D
Don Y
Guest
On 8/31/2020 3:57 PM, Tabby wrote:
two burners. We often have all four in use (some stovetops have 5 & 6!)
as we try to arrange for everything to be \"ready to serve\" at the same
time. We\'d likely have to resort to other \"appliances\" to do some
of the work (or, a large *grill*!)
We\'d (personally) have to change our cooking style to adapt to justOn Sunday, 30 August 2020 15:19:06 UTC+1, Don Y wrote:
Cookers that switch power between different loads to stay under 13A are
found at the cheap end of the scale. I remember using one decades ago.
IIRC
Ah -- so the load management is done within that single appliance? I\'m
not
yup
sure how hard it would be to cook under those constraints. E.g., we
often have all four stovetop burners in use when prepping a meal -- though
the oven only sees real use when baking (and it\'s too hard to manage
cooking and baking at the same time!)
Most folk never use more than 2 rings anyway. They\'re not for everyone.
\'Baby belling\' is the best known of these. An early variant:
You can also get 13A limited 4 ring hobs, it saves calling an electrician
two burners. We often have all four in use (some stovetops have 5 & 6!)
as we try to arrange for everything to be \"ready to serve\" at the same
time. We\'d likely have to resort to other \"appliances\" to do some
of the work (or, a large *grill*!)