Guest
On Monday, June 10, 2019 at 7:19:16 PM UTC-4, jurb...@gmail.com wrote:
Cool, so Clinton pal, pants stuffing, Sandy Berger apparently can't hold
office. No, wait a minute, he was just illegally removing things from
the national archives, so he can still run for office. So far,
DL can't come up with what he claims, which is that
a felon can't run for president period. i agree with what you say above,
it looks like that one screwy law says if you lift documents from a court,
that crime bars you from running. So that's what? .00000001% of felons?
Has anyone even been convicted of that law in the last 50 years?
The actual staute seems to be quoted here:
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071
In the wording is
"willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. "
That is a separate issue, it is written into the statute itself as part of the penalty. That is perfectly legal I think. But an actual statute specifically prohibiting a felon from holding office was not forthcoming in my search.
There are other laws that if broken they will bar someone from public office. But it is not a universal thing. It does apply to THIS statute though....
Cool, so Clinton pal, pants stuffing, Sandy Berger apparently can't hold
office. No, wait a minute, he was just illegally removing things from
the national archives, so he can still run for office. So far,
DL can't come up with what he claims, which is that
a felon can't run for president period. i agree with what you say above,
it looks like that one screwy law says if you lift documents from a court,
that crime bars you from running. So that's what? .00000001% of felons?
Has anyone even been convicted of that law in the last 50 years?