love destruction and death.
Since whole idea of \"cannibal leftists\" is an invention of John Doe\'s diseased brain, he\'s the only person who can tell us about them.
Identifying real people as \"cannibal leftists\" is known as \"projection\". Since they don\'t actually correspond to John Doe\'s demented delusions, it\'s not to be taken seriously.
<snipped more fatuous nonsense>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 4:18:04 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
> Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
John Doe\'s ideas about the vast superiority of the invading Russian forces over the Ukranian army and it\'s auxiliaries are worth about as much as all his other demented delusions. He\'s the prime example of foolishness on show around here.
<snipped more foolishness>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
> Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
John Doe\'s ideas about the vast superiority of the invading Russian forces over the Ukranian army and it\'s auxiliaries are worth about as much as all his other demented delusions. He\'s the prime example of foolishness on show around here.
<snipped more foolishness>
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:17:15 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
John Doe needs to ask?
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Sylvia Else <syl...@email.invalid> wrote:
On 14-Mar-22 4:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing
against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a judgement
to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war crime.
I said civilians attacking soldiers LEADS to \"war crimes\".
Of course FOOLISHNESS is not a war crime, it\'s just FOOLISH.
Encouraging such FOOLISHNESS is CRIMINAL unless you are a non-consequential blowhard.
How can any grown-up be THAT stupid?
John Doe needs to ask?
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
S
Sylvia Else
Guest
On 14-Mar-22 5:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
You said:
\"Sometimes the media encourages Ukrainians to throw Molotov cocktails at
Russian soldiers...
Doesn\'t that lead to WAR CRIMES??? \"
The only obvious possible outcome of encouraging Ukrainians to throw
Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers is that Ukrainians will throw
Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers.
If that\'s not the alleged war crime you were referring to, then you need
more than a rhetorical question to support your position.
Sylvia.
I said civilians attacking soldiers LEADS to \"war crimes\".
Of course FOOLISHNESS is not a war crime, it\'s just FOOLISH.
Encouraging such FOOLISHNESS is CRIMINAL unless you are a
non-consequential blowhard.
How can any grown-up be THAT stupid?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
On 14-Mar-22 4:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but flailing
against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a judgement
to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war crime.
Sylvia.
You said:
\"Sometimes the media encourages Ukrainians to throw Molotov cocktails at
Russian soldiers...
Doesn\'t that lead to WAR CRIMES??? \"
The only obvious possible outcome of encouraging Ukrainians to throw
Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers is that Ukrainians will throw
Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers.
If that\'s not the alleged war crime you were referring to, then you need
more than a rhetorical question to support your position.
Sylvia.
J
John Doe
Guest
Probably could have been written better.
S
server
Guest
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote in
news:j98k4vF4r7aU1@mid.individual.net:
You all seem to forget one word here...
INVADING Russian soldiers. Meaning that ALL of THEIR actions are
crimes and ALL the Ukraine people come up with to repel them are NOT
crimes!
Worried about a burning cocktail? These invading assholes need a
few MOABs dropped onto their asses along with a few incindiary bombs.
Up and down the line. Let the rest surrender as they see the flames
and explosions heading their way. Just like Saddam\'s elite guard.
First the troops pay, then the head of the snake too. BUNKER BUSTERS
for Putin AT the Kremlin! Blow that war mongering building to hell.
news:j98k4vF4r7aU1@mid.individual.net:
On 14-Mar-22 5:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
I said civilians attacking soldiers LEADS to \"war crimes\".
Of course FOOLISHNESS is not a war crime, it\'s just FOOLISH.
Encouraging such FOOLISHNESS is CRIMINAL unless you are a
non-consequential blowhard.
How can any grown-up be THAT stupid?
Sylvia Else <sylvia@email.invalid> wrote:
On 14-Mar-22 4:17 pm, John Doe wrote:
Self-defense is a basic human right (I\'m a firm believer), but
flailing against a vastly superior enemy is FOOLISH.
Whether or not it is foolish, which, as Phil pointed out, is a
judgement to be made by the people concerned, it is not a war
crime.
Sylvia.
You said:
\"Sometimes the media encourages Ukrainians to throw Molotov
cocktails at Russian soldiers...
Doesn\'t that lead to WAR CRIMES??? \"
The only obvious possible outcome of encouraging Ukrainians to
throw Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers is that Ukrainians
will throw Molotov cocktails at Russian soldiers.
If that\'s not the alleged war crime you were referring to, then
you need more than a rhetorical question to support your position.
You all seem to forget one word here...
INVADING Russian soldiers. Meaning that ALL of THEIR actions are
crimes and ALL the Ukraine people come up with to repel them are NOT
crimes!
Worried about a burning cocktail? These invading assholes need a
few MOABs dropped onto their asses along with a few incindiary bombs.
Up and down the line. Let the rest surrender as they see the flames
and explosions heading their way. Just like Saddam\'s elite guard.
First the troops pay, then the head of the snake too. BUNKER BUSTERS
for Putin AT the Kremlin! Blow that war mongering building to hell.
F
Flyguy
Guest
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 4:46:40 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
You are a Putin apologist - there are PLENTY of CLEAR war crimes committed by Putin and his lackies.
Sometimes the media encourages Ukrainians to throw Molotov cocktails at
Russian soldiers...
Doesn\'t that lead to WAR CRIMES???
Dirty laundry...
You are a Putin apologist - there are PLENTY of CLEAR war crimes committed by Putin and his lackies.
J
John Doe
Guest
Nope, no apologies here.
Like it or not... I\'m presenting the non-Western propagandist side of the
story.
The only justification I can think of for NATO\'s aggressive expansion,
their attempt to establish a first strike capability against Russia...
Someday, one of the major powers (or conceivably a minor power) will
develop a super sinister all-powerful weapon (for example, a device that
disables nukes) and take over the world. Would Russia employ it against
the rest of the world? Probably. So would the other powers.
Either that, or the slow march of the New World Order takes over. In
either case, eventually there will be one world government. That\'s when
the screws begin to tighten on ordinary people.
So, oh well.
--
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
Like it or not... I\'m presenting the non-Western propagandist side of the
story.
The only justification I can think of for NATO\'s aggressive expansion,
their attempt to establish a first strike capability against Russia...
Someday, one of the major powers (or conceivably a minor power) will
develop a super sinister all-powerful weapon (for example, a device that
disables nukes) and take over the world. Would Russia employ it against
the rest of the world? Probably. So would the other powers.
Either that, or the slow march of the New World Order takes over. In
either case, eventually there will be one world government. That\'s when
the screws begin to tighten on ordinary people.
So, oh well.
--
Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com> wrote:
X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:10d:b0:2e1:db41:66d with SMTP id u13-20020a05622a010d00b002e1db41066dmr2417392qtw.670.1647492534887; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:141:0:b0:2dd:c7:f676 with SMTP id 62-20020a810141000000b002dd00c7f676mr3686764ywb.487.1647492534672; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.misty.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 21:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <t0klim$h8f$2@dont-email.me
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2600:6c54:5340:1aa4:901c:ed83:f3fa:2130; posting-account=igyo_woAAAAxdxQHjAB2cSS7_KQghTOv
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2600:6c54:5340:1aa4:901c:ed83:f3fa:2130
References: <t0klim$h8f$2@dont-email.me
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <33b70c03-7765-4637-b7d9-d2706444e8fdn@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: OT: The media encouraging Ukrainians to attack Russian soldiers...
From: Flyguy <soar2morrow@yahoo.com
Injection-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 04:48:54 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=\"UTF-8\"
Lines: 8
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:663285
On Sunday, March 13, 2022 at 4:46:40 AM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Sometimes the media encourages Ukrainians to throw Molotov cocktails at
Russian soldiers...
Doesn\'t that lead to WAR CRIMES???
Dirty laundry...
You are a Putin apologist - there are PLENTY of CLEAR war crimes committed by Putin and his lackies.
E
Ed Lee
Guest
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 10:02:46 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
How do you reckon that would work? Disable launching or disable radiation? If you can build it, perhaps you will get the Nobel prize.
Depends on whether this one world government is democratic or not.
Nope, no apologies here.
Like it or not... I\'m presenting the non-Western propagandist side of the
story.
The only justification I can think of for NATO\'s aggressive expansion,
their attempt to establish a first strike capability against Russia...
Someday, one of the major powers (or conceivably a minor power) will
develop a super sinister all-powerful weapon (for example, a device that
disables nukes)
How do you reckon that would work? Disable launching or disable radiation? If you can build it, perhaps you will get the Nobel prize.
and take over the world. Would Russia employ it against
the rest of the world? Probably. So would the other powers.
Either that, or the slow march of the New World Order takes over. In
either case, eventually there will be one world government. That\'s when
the screws begin to tighten on ordinary people.
Depends on whether this one world government is democratic or not.
E
Edward Hernandez
Guest
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:02:39 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t0ufdf$a7o$1@dont-email.me>).
This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
uPjhD6mvvEIK
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:02:39 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
<t0ufdf$a7o$1@dont-email.me>).
This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
uPjhD6mvvEIK
J
John Doe
Guest
Ed Lee <edward.ming.lee@gmail.com> wrote:
I have no idea how. Superduper Patriot missiles? But that\'s probably very
messy and still destroys much life on this planet.
It could involve biological weapons. Immunizing their own people and then
letting it loose. There are all sorts of possibilities.
\"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men
are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority.\" (Lord Acton)
https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165acton.html
Power is sucked up into the top. Eventually when there is only one world
government, there will be no \"balance of power\". When governments are no
longer played against each other, that will be it for the citizenry.
In some ways, seems that happens already, governments cooperate against the
people, in secret. When there is only one world government, it gets ugly.
There is a solution (however difficult to believe), but it\'s not man-made.
John Doe wrote:
Nope, no apologies here.
Like it or not... I\'m presenting the non-Western propagandist side of
the story.
The only justification I can think of for NATO\'s aggressive expansion,
their attempt to establish a first strike capability against Russia...
Someday, one of the major powers (or conceivably a minor power) will
develop a super sinister all-powerful weapon (for example, a device
that disables nukes)
How do you reckon that would work? Disable launching or disable
radiation? If you can build it, perhaps you will get the Nobel prize.
I have no idea how. Superduper Patriot missiles? But that\'s probably very
messy and still destroys much life on this planet.
It could involve biological weapons. Immunizing their own people and then
letting it loose. There are all sorts of possibilities.
and take over the world. Would Russia employ it against the rest of the
world? Probably. So would the other powers.
Either that, or the slow march of the New World Order takes over. In
either case, eventually there will be one world government. That\'s when
the screws begin to tighten on ordinary people.
Depends on whether this one world government is democratic or not.
\"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men
are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not
authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of
corruption by authority.\" (Lord Acton)
https://history.hanover.edu/courses/excerpts/165acton.html
Power is sucked up into the top. Eventually when there is only one world
government, there will be no \"balance of power\". When governments are no
longer played against each other, that will be it for the citizenry.
In some ways, seems that happens already, governments cooperate against the
people, in secret. When there is only one world government, it gets ugly.
There is a solution (however difficult to believe), but it\'s not man-made.
J
John Doe
Guest
Poor liddle Eddie got spanked and just can\'t get over it.
Unless Eddie is nym-shifting, it has never posted anything NORMAL
except when it got a severe spanking...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE
Is Eddie a nym-shifting troll, or a newbie netcop wannabe?
See also...
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!
Spanked Eddie...
--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:
Unless Eddie is nym-shifting, it has never posted anything NORMAL
except when it got a severe spanking...
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.electronics.repair/c/MesPLcGU4BE
Is Eddie a nym-shifting troll, or a newbie netcop wannabe?
See also...
Peter Weiner <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward H. <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com>
Eddie is an example for all newbies. Don\'t get spanked!
Spanked Eddie...
--
Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com> wrote:
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.freedyn.de!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer01.ams4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!fx02.ams4.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Edward Hernandez <dtgamer99@gmail.com
Subject: Re: OT: The media encouraging Ukrainians to attack Russian soldiers...
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,free.spam
References: <t0klim$h8f$2@dont-email.me> <33b70c03-7765-4637-b7d9-d2706444e8fdn@googlegroups.com> <t0ufdf$a7o$1@dont-email.me
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <hNzYJ.942767$u91.585492@usenetxs.com
X-Complaints-To: https://www.astraweb.com/aup
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:36:13 UTC
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:36:13 GMT
X-Received-Bytes: 1539
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org sci.electronics.design:663291 free.spam:17588
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
NOBODY likes the John Doe troll\'s contentless spam.
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has continued to post incorrectly
formatted USENET articles that are devoid of content (latest example on
Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:02:39 -0000 (UTC) in message-id
t0ufdf$a7o$1@dont-email.me>).
This posting is a public service announcement for any google groups
readers who happen by to point out that the John Doe troll does not even
follow the rules it uses to troll other posters.
uPjhD6mvvEIK
E
Edward Hernandez
Guest
The John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:41:32 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t0uhmc$a7o$6@dont-email.me>.
Yi6S5XS5+QKJ
<sdhn7c$pkp$4@dont-email.me>:
> The troll doesn\'t even know how to format a USENET post...
And the John Doe troll stated the following in message-id
<sg3kr7$qt5$1@dont-email.me>:
The reason Bozo cannot figure out how to get Google to keep from
breaking its lines in inappropriate places is because Bozo is
CLUELESS...
And yet, the clueless John Doe troll has itself posted yet another
incorrectly formatted USENET posting on Thu, 17 Mar 2022 05:41:32 -0000
(UTC) in message-id <t0uhmc$a7o$6@dont-email.me>.
Yi6S5XS5+QKJ
A
Anthony William Sloman
Guest
On Thursday, March 17, 2022 at 4:40:48 PM UTC+11, John Doe wrote:
<snip>
In the opinion of every last demented conspiracy theory enthusiast. Sorry, John, there is no Deep State. It is as mythical as Santa Claus.
> When there is only one world government, it gets ugly.
John Doe\'s idea of the future is about as reliable as his ideas about the past. He doesn\'t understand what has happened and extrapolates his delusions into a future that\'s even more implausible than his ideas about what is going on at the moment.
The \"world government\" he\'s so worried about would sit on top of a whole lot of regional governments, in the same way that the US federal government coexists with fifty one state governments. Getting them coordinated to act against the people would be a neat trick .
> There is a solution (however difficult to believe), but it\'s not man-made..
Granting John Doe\'s expressed desires, he probably thinks that a random noise generator is what we all need, and he does inject a lot of it here.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
<snip>
In some ways, seems that happens already, governments cooperate against the
people, in secret.
In the opinion of every last demented conspiracy theory enthusiast. Sorry, John, there is no Deep State. It is as mythical as Santa Claus.
> When there is only one world government, it gets ugly.
John Doe\'s idea of the future is about as reliable as his ideas about the past. He doesn\'t understand what has happened and extrapolates his delusions into a future that\'s even more implausible than his ideas about what is going on at the moment.
The \"world government\" he\'s so worried about would sit on top of a whole lot of regional governments, in the same way that the US federal government coexists with fifty one state governments. Getting them coordinated to act against the people would be a neat trick .
> There is a solution (however difficult to believe), but it\'s not man-made..
Granting John Doe\'s expressed desires, he probably thinks that a random noise generator is what we all need, and he does inject a lot of it here.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
E
Ed Lee
Guest
On Wednesday, March 16, 2022 at 10:40:48 PM UTC-7, John Doe wrote:
Intercepted/detonated nuclear warhead in the air is not much better than in the ground. If anything, it will just spread radiation more evenly in the atmosphere.
Ed Lee <edward....@gmail.com> wrote:
John Doe wrote:
Nope, no apologies here.
Like it or not... I\'m presenting the non-Western propagandist side of
the story.
The only justification I can think of for NATO\'s aggressive expansion,
their attempt to establish a first strike capability against Russia...
Someday, one of the major powers (or conceivably a minor power) will
develop a super sinister all-powerful weapon (for example, a device
that disables nukes)
How do you reckon that would work? Disable launching or disable
radiation? If you can build it, perhaps you will get the Nobel prize.
I have no idea how. Superduper Patriot missiles? But that\'s probably very
messy and still destroys much life on this planet.
Intercepted/detonated nuclear warhead in the air is not much better than in the ground. If anything, it will just spread radiation more evenly in the atmosphere.