Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And yet you have managed to hang a lower profile than a illegal alienThis is not a problem that needs to be fixed.
Is there _any_ problem you ever fixed?
About $200 million worth, so far.
About 13 figures a year and climbing.And you?
One sign that times are changing is that the largest corporation inThe automakers are victims of circumstances.
You mean US automakers. And the failure to innovate isn't
'circumstances'.
Right. �If the USA had decent government run pension and health care
systems like the civilized countries then the "Big Three" would not have
a "Legacy Cost" problem and manufacturing of automobiles would be an
American mainstay.
Very likely.
Pool stenographer.On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:48:21 -0800 (PST), Bret Cahill
BretCahill@aol.com> wrote:
This is not a problem that needs to be fixed.
Is there _any_ problem you ever fixed?
About $200 million worth, so far.
And yet you have managed to hang a lower profile than a illegal alien
drug smuggling coyote.
How do you _manage_ to stay out of the public record?
Every [legal] billionaire on the planet would like to know.
And you?
About 13 figures a year and climbing.
Cool. How about some links to your public record?
Cahill v Florida, 915 F2d 696, (CA 11 1990)
And _no_ I'm _not_ going to do your breathing for you. You need to
get your ignorant triffling fanny down to the law liberry or subscribe
to WestGroup and git yerself some law book larnin'.
Anyway we're all settin' on the edges of our chairs and holding our
breath waiting for some documentation that you have done anything more
than type utter nonsense yer entire life.
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
Are/were you an attorney?
Engineers and lawyers are natural enemies:
we make stuff, you destroy stuff.
^^^^^ people
Cahill v Florida, 915 F2d 696, (CA 11 1990)This is not a problem that needs to be fixed.
Is there _any_ problem you ever fixed?
About $200 million worth, so far.
And yet you have managed to hang a lower profile than a illegal alien
drug smuggling coyote.
How do you _manage_ to stay out of the public record?
Every [legal] billionaire on the planet would like to know.
And you?
About 13 figures a year and climbing.
Cool. How about some links to your public record?
This is not a problem that needs to be fixed.
Is there _any_ problem you ever fixed?
About $200 million worth, so far.
And yet you have managed to hang a lower profile than a illegal alien
drug smuggling coyote.
How do you _manage_ to stay out of the public record?
Every [legal] billionaire on the planet would like to know.
And you?
About 13 figures a year and climbing.
Cool. How about some links to your public record?
Cahill v Florida, 915 F2d 696, (CA 11 1990)
And _no_ I'm _not_ going to do your breathing for you. ?You need to
get your ignorant triffling fanny down to the law liberry or subscribe
to WestGroup and git yerself some law book larnin'.
Anyway we're all settin' on the edges of our chairs and holding our
breath waiting for some documentation that you have done anything more
than type utter nonsense yer entire life.
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
That ain't the public record.This is not a problem that needs to be fixed.
Is there _any_ problem you ever fixed?
About $200 million worth, so far.
And yet you have managed to hang a lower profile than a illegal alien
drug smuggling coyote.
How do you _manage_ to stay out of the public record?
Every [legal] billionaire on the planet would like to know.
And you?
About 13 figures a year and climbing.
Cool. How about some links to your public record?
Cahill v Florida, 915 F2d 696, (CA 11 1990)
And _no_ I'm _not_ going to do your breathing for you. �You need to
get your ignorant triffling fanny down to the law liberry or subscribe
to WestGroup and git yerself some law book larnin'.
Anyway we're all settin' on the edges of our chairs and holding our
breath waiting for some documentation that you have done anything more
than type utter nonsense yer entire life.
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
No, just a constitutional scholar and it's easy to tell from your selfAre/were you an attorney?
And you ain't never done anything substantial in electronics exceptEngineers and lawyers are natural enemies:
we make stuff, you destroy stuff.
This is an oxymoron. We've had a government-run pension and health careRight. If the USA had decent government run pension and health care
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
systems
Much lower, by design. There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way toOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
So I was correct: You have managed to hang a lower profile than aOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
True: Daydreaming in public doesn't fool anyone.What I do is entirely non-coercive:
Michael, I can't get good numbers on the profitabillity of food grown on marginal lands in greenhouses,"Michael Coburn" <mikcob@verizon.net> wrote in message news:gk5lab2akv@news5.newsguy.com...
.......................
Has anyone seen any real evidence of anything close to 2,000
gallons/ acre year?
That's $20,000/acre when berry crops fetch more than that.
A 1000 percent increase above $2 per gallon (that will be the price
by summer) would be $200 per gallon or $400K per acre if 2000
gal/acre.
1000 percent would be 10X, which would be $20/gallon. or $40K per acre
per year for a 2000 gal/acre algae farm.
Actually it would be $30 a gallon because the price is currently $1.50.
Don't want to nit-pick here, but 1000% (10X) of $1.50 is $15 a gallon.
OK, fine, At $15 a gallon the capital investment needed for algae
production is quite profitable. The land costs are zilch. All the costs
are in the short 15 year capital depreciation-amortization of the
reactors. You build 100 reactors they are expensive (even plastic bags).
But when you build 20k reactors the price per reactor goes way the hell
down. That is especially true in a depression. And BTW, Mexico is
running out of oil regardless of what happens elsewhere.
I know what you are saying, and I also felt like this for a long time.
I just don't see the profitability that you see, or to put it differently : I think that other farm use of cheap land would be
more profitable that growing algae.
Let me run an example in detail, and see if I can validate this statement a bit more concrete.
That may clear up the difference in perspective that we seem to have.
Don't have time now, but I will do this soon.
Do you have a link to such an algae pilot project (without enhanced CO2) ?According to what I have seen the 2000 gal per year does not require the
enhanced CO2.
Biofuel can work in commercial aviation.Has anyone seen any real evidence of anything close to 2,000
gallons/ acre year?
That's $20,000/acre when berry crops fetch more than that.
A 1000 percent increase above $2 per gallon (that will be the price
by summer) would be $200 per gallon or $400K per acre if 2000
gal/acre.
1000 percent would be 10X, which would be $20/gallon. or $40K per acre
per year for a 2000 gal/acre algae farm.
Actually it would be $30 a gallon because the price is currently $1.50.
Don't want to nit-pick here, but 1000% (10X) of $1.50 is $15 a gallon..
OK, fine, �At $15 a gallon the capital investment needed for algae
production is quite profitable. �The land costs are zilch. �All the costs
are in the short 15 year capital depreciation-amortization of the
reactors. You build 100 reactors they are expensive (even plastic bags).
But when you build 20k reactors the price per reactor goes way the hell
down. �That is especially true in a depression. And BTW, Mexico is
running out of oil regardless of what happens elsewhere.
I know what you are saying, and I also felt like this for a long time.
I just don't see the profitability that you see, or to put it differently : I think that other farm use of cheap land would be
more profitable that growing algae.
Let me run an example in detail, and see if I can validate this statement a bit more concrete.
That may clear up the difference in perspective that we seem to have.
Don't have time now, but I will do this soon.
Michael, I can't get good numbers on the profitabillity of food grown on marginal lands in greenhouses,
but I did find this one that is doing just that right now in the Arizona desert :
http://kjzz.org/news/arizona/archives/200602/organicfarming2
The point is that food grown in greenhouses is already profitable now.
With increase in fuel prices (and with that increase in food prices, and increase in land prices) growing food on marginal lands in
greenhouses will become a HUGE profitable market.
Food is always more valuable than fuel, and that's why I believe that algae grown for fuel (in bioractors) will not ever be as
profitable as growning food in similar costing greenhouses.
Even on marginal lands as this example shows.
I studied scams for 15 years in Florida and there are 2 types ofUnless... Algae farms 'bioreactors' become a factor 10X cheaper (per acre). THEN and only then will growing algae for fuel become
profitable, and will already be profitable now.
Don't wait for the price of fuel to go skyhigh.
According to what I have seen the 2000 gal per year does not require the
enhanced CO2.
Do you have a link to such an algae pilot project (without enhanced CO2) ?
AFAICT, worse off (health-care wise, maybe otherwise) than most of theWe've had a government-run pension and health care
system since the Great Depression (1930's). Look where it's gotten us!
Nothing will work without tax hikes on the rich.Right. �If the USA had decent government run pension and health care
ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝ ďż˝^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
systems
This is an oxymoron. We've had a government-run pension and health care
system since the Great Depression (1930's).
70 decades down the road?Look where it's gotten us!
And your design is the trivial solution:Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: �You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defendingThere's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Surely you mean "nothing will work after tax hikes on the rich."Right. ?If the USA had decent government run pension and health care
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
systems
This is an oxymoron. We've had a government-run pension and health care
system since the Great Depression (1930's).
Nothing will work without tax hikes on the rich.
I don't have patents... they are a huge waste of time, and only theOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: ?You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
And your design is the trivial solution:
Not doing _anything_.
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
THIS is your great web page design? What's the broken link box on theLike I said several weeks ago, no public record means you never did
anything.
Of course, I knew that from your idle banter, your lack of interest in
anything technical, your lack of knowledge of anything technical, your
moronic web page, your association with other dunces in denial.
I've done a lot of work calling bluffs. I've called the biggest bluff
in the history of civilization:
The free markets without free speech scam.
www.bretcahill.com
Purchase orders don't lie.You need to quit lying to yourself because you aren't fooling anyone
else, not even our too clever by half rightards.
I'm an electronic circuit designer, and there is no "status quo" in myOn Jan 10, 8:15 am, Bret Cahill <BretCah...@aol.com> wrote:
Oh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
And your design is the trivial solution:
Not doing _anything_.
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
Like I said several weeks ago, no public record means you never did
anything.
Of course, I knew that from your idle banter, your lack of interest in
anything technical, your lack of knowledge of anything technical, your
moronic web page, your association with other dunces in denial.
I've done a lot of work calling bluffs. I've called the biggest bluff
in the history of civilization:
The free markets without free speech scam.
www.bretcahill.com
You need to quit lying to yourself because you aren't fooling anyone
else, not even our too clever by half rightards.
Bret Cahill
John Larken and others of their Rothschild mainstream status quo kind
are never going to change.
John Larken and others of their Rothschild mainstream status quo kindOh, I'm just a circuit designer, and I've already posted some public
(free!) links to my stuff.
That ain't the public record.
If you mean court records, correct:
So I was correct: You have managed to hang a lower profile than a
successful illegal alien / drug smuggling coyote.
Much lower, by design.
And your design is the trivial solution:
Not doing _anything_.
There's no more excrutiatingly-boring way to
waste money than getting tangled in the legal system.
Someone needs to tell HP, TI, IBM, Apple etc. to stop defending
patents.
Like I said several weeks ago, no public record means you never did
anything.
Of course, I knew that from your idle banter, your lack of interest in
anything technical, your lack of knowledge of anything technical, your
moronic web page, your association with other dunces in denial.
I've done a lot of work calling bluffs. I've called the biggest bluff
in the history of civilization:
The free markets without free speech scam.
www.bretcahill.com
You need to quit lying to yourself because you aren't fooling anyone
else, not even our too clever by half rightards.
Bret Cahill
You're an idiot, Cahill.The most efficient power plant on the planet is a natural gas fired
industrial gas turbine made by GE -- 60% efficient.
It's down hill from there as far as efficiency is concerned so a few
points increase is a farce when compared to the impending 1000+%
increase in fuel prices.
The only way to go is hybrid electric with electrification of major
highways.
Do _not_ give automakers any bailout money unless they agree to go
completely hybrid.
Bret Cahill
So. You want to get away from the free enterprise system. Free
enterprise is when the _people_ decide what products or services are
needed, wanted, desired and ultimately produced. If the _people_ did
not what SUV's, pickups and sedans, they would not buy them and the
automakers would not build them. If the _people_ demonstrate (by
using their dollars) they want hybrids most, then the automakers would
build them.
What you are proposing is that the government decide what products the
automakers make and what products are available to the _people_. I
don't think your vision for the future is desired or wanted by any
free enterprise advocate.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
I'n not answering for Bret, just posing a question:
What part of "free enterprise" is screwing up your own business and
then asking the government to give you tax dollars and let you do it
again any way you like??
If you walk down the street handing out free money, sure I'll have
some. It's called "benefit with no down side", better known as
"cake and eat it too".
The same part of "free enterprise" that brought you Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac. It's a great job, if you can get it.
Well voters _can_ get it.
Until everyone starves, as is your wish.That's why popular government is so popular.
Actually, hybrid vehicles are far lighter than IC cars, at least forBret Cahill wrote:
Do _not_ give automakers any bailout money unless they agree to go
completely hybrid.
Hybrids are uneconomic. You'll push them even faster into
bankruptcy. Liquid fossil fuels win on *weight*. Energy per
unit mass is the lowest.