OT: American flyers bomb their allies AGAIN !

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:47:27 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Radiosrfun wrote:

If we hadn't fought "Their" war for them

Germany declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbor. There is no 'their war'
about it.

You mean as a result of all those ships full of raw materials that we
were sending "over there" to you guys. It WAS YOUR WAR. We were helping
you LONG BEFORE Pearl Harbor, and long before Germany declared war on us.

FYI, the Germans were working on long range bombers to bomb the USA and did
indeed make several that allegedly did the job.

They attempted to invade Alaska, you fucking retard. We drove them out
of there as well.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:59:12 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Radiosrfun wrote:

It isn't like some of our own - haven't been killed by "Friendly"
fire.............

How many of your own in Afghanistan have you killed recently ?

Our ground forces don't call in air support on positions within 150
yards of our position.

Funnily enough, the RAF don't bomb British troops.

Does the RAF have ANY bombing missions at all?

Grow up, pussy. Your guys asked for help, and gave coordinates that
were close enough to be a problem for them. It turns out that it was a
problem. This happens when the enemy you are fighting (or begging to be
saved from) are so close to you that bombing them poses a proximity
problem for you men as well.

Just so you know, after one calls the fire mission in, and the planes go
over... that's when you are supposed to duck.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:21:49 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other
allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their
lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE don't
answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The US military
are hoplelessly incompetent.

You're an idiot. Just so you know, dumbfuck, the same targeting
electronics are used by both.

All this really means is that the RAF does not get hazardous bombing
missions to begin with.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 08:43:37 -0700, Tolstoy <kellrobinson@billburg.com>
wrote:

On Aug 25, 7:41 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@hotmail.com
wrote:
gearhead wrote:
Eeyore wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

Too bad they didn't get YOU.

The American answer to anything you don't like. Kill, kill , kill.

Graham- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Exactly. So eat shit and die, you little twit.

You're more meaningless than even the OP is.

 

[Anthony Fremont]

Jim Thompson wrote:

I don't why it is that this crap must continue.

EVERYONE should simply SHUN donkey-ass and we will never be bothered
again.

I hear that. I've been trying to ignore the trolls for the most part as
there's simply no point in arguing with them. My 3 year old daughter has
more demonstrable intelligence AND self-control than the entire lot of them.
To get back on the topic of asses, with Eyesore's hate rants I can sorta see
why the UK needs such extreme levels of public surveilance and gun control.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:21:49 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other
allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their
lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE don't
answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The US military
are hoplelessly incompetent.

Funny... when your boys were in need of a fire mission to quell the
ambush they found themselves in, why didn't they call up an RAF bombing
run?

 

[Don Bowey]

On 8/25/07 10:57 AM, in article pbr0d3p9j2kj6sil3pg5i5m8m2p3cdklqd@4ax.com,
"ChairmanOfTheBored" <RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:41:45 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

I rather doubt the USA will have any allies left before long. We're getting
very sick of you and
your vile attitudes.


You're full of shit, DonkTard.

You have no clue as to the position those that matter in your country
carry.

I think the donkey was only speaking for himself and his collection of
fleas.

 

[Don Bowey]

On 8/25/07 11:00 AM, in article hdr0d3ptajov18ko96lu7tn4k14r1k28i2@4ax.com,
"ChairmanOfTheBored" <RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:47:27 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



Radiosrfun wrote:

If we hadn't fought "Their" war for them

Germany declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbor. There is no 'their war'
about it.

You mean as a result of all those ships full of raw materials that we
were sending "over there" to you guys. It WAS YOUR WAR. We were helping
you LONG BEFORE Pearl Harbor, and long before Germany declared war on us.

FYI, the Germans were working on long range bombers to bomb the USA and did
indeed make several that allegedly did the job.

They attempted to invade Alaska, you fucking retard. We drove them out
of there as well.

Germans, no. It was the Japanese who DID invade Alaska. It lasted a very
short time. A misunderstanding on their part caused a rapid retreat.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:13:04 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@comcast.net> wrote:

On 8/25/07 11:00 AM, in article hdr0d3ptajov18ko96lu7tn4k14r1k28i2@4ax.com,
"ChairmanOfTheBored" <RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:47:27 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:



Radiosrfun wrote:

If we hadn't fought "Their" war for them

Germany declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbor. There is no 'their war'
about it.

You mean as a result of all those ships full of raw materials that we
were sending "over there" to you guys. It WAS YOUR WAR. We were helping
you LONG BEFORE Pearl Harbor, and long before Germany declared war on us.

FYI, the Germans were working on long range bombers to bomb the USA and did
indeed make several that allegedly did the job.

They attempted to invade Alaska, you fucking retard. We drove them out
of there as well.

Germans, no. It was the Japanese who DID invade Alaska. It lasted a very
short time. A misunderstanding on their part caused a rapid retreat.

Yes... you are correct. Even as I wrote it there were flags in my head.
Just shows what ten billion dead brain cells will get ya.

I am thinking of a McDonalds lingo, but can't quite put that together
either... It must be Saturday.

 

[Anthony Fremont]

Eeyore wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and
other allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire'
tragedy in Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position
as they battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British
soldiers were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves
fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously
wrong, and led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue'
incidents involving American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE
don't answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The
US military are hoplelessly incompetent.

Why do you continue to make blanket statements like that? In 1941 the Fleet
Air Arm torpedoed the HMS Sheffield when trying to hunt down the Bismarck.
In 1942 the HMS St. Albens sunk a polish sub. In 1944 a Brittish British
flotilla was attacked by RAF Hawker Typhoons, off Cap d'Antifer, Le Havre.
HMS Britomart and HMS Hussar sunk. HMS Salamander damaged beyond repair and
scrapped. Just ripped that stuff out of the wiki. I know that's not much
of an authoritative source, but I suspect these things are likely true since
no one has changed or erased it from the wikipedia. BTW, nice job in the
Falklands with at least three major occurences of friendly fire including
shooting down one of your own AAC Gazelles. I think the hour long
fire-fight involving artillery and other "heavy" weapons between two
companys warrants a special mention. How long did that "war" last anyway?

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:27:37 -0500, "Anthony Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com>
wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Don Bowey wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and
other allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire'
tragedy in Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position
as they battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British
soldiers were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves
fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously
wrong, and led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue'
incidents involving American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE
don't answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The
US military are hoplelessly incompetent.

Why do you continue to make blanket statements like that? In 1941 the Fleet
Air Arm torpedoed the HMS Sheffield when trying to hunt down the Bismarck.
In 1942 the HMS St. Albens sunk a polish sub. In 1944 a Brittish British
flotilla was attacked by RAF Hawker Typhoons, off Cap d'Antifer, Le Havre.
HMS Britomart and HMS Hussar sunk. HMS Salamander damaged beyond repair and
scrapped. Just ripped that stuff out of the wiki. I know that's not much
of an authoritative source, but I suspect these things are likely true since
no one has changed or erased it from the wikipedia. BTW, nice job in the
Falklands with at least three major occurences of friendly fire including
shooting down one of your own AAC Gazelles. I think the hour long
fire-fight involving artillery and other "heavy" weapons between two
companys warrants a special mention. How long did that "war" last anyway?

All of you idiots making stupid remarks about wikipedia not being

reliable are complete and utter retards. Nearly ALL entries carry
reference data at the bottom of the page. If you had ANY clue, you could
easily discern between any questionable pages, and those that are 100%
reliable and accurate.

Try these if you want a good example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celilo_Converter_Station
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_DC_Intertie

Do you really think the things that end up there are shit?

You need a clue, boy.

 

[Fred Bloggs]

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other allies
?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?


" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Graham

Are you such a moron you think the pilot eyeballs the bomb release? It
is obviously a case of the British calling in the wrong coordinates.
They're supposed to call in the enemy position and not their own. If it
was a case of mistaken identity all 60 British troops would have been
cremated.

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 15:05:38 -0400, Fred Bloggs <nospam@nospam.com>
wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other allies
?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?


" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Graham


Are you such a moron you think the pilot eyeballs the bomb release? It
is obviously a case of the British calling in the wrong coordinates.
They're supposed to call in the enemy position and not their own. If it
was a case of mistaken identity all 60 British troops would have been
cremated.

If one is within 200 yards of a 500 Lb bomb hit, one has a very good
chance of not having a very good day.

 

[Anthony Fremont]

UltimatePatriot wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:27:37 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"

Why do you continue to make blanket statements like that? In 1941
the Fleet Air Arm torpedoed the HMS Sheffield when trying to hunt
down the Bismarck. In 1942 the HMS St. Albens sunk a polish sub. In
1944 a Brittish British flotilla was attacked by RAF Hawker
Typhoons, off Cap d'Antifer, Le Havre. HMS Britomart and HMS Hussar
sunk. HMS Salamander damaged beyond repair and scrapped. Just
ripped that stuff out of the wiki. I know that's not much of an
authoritative source, but I suspect these things are likely true
since no one has changed or erased it from the wikipedia. BTW,
nice job in the Falklands with at least three major occurences of
friendly fire including shooting down one of your own AAC Gazelles.
I think the hour long fire-fight involving artillery and other
"heavy" weapons between two companys warrants a special mention.
How long did that "war" last anyway?

All of you idiots making stupid remarks about wikipedia not being
reliable are complete and utter retards. Nearly ALL entries carry
reference data at the bottom of the page. If you had ANY clue, you
could easily discern between any questionable pages, and those that
are 100% reliable and accurate.

WTF is your problem? I didn't slam the wiki, I only said that "it's not
much of an authoritative source". Like it or not, it's not recognized as a
"truly authoritive source" like say "The Encyclopedia Brittanica" or
something along those lines. Sure there's lots of accurate information on
the wiki, but it's also very much a playground for revisionists and other
people with other agenda. Just because someone writes something down,
doesn't automatically make it a fact. Take a pill, calm down and try get
over it.

Try these if you want a good example:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celilo_Converter_Station
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pacific_DC_Intertie

Do you really think the things that end up there are shit?

You need a clue, boy.

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?

 

[UltimatePatriot]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com>
wrote:

WTF is your problem? I didn't slam the wiki, I only said that "it's not
much of an authoritative source".

Sorry, but that IS "slamming the wiki".

 

[ChairmanOfTheBored]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com>
wrote:

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?

Let's just say that it is easy to get past you, boy.

Twice yesterday, and I will again, I'm sure.

You sound a lot like a dope with an indefensible position... absolute
relationship there, I'm sure.

 

[Martin Griffith]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:07:59 -0500, in sci.electronics.design "Anthony
Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

I don't why it is that this crap must continue.

EVERYONE should simply SHUN donkey-ass and we will never be bothered
again.

I hear that. I've been trying to ignore the trolls for the most part as
there's simply no point in arguing with them. My 3 year old daughter has
more demonstrable intelligence AND self-control than the entire lot of them.
To get back on the topic of asses, with Eyesore's hate rants I can sorta see
why the UK needs such extreme levels of public surveilance and gun control.

It's getting pretty bad in the UK, I almost applied for a job their

yesterday, but, stuff like this changed my mind:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=460065&in_page_id=1770

and

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130274,00.html


Martin

 

[Anthony Fremont]

Martin Griffith wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 13:07:59 -0500, in sci.electronics.design "Anthony
Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

I don't why it is that this crap must continue.

EVERYONE should simply SHUN donkey-ass and we will never be bothered
again.

I hear that. I've been trying to ignore the trolls for the most
part as there's simply no point in arguing with them. My 3 year old
daughter has more demonstrable intelligence AND self-control than
the entire lot of them. To get back on the topic of asses, with
Eyesore's hate rants I can sorta see why the UK needs such extreme
levels of public surveilance and gun control.

It's getting pretty bad in the UK, I almost applied for a job their
yesterday, but, stuff like this changed my mind:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=460065&in_page_id=1770

Must have been afraid that the some group of pirates would be offended.
Perhaps some former victims of pirates were the plaintifs. ;-)

and

http://www.thesun.co.uk/article/0,,2-2007130274,00.html

Don't worry, we're getting plenty of the same now. Here in Houston, there
are cameras at intersections and along the major roadways everywhere.
Nothing to worry about though, they're only for "traffic". E-Z Tag readers
in odd places all over too. :-/

 

[Anthony Fremont]

ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?


Let's just say that it is easy to get past you, boy.

Twice yesterday, and I will again, I'm sure.

WTF are you going on about now? Until today, I hadn't made any posts in
this group for over a week.

You sound a lot like a dope with an indefensible position... absolute
relationship there, I'm sure.

 

[John Fields]

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:21:49 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other
allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their
lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE don't
answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The US military
are hoplelessly incompetent.

---
Not at all. Our military can break things and kill folks probably
better than anybody, (After all, we learned how to by breaking the
Hun's back and also by vaporizing the Japs) but it seems that the
problem you've got red-ass about was that you lot couldn't identify
yourselves as friendlies, so you got zapped.

ISTR something about that you draped yourselves with orange tarps or
something like that and expected them to be your shields. The bad
guys could have done the same thing, so what you really should have
had was IFF transponder.

Or, you might have tried draping yourselves in American flags...


--
JF