B
Bill Sloman
Guest
On Tuesday, September 1, 2020 at 4:11:39 PM UTC+10, Flyguy wrote:
It\'s all a little too complicated to make sense to Flyguy, whose analytical skills seem to run out after 2+2=4.
Somebody may have put together something like \"Climate change for total dummies\", but Flyguy has already made up all the mind he has got, so he isn\'t going to bother sounding out all the long words involved.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 9:55:22 PM UTC-7, whit3rd wrote:
On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 7:21:34 PM UTC-7, Flyguy wrote:
On Monday, August 31, 2020 at 6:47:49 PM UTC-7, Bill Sloman wrote:
You did not present ANY CONCLUSIVE evidence linking CO2 levels with our current global warming.
- skeptics WANT scientific evidence, alarmists say it is SETTLED SCIENCE!!!
Skeptics and alarmists, are presumably people? That isn\'t
important to the planet, it isn\'t hearing anything they say. It is warming.
Educated folk know why. Infants, fence-sitting politicians, and Flyguy perhaps don\'t.
Typical libtard newspeak - makes no fucking sense whatsoever! If you had CONCLUSIVE evidence to support your weak thesis, PRESENT IT, not this bullshit!
It\'s all a little too complicated to make sense to Flyguy, whose analytical skills seem to run out after 2+2=4.
Somebody may have put together something like \"Climate change for total dummies\", but Flyguy has already made up all the mind he has got, so he isn\'t going to bother sounding out all the long words involved.
--
Bill Sloman, Sydney