OT: If Kerry is elected...

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:15:40 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

The multi-nationals are far too intelligent to employ a president with an
IQ greater than 75.
:)

Jon
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:50:46 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

Reg Edwards wrote:
Bush is a dangerous idiot.

=============================

The multi-nationals are far too intelligent to employ a president with an
IQ greater than 75.


That is a credible number in my estimation.

Remember- Bush is a dangerous idiot and liar!

An article in The New York Times estimated the IQ of Bush and Kerry
from available test results. They estimated Kerry at 120, Bush as "mid
120's." Both graduated from Yale.

John
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 10:56:52 -0800, John Larkin wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 17:58:05 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:



John Larkin wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 13:50:46 GMT, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com
wrote:



Reg Edwards wrote:

Bush is a dangerous idiot.

=============================

The multi-nationals are far too intelligent to employ a president
with an
IQ greater than 75.


That is a credible number in my estimation.

Remember- Bush is a dangerous idiot and liar!



An article in The New York Times estimated the IQ of Bush and Kerry
from available test results. They estimated Kerry at 120, Bush as "mid
120's." Both graduated from Yale.

John




Can you cite that article. My guess would have been Kerry at 150+ and
Bush no greater than 85- no way can I believe Bush is higher- he's an
impulsive idiot.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/10/24/politics/campaign/24points.html

You'll see a lot of similar stuff if you google "Bush Kerry IQ". Most
conclude that they are close, in the 120's, with W maybe a little ahead.

Nobody with an IQ of 85 would be allowed to wash a jet fighter, much less
fly one. And 150+ is genius, which JK isn't; that's obvious from the way
he's run his campaign.
140+, thank you very much.

And I am a living example that a high IQ is no guarantee of, well,
anything.

Cheers!
Rich
 
John Larkin wrote:

Nobody with an IQ of 85 would be allowed to wash a jet fighter, much
less fly one.
You seem to be forgetting the age deterioration effect. The military
minimum is something like 100- but that's not a real test. There is no
way in hell that Bush is above 85 at this time. He is a brain-damaged
coke-head.
 
IQ is a measure of the ability to distinguish between the important and the
unimportant.

The whole lot of you have (deliberately?) missed the point.

What matters is who funds the payments to corrupt politicians for services
rendered to the oil companies, bankers, insurance companies and other
powerful multinationals.

On the bottom line, it is the unfortunate survivers of the 12-years of
continuous use of weapons of mass destruction on Iraq. The whole world,
beyond ill-educated, ill-informed USA citizens, is aware of this.
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:57:03 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

IQ is a measure of the ability to distinguish between the important and the
unimportant.
Ummm? IQ mostly reflects an ability to learn, but rarely actually
reflects success, which is usually attained by ambition.

The whole lot of you have (deliberately?) missed the point.

What matters is who funds the payments to corrupt politicians for services
rendered to the oil companies, bankers, insurance companies and other
powerful multinationals.

On the bottom line, it is the unfortunate survivers of the 12-years of
continuous use of weapons of mass destruction on Iraq. The whole world,
beyond ill-educated, ill-informed USA citizens, is aware of this.
We "ill-informed USA citizens" don't really give a damn what you
think. Why are you so dense as to not understand... if we stopped
holding your hand you'd go under.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
John Larkin wrote:

Nobody with an IQ of 85 would be allowed to wash a jet fighter, much
less fly one. And 150+ is genius, which JK isn't; that's obvious from
the way he's run his campaign.
Actually my oldest brother was a T38 flight instructor at that Moody AFB
right at the time Bush entered the school there in 1968. I can ask him
if he has any recollection of Bush.
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:29:44 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

Nobody with an IQ of 85 would be allowed to wash a jet fighter, much
less fly one. And 150+ is genius, which JK isn't; that's obvious from
the way he's run his campaign.

Actually my oldest brother was a T38 flight instructor at that Moody AFB
right at the time Bush entered the school there in 1968. I can ask him if
he has any recollection of Bush.
You're just now bringing this up?

What in Hell have you been waiting for?

Thanks,
Rich
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:57:03 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
<g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

IQ is a measure of the ability to distinguish between the important and the
unimportant.
Not at all. IQ measures how well you do on an IQ test. It says nothing
about one's ability to perceive reality or causality, or what you care
about in life. Autistics, almost totally lacking in empathy, can have
high IQs.

John
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 22:50:51 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@example.net> wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 21:29:44 +0000, Fred Bloggs wrote:



John Larkin wrote:

Nobody with an IQ of 85 would be allowed to wash a jet fighter, much
less fly one. And 150+ is genius, which JK isn't; that's obvious from
the way he's run his campaign.

Actually my oldest brother was a T38 flight instructor at that Moody AFB
right at the time Bush entered the school there in 1968. I can ask him if
he has any recollection of Bush.

You're just now bringing this up?

What in Hell have you been waiting for?
Fear that his brother might not trash W?

John
 
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:54:58 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@highlandSNIPtechTHISnologyPLEASE.com> wrote:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:06:40 -0700, Jim Thompson
thegreatone@example.com> wrote:

[snip]

Want to see a collected group of village idiots? Go to a Mensa
meeting.

...Jim Thompson


Never done that, but I knew a couple of people who tried it. They said
everybody sits around telling everybody else how smart they are.

John
Exactly. And complaining about how they weren't paid for being smart.
When I asked what they had _contributed_, to make profits at the
company where they worked, they got all hostile (and acted like
Democrats :)

I joined around 1973 and dropped out in 1977, didn't care for people
who think a "party" means bringing a bottle of any old cheap booze and
pouring it into the communal "Mensa Punch Bowl"... yeccch!

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
 
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote in
news:cm39jp$fol$9@blue.rahul.net:




Bush has not promised everything and anything in order to get elected.
And he's no traitor like Kerry.

"John Kerry;betraying America since 1971."

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in
news:a3lao0hkp5k8tup5d1d4tbejb46o3ki9ah@4ax.com:

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:57:03 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:

The whole
world, beyond ill-educated, ill-informed USA citizens, is aware of
this.


We "ill-informed USA citizens" don't really give a damn what you
think. Why are you so dense as to not understand... if we stopped
holding your hand you'd go under.

...Jim Thompson
Mostly ill-informed due to a biased,leftist media.
That includes foreign countries.

--
Jim Yanik
jyanik-at-kua.net
 
Jim Yanik wrote:

Bush has not promised everything and anything in order to get elected.
Oh really? A long time spokesman for the Conservative bloc of the GOP,
Richard A. Viguerie, just spent about 30 minutes characterizing the GW
Bush approach to re-election as "bribery"- see the story:

http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/viguerie.html

Here is what he said:

MOYERS: You can't be too happy with this war. The cost the catastrophe
in Iraq right now.

VIGUERIE: No, and I don't think anybody's happy. But conservatives have
mostly different problems then the Iraq War with George Bush and the
Republican leadership. It appears to me Bill, that early on in this
Presidency, 2001, the leadership of the Republican Party made a
conscious decision to run for re-election based on a one word strategy.
Unfortunately that one word strategy was bribery.

We're going to bribe the voters. And they wanted to bribe the seniors
with prescription drugs plans. Bribe the farmers with more subsidies.
And recently multi-billion dollar bail out of the tobacco farmers. The
Christian with faith based initiative, the Hispanics. Just one group
after another. And in essence said, "If you've got votes, we've got
money. Let's talk.

**********************************************************

Yanik is just exemplifying the well-known statistic of Bush supporters-
he is an idiot who knows and understands next to nothing- pathetic really.
 
Jim Yanik wrote:
Jim Thompson <thegreatone@example.com> wrote in
news:a3lao0hkp5k8tup5d1d4tbejb46o3ki9ah@4ax.com:


On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:57:03 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
g4fgq.regp@ZZZbtinternet.com> wrote:




The whole
world, beyond ill-educated, ill-informed USA citizens, is aware of
this.


We "ill-informed USA citizens" don't really give a damn what you
think. Why are you so dense as to not understand... if we stopped
holding your hand you'd go under.

...Jim Thompson


Mostly ill-informed due to a biased,leftist media.
That includes foreign countries.
You are so incredibly mindless- it is lucky for you they have done away
with literacy testing at the polls. On the upside, you're probably too
damned dumb to cast your vote right.
 
In article <Xns9593D54EBD9B8jyanikkuanet@129.250.170.86>,
Jim Yanik <jyanik@abuse.gov.> wrote:
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) wrote in
news:cm39jp$fol$9@blue.rahul.net:


Bush has not promised everything and anything in order to get elected.
Yes, Bush has vowed to continue screwing up in exactly the same way for
four more years. This is his only real promise.


And he's no traitor like Kerry.

We've been over that ground before. It is the Bush admin. that outed the
CIA agent. They are the traitors. Kerry has been accused of many things
by the right wing nut cases. All of them have been proven untrue. The
charge of treason against Kerry is just a rationalization for those who
intend to return a known traitor to the Whitehouse.

--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
In article <4185A86A.2040407@nospam.com>,
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
[...]
You are so incredibly mindless- it is lucky for you they have done away
with literacy testing at the polls. On the upside, you're probably too
damned dumb to cast your vote right.

Chances are he won't even remember to go to the poles on Wednesday like
the republicans are supposed to.



--
--
kensmith@rahul.net forging knowledge
 
In article <cm4it4$god$2@blue.rahul.net>,
kensmith@green.rahul.net (Ken Smith) writes:
In article <4185A86A.2040407@nospam.com>,
Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com> wrote:
[...]
You are so incredibly mindless- it is lucky for you they have done away
with literacy testing at the polls. On the upside, you're probably too
damned dumb to cast your vote right.


Chances are he won't even remember to go to the poles on Wednesday like
the republicans are supposed to.

The GOPers might want to go to the poles on Wednesday, but hopefully
they'll go to the polls on Tuesday. Of all words to misspell, there is
no excuse for the word 'poll.'

John
 
John S. Dyson wrote...
Ken Smith writes:

Chances are he won't even remember to go to the poles on Wednesday
like the republicans are supposed to.

The GOPers might want to go to the poles on Wednesday, but hopefully
they'll go to the polls on Tuesday.
Right, on Tuesday we'll all go to the polls. On Wednesday the Bushites,
seeing the results, will go to the poles, while the rest of us celebrate.


--
Thanks,
- Win

(email: use hill_at_rowland-dotties-org for now)
 
On 1 Nov 2004 05:53:50 -0800, Winfield Hill
<Winfield_member@newsguy.com> wrote:


Right, on Tuesday we'll all go to the polls. On Wednesday the Bushites,
seeing the results, will go to the poles, while the rest of us celebrate.

Unless the polls are right...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls.html


John
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top