C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 11:34:40 -0000, <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com> wrote:
And your stomach is happy to wait?!
And your stomach is happy to wait?!
D
dkol
Guest
"Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote in message
news
p.zuwrwhddwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...
We arent all silly little kids stamping their foot and demanding what they
want right now.
news
p.zuwrwhddwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...We arent all silly little kids stamping their foot and demanding what they
want right now.
P
Peeler
Guest
On Tue, 1 Jan 2019 15:35:40 +1100, dkol, better known as cantankerous
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
YOU are silly senile little old fart that keeps trolling on Usenet like some
maladjusted mentally disturbed youngster!
--
Richard addressing Rot Speed:
"Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll."
MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
YOU are silly senile little old fart that keeps trolling on Usenet like some
maladjusted mentally disturbed youngster!
--
Richard addressing Rot Speed:
"Shit you're thick/pathetic excuse for a troll."
MID: <ogoa38$pul$1@news.mixmin.net>
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:18:44 -0000, Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
So what we need is a bigger fucking magnetron. More power! Get one from Binford!
So what we need is a bigger fucking magnetron. More power! Get one from Binford!
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 15:12:23 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
Well they're meant to, but you can see them flickering, especially at the lower quarter of brightness. Or maybe I have better eyesight than the designers?
Well they're meant to, but you can see them flickering, especially at the lower quarter of brightness. Or maybe I have better eyesight than the designers?
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:18:43 -0000, Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
Why could they not be switched independantly after the stepup transformer?
Yes I know that. But however it lowers the total cooking power, I've never felt the need to use less than all of it. Just as when I drive a car, I only lift my foot off the floor for a corner or a slow woman driver in front of me.
"William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is
news
GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:38:04 -0000, Clare Snyder
clare@snyder.on.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:07:42 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 6:37 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 9:23:42 AM UTC-5, Bill Gill
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 7:43 AM, William Gothberg wrote:
Shouldn't we have faster microwaves by now giving out a few
kW? They were invented decades ago.
Higher powered microwaves would require higher powered
electric outlets, probably 220VAC (in the USA).
Also it is questionable whether higher powered ovens would be
practical for use. Getting warming times down to a couple of
seconds might not be a good idea. More speed is not always
better.
Bill
+1
That about covers it. Not sure how useful more power would be.
For example, last night I was thawing out a tomato sauce in a
quart plastic container. The Panasonic has a defrost mode that
uses about 30% power and cycles that.
It gets the 30% power by cycling the 100% power on 30% of the
time.
(By the way, adjusting the level does not actually change the
wattage. It simply means the microwave will pulse on and off at
its fixed wattage until the desired level is reached.)
https://lifehacker.com/5974788/familiarize-yourself-with-your-mic
rowaves-power-settings-to-make-microwave-cooking-a-joy
That was true of the first generation of Microwaves, but the
current
"inverter" driver units actually CAN throttle the power. Inverter
microwaves are much better for defrosting AND cooking.
We've had ours for about 2 years now - replacing our original
that we bought in about 1985.
BIG difference (but the old one would likely still be working by
the time this one dies)
Why is it called an invertor? I thought an invertor was a device
to increase the voltage - like running 240V devices off a 12V car
battery.
It's actually a switching power supply, instead of the old heavy step
up transformer, diode and capacitor system. And contrary to the other
posters reply, there 'inverter' style microwave is NOT throttling the
power going to the magnetron. It's still getting high voltage DC
current, just like the original ones. It's better able to control the
timing period for magnetron on/off cycles as well as independent
control over the magnetrons required filament. the old step up
transformer style fired the element with another tap on the
secondary. so, if the transformer had power, both the filament and
magnetron do too. No way to seperate them in that design.
Why could they not be switched independantly after the stepup transformer?
Yes I know that. But however it lowers the total cooking power, I've never felt the need to use less than all of it. Just as when I drive a car, I only lift my foot off the floor for a corner or a slow woman driver in front of me.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:04:24 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
Not really true with the old microwaves where the on/off cycle was every 10 seconds! All that does is make the food hot then warm then hot then warm, not very good I would have thought.
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 2:18:47 AM UTC-5, Diesel wrote:
"William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is
news
GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:38:04 -0000, Clare Snyder
clare@snyder.on.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:07:42 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 6:37 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 9:23:42 AM UTC-5, Bill Gill
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 7:43 AM, William Gothberg wrote:
Shouldn't we have faster microwaves by now giving out a few
kW? They were invented decades ago.
Higher powered microwaves would require higher powered
electric outlets, probably 220VAC (in the USA).
Also it is questionable whether higher powered ovens would be
practical for use. Getting warming times down to a couple of
seconds might not be a good idea. More speed is not always
better.
Bill
+1
That about covers it. Not sure how useful more power would be.
For example, last night I was thawing out a tomato sauce in a
quart plastic container. The Panasonic has a defrost mode that
uses about 30% power and cycles that.
It gets the 30% power by cycling the 100% power on 30% of the
time.
(By the way, adjusting the level does not actually change the
wattage. It simply means the microwave will pulse on and off at
its fixed wattage until the desired level is reached.)
https://lifehacker.com/5974788/familiarize-yourself-with-your-mic
rowaves-power-settings-to-make-microwave-cooking-a-joy
That was true of the first generation of Microwaves, but the
current
"inverter" driver units actually CAN throttle the power. Inverter
microwaves are much better for defrosting AND cooking.
We've had ours for about 2 years now - replacing our original
that we bought in about 1985.
BIG difference (but the old one would likely still be working by
the time this one dies)
Why is it called an invertor? I thought an invertor was a device
to increase the voltage - like running 240V devices off a 12V car
battery.
It's actually a switching power supply, instead of the old heavy step
up transformer, diode and capacitor system. And contrary to the other
posters reply, there 'inverter' style microwave is NOT throttling the
power going to the magnetron. It's still getting high voltage DC
current, just like the original ones. It's better able to control the
timing period for magnetron on/off cycles as well as independent
control over the magnetrons required filament. the old step up
transformer style fired the element with another tap on the
secondary. so, if the transformer had power, both the filament and
magnetron do too. No way to seperate them in that design.
And why on earth would you not want to cook on full power? I've
never had a reason to lower the power from the maximum of 800W. I
want the meal as soon as possible!
You aren't lowering or raising the power to your magnetron when you
adjust those cooking settings. All you're actually doing is telling
the microwaves computer how long to leave the magnetron on for. Ie:
how fast does it cycle the magnetrons power state. For the old heavy
ones, non 'inverter', it's opening/closing a single pole relay that
controls the input on the primary coil to the step up transformer.
Your 'cooking' settings determine how long that relay stays open and
closes for. That's all. Anytime it's closed, your magnetron (in your
case) is kicking 800watts of microwave energy. You can't adjust that.
What you can adjust is how long it's firing the energy into the
cooking chamber.
Which is in fact changing the power input to the magnetron and the power
output of the magnetron. It's like a 100W bulb on a dimmer. I set the
dimmer to 50%, is the dimmer still delivering 100W? Is the bulb still
putting out 100W? No, it's now 50W.
Not really true with the old microwaves where the on/off cycle was every 10 seconds! All that does is make the food hot then warm then hot then warm, not very good I would have thought.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 18:31:52 -0000, Meanie <Me@gmail.com> wrote:
You have the same little intelligence as Rod Speed and Steve Pounder. Try responding with a sentence instead of an insult I'd see from a 6 year old.
Not sure why I'm trying to have a discussion about something technical with a woman anyway.
You have the same little intelligence as Rod Speed and Steve Pounder. Try responding with a sentence instead of an insult I'd see from a 6 year old.
Not sure why I'm trying to have a discussion about something technical with a woman anyway.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 18:31:21 -0000, Murmansk <stainburn@gmail.com> wrote:
Exactly, more power, less time.
Exactly, more power, less time.
D
dkol
Guest
"Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote in message
newsp.zuyajby3wdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...
Yes, you actually are that stupid.
Yes, you actually are that stupid.
news
p.zuyajby3wdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 07:18:43 -0000, Diesel <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
"William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is
news
GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:38:04 -0000, Clare Snyder
clare@snyder.on.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:07:42 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 6:37 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 9:23:42 AM UTC-5, Bill Gill
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 7:43 AM, William Gothberg wrote:
Shouldn't we have faster microwaves by now giving out a few
kW? They were invented decades ago.
Higher powered microwaves would require higher powered
electric outlets, probably 220VAC (in the USA).
Also it is questionable whether higher powered ovens would be
practical for use. Getting warming times down to a couple of
seconds might not be a good idea. More speed is not always
better.
Bill
+1
That about covers it. Not sure how useful more power would be.
For example, last night I was thawing out a tomato sauce in a
quart plastic container. The Panasonic has a defrost mode that
uses about 30% power and cycles that.
It gets the 30% power by cycling the 100% power on 30% of the
time.
(By the way, adjusting the level does not actually change the
wattage. It simply means the microwave will pulse on and off at
its fixed wattage until the desired level is reached.)
https://lifehacker.com/5974788/familiarize-yourself-with-your-mic
rowaves-power-settings-to-make-microwave-cooking-a-joy
That was true of the first generation of Microwaves, but the
current
"inverter" driver units actually CAN throttle the power. Inverter
microwaves are much better for defrosting AND cooking.
We've had ours for about 2 years now - replacing our original
that we bought in about 1985.
BIG difference (but the old one would likely still be working by
the time this one dies)
Why is it called an invertor? I thought an invertor was a device
to increase the voltage - like running 240V devices off a 12V car
battery.
It's actually a switching power supply, instead of the old heavy step
up transformer, diode and capacitor system. And contrary to the other
posters reply, there 'inverter' style microwave is NOT throttling the
power going to the magnetron. It's still getting high voltage DC
current, just like the original ones. It's better able to control the
timing period for magnetron on/off cycles as well as independent
control over the magnetrons required filament. the old step up
transformer style fired the element with another tap on the
secondary. so, if the transformer had power, both the filament and
magnetron do too. No way to seperate them in that design.
Why could they not be switched independantly after the stepup transformer?
And why on earth would you not want to cook on full power? I've
never had a reason to lower the power from the maximum of 800W. I
want the meal as soon as possible!
You aren't lowering or raising the power to your magnetron when you
adjust those cooking settings. All you're actually doing is telling
the microwaves computer how long to leave the magnetron on for. Ie:
how fast does it cycle the magnetrons power state. For the old heavy
ones, non 'inverter', it's opening/closing a single pole relay that
controls the input on the primary coil to the step up transformer.
Your 'cooking' settings determine how long that relay stays open and
closes for. That's all. Anytime it's closed, your magnetron (in your
case) is kicking 800watts of microwave energy. You can't adjust that.
What you can adjust is how long it's firing the energy into the
cooking chamber.
Yes I know that. But however it lowers the total cooking power, I've
never felt the need to use less than all of it.
Yes, you actually are that stupid.
Yes, you actually are that stupid.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:49:18 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
I don't freeze things in stupid containers, no.
You carry on wasting your time if you like, I have hobbies and other things I prefer to do than fucking about making food. Food is a fuel, if it tastes nice and gives me energy, that's fine, then I can get on with my life.
And fix your newsreader, why is it allergic to crossposts? You're breaking the conversation into four parts moron.
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 3:36:05 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 13:29:15 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 3:22:52 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:16:33 -0000, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> wrote:
On 12/29/18 12:52 PM, William Gothberg wrote:
[snip]
Microwaving something in a cheap shit plastic container is insane. I
always cook or eat things in a real pot bowl. Plastic melts!
The first thing I heated in a microwave was frozen macaroni and cheese.
The instructions said to cover it in plastic wrap. It didn't take me
long to figure out that it was a really bad idea, consider trying to
separate melted plastic from melted cheese.
Indeed, that cheap shit plastic melts in a 700W microwave oven. Or in any microwave oven, it can't handle boiling water, which inevitably you get from the food. And I bet it's rather toxic.
Which is why when DEFROSTING something that's in a plastic container you
use the DEFROST cycle that uses low power and then cycles even that after
about 75 secs.
I'm not talking about defrosting. I've bought ready meals which are sat at room or fridge temperature, they go in the microwave to heat and the plastic melts.
You've said you just use yours for cooking pre-made
frozen dinners and the like, which is crap I wouldn't even eat.
It's more tasty and quicker to make
Others here use microwaves for other uses, including defrosting raw foods that
you don't want to cook in the microwave. I gave you an example, pork chops.
I want them DEFROSTED, not cooked. Once DEFROSTED, I can then brine them,
marinate them, grill them, so what I would with any fresh pork chops.
What a palava. We invented ready meals for a reason.
Or defrosting tomato sauce that in a plastic container. I want the sauce
DEFROSTED, not a melted container. I suppose I should only freeze foods
in ceramic bowls that go in a microwave?
You take them out of the container they were in dumbass.
You can't get most frozen food, like sauce, out of a one quart plastic container until
it's at least partially defrosted moron. You wouldn't even know, because
you apparently don't prepare and then freeze food in those kinds of containers.
I don't freeze things in stupid containers, no.
You carry on wasting your time if you like, I have hobbies and other things I prefer to do than fucking about making food. Food is a fuel, if it tastes nice and gives me energy, that's fine, then I can get on with my life.
And fix your newsreader, why is it allergic to crossposts? You're breaking the conversation into four parts moron.
D
dkol
Guest
"Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote in message
newsp.zuyalgnjwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...
Yes, you actually are that pig ignorant.
It allows more time for the heat to move from the
outer layer of a big chunk of stuff like with a leg
of lamb or quart of something you are defrosting
to the inside where the microwaves don't get to.
news
p.zuyalgnjwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 14:04:24 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net
wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 2:18:47 AM UTC-5, Diesel wrote:
"William Gothberg" <William_Gothberg@internet.co.is
news
GMT in alt.home.repair, wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 17:38:04 -0000, Clare Snyder
clare@snyder.on.ca> wrote:
On Sat, 29 Dec 2018 08:07:42 -0800, Bob F <bobnospam@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 6:37 AM, trader_4 wrote:
On Saturday, December 29, 2018 at 9:23:42 AM UTC-5, Bill Gill
wrote:
On 12/29/2018 7:43 AM, William Gothberg wrote:
Shouldn't we have faster microwaves by now giving out a few
kW? They were invented decades ago.
Higher powered microwaves would require higher powered
electric outlets, probably 220VAC (in the USA).
Also it is questionable whether higher powered ovens would be
practical for use. Getting warming times down to a couple of
seconds might not be a good idea. More speed is not always
better.
Bill
+1
That about covers it. Not sure how useful more power would be.
For example, last night I was thawing out a tomato sauce in a
quart plastic container. The Panasonic has a defrost mode that
uses about 30% power and cycles that.
It gets the 30% power by cycling the 100% power on 30% of the
time.
(By the way, adjusting the level does not actually change the
wattage. It simply means the microwave will pulse on and off at
its fixed wattage until the desired level is reached.)
https://lifehacker.com/5974788/familiarize-yourself-with-your-mic
rowaves-power-settings-to-make-microwave-cooking-a-joy
That was true of the first generation of Microwaves, but the
current
"inverter" driver units actually CAN throttle the power. Inverter
microwaves are much better for defrosting AND cooking.
We've had ours for about 2 years now - replacing our original
that we bought in about 1985.
BIG difference (but the old one would likely still be working by
the time this one dies)
Why is it called an invertor? I thought an invertor was a device
to increase the voltage - like running 240V devices off a 12V car
battery.
It's actually a switching power supply, instead of the old heavy step
up transformer, diode and capacitor system. And contrary to the other
posters reply, there 'inverter' style microwave is NOT throttling the
power going to the magnetron. It's still getting high voltage DC
current, just like the original ones. It's better able to control the
timing period for magnetron on/off cycles as well as independent
control over the magnetrons required filament. the old step up
transformer style fired the element with another tap on the
secondary. so, if the transformer had power, both the filament and
magnetron do too. No way to seperate them in that design.
And why on earth would you not want to cook on full power? I've
never had a reason to lower the power from the maximum of 800W. I
want the meal as soon as possible!
You aren't lowering or raising the power to your magnetron when you
adjust those cooking settings. All you're actually doing is telling
the microwaves computer how long to leave the magnetron on for. Ie:
how fast does it cycle the magnetrons power state. For the old heavy
ones, non 'inverter', it's opening/closing a single pole relay that
controls the input on the primary coil to the step up transformer.
Your 'cooking' settings determine how long that relay stays open and
closes for. That's all. Anytime it's closed, your magnetron (in your
case) is kicking 800watts of microwave energy. You can't adjust that.
What you can adjust is how long it's firing the energy into the
cooking chamber.
Which is in fact changing the power input to the magnetron and the power
output of the magnetron. It's like a 100W bulb on a dimmer. I set the
dimmer to 50%, is the dimmer still delivering 100W? Is the bulb still
putting out 100W? No, it's now 50W.
Not really true with the old microwaves where the on/off cycle was every
10 seconds! All that does is make the food hot then warm then hot then
warm, not very good I would have thought.
Yes, you actually are that pig ignorant.
It allows more time for the heat to move from the
outer layer of a big chunk of stuff like with a leg
of lamb or quart of something you are defrosting
to the inside where the microwaves don't get to.
P
Peeler
Guest
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 06:58:28 +1100, dkol, better known as cantankerous
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH another 104 lines of stinking trollshit>
....and much better air in here again!
--
MrTurnip@down.the.farm about senile Rot Speed:
"This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage."
MID: <ps10v9$uo2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH another 104 lines of stinking trollshit>
....and much better air in here again!
--
MrTurnip@down.the.farm about senile Rot Speed:
"This is like having a conversation with someone with brain damage."
MID: <ps10v9$uo2$1@gioia.aioe.org>
M
Mr Pounder Esquire
Guest
Commander Kinsey wrote:
Prick.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:49:18 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net
wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 3:36:05 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 13:29:15 -0000, trader_4
trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 3:22:52 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg
wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:16:33 -0000, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid
wrote:
On 12/29/18 12:52 PM, William Gothberg wrote:
[snip]
Microwaving something in a cheap shit plastic container is
insane. I always cook or eat things in a real pot bowl. Plastic
melts!
The first thing I heated in a microwave was frozen macaroni and
cheese. The instructions said to cover it in plastic wrap. It
didn't take me long to figure out that it was a really bad idea,
consider trying to separate melted plastic from melted cheese.
Indeed, that cheap shit plastic melts in a 700W microwave oven. Or in
any microwave oven, it can't handle boiling water, which
inevitably you get from the food. And I bet it's rather toxic.
Which is why when DEFROSTING something that's in a plastic
container you use the DEFROST cycle that uses low power and then cycles
even
that after about 75 secs.
I'm not talking about defrosting. I've bought ready meals which
are sat at room or fridge temperature, they go in the microwave to
heat and the plastic melts.
You've said you just use yours for cooking pre-made
frozen dinners and the like, which is crap I wouldn't even eat.
It's more tasty and quicker to make
Others here use microwaves for other uses, including defrosting
raw foods that you don't want to cook in the microwave. I gave
you an example, pork chops. I want them DEFROSTED, not cooked. Once
DEFROSTED, I can then brine them, marinate them, grill them,
so what I would with any fresh pork chops.
What a palava. We invented ready meals for a reason.
Or defrosting tomato sauce that in a plastic container. I want
the sauce DEFROSTED, not a melted container. I suppose I should
only freeze foods in ceramic bowls that go in a microwave?
You take them out of the container they were in dumbass.
You can't get most frozen food, like sauce, out of a one quart
plastic container until it's at least partially defrosted moron. You
wouldn't even know, because you apparently don't prepare and then freeze
food in those kinds of
containers.
I don't freeze things in stupid containers, no.
You're living off pre-cooked, TV dinner crap. Anyone that makes a
post saying there is no reason not to cook pizza in a microwave has
already said way more than enough about their knowledge of food and
cooking.
We have a show here you could be on, Worst Cooks in America.
You carry on wasting your time if you like, I have hobbies and other
things I prefer to do than fucking about making food. Food is a
fuel, if it tastes nice and gives me energy, that's fine, then I can
get on with my life.
And fix your newsreader, why is it allergic to crossposts? You're
breaking the conversation into four parts moron.
Prick.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 20:17:15 -0000, Mr Pounder Esquire <MrPounder@rationalthought.com> wrote:
Go on, get yourself a hobby.
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 20:49:18 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net
wrote:
On Monday, December 31, 2018 at 3:36:05 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 13:29:15 -0000, trader_4
trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
On Sunday, December 30, 2018 at 3:22:52 PM UTC-5, William Gothberg
wrote:
On Sun, 30 Dec 2018 20:16:33 -0000, Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid
wrote:
On 12/29/18 12:52 PM, William Gothberg wrote:
[snip]
Microwaving something in a cheap shit plastic container is
insane. I always cook or eat things in a real pot bowl. Plastic
melts!
The first thing I heated in a microwave was frozen macaroni and
cheese. The instructions said to cover it in plastic wrap. It
didn't take me long to figure out that it was a really bad idea,
consider trying to separate melted plastic from melted cheese.
Indeed, that cheap shit plastic melts in a 700W microwave oven. Or in
any microwave oven, it can't handle boiling water, which
inevitably you get from the food. And I bet it's rather toxic.
Which is why when DEFROSTING something that's in a plastic
container you use the DEFROST cycle that uses low power and then cycles
even
that after about 75 secs.
I'm not talking about defrosting. I've bought ready meals which
are sat at room or fridge temperature, they go in the microwave to
heat and the plastic melts.
You've said you just use yours for cooking pre-made
frozen dinners and the like, which is crap I wouldn't even eat.
It's more tasty and quicker to make
Others here use microwaves for other uses, including defrosting
raw foods that you don't want to cook in the microwave. I gave
you an example, pork chops. I want them DEFROSTED, not cooked. Once
DEFROSTED, I can then brine them, marinate them, grill them,
so what I would with any fresh pork chops.
What a palava. We invented ready meals for a reason.
Or defrosting tomato sauce that in a plastic container. I want
the sauce DEFROSTED, not a melted container. I suppose I should
only freeze foods in ceramic bowls that go in a microwave?
You take them out of the container they were in dumbass.
You can't get most frozen food, like sauce, out of a one quart
plastic container until it's at least partially defrosted moron. You
wouldn't even know, because you apparently don't prepare and then freeze
food in those kinds of
containers.
I don't freeze things in stupid containers, no.
You're living off pre-cooked, TV dinner crap. Anyone that makes a
post saying there is no reason not to cook pizza in a microwave has
already said way more than enough about their knowledge of food and
cooking.
We have a show here you could be on, Worst Cooks in America.
You carry on wasting your time if you like, I have hobbies and other
things I prefer to do than fucking about making food. Food is a
fuel, if it tastes nice and gives me energy, that's fine, then I can
get on with my life.
And fix your newsreader, why is it allergic to crossposts? You're
breaking the conversation into four parts moron.
Prick.
Go on, get yourself a hobby.
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 23:04:29 -0000, trader_4 <trader4@optonline.net> wrote:
No it isn't. The cooking has already been done. All we have to do is apply heat to make it a nice palatable temperature.
> and it does not take very long.
Yes it does, firstly you have to warm up the oven....
No it isn't. The cooking has already been done. All we have to do is apply heat to make it a nice palatable temperature.
> and it does not take very long.
Yes it does, firstly you have to warm up the oven....
C
Commander Kinsey
Guest
On Tue, 01 Jan 2019 13:00:40 -0000, <angelicapaganelli@yahoo.com> wrote:
When I see food, I get hungry, it's a natural instinct. Therefore I cannot prepare food without consuming half the ingredients during the cooking operation.
> If I want something fast, I have scrambled eggs.
I always want something fast, therefore I cook EVERYTHING in a microwave. Even things that say you have to use an oven, I ignore it and use the microwave, funnily enough it tastes nice and is edible.
When I see food, I get hungry, it's a natural instinct. Therefore I cannot prepare food without consuming half the ingredients during the cooking operation.
> If I want something fast, I have scrambled eggs.
I always want something fast, therefore I cook EVERYTHING in a microwave. Even things that say you have to use an oven, I ignore it and use the microwave, funnily enough it tastes nice and is edible.
P
Peeler
Guest
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 07:02:09 +1100, dkol, better known as cantankerous
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH another 109 lines of sick trollshit>
--
Another TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:
Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."
Senile Rot: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're
broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."
Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."
Senile Rot: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."
MID: <fvlcdcFq2icU1@mid.individual.net>
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH another 109 lines of sick trollshit>
--
Another TYPICAL retarded "conversation" between the two resident idiots:
Birdbrain: "But imagine how cool it was to own slaves."
Senile Rot: "Yeah, right. Feed them, clothe them, and fix them when they're
broken.
After all, you paid good money for them. Then you've got to keep an eye
on them all the time."
Birdbrain: "Better than having to give them wages on top of that."
Senile Rot: "Specially when they make more slaves for you
and produce their own food and clothes."
MID: <fvlcdcFq2icU1@mid.individual.net>
D
dkol
Guest
"Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote in message
newsp.zuyhu4vkwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...
Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
Just another stupid little kid that must have everything right away.
> therefore I cook EVERYTHING in a microwave.
Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
> funnily enough it tastes nice and is edible.
Tastes much better when done the right way
with all except boiled veg and a few other things.
news
p.zuyhu4vkwdg98l@desktop-ga2mpl8.lan...Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
Just another stupid little kid that must have everything right away.
> therefore I cook EVERYTHING in a microwave.
Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
Yes, you actually are that terminal a fuckwit.
> funnily enough it tastes nice and is edible.
Tastes much better when done the right way
with all except boiled veg and a few other things.
P
Peeler
Guest
On Wed, 2 Jan 2019 10:07:28 +1100, dkol, better known as cantankerous
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH the two prize idiots' latest idiotic drivel unread again>
--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish wanker and senile
Ozzietard:
Birdbrain: "Horse shit doesn't stink."
Senile Rot: "It does if you roll in it."
Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky shit, but then why does vegetarian human shit stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"
Senile Rot: "Nope, some cow shit stinks too."
Message-ID: <fv5f1tFi3f2U1@mid.individual.net>
nym-shifting trolling senile geezer Rot Speed, wrote:
<FLUSH the two prize idiots' latest idiotic drivel unread again>
--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish wanker and senile
Ozzietard:
Birdbrain: "Horse shit doesn't stink."
Senile Rot: "It does if you roll in it."
Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky shit, but then why does vegetarian human shit stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"
Senile Rot: "Nope, some cow shit stinks too."
Message-ID: <fv5f1tFi3f2U1@mid.individual.net>