Math and electrical desgin

On 2020-03-29 21:25, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:

-------------------


Please spare me.

Phil Hobbs makes money out of collaborating with John Larkin - collaborating with an egomaniac isn't easy.


** I was unaware of that - explains a lot of the crap going on here.

So Hobbs is not just an arrogant prick Septic, he's a paid cock-sucker too.

Maybe they need to get a room....

The concept of having friends must be new to you, Phil, but do try to
get your head around it.

JL and I are friends and occasional collaborators, and we send business
each other's way sometimes. Our wives are friends too. John helped me
out during a thin patch when I was a new consultant, but money hasn't
changed hands between us in almost a decade.

And I'm not an American. I find it funny that Aussies think that their
own primitive plumbing somehow constitutes a deadly insult to Americans.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

--
Dr Philip C D Hobbs
Principal Consultant
ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics
Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics
Briarcliff Manor NY 10510

http://electrooptical.net
http://hobbs-eo.com
 
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 12:37:53 PM UTC+11, Clifford Heath wrote:
On 30/3/20 6:10 am, Joerg wrote:
On 2020-03-28 15:47, Clifford Heath wrote:
On 29/3/20 7:23 am, Joerg wrote:
On 2020-03-27 12:29, blocher@columbus.rr.com wrote:
A topic to elicit some thoughts....
How important is mathematics to you as an engineer?
It ranks surprisingly low on the pecking order.
 ...  Do you consider yourself an applied mathematician? ....
Definitely not. My sister (has a mathematics degree) is razzing me
about that all the time but that's just how I am. IMO engineering is
mostly instinct. People who don't have them can't be good engineers.
Instinct comes with practice, lots of practice.
By definition, anything that only comes with practice is *not* instinct.

You are correct, though it is rather muddled in scientific literature:

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453
Also, that article relies on some basic fallacies. The most obvious one
is this:

"the capacity to learn that language is a human instinct, something that
every normal human child is born with, and that no chimpanzee or gorilla
possesses."

Clearly false, since there are chimps who have been taught complex sign
language (hundreds of words), who converse. and who invent new words and
teach their children to do the same.

That's a rather controversial claim. Quite a few people are less than satisfied with the evidence which was bought forward to support it. Whatever it is that chimps do, they do it a lot less well than humans, though it does seem that the human capacity invent and learn languages is just a more highly developed version of the system that most of the more highly evolved vertebrates have.

A rather strange error for a
"Professor of Cognitive Biology" to have made.

It's not an error. More an expression of practical reality.

Cats don't need to be taught to hunt - but they do need to be taught
*how* to hunt. People don't need to be taught to invent - but they can
be taught *how* to invent.

Human language acquisition is mostly working out how everybody in the immediate vicinity uses language. The way you listen to language is heavily influenced by the language (or languages) you heard when you were an infant. The first six months are devoted to learning which features you can ignore.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 18:25:50 -0700 (PDT), Phil Allison
<pallison49@gmail.com> wrote:

Bill Sloman wrote:

-------------------


Please spare me.

Phil Hobbs makes money out of collaborating with John Larkin - collaborating with an egomaniac isn't easy.


** I was unaware of that - explains a lot of the crap going on here.

We did work with one big semi manufacturer together once, me as an
equipment provider and he as a consultant to them. We haven't done
much else except help one another and share information. We are
complementary in that I have a lot of crazy ideas and he has the math
skills to shoot them down.

He did help me recently with my triggered Colpitts oscillator. I've
shared measurements on phemts and things.

Both our wives are called Mo.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
On Sun, 29 Mar 2020 22:10:21 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> wrote:

On 2020-03-29 21:25, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:

-------------------


Please spare me.

Phil Hobbs makes money out of collaborating with John Larkin - collaborating with an egomaniac isn't easy.


** I was unaware of that - explains a lot of the crap going on here.

So Hobbs is not just an arrogant prick Septic, he's a paid cock-sucker too.

Maybe they need to get a room....

The concept of having friends must be new to you, Phil, but do try to
get your head around it.

JL and I are friends and occasional collaborators, and we send business
each other's way sometimes. Our wives are friends too. John helped me
out during a thin patch when I was a new consultant, but money hasn't
changed hands between us in almost a decade.

And I'm not an American. I find it funny that Aussies think that their
own primitive plumbing somehow constitutes a deadly insult to Americans.

Cheers

Phil Hobbs

I've met and like several people who post here. Speff, James, Joerg,
you. People who actually design electronics seem to get along for some
reason. People who don't, less so.

But James is weird. He skis in short pants.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:51:34 +1100, Clifford Heath
<no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 30/3/20 9:43 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
There's a story told about Roy Cohn.  He was giving a speech at a
convention for magicians.  At the end of the speech, he asked somebody
to shuffle a deck of cards, and announced that he would pull out the
jack of diamonds.  He cut the deck, and some other card came up.

A friend asked him later, "Why did you do that, Roy?"  Cohn replied, "I
had one chance in 52 of becoming a legend among magicians."

Similar story (probably apocryphal) about a kid who wanted to get hired
as a stockbroker.

He made a list of 4096 broking companies, and sent half of them one
prediction, the other half the opposite prediction.

When the outcome was decided, he did the same with the 2048 companies
he'd sent the correct answer to.

After repeating 12 times, he had one company left, and they offered him
a job. Right twelve times in a row, that has to be worth something, no?

Sort-of how JL "designs" electronics :p

Clifford Heath.

Pick a product from my web site and tell us how you would design it.
Something trivial like a delay generator, laser driver, resistive or
capacitive or thermocouple transducer simulator, synchro processor,
something easy like that.

I do start with a lot of crazy ideas, accidental simulations, wild
guesses. But that's just to conceive an architecture; the next step is
to define a product and implement it with brutal discipline and get it
right first try. Not many people are comfortable performing both of
those roles.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

Science teaches us to doubt.

Claude Bernard
 
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 2:05:54 PM UTC+11, Phil Allison wrote:
Clifford Heath is an Idiot wrote:

----------------------------------


https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453
Also, that article relies on some basic fallacies. The most obvious one
is this:

"the capacity to learn that language is a human instinct, something that
every normal human child is born with, and that no chimpanzee or gorilla
possesses."

Clearly false, since there are chimps who have been taught complex sign
language

** That is neither or speaking or conversing.

Sign language isn't speech, but lots of people use it for conversation.

Speech researchers do study it, and for all practical purposes it is a kind of speech.

(hundreds of words), who converse.

** Utter bullshit.

It's actually a controversial claim, but the controversy it about the quality of the conversation taking place rather than any idea there wasn't a conversation going on.

> Maybe your brain is more ape like than human.

It's more like an apes brain than any other vertebrates brain, but then again so is yours.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney
 
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:


-------------------------------------

Phil Hobbs makes money out of collaborating with John Larkin - collaborating with an egomaniac isn't easy.


** I was unaware of that - explains a lot of the crap going on here.


(snip irrelevant JL solo trumpet & bullshitting)

Both our wives are called Mo.

** Short for " Moll " no doubt.



.... Phil
 
On 30/3/20 2:05 pm, Phil Allison wrote:
https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453
Also, that article relies on some basic fallacies. The most obvious one
is this:

"the capacity to learn that language is a human instinct, something that
every normal human child is born with, and that no chimpanzee or gorilla
possesses."

Clearly false, since there are chimps who have been taught complex sign
language

** That is neither or speaking or conversing.


(hundreds of words), who converse.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washoe_(chimpanzee)>

CH
 
Phil Hobbs wrote:
On 2020-03-29 21:25, Phil Allison wrote:
Bill Sloman wrote:

-------------------


Please spare me.

Phil Hobbs makes money out of collaborating with John Larkin - collaborating with an egomaniac isn't easy.


** I was unaware of that - explains a lot of the crap going on here.

So Hobbs is not just an arrogant prick Septic, he's a paid cock-sucker too.

Maybe they need to get a room....

The concept of having friends must be new to you,

** Ridiculous.


JL and I are friends and occasional collaborators,

** No - you are a lot more here.

There is collaboration and then there is conspiracy.

The latter is what criminals engage in.

The cap bloody fits you both.


FYI:

Septic (tank) is rhyming slang for Yank.

But the obvious implication also fits only too well.



...... Phil
 
Clifford Heath is an Idiot wrote:

----------------------------------

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/11453
Also, that article relies on some basic fallacies. The most obvious one
is this:

"the capacity to learn that language is a human instinct, something that
every normal human child is born with, and that no chimpanzee or gorilla
possesses."

Clearly false, since there are chimps who have been taught complex sign
language

** That is neither or speaking or conversing.


(hundreds of words), who converse.

** Utter bullshit.

Maybe your brain is more ape like than human.



...... Phil
 
On 30/3/20 1:07 pm, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:51:34 +1100, Clifford Heath
no.spam@please.net> wrote:

On 30/3/20 9:43 am, Phil Hobbs wrote:
There's a story told about Roy Cohn.  He was giving a speech at a
convention for magicians.  At the end of the speech, he asked somebody
to shuffle a deck of cards, and announced that he would pull out the
jack of diamonds.  He cut the deck, and some other card came up.

A friend asked him later, "Why did you do that, Roy?"  Cohn replied, "I
had one chance in 52 of becoming a legend among magicians."

Similar story (probably apocryphal) about a kid who wanted to get hired
as a stockbroker.

He made a list of 4096 broking companies, and sent half of them one
prediction, the other half the opposite prediction.

When the outcome was decided, he did the same with the 2048 companies
he'd sent the correct answer to.

After repeating 12 times, he had one company left, and they offered him
a job. Right twelve times in a row, that has to be worth something, no?

Sort-of how JL "designs" electronics :p

Clifford Heath.

Pick a product from my web site and tell us how you would design it.
Something trivial like a delay generator, laser driver, resistive or
capacitive or thermocouple transducer simulator, synchro processor,
something easy like that.

I do start with a lot of crazy ideas, accidental simulations, wild
guesses. But that's just to conceive an architecture; the next step is
to define a product and implement it with brutal discipline and get it
right first try. Not many people are comfortable performing both of
those roles.

Hey, don't be too sensitive, I'm just poking fun. I actually admire you
in the "play" aspect of inventing stuff and have used it a lot in my
career too.

Edison reckoned he found many different ways to not make a lightbulb,
too. I think that's important. Systematic approaches to design only
works after you have enough experience to systematise things. When
you're expanding frontiers, the approach only works for the support
stuff, not for the core innovations.

CH
 
On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 4:02:50 AM UTC-4, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2020-03-28, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote:
In article <r5lujd$1pt7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol Âľ And you knew that. You're just lazy.

And you are just intentionally setting out to annoy the Greeks by
calling "symbol Âľ" "Latin"!

According to ISO it's Latin.

Âľ - "Latin-1" "micro sign". code point U+00B5

This one is Greek

Îź - "Greek" "lower case Mu" code point U+03BC

Look the same to me. "Latin-1" is not a language indication. It's a Unicode block name. It also contains ¢, £ and ¼. Are they all Latin characters as well?

The letter mu is definitely a Greek character.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet

Completely different from the Latin alphabet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet

--

Rick C.

-+- Get 1,000 miles of free Supercharging
-+- Tesla referral code - https://ts.la/richard11209
 
On 2020-03-28, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote:
In article <r5lujd$1pt7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol Âľ And you knew that. You're just lazy.

And you are just intentionally setting out to annoy the Greeks by
calling "symbol Âľ" "Latin"!

According to ISO it's Latin.

Âľ - "Latin-1" "micro sign". code point U+00B5

This one is Greek

Îź - "Greek" "lower case Mu" code point U+03BC


--
Jasen.
 
On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 07:59:40 -0000 (UTC), Jasen Betts
<jasen@xnet.co.nz> wrote:

On 2020-03-28, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote:
In article <r5lujd$1pt7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol ľ And you knew that. You're just lazy.

And you are just intentionally setting out to annoy the Greeks by
calling "symbol ľ" "Latin"!

According to ISO it's Latin.

ľ - "Latin-1" "micro sign". code point U+00B5

The micro sign (from Greek) was already in DEC MCS (Multinational
Character Set) at position 0xB5 to indicate 0.000001.

ISO 8859-1 adopted the DEC MCS nearly completely. The ISO-8859-1 was
then nicknamed Latin-1 That nicknaming doesn't make 0xB5 Latin.


This one is Greek

? - "Greek" "lower case Mu" code point U+03BC

I assume you are referring to ISO 8859-7 as "Greek",

It has that symbol among ordinary greek lower case letters.

Please note that ISO 8859-7 doesn't have the micro symbol in position
0xB5.
 
Le 28/03/2020 à 15:44, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org a Êcrit :
Oh, and the term is a single word, child. As in:

YOU are an ASSHOLE!

Bwa Ahh ahh ahh! You couldn't even count till 4! Who is now the asshole?
you Numero Uno largely below zero :-D
 
Rick C <gnuarm.deletethisbit@gmail.com> wrote in
news:afa55912-15ca-4c81-be04-d98efb5135ae@googlegroups.com:

On Monday, March 30, 2020 at 4:02:50 AM UTC-4, Jasen Betts wrote:
On 2020-03-28, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote:
In article <r5lujd$1pt7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a
microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol Âľ And you knew that. You're just
lazy.

And you are just intentionally setting out to annoy the Greeks
by calling "symbol Âľ" "Latin"!

According to ISO it's Latin.

Âľ - "Latin-1" "micro sign". code point U+00B5

This one is Greek

Îź - "Greek" "lower case Mu" code point U+03BC

Look the same to me. "Latin-1" is not a language indication.
It's a Unicode block name. It also contains ¢, £ and ¼. Are
they all Latin characters as well?

The letter mu is definitely a Greek character.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greek_alphabet

Completely different from the Latin alphabet.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latin_alphabet

Micro- (Greek letter ľ or legacy micro symbol ľ) is a unit prefix in
the metric system denoting a factor of 10-6 (one millionth).
Confirmed in 1960, the prefix comes from the Greek ľ????? (mikrós),
meaning "small". The symbol for the prefix comes from the Greek
letter ľ (mu).

I guess I just said Latin because medical and math uses it so much.

My next line is supposed to be:

"It's all Greek to me."
 
In article <r5s8tc$992$1@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org>, jasen@xnet.co.nz
says...
On 2020-03-28, Mike Coon <gravity@mjcoon.plus.com> wrote:
In article <r5lujd$1pt7$1@gioia.aioe.org>,
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org says...

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol ľ And you knew that. You're just lazy.

And you are just intentionally setting out to annoy the Greeks by
calling "symbol ľ" "Latin"!

According to ISO it's Latin.

ľ - "Latin-1" "micro sign". code point U+00B5

This one is Greek

ľ - "Greek" "lower case Mu" code point U+03BC

Thanks for that; very subtle!
 
bilboard@eu.eu wrote in news:5e81cca4$0$21615$426a74cc@news.free.fr:

Le 28/03/2020 Ă  15:44, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org a
Êcrit :
Oh, and the term is a single word, child. As in:

YOU are an ASSHOLE!

Bwa Ahh ahh ahh! You couldn't even count till 4! Who is now the
asshole? you Numero Uno largely below zero :-D

Nice try. I learned to swim by 2 and knew my alphabet and could
easily count the number of blacksnakes my brother had outside in the
garbage cans.

Essentially, you are just another mouthly little bitch putz.
Bark, bitch... bark.
 
David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> wrote in
news:r5sq20$3h4$1@dont-email.me:

On 27/03/2020 23:26, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org
wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:86ns7fhvf1jenfnj92adirpc8t17vkne50@4ax.com:

uPs

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a
microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol Âľ And you knew that. You're just
lazy.

Alt-0181

Just like math, certain key combinations should be known by
today's
modern computer user.

ÂľPs

Looks better.
Sounds better.
Feels good.
Real good.
Get some.

Degree symbol is alt-0176
37° C

39° C would be where I start looking for other symptoms.

Another way is to hit the windows symbol key and the R key to
bring
up the Run dialog, and enter 'charmap' in the dialog box and
press return. Grab any character you want at that point, and see
the key combo down in the lower status bar.


Surely as a Linux use you can just type these symbols directly?
Maybe you first have to choose a better keyboard layout if you
have picked the severely limited standard US keyboard layout.

Maybe you should rememeber the roots of the machine you are typeing
on, special keyboard boy.

I
get ¾ from AltGr+m, and ° from Shift+AltGr+0. Easier to type,
and easier to remember.

Alt Gr m??? We have no Gr key over here, boy! (Foghorn Leghorn)

And it is easy to tell why.

And easy to rememeber why.

The ALTernate character set is not part of the main 128 character
set, and is accessed on a perfectly NORMAL keyboard using the alt key
and a numeric sequence that ALL personal computers started with.
What the fuck a "Gr" key is we do not know. But I can assign
keyboard shortcuts as I wish without the need for some strange
character.

ANY "user" of ANY computer should possess enough brains to learn
basic computing paradigms, or be relinquished to asking others for
help. But the text substitute thing is bad.

U R Stew Pid and LOL and all that crap is really dumb. TYPE IT OUT.

That's the same realm we got pants down past the asscrack stupidity
from. And any odd keyboard layout adopted since the AT spec emerged
are the odd men out, not us. And if Linux or BSD does not allow me
to simply tyrpe in the standardized alt + numeric to get an otherwise
unavailable character up, then fuck them too.
 
On 27/03/2020 23:26, DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:
jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:86ns7fhvf1jenfnj92adirpc8t17vkne50@4ax.com:

uPs

It is not an uninterruptible power supply. It is a microprocessor.
Need the Latin Mu symbol Âľ And you knew that. You're just lazy.

Alt-0181

Just like math, certain key combinations should be known by today's
modern computer user.

ÂľPs

Looks better.
Sounds better.
Feels good.
Real good.
Get some.

Degree symbol is alt-0176
37° C

39° C would be where I start looking for other symptoms.

Another way is to hit the windows symbol key and the R key to bring
up the Run dialog, and enter 'charmap' in the dialog box and press
return. Grab any character you want at that point, and see the key
combo down in the lower status bar.

Surely as a Linux use you can just type these symbols directly? Maybe
you first have to choose a better keyboard layout if you have picked the
severely limited standard US keyboard layout. I get Âľ from AltGr+m, and
° from Shift+AltGr+0. Easier to type, and easier to remember.
 

Welcome to EDABoard.com

Sponsor

Back
Top