OT: American flyers bomb their allies AGAIN !

On 8/25/07 12:28 PM, in article 3n01d3p4fdmb3kd5qml2n0fnlgdv1o7950@4ax.com,
"UltimatePatriot" <UltimatePatriot@thebestcountry.org> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com
wrote:

WTF is your problem? I didn't slam the wiki, I only said that "it's not
much of an authoritative source".


Sorry, but that IS "slamming the wiki".
No it isn't. But you are slamming intelligent caution.
 
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 11:06:18 -0700, ChairmanOfTheBored
<RUBored@crackasmile.org> wrote:

On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 16:21:49 +0100, Eeyore
rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The US military
are hoplelessly incompetent.

You're an idiot. Just so you know, dumbfuck, the same targeting
electronics are used by both.

All this really means is that the RAF does not get hazardous bombing
missions to begin with.
---
With good reason.

Had it been them on that mission the score would probably have been
reversed.


--
JF
 
Eeyore wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other allies
?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?


" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Graham

If you guys didn't look like such weeny roast, it wouldn't be so hard to
tell you apart!. or maybe you guys have a problem learning to use the
equipment given to signal back where to drop the bombs!
Some times listening to that english twisted verbose is a whole new
subject.
If you talked like the brothers, the language base is limited ,
generally short and rite to the point!
"Hey brother", "Drop that sucker in that whole, mother fucker! "

I think that would get the message over just nicely boy!.





--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Eeyore wrote:

Radiosrfun wrote:


It isn't like some of our own - haven't been killed by "Friendly"
fire.............


How many of your own in Afghanistan have you killed recently ?

Funnily enough, the RAF don't bomb British troops.

Graham

LOL! Bull Shit!

They just don't have the balls to tell you about it.
Easier to blame some one else, isn't it Boy!


--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Eeyore wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:


"Eeyore" wrote:


When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and other
allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire' tragedy in
Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position as they
battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British soldiers
were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves fighting for their
lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously wrong, and
led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue' incidents involving
American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE don't
answer that.


The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The US military
are hoplelessly incompetent.

Graham


well sure, Not many of you in the air! I hear there's a shorted of
talented recruits in the UK that are qualified to fly those little pea
shooters.


--
"I'm never wrong, once i thought i was, but was mistaken"
Real Programmers Do things like this.
http://webpages.charter.net/jamie_5
 
Radiosrfun wrote:
At the risk of getting into an attack on the Brits as he has clearly done
with the Americans - it "appears" he is saying the Brits are "not' able to
make mistakes?
Hahahahahaa.................... WAKE UP - DUDE. YOU"RE DREAMING.

I'm sure many of his countrymen would love to slap him upside his head.
DUDE - we're ALL "human" - we ALL make mistakes. Your parents did -
conceiving you!

And then they were run out of the village with pitchforks and flaming
torches.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:46D0AD86.423F77D5@earthlink.net...
Radiosrfun wrote:

At the risk of getting into an attack on the Brits as he has clearly done
with the Americans - it "appears" he is saying the Brits are "not' able
to
make mistakes?
Hahahahahaa.................... WAKE UP - DUDE. YOU"RE DREAMING.

I'm sure many of his countrymen would love to slap him upside his head.
DUDE - we're ALL "human" - we ALL make mistakes. Your parents did -
conceiving you!


And then they were run out of the village with pitchforks and flaming
torches.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
Yeah, talk about the story of Frankenstein - when his mother "shit" - she
said OH NO - WHAT HAVE I DONE? It almost looks human! SO - they let it
manifest into what it is today. YIKES................
 
Anthony Fremont wrote:
You sound a lot like darkmatter. Any relation?

Look at the headers.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Anthony Fremont wrote:
ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?


Let's just say that it is easy to get past you, boy.

Twice yesterday, and I will again, I'm sure.

WTF are you going on about now? Until today, I hadn't made any posts in
this group for over a week.

You sound a lot like a dope with an indefensible position... absolute
relationship there, I'm sure.

Look at the headers.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Anthony Fremont wrote:

ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?


Let's just say that it is easy to get past you, boy.

Twice yesterday, and I will again, I'm sure.

WTF are you going on about now? Until today, I hadn't made any
posts in this group for over a week.

You sound a lot like a dope with an indefensible position...
absolute relationship there, I'm sure.


Look at the headers.
I did and saw a remarkable similarity between the two, but I've also seen
some flooders lately that have the ability to inject messages into the feed
with complete header forgeries. I still don't get the remark about "getting
past me twice yesterday". :-?
 
Anthony Fremont wrote:
I did and saw a remarkable similarity between the two, but I've also seen
some flooders lately that have the ability to inject messages into the feed
with complete header forgeries. I still don't get the remark about "getting
past me twice yesterday". :-?

He sufferes from delusions of adaquacy.


--
Service to my country? Been there, Done that, and I've got my DD214 to
prove it.
Member of DAV #85.

Michael A. Terrell
Central Florida
 
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Anthony Fremont wrote:

I did and saw a remarkable similarity between the two, but I've also
seen some flooders lately that have the ability to inject messages
into the feed with complete header forgeries. I still don't get the
remark about "getting past me twice yesterday". :-?


He sufferes from delusions of adaquacy.
At least no one else will be fooled. ;-)
 
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 18:38:15 -0500, "Anthony Fremont" <anyone@nospam.com>
wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Anthony Fremont wrote:

ChairmanOfTheBored wrote:
On Sat, 25 Aug 2007 14:17:55 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
anyone@nospam.com> wrote:

You sound allot like darkmatter. Any relation?


Let's just say that it is easy to get past you, boy.

Twice yesterday, and I will again, I'm sure.

WTF are you going on about now? Until today, I hadn't made any
posts in this group for over a week.

You sound a lot like a dope with an indefensible position...
absolute relationship there, I'm sure.


Look at the headers.

I did and saw a remarkable similarity between the two, but I've also seen
some flooders lately that have the ability to inject messages into the feed
with complete header forgeries. I still don't get the remark about "getting
past me twice yesterday". :-?

I confused you and the GriseTard... imagine that.
 
John Fields wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Radiosrfun wrote:

If we hadn't fought "Their" war for them

Germany declared war on the USA after Pearl Harbor. There is no 'their war'
about it.

---
Bullshit. It was a war in Europe started by Europeans.
---

FYI, the Germans were working on long range bombers to bomb the USA and did
indeed make several that allegedly did the job.

---
I don't recall reading about German bombs raining down on the US.
Got a link?
You'd be crazy to imagine it wasn't on their list of things to do. They were
after all working on advanced rocketry.

Graham
 
Don Bowey wrote:

Don't you think the State Department has been given insight about him? I
don't think he could get into the country.
You'd want to exclude someone simply for not agreeing with the Republican agenda ?

Graham
 
Radiosrfun wrote:

I'm sure many of his countrymen would love to slap him upside his head.
DUDE - we're ALL "human" - we ALL make mistakes. Your parents did -
conceiving you!
These people would appear to agree with me.

Bear in mind to that the Daily Mail tends to be read not by socialiasts but those
leaning to the political right.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=477478&in_page_id=1811&in_page_id=1811&expand=true#StartComments



Who needs the Taliban with the Americans around.
- Mickey V, Manchester, UK

Isn't it time we started shooting back at these gung ho so called "allies".
- Ken Parton, Cleethorpes

Who needs enemies - we've got the Americans on our side. I think.
- Mike Randall, Worcester, England

it is bad enough fighting the enemy without being bombed by our so called allies who
only the other day were accusing us of surrendering in Basra. The yanks have always
been a bunch of gung ho cowboys so let's leave them to it.
- John Phillips, Derby

Friendly fire? Negligence surely! These incidents will continue to happen until those
guilty of it are accountable! It's about time this phrase was dropped and a new term
used - how about murder?
- Gr., Southwest, UK

Let's pull our troops out now, before any more of them get slaughtered by careless
Yanks!
- Liz, London, England

American soldiers are too trigger happy.
- Helen Thomsett, Hobart, Australia

Unfortunately for our lads, when the Americans fly British troops die! That's the way
it is!
- Tony H., Sheffield, England.

There is no such thing as 'friendly fire'. Incompetence - yes, manslaughter - yes.
This is a crime and should be treated like any other; people should be prosecuted.
- Maggie G, W. London

What is wrong with these damn incompetent American pilots?
- Mike, Coventry

There are too many cases of the Americans doing this. What is wrong with them? We
should pull our troops out of both Afghanistan and Iraq now. Enough is enough.
- M Clayton, Scarborough, England

With the American military for "friends", you don't need any enemies.
- Fred James, Worcester

Friendly fire should be renamed Stupidity Strike in honour of the idiots responsible.
Are American troops actually trained or does any idiot with a love of guns qualify to
join?
- Jo, Kent

It isn't the first time: it won't be the last. I have worked with US forces and they
are incompetent!
- Ken Raf , Trowbridge, UK

Canada's first dead soldiers were not killed by the Taliban, they were also bombed by
an American National Guard cowboy with wings.
- Axel, Montreal, Canada

I have also trained alongside our American allies, and found their attitude to be
too 'gung ho, and way OTT'! As a result I have little confidence in their ability to
operate efficiently, effectively, and professionally.
- Desmond, Devon, UK

my brother is serving in Helmund provence at the moment it truly sickens me that he
could come to harm by American pilots who seem to have a 'Vietnam mentality' and just
don't seem to be up to the job.
- Sandy, Spain

Time for our puppet politicians to demand that the American Government thoroughly
investigates the far too many times their servicemen have killed and injured their
allies
- G.Virr, Sunbury, England.

And will the American pilot suffer any penalties, no chance he will probably get a
medal. They usually get one for just getting out of bed.
- Tony Watkins, Bideford, Devon

What chance have our soldiers got when they need to be looking over their shoulders
at our allies as well as the target? Who needs enemies when you've got the US on your
side!
- Mark, Birkenhead, Wirral

There is obviously one set of rules for the Americans and one for the rest of the
world.
- Lynn Baird, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
 
Jim Thompson wrote:

I don't why it is that this crap must continue.
Because the USA is a danger to the world.


EVERYONE should simply SHUN donkey-ass and we will never be bothered
again.
Like you're anyone to talk.

Graham
 
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 04:00:18 +0100, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@hotmail.com> wrote:

Don Bowey wrote:

Don't you think the State Department has been given insight about him? I
don't think he could get into the country.

You'd want to exclude someone simply for not agreeing with the Republican agenda ?

Graham

You're a goddamned idiot. You do not declare "republicans are stupid".
Your retarded ass exclaims that Americans are stupid, you US hating
retarded bastard!
 
Richard The Dreaded Libertarian wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

The way I heard it, Bush has been toadying up to the UN, so technically,
_WE_ are fighting _YOUR_ war for _YOU_.
Eh ? What kind of tortured logic did you use to come to that conclusion ?

Graham
 
Anthony Fremont wrote:

Eeyore wrote:
Don Bowey wrote:
"Eeyore" wrote:

When will US airmen ever stop shooting up the Brits, Canadians, and
other allies ?

Why are we even fighting your stupid wars for you ?

" Three British soldiers have been killed in a 'friendly fire'
tragedy in Afghanistan by an American airman.

A U.S. Air Force jet dropped a 500lb bomb on the soldiers' position
as they battled Taliban insurgents.

A pair of F-15 warplanes had been called in to help when 60 British
soldiers were ambushed by Taliban fighters and found themselves
fighting for their lives.

An inquiry was under way last night into what went so disastrously
wrong, and led to the latest in a string of socalled 'blue-on-blue'
incidents involving American forces. "
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_
id=477478&in_page_id=1811

Last time it happened, the Pentagon even tried to suppress evidence.

Take it up with your government, you anti-American dumbprick.

What part of "extremely hazardous" don't you understand. PLEASE
don't answer that.

The RAF doesn't bomb British ground troops. It's ALWAYS the USAF. The
US military are hoplelessly incompetent.

Why do you continue to make blanket statements like that? In 1941 the Fleet
Air Arm torpedoed the HMS Sheffield when trying to hunt down the Bismarck.
In 1942 the HMS St. Albens sunk a polish sub. In 1944 a Brittish British
flotilla was attacked by RAF Hawker Typhoons, off Cap d'Antifer, Le Havre.
HMS Britomart and HMS Hussar sunk. HMS Salamander damaged beyond repair and
scrapped. Just ripped that stuff out of the wiki. I know that's not much
of an authoritative source, but I suspect these things are likely true since
no one has changed or erased it from the wikipedia. BTW, nice job in the
Falklands with at least three major occurences of friendly fire including
shooting down one of your own AAC Gazelles. I think the hour long
fire-fight involving artillery and other "heavy" weapons between two
companys warrants a special mention. How long did that "war" last anyway?
I wasn't talking about WW2. For starters the same electronic aids didn't exist. The
USA had a high 'friendly fire' score in WW2 too btw.

The RAF is trained to be far more 'careful' with dropping bombs than the USAF. They
don't appreciate the cowboy attitude.

Graham
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top