G
Gareth Magennis
Guest
"Fox's Mercantile" wrote in message
news:-bCdnUo2Dt1LHgHHnZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
On 3/4/18 5:32 PM, Gareth Magennis wrote:
I didn't say it was variable.
I said it's arbitrary, and the arbitrarily assigned value is more
precises and repeatable now.
************************
I don't need to argue semantics with you.
news:-bCdnUo2Dt1LHgHHnZ2dnUU7-d2dnZ2d@giganews.com...
On 3/4/18 5:32 PM, Gareth Magennis wrote:
"Fox's Mercantile" wrote in message
news:HpWdnUsDafA74QHHnZ2dnUU7-VXNnZ2d@giganews.com...
On 3/4/18 4:16 PM, Gareth Magennis wrote:
Is it not now considered that time is no longer arbitrary?
i.e. Atomic clocks base a second around the determinable
decay of some kind of (cesium) radioactive particle?
It's still an arbitrary measurement.
Just now, it is one they can assign it's arbitrary value more
accurately and consistently.
****************************
So are you saying it is a variable?
Either it is, or it isn't.
I didn't say it was variable.
I said it's arbitrary, and the arbitrarily assigned value is more
precises and repeatable now.
************************
I don't need to argue semantics with you.