O
On Web
Guest
"Jim" <nomail@riomail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns99545E881C2A75D4AM2@127.0.0.1...
are many improper uses for such a device and it is very, very unusual to
need any kind of phone triggered device. I still struggle with this a bit.
Knowing that there are inappropriate uses to the technology I really don't
know why you're so angry that I've had a concern about the final
application.
Throughout the thread you have been secretive about what you planned to do
with such a device. If this was a straightforward application you probably
would have told us all about it by now.
If this is related to your attempt to capture callers numbers, then I
suspect you may be dissappointed - it's easy to withold a number from
nuisance calls and you'd have to involve the authorities to capture the real
number.
You've already had a load of suggestions from other posters.
I've raised my concerns, you've half explained why you are pursuing this -
it's time to move on.
If this is really required to aid a family member, concentrate on them and
consider if this route is really the best form of action.
news:Xns99545E881C2A75D4AM2@127.0.0.1...
I was really concerned about what was planned for this device since thereOn 18 Jun 2007, On Web <a@b.com> wrote:
"Jim" <nomail@riomail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9953D32F1928C5D4AM2@127.0.0.1...
On 18 Jun 2007, On Web <a@b.com> wrote:
lots of snips..
What is it you are trying to do?
I am setting something up to ensure safety for someone in the
household who is suffering trauma and I do not feel I need to go
into the details.
Then I wish you luck with it, whatever it is. I can't help but feel
that for whatever your trying to accomplish there's a more direct
route to the solution, and no I don't want to know any more, I'm
done with this.
So after saying that you, oooooh, couldn't possibly help unless you
were able to know more and more of situation (to the point of almost
prying into a third party's distress) you now say you have nothing to
offer?
So why waste everybody's time while you kept needling away at what is
obviously an uncomfortable situation for someone I know. And then
you declare that, "oh well if that's the case, it is too serious or
too delicate" for people like youself to be involved.
Are you some sort of master time waster? Or someone who tries to
create distress?
Perhaps you didn't know anything helpful in the first place? Maybe
you just pretended to gave something to say and just wanted to take
on a very loud and overlbearing moral tone in the hope that people
like myself who have a genuine need to seek info will be intimidated
by your sniping?
Would it be asking too much to either contribute something as asked
in the original post or not to make any further remarks about how
innocent and correct you are.
are many improper uses for such a device and it is very, very unusual to
need any kind of phone triggered device. I still struggle with this a bit.
Knowing that there are inappropriate uses to the technology I really don't
know why you're so angry that I've had a concern about the final
application.
Throughout the thread you have been secretive about what you planned to do
with such a device. If this was a straightforward application you probably
would have told us all about it by now.
If this is related to your attempt to capture callers numbers, then I
suspect you may be dissappointed - it's easy to withold a number from
nuisance calls and you'd have to involve the authorities to capture the real
number.
You've already had a load of suggestions from other posters.
I've raised my concerns, you've half explained why you are pursuing this -
it's time to move on.
If this is really required to aid a family member, concentrate on them and
consider if this route is really the best form of action.