Name of plug in US

On 2011-04-30, Paul <nospam@needed.com> wrote:
Man-wai Chang wrote:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cable-Tex-Coaxial-Aerial-Cable-White/dp/B003S46D06/ref=sr_1_10?ie=UTF8&qid=1304163450&sr=8-10


What's the name of the plugs in USA?

It seems that USA televisions only use F Type connectors.


The UK version is mentioned here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TV_aerial_plug

"Belling-Lee connector or IEC 169-2 connector,
more often simply known as TV aerial plug"

A lot of my wiring here (Canada), is done with F series.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F_connector

The RCA / Cinch connector is also a common
connector type on home electronics, being used
for audio and video. Compared to the Belling-Lee,
the central prong is longer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCA_connector

The antenna connector in my car, is like none
of those, so there is at least one other flavor,
The car radio antenna plug is often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_connector

--
⚂⚃ 100% natural
 
"Jasen Betts" <jasen@xnet.co.nz>

** Kiwi sheep shagger alert !

When not called "tv coaxial antenna plug" (or some variation thereof)
I've heard it called called "Belling-Lee" or "PAL" (neither of which
are technically accurate).
** The correct name for any thing, animal or person is that name by which it
is most commonly known.

Any other names are less correct.

Being technically accurate has nothing to do with names.

Or else, your correct name would be:

" tedious, PITA, sheep fucker and massive troll "

Get it ??

Betts you don't.



.... Phil
 
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
The Daring Dufas wrote:
I've also heard them called "British Naval Connectors".

In England some people joke that it stands for "Brand New Connector" and
the later TNC stands for "Terribly New Connector". :)

** I was once told it stood for " Bloody Nice Connector " .......




..... Phil
 
"Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm@mendelson.com> wrote in message
news:slrnirqgus.u9.gsm@cable.mendelson.com...

<stuff snipped>

It wasn't until the second world war that the concept of standarization
across manufacturers was pushed. Companies made their own parts,
connectors,
etc, and tried to prevent competion.
It seems that the manufacturers of anything battery-powered haven't gotten
the message. I have two shelves full of nearly identical batteries and
nearly identical chargers that are totally incompatible.

--
Bobby G.
 
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.
Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.

Probably at one time RCA had a patent on its connector and Motorola
had a patent on theirs.

It wasn't until the second world war that the concept of standarization
across manufacturers was pushed. Companies made their own parts, connectors,
etc, and tried to prevent competion.

Geoff.


--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to misquote it.
 
"Klay_Anderson" <klay@klay.com> wrote in message
news:2404ffd8-0270-4b00-a9c4-0ee7a6642899@k27g2000pri.googlegroups.com...

The connectors in the photo are "press-on F" connectors.
Cheap to make, they simply slide on the chassis threaded F.
They are horrible and cause a lot of issues as they do not
allow proper and tight sheilding.
I don't think that's correct. An F connector normally uses the center
conductor of the cable -- a wire -- as the center connection -- not an
RCA-like plug.

The press-on F connectors I've seen use a slotted jacket that usually fits
snugly and rarely causes problems.
 
Robert Green wrote:
It seems that the manufacturers of anything battery-powered haven't gotten
the message. I have two shelves full of nearly identical batteries and
nearly identical chargers that are totally incompatible.
While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.

You would figure that after the battery disaster with the original iPod
Apple would have done something better but it seems that their customers
prefer internal batteries that need to be replace by a technician or the
entire device recycled.

Come to think of it, every pocket music or video player I have ever seen
except for the first, a 256meg USB stick, had a "permanent" battery.

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM
Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to misquote it.
 
The connectors in the photo are "press-on F" connectors. Cheap to
make, they simply slide on the chassis threaded F. They are horrible
and cause a lot of issues as they do not allow proper and tight
sheilding.
Look at the "shell" carefully: no screw... :)

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and farces be with you!
/( _ )\ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.38.4
^ ^ 22:50:01 up 7 days 2:51 1 user load average: 1.08 1.04 1.05
不借貸! 不詐騙! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_pubsvc/page_socsecu/sub_addressesa
 
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:00:41 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1888@gmail.com>
wrote:

On May 1, 4:29 am, "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <g...@mendelson.com> wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.


Or the "GR" plug on General Radio equipment. People my age fairly
universally called it the "double banana" plug.
The "GR" connector is *not* a "double banana". The GR connector is a
hermaphroditic connector about an inch in diameter.

Some GR to BNC in the first pic and a GR 'T's in the second and third:

http://www.mgs4u.com/RF-Microwave/RF-connectors.htm
 
On Apr 30, 5:39 am, Man-wai Chang <toylet.toy...@gmail.com> wrote:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Cable-Tex-Coaxial-Aerial-Cable-White/dp/B003S...

What's the name of the plugs in USA?

It seems that USA televisions only use F Type connectors.
The connectors in the photo are "press-on F" connectors. Cheap to
make, they simply slide on the chassis threaded F. They are horrible
and cause a lot of issues as they do not allow proper and tight
sheilding.



e-ya later!
Klay Anderson's iPhone 4/iOS4.3.2
Try FaceTime!
 
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:52:59 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1888@gmail.com>
wrote:

On May 1, 8:35 am, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz
wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:00:41 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail.com
wrote:

On May 1, 4:29 am, "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <g...@mendelson.com> wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.

Or the "GR" plug on General Radio equipment. People my age fairly
universally called it the "double banana" plug.

The "GR" connector is *not* a "double banana".  The GR connector is a
hermaphroditic connector about an inch in diameter.

Some GR to BNC in the first pic and a GR 'T's in the second and third:

http://www.mgs4u.com/RF-Microwave/RF-connectors.htm

I mean the 1924 GR plug, not some modern 1960s RF connector.
'60s? <guffaw>
 
On May 1, 4:29 am, "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <g...@mendelson.com> wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.
Or the "GR" plug on General Radio equipment. People my age fairly
universally called it the "double banana" plug.
 
On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 21:29:04 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
<gsm@mendelson.com> wrote:

Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 4/30/2011 10:16 PM, Stephen wrote:
All of you are all wrong.. The plugs that are on the white cable in the
Weblink is in fact known as Belling Lee. They are used all over Great
Britain for both FM and UHF TV The ones in the pic are the male version of
Belling Lee.

I can't find a BNC female to Belling Lee adaptor in Amazon US...

In fact Amazon US doesn't have any electronics item with "Belling Lee"
in its specification.

In the US they are called PAL connectors.

http://www.radioshack.com/product/index.jsp?productId=2103468

Geoff.
Officially, on both sides of the pond, they are referred to as IEC
169-2, or IEC 60169-2 connectors, and they are CRAP for TV usage as
they are not a proper match to 75 ohm cable - actually closer to 50
ohm, and cause reflections and ghosting of the signal

The IEC 169-24, or "F" connector is superior for TV use.
 
On May 1, 8:35 am, "k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <k...@att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz>
wrote:
On Sun, 1 May 2011 08:00:41 -0700 (PDT), spamtrap1888 <spamtrap1...@gmail..com
wrote:

On May 1, 4:29 am, "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <g...@mendelson.com> wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.

Or the "GR" plug on General Radio equipment. People my age fairly
universally called it the "double banana" plug.

The "GR" connector is *not* a "double banana".  The GR connector is a
hermaphroditic connector about an inch in diameter.

Some GR to BNC in the first pic and a GR 'T's in the second and third:

http://www.mgs4u.com/RF-Microwave/RF-connectors.htm
I mean the 1924 GR plug, not some modern 1960s RF connector.
 
Jasen Betts wrote:

The car radio antenna plug is often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorola_connector
I didn't realize it was that common.

Paul
 
Klay_Anderson wrote:
On Apr 30, 5:39 am, Man-wai Chang <toylet.toy...@gmail.com> wrote:

What's the name of the plugs in USA?

It seems that USA televisions only use F Type connectors.

The connectors in the photo are "press-on F" connectors.
Not the ones I saw in the picture. The center pin is WAY too fat
for an F. They're simply audiophool-style RCA connectors with a solid
shell that looks "kewl".

Cheers!
Rich
 
William Sommerwerck wrote:
"Klay_Anderson" <klay@klay.com> wrote in message

The connectors in the photo are "press-on F" connectors.
Cheap to make, they simply slide on the chassis threaded F.
They are horrible and cause a lot of issues as they do not
allow proper and tight sheilding.

I don't think that's correct. An F connector normally uses the center
conductor of the cable -- a wire -- as the center connection -- not an
RCA-like plug.

The press-on F connectors I've seen use a slotted jacket that usually fits
snugly and rarely causes problems.
And are good for about ten or twenty insertions before they get loose.

Cheers!
Rich
 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Jasen Betts wrote:
The car radio antenna plug if often called "Motorola"
no doubt it has a technical name too, but Wikipedia
doesn't seem to know it.

Why can't Motorola be it's proper name? It was "invented" by Motorola.
It's a longer version of the the RCA connector, "invented" by RCA.

Probably at one time RCA had a patent on its connector and Motorola
had a patent on theirs.

It wasn't until the second world war that the concept of standarization
across manufacturers was pushed. Companies made their own parts,
connectors, etc, and tried to prevent competion.

A car antenna connector (AM band) has an "inside-out" shell:
http://shop.vetcosurplus.com/catalog/popup_image.php?pID=8818

Hope This Helps!
Rich
 
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
While I personally think the world would be a better place if everyone
standardized on 1.2 volt AA batteries (preferably NiMH at the moment) it's
a loosing battle.
I'll never ever waste my money on NiMH batteries again. They're the
crappiest excuse for batteries I've ever encountered. After about six
months of use, and charge/use cycles, their useful life (per charge)
deteriorates to a matter of seconds.

Anyone who spends money on NiMHs, even with a "smart" charger, is an
idiot.

And you misspelled "losing."

Hope This Helps!
Rich
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top