#Lying Bag Of Schiff

[bitrex]

On 10/12/19 1:35 AM, bitrex wrote:

On 10/11/19 9:58 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:
On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 2:13:21 AM UTC+11,
jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:25:07 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/10/19 4:53 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:44:15 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:j7mupedeig07m8r4tk5ut9n3cko5h1ivq0@4ax.com:

Did that make them disloyal to their Commander in Chief?


   Miliary personnel are NOT admonished to be loyal to their
commander
in chief.  They ARE admonished to remain silent in their views when
on duty.  However, we are supposed to make observations and decisions
based on those onservations, and this person observed criminal
behavior from way back before he even ran.

This is hilarious: Congress will send their Seargeant at Arms to
arrest the President, and Trump will send the US Army to meet him.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/10/10/cornell-law-prof-encourages-congress-to-arrest-trump-allies-in-nyt-op-ed/


Can't wait!


You can't wait to live under a military dictatorship? Lol I think
you're
gonna like that a lot less than you think

Dictatorship? Maybe you are thinking of the previous President.

John Larkin has been listening to James Arthur again.

Obama's only crime seems to have been that of being a Democrat. Back
when the Republicans were more or less sane, that didn't count as a
crime, but since the Koch-financed Tea Party takeover, the Republican
Party has gone to the dogs - and to Donald Trump, which is even worse.

I just like the image of some Sergeant at Arms showing up at the
White House waving a piece of paper signed by Pencil Neck, demanding
to the Marine Guard that he be let in to arrest people.

That's not how it works, but lunatic right-wingers do find odd ways of
amusing themselves.

Even sillier is that the President can pardon anyone, which I guess
includes himself.

Seems unlikely.


The Founding Fathers likely thought the notion so absurd it hardly
required explicitly writing down, but I believe John Adams said
something to the effect that the Constitution has no power to provide an
effective framework with which to put constraints on a government of
shameless scam-artists.

Er I mean, "strict textualists."

 

[bitrex]

On 10/11/19 9:58 PM, Bill Sloman wrote:

On Saturday, October 12, 2019 at 2:13:21 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:25:07 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/10/19 4:53 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 16:44:15 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote in
news:j7mupedeig07m8r4tk5ut9n3cko5h1ivq0@4ax.com:

Did that make them disloyal to their Commander in Chief?


Miliary personnel are NOT admonished to be loyal to their commander
in chief. They ARE admonished to remain silent in their views when
on duty. However, we are supposed to make observations and decisions
based on those onservations, and this person observed criminal
behavior from way back before he even ran.

This is hilarious: Congress will send their Seargeant at Arms to
arrest the President, and Trump will send the US Army to meet him.

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2019/10/10/cornell-law-prof-encourages-congress-to-arrest-trump-allies-in-nyt-op-ed/

Can't wait!


You can't wait to live under a military dictatorship? Lol I think you're
gonna like that a lot less than you think

Dictatorship? Maybe you are thinking of the previous President.

John Larkin has been listening to James Arthur again.

Obama's only crime seems to have been that of being a Democrat. Back when the Republicans were more or less sane, that didn't count as a crime, but since the Koch-financed Tea Party takeover, the Republican Party has gone to the dogs - and to Donald Trump, which is even worse.

I just like the image of some Sergeant at Arms showing up at the
White House waving a piece of paper signed by Pencil Neck, demanding
to the Marine Guard that he be let in to arrest people.

That's not how it works, but lunatic right-wingers do find odd ways of amusing themselves.

Even sillier is that the President can pardon anyone, which I guess
includes himself.

Seems unlikely.

The Founding Fathers likely thought the notion so absurd it hardly
required explicitly writing down, but I believe John Adams said
something to the effect that the Constitution has no power to provide an
effective framework with which to put constraints on a government of
shameless scam-artists.

 

[Cursitor Doom]

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of "nexting"
every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a better candidate
perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to apply those techniques to
America but look man, you can't dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly explain a
lot.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

 

[bitrex]

On 10/12/19 9:34 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of "nexting"
every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a better candidate
perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to apply those techniques to
America but look man, you can't dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly explain a
lot.

I'd love to hear about the last time CD touched a human female in a
romantic fashion. I don't remember much about the Thatcher administration.

 

On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:51:44 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/12/19 9:34 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of "nexting"
every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a better candidate
perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to apply those techniques to
America but look man, you can't dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly explain a
lot.




I'd love to hear about the last time CD touched a human female in a
romantic fashion. I don't remember much about the Thatcher administration.

I'd love to hear about the last time you designed some interesting
electronics. Reagan admin?

This ain't Facebook. Or Twitter. Or some gay dating site.



--

John Larkin Highland Technology, Inc

lunatic fringe electronics

 

[bitrex]

On 10/12/19 1:04 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:51:44 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/12/19 9:34 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of "nexting"
every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a better candidate
perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to apply those techniques to
America but look man, you can't dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly explain a
lot.




I'd love to hear about the last time CD touched a human female in a
romantic fashion. I don't remember much about the Thatcher administration.

I'd love to hear about the last time you designed some interesting
electronics. Reagan admin?

We were learning to use computers in primary school to defeat the
Soviets with our cyber-hacking abilities and then didn't get the chance.
What a rip off!

This ain't Facebook. Or Twitter. Or some gay dating site.

I've thought the way your relationship with Phil has really blossomed
lately is very sweeet lol

 

bitrex <user@example.net> wrote in
news:YdtoF.78320$LA2.74684@fx04.iad:

On 10/12/19 1:04 PM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:
On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:51:44 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

On 10/12/19 9:34 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net
wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of
"nexting" every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a
better candidate perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to
apply those techniques to America but look man, you can't
dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly
explain a lot.




I'd love to hear about the last time CD touched a human female
in a romantic fashion. I don't remember much about the Thatcher
administration.

I'd love to hear about the last time you designed some
interesting electronics. Reagan admin?

We were learning to use computers in primary school to defeat the
Soviets with our cyber-hacking abilities and then didn't get the
chance. What a rip off!

This ain't Facebook. Or Twitter. Or some gay dating site.


I've thought the way your relationship with Phil has really
blossomed lately is very sweeet lol

Does he have a purty mouf?

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 4:05:05 AM UTC+11, jla...@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

On Sat, 12 Oct 2019 12:51:44 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/12/19 9:34 AM, Cursitor Doom wrote:
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 18:51:52 -0700, jlarkin wrote:

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:54:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

I understand pick-up-artist "abundance mentality" theory of "nexting"
every woman who irritates you ASAP in search of a better candidate
perfectly well and I know Trump is trying to apply those techniques to
America but look man, you can't dump everyone you just end up gay.

Gay, gay, gay. Is that all you think about?

The voice of personal experience, I imagine. It would certainly explain a
lot.




I'd love to hear about the last time CD touched a human female in a
romantic fashion. I don't remember much about the Thatcher administration.

I'd love to hear about the last time you designed some interesting
electronics. Reagan admin?

He would have been a kid then.

Bitrex does - in fact - post about the electronics he designs from time to time.

Presumably you don't find his work interesting, because it doesn't offer you any opportunity to tell us how good your stuff is.

> This ain't Facebook. Or Twitter. Or some gay dating site.

Nor is it the John Larkin Appreciation Society.

We do appreciate that John Larkin is a self-centred egomaniac - he devotes a lot of bandwidth to telling us that - but this doesn't make sci.electronics.design a more attractive place to hang out and exchange experience.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney

 

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:28:02 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/11/19 11:04 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:45:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/10/19 10:58 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

There certainly is a Deep State that sees Trump as a threat, that
hates him and wants to destroy him and has contempt for the flyover
yokels who elected him. DS is organized here and there, but really
it's the aggregate of people who turn to government for profit and
power, and those who are aggrieved by the perceived success and
happiness of others. There's a lot of energy there to be exploited.


The military, DoD, CIA, FBI, et. al. have for a long time had somewhat
different ideas about who actually runs the country vs. The People and
their elected representatives. That's mostly business-as-usual

That their contempt for Trump should be all the greater in that he
shares quite a number of their same attitudes but has the audacity to be
about 10% radically different opinions in certain areas isn't too
surprising, either. "not invented here"-mentality



The military in the USA have been steadfastly loyal to the
Constitution and to the people. CIA, FBI, DOJ seem to have evolved
into power centers with their own amoral political interests and no
affection for daylight.


More than half of the veterans who've served in combat I've known
personally were liberals/Democrats, sooooo.....

ShortBit lives in a bubble. Who wudda guessed?


My father had many children, the right-wing ones didn't serve, never
visited him, never contributed shit, and never did shit.

I wasn't surprised...

I'm not either. You couldn't.

 

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 23:33:37 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/11/19 11:04 PM, krw@notreal.com wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 11:45:39 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:

On 10/10/19 10:58 AM, jlarkin@highlandsniptechnology.com wrote:

There certainly is a Deep State that sees Trump as a threat, that
hates him and wants to destroy him and has contempt for the flyover
yokels who elected him. DS is organized here and there, but really
it's the aggregate of people who turn to government for profit and
power, and those who are aggrieved by the perceived success and
happiness of others. There's a lot of energy there to be exploited.


The military, DoD, CIA, FBI, et. al. have for a long time had somewhat
different ideas about who actually runs the country vs. The People and
their elected representatives. That's mostly business-as-usual

That their contempt for Trump should be all the greater in that he
shares quite a number of their same attitudes but has the audacity to be
about 10% radically different opinions in certain areas isn't too
surprising, either. "not invented here"-mentality



The military in the USA have been steadfastly loyal to the
Constitution and to the people. CIA, FBI, DOJ seem to have evolved
into power centers with their own amoral political interests and no
affection for daylight.


More than half of the veterans who've served in combat I've known
personally were liberals/Democrats, sooooo.....

ShortBit lives in a bubble. Who wudda guessed?


Hard to believe your ghoulish ass is still slouching around here,
though! Just in time for Halloween, too. Dr. Frankenstein was really
ahead of his time.

It must be Halloween. You're walking around in an AlwaysWrong mask
too.

 

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
<fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which began
before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to the Obama
administration when it was a week old.

You mean right after they felt the tingle run up their leg?

 

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
<fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which began
before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to the
Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until after he
died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his new
chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on whether your
ideal form of government includes wizards and unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.

 

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:26:50 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

"Tom Del Rosso" <fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote
in news:qno2vn$e2t$1@dont-email.me:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to the
Obama administration when it was a week old.


Trump was a known criminal long before he ran and should never have
been allowed to run.

When you lie you're always wrong too, AlwaysWrong.

 

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:ua45qe55urvph8ch649ee4kua2roj59sbd@4ax.com:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to
the Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until after
he died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his
new chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on
whether your ideal form of government includes wizards and
unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.

Yeah... but you're a fuckin' total retard.

 

[Robert Baer]

amdx wrote:

On 10/8/2019 8:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:24:30 -0500, amdx <nojunk@knology.net> wrote:

That's all, feel free to use it.

Hillary lost. Get used to it.

Hey John, is that a response to me, another edict to democrats or a
response to the Decadent one?
Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
 I need more context

                         Mikek
Ahem! Schiff is that brown stuff that comes out of ones back end...

 

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:07:17 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:ua45qe55urvph8ch649ee4kua2roj59sbd@4ax.com:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to
the Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until after
he died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his
new chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on
whether your ideal form of government includes wizards and
unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.


Yeah... but you're a fuckin' total retard.

Since you're AlwaysWrong. Thank you.

 

Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote in
news:1OwoF.67512$pe2.38992@fx34.iad:

amdx wrote:
On 10/8/2019 8:23 PM, John Larkin wrote:
On Tue, 8 Oct 2019 16:24:30 -0500, amdx <nojunk@knology.net
wrote:

That's all, feel free to use it.

Hillary lost. Get used to it.

Hey John, is that a response to me, another edict to democrats or
a response to the Decadent one?
Or, do you not know who Schiff is?
 I need more context

                         Mikek
Ahem! Schiff is that brown stuff that comes out of ones back
end...

Except in your case where it often comes out of your upper asshole
instead of your lower asshole.

Time to imprison the TrumpTard and his TrumpChaff, and applaud the
Patriot Wheat named Schiff and Pelosi.

TRUMP 2020! 20 years at GITMO on 20 charges! The only thing he
should be commanding is his sphincter.

You could go visit him dressed like a porn star, and then he could
then command yours for a minute.

 

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dp65qeh20gag58m97hvgtsdhcfkvi64cgf@
4ax.com:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:07:17 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:ua45qe55urvph8ch649ee4kua2roj59sbd@4ax.com:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him,
which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to
the Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until
after
he died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his
new chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on
whether your ideal form of government includes wizards and
unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.


Yeah... but you're a fuckin' total retard.

Since you're AlwaysWrong. Thank you.

Oh... you are right... you are not a total retard.
You're an upncomer retard. You display more of your self retardation
every day.

 

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 04:00:22 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in news:dp65qeh20gag58m97hvgtsdhcfkvi64cgf@
4ax.com:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:07:17 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:ua45qe55urvph8ch649ee4kua2roj59sbd@4ax.com:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him,
which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to
the Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until
after
he died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his
new chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on
whether your ideal form of government includes wizards and
unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.


Yeah... but you're a fuckin' total retard.

Since you're AlwaysWrong. Thank you.

Oh... you are right... you are not a total retard.
You're an upncomer retard. You display more of your self retardation
every day.

Yep, AlwaysWrong.

 

[Bill Sloman]

On Sunday, October 13, 2019 at 2:34:31 PM UTC+11, k...@notreal.com wrote:

On Sun, 13 Oct 2019 03:07:17 +0000 (UTC),
DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno@decadence.org wrote:

krw@notreal.com wrote in
news:ua45qe55urvph8ch649ee4kua2roj59sbd@4ax.com:

On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:04:05 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:
On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 15:58:49 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
fizzbintuesday@that-google-mail-domain.com> wrote:

John Larkin wrote:

It's my general reaction to the movement to impeach him, which
began before he was even inaugurated.

The same way the media started applying the term 'Camelot' to
the Obama administration when it was a week old.

Was that a compliment or an insult?

It was meant as a compliment but wasn't applied to JFK until after
he died. Obama got that and a Peace Prize before he broke in his
new chair. But whether it should be a compliment depends on
whether your ideal form of government includes wizards and
unicorns.

Hmm, who else has "won" the Peace Prize? Arafat? Jimmy Carter?
AlBore? The UN? IPPCC? It doesn't sound like it's much of a
compliment, to me.


Yeah... but you're a fuckin' total retard.

Since you're AlwaysWrong. Thank you.

He isn't actually always wrong, and he certainly wasn't wrong there.

--
Bill Sloman, Sydney