OT: That didn't take very long!

On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 12:43:44 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:
But why would anyone want to do that? Hundreds of hours of dirty work
for a few seconds of front wheels up? Bizarre.

Fuel dragsters are even stranger. The mean run time between engine
explosions must be 50 seconds. Blowing up the occasional mosfet is
trivial in comparison.

I love my car. Do you love your car?

A couple hundred hours? Either you have never worked on an engine, or you are absolutely the slowest mechanic ever born. It was a couple hours a week, and less than two months from the time I bought the car, until I was finished with everything. Fell under 40 hours work, start to finish and that included the modifications. I spent just under $150 for all the parts, in 1972. I loved that car, and the 1963 Catalina convertible that it replaced. Once I finished serving in the Army, I started driving trucks. That will soon be 45 years ago.
 
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 9:52:08 PM UTC-4, k...@notreal.com wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 10:00:01 -0700 (PDT), Rick C

Yeah, I'm having fun. Getting ready to drive my Tesla.

Evidently it takes a lot of preparation.

A case of Recuperation H?
 
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:34:14 -0700, Michael Terrell wrote:

A couple hundred hours? Either you have never worked on an engine, or
you are absolutely the slowest mechanic ever born. It was a couple
hours a week, and less than two months from the time I bought the
car, until I was finished with everything. Fell under 40 hours work,
start to finish and that included the modifications.

We all have our specialisations. You give me a tool set, an engine and 40
hours to strip it down, by the time the 40 hours expired, I'd just about
maybe get one of the rocker covers off. But I couldn't even guarantee
that much.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.
 
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:23:56 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:2imtge1sh52rso25u9j3vvb561ij5v2oro@4ax.com:

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 12:44:52 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:5s0qge1p94tvuushtp1pp7tka3omcj4dkl@4ax.com:

It's a lot lighter than some rusty old muscle car.

You have obviously never seen a 350HP small block V8 pull the
front
wheels of an AMC Gremlin a foot and a half off the ground at the
start line.

You talk about weight. I talk about power. So despite the
double
weight, dufus.... those muscle cars could STILL set you back in
the seat better than your shit V6. You obviously have no clue,
but seem to be full of stupid irrelavent comments like "rusty" and
"old".

AlwaysWrong thinks an AMC Gremlin is a "muscle car". LOL! That's
funny, even for an AlwaysWrong post!


It is when one places a hot Chevy small block V8 in it. And that
was before the V6 was even produced.

Bullshit, AlwwaysWrong. It was a deathtrap with a V8. No weight on
the drive wheels and too much over the nose. You really are *ALWAYS*
wrong.
So yeah, dumbfuck. A hopped up Gremlin could do 9 second
quarters.'

It would even go that far. The things were absolute junk! Terrible
design and worse execution. Vacuum wipers and an Auburn clutch!
Muscle car, indeed!

Also had a corvair with the tranny flipped over and a 350 Corvette
motor hooked up to it in the back seat.

You've flipped a number of trannies, I'd expect.

> You really are one stupid fuck.

You're *ALWAYS* wrong.

Lil' Red Wagon had a 426 Hemi in it.

No, you stupid asshole...

AlwaysWrong.

Everyone knows that a muscle car was a car the NYC mob used to run
down chumps late on their payments.

More irrelevance from _ALWAYS_WRONG_. When you're cornered, change
the subject.
 
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:48:17 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:kd3vgepffhejaft6qm490cv2lcb5h6otb3@
4ax.com:

On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:26:03 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:4vmtgehgh1n5escgimqb7tb4474ehu0bfp@4ax.com:

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 09:42:30 -0700, John Larkin
jjlarkin@highland_snip_technology.com> wrote:

On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 22:09:27 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

On 6/21/19 10:35 AM, John Larkin wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jun 2019 09:44:09 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 13:33:31 -0700 (PDT), Rick C
gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote:

On Tuesday, June 18, 2019 at 3:50:40 PM UTC-4, Michael
Terrell wrote:

Moron buys an EV, then damns everyone who won't. I haven't
owned a car in over 25 years. Only trucks. The last car
was
a high powered, retired Sherriff's cruiser. I've owned
smaller cars, but I am tall, and they were painful to
drive.
Even some trucks are too small for me to drive. My
favorite
car was a restored 1966 red GTO that could wrap the
speedometer back to the zero pin.

I bought it with a blown engine and rebuilt it. I
installed
a heavy duty three speed automatic transmission in it, and
modified the drive train and chassis to make it fit, in
place of the two speed Powerglide transmission. Gasoline
was
8.9 cents a gallon for high test, on base, and it wouldn't
hold three dollars worth of gasoline.


The latest is a large SUV, because I needed the low
chassis,
and extra legroom to be able to get in and out without
help.
You can stick your electric skateboards where the sun
doesn't shine, along with all your lies.

The United States of America is exporting oil, bitch!

How does it feel that every vehicle you've ever owned is
pig
dog slow compared to a Tesla? My model X which has plenty
of
room and carries up to 6 passengers will still stomp on
anything you've ever owned. It won't wrap the speedo
needle
though, doesn't have one.

Musk's bitch at work. Amazing, even for a fanboi.

Tesla drivers seem to think in terms of alternating bursts of
acceleration and deceleration. I guess some people enjoy
that,
but I know that a lot of passengers don't. Maybe they seldom
have passengers.

I have two driving modes; mine is pretty dynamic, but I tone
the jerk (1st derivative of acceleration, not a synonym for
me)
way down when my wife is onboard. I know some guys who get
sick
from jerk too.

Funny, when she is driving the Audi she enjoys flooring it,
like getting onto a freeway. It's the 3.2L non-turbo V6 and
really pushes a bod into the seat.



telsa owners are the BMW owners of the EV world.

More like the Volvo owners.

Subaru owners are plenty smug.

Failed ex IBM fellows are too.

AlwaysWrong just can't resist being so damned wrong. ...about
everything. Always!


Yeah... You retired with 'honors'.

You have no idea what you're talking about. AS ALWAYS, AlwaysWrong.
Back in the 4 layer days. Probably used tape instead of
computers.

AlwaysWrong. Actually, I don't recall ever doing a four layer board.
Even in the '70s, eight was common for card-on-board technology. TCM
boards were around 100 layers but as _always_ you have no idea what
you're talking about, AlwaysWrong.
 
krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dt80he1rpefvrf00c9nmcmmlikji7jgj1d@
4ax.com:

> It would even go that far.

You're an idiot.

> The things were absolute junk!

Made great little cheap drag cars.

Terrible
design and worse execution.

Whoopie fuckin' doo. You were the idiot dumb enough to buy a new
car from AMC. Getting used and cheap is far better.
Bwuahahahahahaha!!!


> Vacuum wipers and an Auburn clutch!

Not in the hopped up V8.

Hell, I could whip your lame ass back then with a JC Whitney
order!

Muscle car, indeed!
Compared to anything you have mentioned yet, sure.
I had a '63 nova, and a '70 Monte Carlo as well.

Hey Keith... You are a fucking childish little punk, boy.
 
krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dt80he1rpefvrf00c9nmcmmlikji7jgj1d@
4ax.com:

Everyone knows that a muscle car was a car the NYC mob used to
run
down chumps late on their payments.

More irrelevance from _ALWAYS_WRONG_. When you're cornered,
change
the subject.

I guess your 20 IQ keeps you from seeing humor as well.

You are truly not worth conversing with.

You are a piece of shit. Use your underscore and all caps again,
dipshit.

Better yet... Just GRAB THAT CHEST AND EXIT STAGE LEFT, you
retarded fuckhead!

It's coming. It is gonna hurt.

Make sure you evacuate your bowels often, because you are going to
be one stinky fuck when it happens.

Bye, fucktard. Instant karma already got you... You get the long,
slow, painful exodus.
 
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:11:01 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dt80he1rpefvrf00c9nmcmmlikji7jgj1d@
4ax.com:

Bullshit, AlwwaysWrong.

You really only need to put your sig at the end. I know that
always wrong fits you well, but you really do not need to keep
posting your moniker.

It was a deathtrap with a V8.

So says the lame fuck KRW, who was a lame nerd wannabe back then.
You have no clue what real men built back when you were claiming to
be an adult. You never made it to this day. Your posts prove that
fact.

You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong. It *was* a death trap. With a V8
it was dangerous to drive. No weight over the drive wheels and too
much over the steering wheels. You clearly know nothing about cars,
either.
g
No weight on
the drive wheels and too much over the nose.


Nice try, punk, but this isn't MS flight simulator's design
studio. Folks put V-8 small blocks in Opel GTs and MG midgets.

Idiots, like you, perhaps.

> You're an abject idiot struggling to appear intelligent.

You're AlwaysWrong. Always.

You really are *ALWAYS*
wrong.

You really need to learn how to correctly put your sig at the end.

You're AlwaysWrong. Today is no different.
 
krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dt80he1rpefvrf00c9nmcmmlikji7jgj1d@
4ax.com:

> Bullshit, AlwwaysWrong.

You really only need to put your sig at the end. I know that
always wrong fits you well, but you really do not need to keep
posting your moniker.

> It was a deathtrap with a V8.

So says the lame fuck KRW, who was a lame nerd wannabe back then.
You have no clue what real men built back when you were claiming to
be an adult. You never made it to this day. Your posts prove that
fact.

No weight on
the drive wheels and too much over the nose.

Nice try, punk, but this isn't MS flight simulator's design
studio. Folks put V-8 small blocks in Opel GTs and MG midgets.

You're an abject idiot struggling to appear intelligent.

You really are *ALWAYS*
wrong.

You really need to learn how to correctly put your sig at the end.
 
On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 7:23:34 PM UTC-4, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:34:14 -0700, Michael Terrell wrote:

A couple hundred hours? Either you have never worked on an engine, or
you are absolutely the slowest mechanic ever born. It was a couple
hours a week, and less than two months from the time I bought the
car, until I was finished with everything. Fell under 40 hours work,
start to finish and that included the modifications.

We all have our specialisations. You give me a tool set, an engine and 40
hours to strip it down, by the time the 40 hours expired, I'd just about
maybe get one of the rocker covers off. But I couldn't even guarantee
that much.

It wasn't a specialization. That was the first car engine that I rebuilt. :)

It took less than a minute to remove one of them on a Pontiac V8. All you needed was the right sized socket driver, or socket and ratchet. Then it took a couple minutes too remove the remaining pieces of the cork gasket.

I replaced the OEM steel covers for a set of polished aluminum, once I was driving it.
 
John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:nhavge5gpkjocnepl5smqaa17dh1a3ek8a@4ax.com:

> Show us something electronic that you have designed.

You spout this a lot.
You never have.

Yes, I did, and you ignored it.
That is enough for me to ignore you.

IIRC it was a 1.5kV power supply.
 
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 01:59:32 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

John Larkin <jjlarkin@highlandtechnology.com> wrote in
news:nhavge5gpkjocnepl5smqaa17dh1a3ek8a@4ax.com:

Show us something electronic that you have designed.

You spout this a lot.

This is s.e.d.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
krw@notreal.com wrote in news:inc0hep22l8opjgvor6bqjjltu2ol7dlhl@
4ax.com:

You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong. It *was* a death trap. With a
V8
it was dangerous to drive. No weight over the drive wheels and
too
much over the steering wheels. You clearly know nothing about
cars,
either.

You don't. Folks put weight over their rear axles... But only in
the winter months.

You clearly make a lot of retarded "clearly" remarks, and it
clearly shows that you clearly have no fucking clue what others have
a clear understanding of.

I knew what ten thousandth inch fits and tolerances were, likely
before you even knew what machine tools were.

My fucking hopped up lawn mowers ran better than the muck between
your ears.

I have built more engines than you have even seen.

You are a mechanical know nothing.

You are a crybaby bad heart about to die pussy boy, and that's
about it. Die already, you STUPID FUCK!
 
On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 6:35:02 PM UTC+2, John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 20:49:17 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd@gmail.com
wrote:

On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 3:13:42 PM UTC-7, John Larkin wrote:

Absolutely, I'm one of the weirdest people who post to s.e.d.

I actually design electronics.

What makes you weird, though, is that you go to a sci.* newsgroup and
slander scientists...

Questioning the usefulness of computer simulation of poorly understood
chaotic systems isn't slander.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/deoemgz23x047pj/christy_dec8.jpg?raw=1

It is when you haven't got a clue what you are talking about, and citing a climate change denier as your supporting evidence makes your ignorance even more obvious.

I work with PhD scientists all the time. There are a couple of real
scientists here that I get along with fine. Real scientists relish
lively discussion and new ideas.

So I hope you don't let them see your slavish devotion to the past-their-sell-by dates ideas you find on denialist propaganda web-sites.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Monday, June 24, 2019 at 1:23:34 AM UTC+2, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 14:34:14 -0700, Michael Terrell wrote:

A couple hundred hours? Either you have never worked on an engine, or
you are absolutely the slowest mechanic ever born. It was a couple
hours a week, and less than two months from the time I bought the
car, until I was finished with everything. Fell under 40 hours work,
start to finish and that included the modifications.

We all have our specialisations. You give me a tool set, an engine and 40
hours to strip it down, by the time the 40 hours expired, I'd just about
maybe get one of the rocker covers off. But I couldn't even guarantee
that much.

That doesn't suggest lack of specialision so much as spectacular incompetence.

When I had to regrind the one of valve seats in my Peugeot 404, I'd got the rocker cover off in five minutes. Gettting the rockers off didn't take much longer.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in
news:500f8464-e88b-4053-b1b5-f800e9d903d1@googlegroups.com:

When I had to regrind the one of valve seats in my Peugeot 404,
I'd got the rocker cover off in five minutes. Gettting the rockers
off didn't take much longer.

Getting the entire head off to remove a valve to regrind the seat is
a bit more time consuming.

I have pulled an intake manifold, and a pair of heads off inside ten
minutes.
 
On Sun, 23 Jun 2019 10:03:15 -0000 (UTC), Cursitor Doom
<curd@notformail.com> wrote:

On Sat, 22 Jun 2019 21:05:35 -0700, Rick C wrote:

On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 6:13:42 PM UTC-4, John Larkin wrote:

Absolutely, I'm one of the weirdest people who post to s.e.d.

I actually design electronics.

I like the way Larkin posts two totally unrelated statements and then
says nothing else about them.

Actually the second one is not completely correct. It should read, "The
only thing I know about is designing electronics".

As opposed to "knowing very little about a lot" like some other people
here. >:-

This is s.e.d. These design-nothing drones would complain about Tiger
Woods only being good at golf.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc
picosecond timing precision measurement

jlarkin att highlandtechnology dott com
http://www.highlandtechnology.com
 
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:51:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:inc0hep22l8opjgvor6bqjjltu2ol7dlhl@
4ax.com:

You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong. It *was* a death trap. With a
V8
it was dangerous to drive. No weight over the drive wheels and
too
much over the steering wheels. You clearly know nothing about
cars,
either.

You don't. Folks put weight over their rear axles... But only in
the winter months.

Balance, AlwaysWrong, Balance. Too much weight over either is bad
news. Gremlins were *way* underweight in the rear and the V8s had way
too much power for the weight. The TR7 had the same problem.
Deathtraps.
You clearly make a lot of retarded "clearly" remarks, and it
clearly shows that you clearly have no fucking clue what others have
a clear understanding of.

You're AlwaysWrong. Everyone here *knows* that fact.

I knew what ten thousandth inch fits and tolerances were, likely
before you even knew what machine tools were.

And there we have it! AlwaysWrong changes the subject to something
completely irrelevant.

My fucking hopped up lawn mowers ran better than the muck between
your ears.

I can imagine that you hopped lawn mowers. It was all you could get.
I have built more engines than you have even seen.

AlwaysWrong. Good gried, what a lie!

> You are a mechanical know nothing.

You're *always* wrong.

You are a crybaby bad heart about to die pussy boy, and that's
about it. Die already, you STUPID FUCK!

AlwaysWrong. ...and even *you* know it.
 
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:52:49 -0400, krw@notreal.com wrote:

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 02:51:43 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:inc0hep22l8opjgvor6bqjjltu2ol7dlhl@
4ax.com:

You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong. It *was* a death trap. With a
V8
it was dangerous to drive. No weight over the drive wheels and
too
much over the steering wheels. You clearly know nothing about
cars,
either.

You don't. Folks put weight over their rear axles... But only in
the winter months.

Balance, AlwaysWrong, Balance. Too much weight over either is bad
news. Gremlins were *way* underweight in the rear and the V8s had way
too much power for the weight. The TR7 had the same problem.
Deathtraps.

It has all the weight on the rear when it's doing a wheelie.

The Porsche 914-6 could do a wheelie, and there was a Datsun that
could too. Both were death traps.


--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics
 
On Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 9:24:01 AM UTC-5, DecadentLinux...@decadence.org wrote:

It is when one places a hot Chevy small block V8 in it. And >that was before the V6 was even produced.

Ha, friend of mine had some late 1070s shitcan he put a 400 in. I called it the abortionmobile. It moved but you had to take out the engine to change the spark plugs.

So yeah, dumbfuck. A hopped up Gremlin could do 9 second
quarters.'

People I know have had problems with other things, engine mounts, tranny mounts, rearend mounts.

Also had a corvair with the tranny flipped over and a 350 >Corvette motor hooked up to it in the back seat.

When I was little Ma had a Monza. It did not get in its own way. Actaully I am having a hard time visualising that abortionmobile. A picture of such an install would be worth many thousands or words.

You really are one stupid fuck.

You only say that because you like him.

Lil' Red Wagon had a 426 Hemi in it.

I hope you don't mean an old Radio Flyer. Frame can't take it.

Snipped the rest because, well just because.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top